Cooling of equine semen at 16°C for 36 hours with addition of different glutathione concentrations
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/19182 |
Resumo: | Handling equine semen during the refrigeration process reduces sperm viability, and consequently causes membrane lipid peroxidation, among other challenges. The present study aimed to evaluate the in vitro effects of glutathione (control, 1. 0, 1. 5, and 2. 5 mM) on equine semen in a refrigeration protocol of 16ºC for 36 hours. The following variables were evaluated after 0, 12, 24, and 36 hours refrigeration: total sperm motility, vigor, viability, and plasma and acrosomal membrane integrity. Motility was higher with 2. 5mM of glutathione (57. 8 ± 7. 3) after 12 hours of refrigeration compared to the control (53. 2 ± 8. 3) (P < 0. 05). After 36 hours of refrigeration, motility was higher with 1. 5 mM (43. 4 ± 12. 7) and 2. 5mM glutathione (45. 5 ± 6. 2), than it was with 1mM glutathione (38. 2 ± 9) and the control (35. 5 ± 18. 4) (P < 0. 05), respectively. Vigor was highest with 1. 5mM glutathione (3. 7 ± 0. 3) after 36 hours compared to the control (3. 2 ± 1. 1), (P < 0. 05). Viability differed between control and 1mM treatments (79. 5 ± 1. 8) only after 24 hours (75. 5 ± 9. 7) (P < 0. 05). Throughout the investigation, no significant differences were noted in plasma and acrosomal membrane integrity (P > 0. 05). The 1. 5 and 2. 5mM glutathione levels were more efficient in protecting sperm cells and yielded higher total motility values after 36 hours of refrigeration. |
id |
UEL-11_f8779e5f1bbb8bfa61fc7a6999335561 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/19182 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-11 |
network_name_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Cooling of equine semen at 16°C for 36 hours with addition of different glutathione concentrationsRefrigeração do sêmen equino a 16ºC por 36h com adição de glutationa em diferentes concentraçõesAntioxidantSpermStallionCooled semen.AntioxidanteEspermatozóideGaranhãoSêmen refrigerado.Handling equine semen during the refrigeration process reduces sperm viability, and consequently causes membrane lipid peroxidation, among other challenges. The present study aimed to evaluate the in vitro effects of glutathione (control, 1. 0, 1. 5, and 2. 5 mM) on equine semen in a refrigeration protocol of 16ºC for 36 hours. The following variables were evaluated after 0, 12, 24, and 36 hours refrigeration: total sperm motility, vigor, viability, and plasma and acrosomal membrane integrity. Motility was higher with 2. 5mM of glutathione (57. 8 ± 7. 3) after 12 hours of refrigeration compared to the control (53. 2 ± 8. 3) (P < 0. 05). After 36 hours of refrigeration, motility was higher with 1. 5 mM (43. 4 ± 12. 7) and 2. 5mM glutathione (45. 5 ± 6. 2), than it was with 1mM glutathione (38. 2 ± 9) and the control (35. 5 ± 18. 4) (P < 0. 05), respectively. Vigor was highest with 1. 5mM glutathione (3. 7 ± 0. 3) after 36 hours compared to the control (3. 2 ± 1. 1), (P < 0. 05). Viability differed between control and 1mM treatments (79. 5 ± 1. 8) only after 24 hours (75. 5 ± 9. 7) (P < 0. 05). Throughout the investigation, no significant differences were noted in plasma and acrosomal membrane integrity (P > 0. 05). The 1. 5 and 2. 5mM glutathione levels were more efficient in protecting sperm cells and yielded higher total motility values after 36 hours of refrigeration.A manipulação do sêmen equino durante o processo de refrigeração reduz a viabilidade espermática em consequência, entre outros problemas, da peroxidação de lipídios da membrana. Objetivou-se avaliar o efeito in vitro da adição de glutationa (controle; 1,0; 1,5 e 2,5mM) em protocolo de refrigeração a 16ºC por 36h. As variáveis avaliadas foram motilidade total, vigor, viabilidade espermática e integridade das membranas plasmática e acrossomal em quatro momentos diferentes de refrigeração (0, 12, 24 e 36h). A motilidade foi superior com 2,5mM de glutationa (57,8±7,3) com 12h de refrigeração quando comparado ao controle (53,2±8,3), P<0,05. Com 36h de refrigeração a motilidade foi superior com 1,5mM (43,4±12,7) e 2,5mM (45,5±6,2) quando comparado com 1mM (38,2±9) e ao controle (35,5±18,4), P<0,05. Com relação ao vigor houve superioridade com 1,5mM de glutationa (3,7±0,3), na avaliação de 36h, em comparação ao controle (3,2±1,1), P<0,05. Para viabilidade só houve diferença em relação ao controle na avaliação de 24h (75,5±9,7) quando comparado ao tratamento 1mM (79,5±1,8), P<0,05. Não houve diferença em relação ao controle para as avaliações de integridade de membrana plasmática e acrosomal, em todos os momentos de avaliação, P>0,05. As concentrações de 1,5 e 2,5MM de glutationa foram mais eficientes para proteção da célula espermática com valores superiores de motilidade total na avaliação de 36h.UEL2015-12-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisaapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/1918210.5433/1679-0359.2015v36n6p3699Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 36 No. 6 (2015); 3699-3704Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 36 n. 6 (2015); 3699-37041679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/19182/17452http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, Rodrigo Arruda deViu, Marco Antônio de OliveiraGambarini, Maria Lúcia2022-12-02T16:31:20Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/19182Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-12-02T16:31:20Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Cooling of equine semen at 16°C for 36 hours with addition of different glutathione concentrations Refrigeração do sêmen equino a 16ºC por 36h com adição de glutationa em diferentes concentrações |
title |
Cooling of equine semen at 16°C for 36 hours with addition of different glutathione concentrations |
spellingShingle |
Cooling of equine semen at 16°C for 36 hours with addition of different glutathione concentrations Oliveira, Rodrigo Arruda de Antioxidant Sperm Stallion Cooled semen. Antioxidante Espermatozóide Garanhão Sêmen refrigerado. |
title_short |
Cooling of equine semen at 16°C for 36 hours with addition of different glutathione concentrations |
title_full |
Cooling of equine semen at 16°C for 36 hours with addition of different glutathione concentrations |
title_fullStr |
Cooling of equine semen at 16°C for 36 hours with addition of different glutathione concentrations |
title_full_unstemmed |
Cooling of equine semen at 16°C for 36 hours with addition of different glutathione concentrations |
title_sort |
Cooling of equine semen at 16°C for 36 hours with addition of different glutathione concentrations |
author |
Oliveira, Rodrigo Arruda de |
author_facet |
Oliveira, Rodrigo Arruda de Viu, Marco Antônio de Oliveira Gambarini, Maria Lúcia |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Viu, Marco Antônio de Oliveira Gambarini, Maria Lúcia |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira, Rodrigo Arruda de Viu, Marco Antônio de Oliveira Gambarini, Maria Lúcia |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Antioxidant Sperm Stallion Cooled semen. Antioxidante Espermatozóide Garanhão Sêmen refrigerado. |
topic |
Antioxidant Sperm Stallion Cooled semen. Antioxidante Espermatozóide Garanhão Sêmen refrigerado. |
description |
Handling equine semen during the refrigeration process reduces sperm viability, and consequently causes membrane lipid peroxidation, among other challenges. The present study aimed to evaluate the in vitro effects of glutathione (control, 1. 0, 1. 5, and 2. 5 mM) on equine semen in a refrigeration protocol of 16ºC for 36 hours. The following variables were evaluated after 0, 12, 24, and 36 hours refrigeration: total sperm motility, vigor, viability, and plasma and acrosomal membrane integrity. Motility was higher with 2. 5mM of glutathione (57. 8 ± 7. 3) after 12 hours of refrigeration compared to the control (53. 2 ± 8. 3) (P < 0. 05). After 36 hours of refrigeration, motility was higher with 1. 5 mM (43. 4 ± 12. 7) and 2. 5mM glutathione (45. 5 ± 6. 2), than it was with 1mM glutathione (38. 2 ± 9) and the control (35. 5 ± 18. 4) (P < 0. 05), respectively. Vigor was highest with 1. 5mM glutathione (3. 7 ± 0. 3) after 36 hours compared to the control (3. 2 ± 1. 1), (P < 0. 05). Viability differed between control and 1mM treatments (79. 5 ± 1. 8) only after 24 hours (75. 5 ± 9. 7) (P < 0. 05). Throughout the investigation, no significant differences were noted in plasma and acrosomal membrane integrity (P > 0. 05). The 1. 5 and 2. 5mM glutathione levels were more efficient in protecting sperm cells and yielded higher total motility values after 36 hours of refrigeration. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-12-09 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Pesquisa |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/19182 10.5433/1679-0359.2015v36n6p3699 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/19182 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1679-0359.2015v36n6p3699 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/19182/17452 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 36 No. 6 (2015); 3699-3704 Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 36 n. 6 (2015); 3699-3704 1679-0359 1676-546X reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
collection |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
semina.agrarias@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306072683446272 |