Buffalo mozzarella chemical composition and authenticity assessment by electrophoretic profiling

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gonçalves, Ben-Hur Ramos Ferreira
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Silva, Grazielly de Jesus, Conceição, Daniele Gomes, Egito, Antonio Silvio do, Ferrão, Sibelli Passini Barbosa
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/25533
Resumo: Buffalo milk mozzarella is often adulterated by the addition of cow’s milk. The aim of this study was to assess the quality of buffalo milk mozzarella by using electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) to detect the addition of cow’s milk. Reference cheeses were produced exclusively from combinations of buffalo and cow milk, and labeled reference treatment buffalo or cow (RTB and RTC, respectively). Standardized cheeses were made by combining buffalo milk and 2.5%, 5.0%, 10%, 20%, 30%, 40% or 50% cow’s milk. A total of 9 cheese formulations were produced and either frozen immediately (time 0) or after 20 days (time 20). Eighteen commercial samples of buffalo mozzarella were sampled between 0–20 days of production. The chemical composition (moisture, ash, fat in dry matter, protein, total solids and defatted dry extract) and physicochemical characteristics (acidity) of the cheeses were evaluated. Proteins and water-soluble peptides (WSP) extracted from RTB, RTC and from the commercial samples, and were analyzed by SDS-PAGE electrophoresis under denaturing conditions. It was not possible to detect the inclusion of cow’s milk by the cheeses’ chemical and physicochemical properties. However, the separation and detection of peptide and protein fractions of the cheese was possible by electrophoresis. The results of the electrophoretic analysis suggest that 28% of the commercial samples considered here had evidence of the addition of cow’s milk. The methodology described here is important to identify occurrences of fraud in buffalo mozzarella production.
id UEL-11_f8d745cd41b596527822e1e127ce7e62
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/25533
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Buffalo mozzarella chemical composition and authenticity assessment by electrophoretic profilingAvaliação da composição química e autenticidade de muçarela de búfala por meio do perfil eletroforéticoAdulterationPeptidesProteinsCheeseSDS-PAGE.AdulteraçãoPeptídeosProteínasQueijoSDS-PAGE.Buffalo milk mozzarella is often adulterated by the addition of cow’s milk. The aim of this study was to assess the quality of buffalo milk mozzarella by using electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) to detect the addition of cow’s milk. Reference cheeses were produced exclusively from combinations of buffalo and cow milk, and labeled reference treatment buffalo or cow (RTB and RTC, respectively). Standardized cheeses were made by combining buffalo milk and 2.5%, 5.0%, 10%, 20%, 30%, 40% or 50% cow’s milk. A total of 9 cheese formulations were produced and either frozen immediately (time 0) or after 20 days (time 20). Eighteen commercial samples of buffalo mozzarella were sampled between 0–20 days of production. The chemical composition (moisture, ash, fat in dry matter, protein, total solids and defatted dry extract) and physicochemical characteristics (acidity) of the cheeses were evaluated. Proteins and water-soluble peptides (WSP) extracted from RTB, RTC and from the commercial samples, and were analyzed by SDS-PAGE electrophoresis under denaturing conditions. It was not possible to detect the inclusion of cow’s milk by the cheeses’ chemical and physicochemical properties. However, the separation and detection of peptide and protein fractions of the cheese was possible by electrophoresis. The results of the electrophoretic analysis suggest that 28% of the commercial samples considered here had evidence of the addition of cow’s milk. The methodology described here is important to identify occurrences of fraud in buffalo mozzarella production.Objetivou-se com o presente estudo detectar fraudes por adição de leite de vaca em muçarela de búfala. Foram produzidos queijos exclusivamente com leite de búfala (TRB) e vaca (TRV) e com inclusões crescentes de leite bovino ao bubalino (2,5%, 5,0%, 10%, 20%, 30%, 40% e 50%), totalizando 9 formulações que foram congeladas no dia de fabricação (Tempo 0) e com 20 dias após a data de fabricação (Tempo 20). Foram coletadas 18 amostras comerciais de muçarela de búfala com até 20 dias de fabricação sendo congeladas no Tempo 20. Os queijos foram avaliados em relação à composição química (umidade, cinzas, gordura no extrato seco, proteínas, extrato seco total e extrato seco desengordurado) e característica físico-química (acidez titulável). Proteínas dos queijos muçarela produzidos e amostras comerciais e peptídeos solúveis em água (PSA) extraídos de TRB, TRV e amostras comerciais foram analisados por eletroforese sob condições desnaturantes por meio de dodecil sulfato de sódio (SDS-PAGE). Não foi possível detectar adulterações por meio dos resultados de composição química e caracterização físico-química. A técnica SDS-PAGE mostrou-se eficiente na separação e detecção das frações proteicas e peptídeos dos queijos. Em 28% das amostras comerciais de muçarela de búfala houve indícios de adulteração por adição de leite de vaca. Os resultados deste trabalho mostraram-se importantes para alertar sobre a ocorrência de fraudes em muçarela de búfala.UEL2017-08-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionSearch - Scientific articlePesquisa - Artigos científicosapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2553310.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n4p1841Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 38 No. 4 (2017); 1841-1852Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 38 n. 4 (2017); 1841-18521679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/25533/21362Copyright (c) 2017 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGonçalves, Ben-Hur Ramos FerreiraSilva, Grazielly de JesusConceição, Daniele GomesEgito, Antonio Silvio doFerrão, Sibelli Passini Barbosa2022-10-24T12:19:51Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/25533Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-10-24T12:19:51Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Buffalo mozzarella chemical composition and authenticity assessment by electrophoretic profiling
Avaliação da composição química e autenticidade de muçarela de búfala por meio do perfil eletroforético
title Buffalo mozzarella chemical composition and authenticity assessment by electrophoretic profiling
spellingShingle Buffalo mozzarella chemical composition and authenticity assessment by electrophoretic profiling
Gonçalves, Ben-Hur Ramos Ferreira
Adulteration
Peptides
Proteins
Cheese
SDS-PAGE.
Adulteração
Peptídeos
Proteínas
Queijo
SDS-PAGE.
title_short Buffalo mozzarella chemical composition and authenticity assessment by electrophoretic profiling
title_full Buffalo mozzarella chemical composition and authenticity assessment by electrophoretic profiling
title_fullStr Buffalo mozzarella chemical composition and authenticity assessment by electrophoretic profiling
title_full_unstemmed Buffalo mozzarella chemical composition and authenticity assessment by electrophoretic profiling
title_sort Buffalo mozzarella chemical composition and authenticity assessment by electrophoretic profiling
author Gonçalves, Ben-Hur Ramos Ferreira
author_facet Gonçalves, Ben-Hur Ramos Ferreira
Silva, Grazielly de Jesus
Conceição, Daniele Gomes
Egito, Antonio Silvio do
Ferrão, Sibelli Passini Barbosa
author_role author
author2 Silva, Grazielly de Jesus
Conceição, Daniele Gomes
Egito, Antonio Silvio do
Ferrão, Sibelli Passini Barbosa
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gonçalves, Ben-Hur Ramos Ferreira
Silva, Grazielly de Jesus
Conceição, Daniele Gomes
Egito, Antonio Silvio do
Ferrão, Sibelli Passini Barbosa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Adulteration
Peptides
Proteins
Cheese
SDS-PAGE.
Adulteração
Peptídeos
Proteínas
Queijo
SDS-PAGE.
topic Adulteration
Peptides
Proteins
Cheese
SDS-PAGE.
Adulteração
Peptídeos
Proteínas
Queijo
SDS-PAGE.
description Buffalo milk mozzarella is often adulterated by the addition of cow’s milk. The aim of this study was to assess the quality of buffalo milk mozzarella by using electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) to detect the addition of cow’s milk. Reference cheeses were produced exclusively from combinations of buffalo and cow milk, and labeled reference treatment buffalo or cow (RTB and RTC, respectively). Standardized cheeses were made by combining buffalo milk and 2.5%, 5.0%, 10%, 20%, 30%, 40% or 50% cow’s milk. A total of 9 cheese formulations were produced and either frozen immediately (time 0) or after 20 days (time 20). Eighteen commercial samples of buffalo mozzarella were sampled between 0–20 days of production. The chemical composition (moisture, ash, fat in dry matter, protein, total solids and defatted dry extract) and physicochemical characteristics (acidity) of the cheeses were evaluated. Proteins and water-soluble peptides (WSP) extracted from RTB, RTC and from the commercial samples, and were analyzed by SDS-PAGE electrophoresis under denaturing conditions. It was not possible to detect the inclusion of cow’s milk by the cheeses’ chemical and physicochemical properties. However, the separation and detection of peptide and protein fractions of the cheese was possible by electrophoresis. The results of the electrophoretic analysis suggest that 28% of the commercial samples considered here had evidence of the addition of cow’s milk. The methodology described here is important to identify occurrences of fraud in buffalo mozzarella production.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-08-04
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Search - Scientific article
Pesquisa - Artigos científicos
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/25533
10.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n4p1841
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/25533
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n4p1841
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/25533/21362
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 38 No. 4 (2017); 1841-1852
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 38 n. 4 (2017); 1841-1852
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1799306075817639936