Comparative study between the use of Levobupivacaine 0,5% and Ropivacaine 1,0% in lumbosacral epidural anesthesia in cats
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
DOI: | 10.5433/1679-0359.2013v34n6p2925 |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/14896 |
Resumo: | Epidural anesthesia is a locoregional anesthesia technique that provides abolition of nociceptive stimuli in retro-umbilical region. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of sensory and motor block of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine administered epidurally in cats. Six female cats were submitted to epidural anesthesia which received randomly, through blind study, three treatments at intervals of one week between these: group NaCl 0.9% (control); group levobupivacaine 0.5%; group ropivacaine 1%. After solutions infusion the nociceptive stimuli was proceeded by clamping technique. The sensory block was determined by visual analogue scale and simple descriptive scale and through heart rate (HR) and respiratory rate variances (RR). Furthermore, the motor block was evaluated using a modified Bromage score and patellar tendon reflex test. The analysis of variance and the Kruskal-Wallis test were used for statistical analysis. No significant differences were observed for the variables HR, RR, sensory and motor block, however, significant difference was detected in latency periods. The use of ropivacaine and bupivacaine provide equivalent efficacy regarding the sensory and motor block, however, the sensory and motor latency times are greater in the use of ropivacaine. |
id |
UEL-11_f1f1c0c353378d9b5557fadd17d86673 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/14896 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-11 |
network_name_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
spelling |
Comparative study between the use of Levobupivacaine 0,5% and Ropivacaine 1,0% in lumbosacral epidural anesthesia in catsEstudo comparativo entre a utilização de Levobupivacaína 0,5% e Ropivacaína 1% na anestesia epidural lombossacra em gatosLocoregional anesthesiaPain scalesAnalgesiaEfficacy.Anestesia locorregionalEscalas de dorAnalgesiaEficácia.5.05.01.01-1 Anestesiologia Animal Epidural anesthesia is a locoregional anesthesia technique that provides abolition of nociceptive stimuli in retro-umbilical region. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of sensory and motor block of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine administered epidurally in cats. Six female cats were submitted to epidural anesthesia which received randomly, through blind study, three treatments at intervals of one week between these: group NaCl 0.9% (control); group levobupivacaine 0.5%; group ropivacaine 1%. After solutions infusion the nociceptive stimuli was proceeded by clamping technique. The sensory block was determined by visual analogue scale and simple descriptive scale and through heart rate (HR) and respiratory rate variances (RR). Furthermore, the motor block was evaluated using a modified Bromage score and patellar tendon reflex test. The analysis of variance and the Kruskal-Wallis test were used for statistical analysis. No significant differences were observed for the variables HR, RR, sensory and motor block, however, significant difference was detected in latency periods. The use of ropivacaine and bupivacaine provide equivalent efficacy regarding the sensory and motor block, however, the sensory and motor latency times are greater in the use of ropivacaine.A anestesia epidural é uma técnica de anestesia locorregional que propicia abolição de estímulos nociceptivos na região retro-umbilical. Este estudo visou comparar a eficácia do bloqueio sensitivo e motor da levobupivacaína e da ropivacaína, administradas por via epidural, em gatos. Foram submetidas ao bloqueio epidural, seis gatas as quais receberam de forma aleatória, através de estudo cego, três tratamentos com intervalos de uma semana entre estes: grupo NaCl 0,9% (controle); grupo levobupivacaína 0,5%; grupo ropivacaína 1%. Após a infusão das soluções procedeu-se estímulos nociceptivos através da técnica de pinçamentos. O bloqueio sensitivo foi determinado através das escalas visual analógica e simples descritiva e pelas variações de frequência cardíaca (FC) e respiratória (FR). Ademais, o bloqueio motor foi avaliado através do Escore de Bromage modificado e teste do reflexo do tendão patelar. Aplicou-se os teste da Análise de Variância e de Kruskal-Wallis para análise estatística dos dados. Não houve diferença significativa entre as variáveis FC, FR, bloqueio sensitivo e motor, entretanto, observou-se diferença nos períodos de latência. O uso da ropivacaína e da bupivacaína conferem eficácia equivalentes no que tange o bloqueio sensitivo e motor, diferindo nos tempos de latência sensitiva e motora, os quais são maiores no uso da ropivacaína.UEL2013-12-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo experimentalapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/1489610.5433/1679-0359.2013v34n6p2925Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 34 No. 6 (2013); 2925-2936Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 34 n. 6 (2013); 2925-29361679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/14896/pdf_138Souza, Mariana do Desterro Inácio eMencalha, RodrigoWakoff, Thiago IgnácioSousa, Carlos Augusto dos SantosScherer, Paulo Oldemarinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2015-11-19T18:36:22Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/14896Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2015-11-19T18:36:22Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparative study between the use of Levobupivacaine 0,5% and Ropivacaine 1,0% in lumbosacral epidural anesthesia in cats Estudo comparativo entre a utilização de Levobupivacaína 0,5% e Ropivacaína 1% na anestesia epidural lombossacra em gatos |
title |
Comparative study between the use of Levobupivacaine 0,5% and Ropivacaine 1,0% in lumbosacral epidural anesthesia in cats |
spellingShingle |
Comparative study between the use of Levobupivacaine 0,5% and Ropivacaine 1,0% in lumbosacral epidural anesthesia in cats Comparative study between the use of Levobupivacaine 0,5% and Ropivacaine 1,0% in lumbosacral epidural anesthesia in cats Souza, Mariana do Desterro Inácio e Locoregional anesthesia Pain scales Analgesia Efficacy. Anestesia locorregional Escalas de dor Analgesia Eficácia. 5.05.01.01-1 Anestesiologia Animal Souza, Mariana do Desterro Inácio e Locoregional anesthesia Pain scales Analgesia Efficacy. Anestesia locorregional Escalas de dor Analgesia Eficácia. 5.05.01.01-1 Anestesiologia Animal |
title_short |
Comparative study between the use of Levobupivacaine 0,5% and Ropivacaine 1,0% in lumbosacral epidural anesthesia in cats |
title_full |
Comparative study between the use of Levobupivacaine 0,5% and Ropivacaine 1,0% in lumbosacral epidural anesthesia in cats |
title_fullStr |
Comparative study between the use of Levobupivacaine 0,5% and Ropivacaine 1,0% in lumbosacral epidural anesthesia in cats Comparative study between the use of Levobupivacaine 0,5% and Ropivacaine 1,0% in lumbosacral epidural anesthesia in cats |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative study between the use of Levobupivacaine 0,5% and Ropivacaine 1,0% in lumbosacral epidural anesthesia in cats Comparative study between the use of Levobupivacaine 0,5% and Ropivacaine 1,0% in lumbosacral epidural anesthesia in cats |
title_sort |
Comparative study between the use of Levobupivacaine 0,5% and Ropivacaine 1,0% in lumbosacral epidural anesthesia in cats |
author |
Souza, Mariana do Desterro Inácio e |
author_facet |
Souza, Mariana do Desterro Inácio e Souza, Mariana do Desterro Inácio e Mencalha, Rodrigo Wakoff, Thiago Ignácio Sousa, Carlos Augusto dos Santos Scherer, Paulo Oldemar Mencalha, Rodrigo Wakoff, Thiago Ignácio Sousa, Carlos Augusto dos Santos Scherer, Paulo Oldemar |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Mencalha, Rodrigo Wakoff, Thiago Ignácio Sousa, Carlos Augusto dos Santos Scherer, Paulo Oldemar |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Souza, Mariana do Desterro Inácio e Mencalha, Rodrigo Wakoff, Thiago Ignácio Sousa, Carlos Augusto dos Santos Scherer, Paulo Oldemar |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Locoregional anesthesia Pain scales Analgesia Efficacy. Anestesia locorregional Escalas de dor Analgesia Eficácia. 5.05.01.01-1 Anestesiologia Animal |
topic |
Locoregional anesthesia Pain scales Analgesia Efficacy. Anestesia locorregional Escalas de dor Analgesia Eficácia. 5.05.01.01-1 Anestesiologia Animal |
description |
Epidural anesthesia is a locoregional anesthesia technique that provides abolition of nociceptive stimuli in retro-umbilical region. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of sensory and motor block of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine administered epidurally in cats. Six female cats were submitted to epidural anesthesia which received randomly, through blind study, three treatments at intervals of one week between these: group NaCl 0.9% (control); group levobupivacaine 0.5%; group ropivacaine 1%. After solutions infusion the nociceptive stimuli was proceeded by clamping technique. The sensory block was determined by visual analogue scale and simple descriptive scale and through heart rate (HR) and respiratory rate variances (RR). Furthermore, the motor block was evaluated using a modified Bromage score and patellar tendon reflex test. The analysis of variance and the Kruskal-Wallis test were used for statistical analysis. No significant differences were observed for the variables HR, RR, sensory and motor block, however, significant difference was detected in latency periods. The use of ropivacaine and bupivacaine provide equivalent efficacy regarding the sensory and motor block, however, the sensory and motor latency times are greater in the use of ropivacaine. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-12-11 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo experimental |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/14896 10.5433/1679-0359.2013v34n6p2925 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/14896 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1679-0359.2013v34n6p2925 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/14896/pdf_138 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 34 No. 6 (2013); 2925-2936 Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 34 n. 6 (2013); 2925-2936 1679-0359 1676-546X reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
collection |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
semina.agrarias@uel.br |
_version_ |
1822182783846449152 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.5433/1679-0359.2013v34n6p2925 |