Comparative study between the use of Levobupivacaine 0,5% and Ropivacaine 1,0% in lumbosacral epidural anesthesia in cats

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Souza, Mariana do Desterro Inácio e
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Mencalha, Rodrigo, Wakoff, Thiago Ignácio, Sousa, Carlos Augusto dos Santos, Scherer, Paulo Oldemar
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/14896
Resumo:  Epidural anesthesia is a locoregional anesthesia technique that provides abolition of nociceptive stimuli in retro-umbilical region. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of sensory and motor block of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine administered epidurally in cats. Six female cats were submitted to epidural anesthesia which received randomly, through blind study, three treatments at intervals of one week between these: group NaCl 0.9% (control); group levobupivacaine 0.5%; group ropivacaine 1%. After solutions infusion the nociceptive stimuli was proceeded by clamping technique. The sensory block was determined by visual analogue scale and simple descriptive scale and through heart rate (HR) and respiratory rate variances (RR). Furthermore, the motor block was evaluated using a modified Bromage score and patellar tendon reflex test. The analysis of variance and the Kruskal-Wallis test were used for statistical analysis. No significant differences were observed for the variables HR, RR, sensory and motor block, however, significant difference was detected in latency periods. The use of ropivacaine and bupivacaine provide equivalent efficacy regarding the sensory and motor block, however, the sensory and motor latency times are greater in the use of ropivacaine.
id UEL-11_f1f1c0c353378d9b5557fadd17d86673
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/14896
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparative study between the use of Levobupivacaine 0,5% and Ropivacaine 1,0% in lumbosacral epidural anesthesia in catsEstudo comparativo entre a utilização de Levobupivacaína 0,5% e Ropivacaína 1% na anestesia epidural lombossacra em gatosLocoregional anesthesiaPain scalesAnalgesiaEfficacy.Anestesia locorregionalEscalas de dorAnalgesiaEficácia.5.05.01.01-1 Anestesiologia Animal Epidural anesthesia is a locoregional anesthesia technique that provides abolition of nociceptive stimuli in retro-umbilical region. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of sensory and motor block of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine administered epidurally in cats. Six female cats were submitted to epidural anesthesia which received randomly, through blind study, three treatments at intervals of one week between these: group NaCl 0.9% (control); group levobupivacaine 0.5%; group ropivacaine 1%. After solutions infusion the nociceptive stimuli was proceeded by clamping technique. The sensory block was determined by visual analogue scale and simple descriptive scale and through heart rate (HR) and respiratory rate variances (RR). Furthermore, the motor block was evaluated using a modified Bromage score and patellar tendon reflex test. The analysis of variance and the Kruskal-Wallis test were used for statistical analysis. No significant differences were observed for the variables HR, RR, sensory and motor block, however, significant difference was detected in latency periods. The use of ropivacaine and bupivacaine provide equivalent efficacy regarding the sensory and motor block, however, the sensory and motor latency times are greater in the use of ropivacaine.A anestesia epidural é uma técnica de anestesia locorregional que propicia abolição de estímulos nociceptivos na região retro-umbilical. Este estudo visou comparar a eficácia do bloqueio sensitivo e motor da levobupivacaína e da ropivacaína, administradas por via epidural, em gatos. Foram submetidas ao bloqueio epidural, seis gatas as quais receberam de forma aleatória, através de estudo cego, três tratamentos com intervalos de uma semana entre estes: grupo NaCl 0,9% (controle); grupo levobupivacaína 0,5%; grupo ropivacaína 1%. Após a infusão das soluções procedeu-se estímulos nociceptivos através da técnica de pinçamentos. O bloqueio sensitivo foi determinado através das escalas visual analógica e simples descritiva e pelas variações de frequência cardíaca (FC) e respiratória (FR). Ademais, o bloqueio motor foi avaliado através do Escore de Bromage modificado e teste do reflexo do tendão patelar. Aplicou-se os teste da Análise de Variância e de Kruskal-Wallis para análise estatística dos dados. Não houve diferença significativa entre as variáveis FC, FR, bloqueio sensitivo e motor, entretanto, observou-se diferença nos períodos de latência. O uso da ropivacaína e da bupivacaína conferem eficácia equivalentes no que tange o bloqueio sensitivo e motor, diferindo nos tempos de latência sensitiva e motora, os quais são maiores no uso da ropivacaína.UEL2013-12-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo experimentalapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/1489610.5433/1679-0359.2013v34n6p2925Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 34 No. 6 (2013); 2925-2936Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 34 n. 6 (2013); 2925-29361679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/14896/pdf_138Souza, Mariana do Desterro Inácio eMencalha, RodrigoWakoff, Thiago IgnácioSousa, Carlos Augusto dos SantosScherer, Paulo Oldemarinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2015-11-19T18:36:22Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/14896Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2015-11-19T18:36:22Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparative study between the use of Levobupivacaine 0,5% and Ropivacaine 1,0% in lumbosacral epidural anesthesia in cats
Estudo comparativo entre a utilização de Levobupivacaína 0,5% e Ropivacaína 1% na anestesia epidural lombossacra em gatos
title Comparative study between the use of Levobupivacaine 0,5% and Ropivacaine 1,0% in lumbosacral epidural anesthesia in cats
spellingShingle Comparative study between the use of Levobupivacaine 0,5% and Ropivacaine 1,0% in lumbosacral epidural anesthesia in cats
Souza, Mariana do Desterro Inácio e
Locoregional anesthesia
Pain scales
Analgesia
Efficacy.
Anestesia locorregional
Escalas de dor
Analgesia
Eficácia.
5.05.01.01-1 Anestesiologia Animal
title_short Comparative study between the use of Levobupivacaine 0,5% and Ropivacaine 1,0% in lumbosacral epidural anesthesia in cats
title_full Comparative study between the use of Levobupivacaine 0,5% and Ropivacaine 1,0% in lumbosacral epidural anesthesia in cats
title_fullStr Comparative study between the use of Levobupivacaine 0,5% and Ropivacaine 1,0% in lumbosacral epidural anesthesia in cats
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study between the use of Levobupivacaine 0,5% and Ropivacaine 1,0% in lumbosacral epidural anesthesia in cats
title_sort Comparative study between the use of Levobupivacaine 0,5% and Ropivacaine 1,0% in lumbosacral epidural anesthesia in cats
author Souza, Mariana do Desterro Inácio e
author_facet Souza, Mariana do Desterro Inácio e
Mencalha, Rodrigo
Wakoff, Thiago Ignácio
Sousa, Carlos Augusto dos Santos
Scherer, Paulo Oldemar
author_role author
author2 Mencalha, Rodrigo
Wakoff, Thiago Ignácio
Sousa, Carlos Augusto dos Santos
Scherer, Paulo Oldemar
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Souza, Mariana do Desterro Inácio e
Mencalha, Rodrigo
Wakoff, Thiago Ignácio
Sousa, Carlos Augusto dos Santos
Scherer, Paulo Oldemar
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Locoregional anesthesia
Pain scales
Analgesia
Efficacy.
Anestesia locorregional
Escalas de dor
Analgesia
Eficácia.
5.05.01.01-1 Anestesiologia Animal
topic Locoregional anesthesia
Pain scales
Analgesia
Efficacy.
Anestesia locorregional
Escalas de dor
Analgesia
Eficácia.
5.05.01.01-1 Anestesiologia Animal
description  Epidural anesthesia is a locoregional anesthesia technique that provides abolition of nociceptive stimuli in retro-umbilical region. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of sensory and motor block of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine administered epidurally in cats. Six female cats were submitted to epidural anesthesia which received randomly, through blind study, three treatments at intervals of one week between these: group NaCl 0.9% (control); group levobupivacaine 0.5%; group ropivacaine 1%. After solutions infusion the nociceptive stimuli was proceeded by clamping technique. The sensory block was determined by visual analogue scale and simple descriptive scale and through heart rate (HR) and respiratory rate variances (RR). Furthermore, the motor block was evaluated using a modified Bromage score and patellar tendon reflex test. The analysis of variance and the Kruskal-Wallis test were used for statistical analysis. No significant differences were observed for the variables HR, RR, sensory and motor block, however, significant difference was detected in latency periods. The use of ropivacaine and bupivacaine provide equivalent efficacy regarding the sensory and motor block, however, the sensory and motor latency times are greater in the use of ropivacaine.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-12-11
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo experimental
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/14896
10.5433/1679-0359.2013v34n6p2925
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/14896
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2013v34n6p2925
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/14896/pdf_138
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 34 No. 6 (2013); 2925-2936
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 34 n. 6 (2013); 2925-2936
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1799306069676130304