Management of ripe grape rot on ‘Niagara Rosada’ grapevine

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Leles, Nathalia Rodrigues
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Genta, Werner, Marques, Viviani Vieira, Tessmann, Dauri José, Roberto, Sergio Ruffo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/46323
Resumo: Ripe grape rot disease, caused by Colletotrichum spp., threatens grape cultivation under high precipitation and temperatures. Information regarding the control of this disease in American table grapes such as ‘Niagara Rosada’ is scarce, and this study aims at answering  the following questions: a) at which phenological stage does the fungicide application have better control efficiency, b) which fungicides and/or biological products have a better control efficiency, c) do the spray side and target components of the vine influence disease control, and d) does eradication by removing crop residues, applying urea in the soil, or applying lime sulfur influence disease control? To answer these questions, four experiments were conducted in randomized blocks in commercial vineyards located in the municipality of Rosário do Ivaí, PR, Brazil, from 2016 to 2020. In the first experiment, the fungicide application was evaluated in different phenological phases on disease control: a) full flowering, b) end of flowering, c) berries at the pea stage, d) beginning of bunch closure (half berry), e) beginning of bunch ripening, f) half of bunch ripening, and g) beginning and half of bunch ripening. In the second experiment, we evaluated the effects of different fungicides and biological products on disease control. In the third experiment, which was conducted in a factorial arrangement (2×2), the following factors and levels were evaluated for disease control: a) application targets (directed to clusters, and directed to shoots and clusters) and b) application modes (on one side of the vine and on both sides of the vine). The fourth experiment was conducted in a factorial arrangement (2×2×2), and the following factors were evaluated for disease control: a) inoculum source – mummified bunches (removed or not), b) application of urea in the soil for the degradation of crop residues (applied or not), and c) application of lime sulfur after winter pruning (applied or not). At the end of each season, the ripe rot incidence in the bunch was evaluated in all experiments. Data were subjected to an analysis of variance, and the means were compared using Fisher's test (LSD) at a significance of 5%. Spraying the fungicide at the final flowering, pea size, and ripening phenological stages (directed to bunches on one side of the vine), reduced the ripe grape rot incidence in the ‘Niagara Rosada’ grape, and the following fungicides can be used: metiram combined with pyraclostrobin, with or without potassium phosphite or with a biofungicide formulation containing the bacterium Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain d-747, trifloxystrobin combined with tebuconazole, tebuconazole, tetraconazole, captan, and folpet. Removing mummified bunches of previous seasons reduces the disease incidence by eliminating the primary inoculum.
id UEL-11_f81e89789bbb6879292c1931495f0dc3
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/46323
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Management of ripe grape rot on ‘Niagara Rosada’ grapevineManejo da podridão da uva madura em videira ‘Niagara Rosada’Colletotrichum spp.FungicidasVitis labrusca.colletotrichum ssp. FungicidesVitis labruscaRipe grape rot disease, caused by Colletotrichum spp., threatens grape cultivation under high precipitation and temperatures. Information regarding the control of this disease in American table grapes such as ‘Niagara Rosada’ is scarce, and this study aims at answering  the following questions: a) at which phenological stage does the fungicide application have better control efficiency, b) which fungicides and/or biological products have a better control efficiency, c) do the spray side and target components of the vine influence disease control, and d) does eradication by removing crop residues, applying urea in the soil, or applying lime sulfur influence disease control? To answer these questions, four experiments were conducted in randomized blocks in commercial vineyards located in the municipality of Rosário do Ivaí, PR, Brazil, from 2016 to 2020. In the first experiment, the fungicide application was evaluated in different phenological phases on disease control: a) full flowering, b) end of flowering, c) berries at the pea stage, d) beginning of bunch closure (half berry), e) beginning of bunch ripening, f) half of bunch ripening, and g) beginning and half of bunch ripening. In the second experiment, we evaluated the effects of different fungicides and biological products on disease control. In the third experiment, which was conducted in a factorial arrangement (2×2), the following factors and levels were evaluated for disease control: a) application targets (directed to clusters, and directed to shoots and clusters) and b) application modes (on one side of the vine and on both sides of the vine). The fourth experiment was conducted in a factorial arrangement (2×2×2), and the following factors were evaluated for disease control: a) inoculum source – mummified bunches (removed or not), b) application of urea in the soil for the degradation of crop residues (applied or not), and c) application of lime sulfur after winter pruning (applied or not). At the end of each season, the ripe rot incidence in the bunch was evaluated in all experiments. Data were subjected to an analysis of variance, and the means were compared using Fisher's test (LSD) at a significance of 5%. Spraying the fungicide at the final flowering, pea size, and ripening phenological stages (directed to bunches on one side of the vine), reduced the ripe grape rot incidence in the ‘Niagara Rosada’ grape, and the following fungicides can be used: metiram combined with pyraclostrobin, with or without potassium phosphite or with a biofungicide formulation containing the bacterium Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain d-747, trifloxystrobin combined with tebuconazole, tebuconazole, tetraconazole, captan, and folpet. Removing mummified bunches of previous seasons reduces the disease incidence by eliminating the primary inoculum.A podridão da uva madura causada por Colletotrichum spp. é uma ameaça ao cultivo de uvas sob condições de alta precipitação e temperaturas elevadas. Devido à carência de informações disponíveis sobre medidas de controle desta doença em uva rústica de mesa ‘Niágara Rosada’, este trabalho teve como objetivo responder às seguintes questões: a) em quais estádios fenológicos a aplicação de fungicidas tem maior eficiência no seu controle? b) quais fungicidas e produtos biológicos apresentam maior eficiência no seu controle? c) os componentes lado e alvo de pulverização da videira influenciam no seu controle? e d) a erradicação do inóculo por remoção de restos culturais, aplicação de ureia no solo ou aplicação de calda sulfocálcica influenciam no seu controle? Para responder essas questões, foram realizados quatro experimentos em blocos casualizados, em parreirais comerciais localizados em Rosário do Ivaí, PR, Brasil, durante as safras de 2016 a 2020. No primeiro experimento avaliou-se a aplicação de fungicidas nas fases fenológicas: a) pleno florescimento; b) fim do florescimento; c) bagas no estágio de grão de ervilha; d) início do fechamento do cacho (meia baga); e) início do amadurecimento do cacho; f) metade do amadurecimento do cacho; e g) início e metade do amadurecimento do cacho. No segundo experimento avaliou-se a aplicação de diferentes fungicidas e produtos biológicos. No terceiro experimento, realizado em arranjo fatorial 2×2, avaliaram-se os seguintes fatores e níveis: a) alvos de aplicação (direcionada aos cachos, e direcionada aos ramos e aos cachos); e b) modos de aplicação (em um lado da videira somente e nos dois lados da videira). No quarto experimento, realizado em arranjo fatorial 2×2×2, avaliaram-se os seguintes fatores e níveis: a) fonte de inóculo – cachos mumificados da safra anterior (removidos ou não); b) aplicação de ureia no solo para degradação dos restos culturais (aplicada ou não); e c) aplicação de calda sulfocálcica após a poda de inverno (aplicada ou não). No fim do ciclo produtivo, foi avaliada a incidência de podridão da uva madura em todos os experimentos. Os dados foram submetidos à análise de variância e as médias comparadas pelo teste de Fisher (LSD) a 5% de significância. A pulverização de fungicidas nos estádios fenológicos fim do florescimento, grão ervilha e amadurecimento, direcionada aos cachos em um lado da videira, reduziu a incidência de podridão da uva madura nos cachos de ‘Niágara Rosada’, podendo ser utilizados os seguintes fungicidas: metiram em mistura com piraclostrobina, associado ou não ao fosfito de potássio ou ao biofungicida a base de Bacillus amyloliquefaciens cepa d-747, trifloxistrobina em mistura com tebuconazol, tebuconazol, tetraconazole, captana, folpete. A remoção de cachos mumificados da safra anterior reduziu a incidência da doença.UEL2022-10-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionexperimentaçãoapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/4632310.5433/1679-0359.2022v43n5p2189Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 43 No. 5 (2022); 2189-2204Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 43 n. 5 (2022); 2189-22041679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/46323/47918Copyright (c) 2022 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLeles, Nathalia RodriguesGenta, WernerMarques, Viviani VieiraTessmann, Dauri JoséRoberto, Sergio Ruffo2022-11-17T13:29:39Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/46323Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-11-17T13:29:39Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Management of ripe grape rot on ‘Niagara Rosada’ grapevine
Manejo da podridão da uva madura em videira ‘Niagara Rosada’
title Management of ripe grape rot on ‘Niagara Rosada’ grapevine
spellingShingle Management of ripe grape rot on ‘Niagara Rosada’ grapevine
Leles, Nathalia Rodrigues
Colletotrichum spp.
Fungicidas
Vitis labrusca.
colletotrichum ssp.
Fungicides
Vitis labrusca
title_short Management of ripe grape rot on ‘Niagara Rosada’ grapevine
title_full Management of ripe grape rot on ‘Niagara Rosada’ grapevine
title_fullStr Management of ripe grape rot on ‘Niagara Rosada’ grapevine
title_full_unstemmed Management of ripe grape rot on ‘Niagara Rosada’ grapevine
title_sort Management of ripe grape rot on ‘Niagara Rosada’ grapevine
author Leles, Nathalia Rodrigues
author_facet Leles, Nathalia Rodrigues
Genta, Werner
Marques, Viviani Vieira
Tessmann, Dauri José
Roberto, Sergio Ruffo
author_role author
author2 Genta, Werner
Marques, Viviani Vieira
Tessmann, Dauri José
Roberto, Sergio Ruffo
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Leles, Nathalia Rodrigues
Genta, Werner
Marques, Viviani Vieira
Tessmann, Dauri José
Roberto, Sergio Ruffo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Colletotrichum spp.
Fungicidas
Vitis labrusca.
colletotrichum ssp.
Fungicides
Vitis labrusca
topic Colletotrichum spp.
Fungicidas
Vitis labrusca.
colletotrichum ssp.
Fungicides
Vitis labrusca
description Ripe grape rot disease, caused by Colletotrichum spp., threatens grape cultivation under high precipitation and temperatures. Information regarding the control of this disease in American table grapes such as ‘Niagara Rosada’ is scarce, and this study aims at answering  the following questions: a) at which phenological stage does the fungicide application have better control efficiency, b) which fungicides and/or biological products have a better control efficiency, c) do the spray side and target components of the vine influence disease control, and d) does eradication by removing crop residues, applying urea in the soil, or applying lime sulfur influence disease control? To answer these questions, four experiments were conducted in randomized blocks in commercial vineyards located in the municipality of Rosário do Ivaí, PR, Brazil, from 2016 to 2020. In the first experiment, the fungicide application was evaluated in different phenological phases on disease control: a) full flowering, b) end of flowering, c) berries at the pea stage, d) beginning of bunch closure (half berry), e) beginning of bunch ripening, f) half of bunch ripening, and g) beginning and half of bunch ripening. In the second experiment, we evaluated the effects of different fungicides and biological products on disease control. In the third experiment, which was conducted in a factorial arrangement (2×2), the following factors and levels were evaluated for disease control: a) application targets (directed to clusters, and directed to shoots and clusters) and b) application modes (on one side of the vine and on both sides of the vine). The fourth experiment was conducted in a factorial arrangement (2×2×2), and the following factors were evaluated for disease control: a) inoculum source – mummified bunches (removed or not), b) application of urea in the soil for the degradation of crop residues (applied or not), and c) application of lime sulfur after winter pruning (applied or not). At the end of each season, the ripe rot incidence in the bunch was evaluated in all experiments. Data were subjected to an analysis of variance, and the means were compared using Fisher's test (LSD) at a significance of 5%. Spraying the fungicide at the final flowering, pea size, and ripening phenological stages (directed to bunches on one side of the vine), reduced the ripe grape rot incidence in the ‘Niagara Rosada’ grape, and the following fungicides can be used: metiram combined with pyraclostrobin, with or without potassium phosphite or with a biofungicide formulation containing the bacterium Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain d-747, trifloxystrobin combined with tebuconazole, tebuconazole, tetraconazole, captan, and folpet. Removing mummified bunches of previous seasons reduces the disease incidence by eliminating the primary inoculum.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-10-27
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
experimentação
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/46323
10.5433/1679-0359.2022v43n5p2189
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/46323
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2022v43n5p2189
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/46323/47918
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 43 No. 5 (2022); 2189-2204
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 43 n. 5 (2022); 2189-2204
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1799306086808813568