Proteic supplements with and without sulfur sources on intake behavior of steers fed with low quality hay
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2011 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/1679-0359.2011v32n3p1151 |
Resumo: | This experiment was conduct to study the effects of proteic supplementation and different sulfur sources added to supplements on the intake behavior, for cattle. Seven Holstein steers, weighing 442 kg ± 59 kg of live weight. The statistical design was a Latin square 7 x 7, and treatments consisted of the supplements use or no with addition or no of different sulfur sources: hay + supplement without sulfur (SWS), hay + sulfur 70S (S70), hay + sulfur 98S (S98), hay + calcium sulfate hemi-hydrated (CSH), hay + calcium sulfate di-hydrated (CSD), hay + ammonium sulfate (SFA) and hay without supplement (FSS). The Supplements affected in a positive way the feeding, chewing and resting activities. Steers without supplement (HWS) showed shorter total time of feeding, lower total time of chewing, and resting than steers with supplements. They had shorter meals and spent more time for rumination chewing per ruminal bolus, had lower efficiency of feeding (g DM/hour) and lower rumination efficiency (g of DM/hour and g of NDF/hour) as well as of the lower intake. SWS showed higher total time of rumination then supplements with different sulfur sources. The animals that had consumed supplements with sulfur, had presented lower number of rumination chews per day and per bolus, but they had not different to feeding efficiency and rumination. |
id |
UEL-11_fce2b670e2797706b1762e26468f6a2e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/3346 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-11 |
network_name_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Proteic supplements with and without sulfur sources on intake behavior of steers fed with low quality haySuplementos proteicos com e sem fontes de enxofre sobre o comportamento ingestivo de novilhos alimentados com feno de baixa qualidadeFeedingSulfurRuminationSulfate.AlimentaçãoEnxofreRuminaçãoSulfato.This experiment was conduct to study the effects of proteic supplementation and different sulfur sources added to supplements on the intake behavior, for cattle. Seven Holstein steers, weighing 442 kg ± 59 kg of live weight. The statistical design was a Latin square 7 x 7, and treatments consisted of the supplements use or no with addition or no of different sulfur sources: hay + supplement without sulfur (SWS), hay + sulfur 70S (S70), hay + sulfur 98S (S98), hay + calcium sulfate hemi-hydrated (CSH), hay + calcium sulfate di-hydrated (CSD), hay + ammonium sulfate (SFA) and hay without supplement (FSS). The Supplements affected in a positive way the feeding, chewing and resting activities. Steers without supplement (HWS) showed shorter total time of feeding, lower total time of chewing, and resting than steers with supplements. They had shorter meals and spent more time for rumination chewing per ruminal bolus, had lower efficiency of feeding (g DM/hour) and lower rumination efficiency (g of DM/hour and g of NDF/hour) as well as of the lower intake. SWS showed higher total time of rumination then supplements with different sulfur sources. The animals that had consumed supplements with sulfur, had presented lower number of rumination chews per day and per bolus, but they had not different to feeding efficiency and rumination.O presente experimento foi realizado com o objetivo de estudar os efeitos da suplementação proteica e de diferentes fontes de enxofre adicionadas aos suplementos, sobre o comportamento ingestivo de bovinos consumindo feno de baixa qualidade. Foram utilizados sete bovinos, machos, castrados, da raça Holandesa Preto e Branco com 442 kg ± 59 kg de peso vivo. O delineamento experimental utilizado foi o quadrado latino 7 x 7, e os tratamentos consistiram na utilização ou não de suplementos com adição ou não de diferentes fontes de enxofre, conforme segue: feno + suplemento sem enxofre (SSE), feno + enxofre 70S (E70), feno + enxofre 98S (E98), feno + sulfato de cálcio hemi-hidratado (SCH), feno + sulfato de cálcio di-hidratado (E98), feno + sulfato de amônia (SFA) e feno sem suplemento (FSS). Os suplementos influenciaram de forma positiva as atividades de alimentação, mastigação e de ócio. Animais que não foram suplementados (FSS) apresentaram menor tempo total de alimentação, menor tempo total de mastigação e de ócio que animais que receberam suplemento. Fizeram refeições mais curtas e despenderam mais tempo para mastigações merícicas por bolo ruminal, apresentaram menor eficiência de alimentação (g MS/hora) e menor eficiência de ruminação (g de MS/hora e g de FDN/hora), e tiveram conseqüentemente menor consumo. SSE apresentou maior tempo total de ruminação que suplementos com diferentes fontes de enxofre. Os animais que consumiram suplementos contendo enxofre tiveram menor número de mastigações merícicas por dia e por bolo, no entanto não apresentaram diferenças nas taxas de eficiência de alimentação e ruminação.UEL2011-08-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionExperimentoapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/1679-0359.2011v32n3p115110.5433/1679-0359.2011v32n3p1151Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 32 No. 3 (2011); 1151-1162Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 32 n. 3 (2011); 1151-11621679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/1679-0359.2011v32n3p1151/8390Granzotto, FernandaBranco, Antonio FerrianiSantos, Alexandre Leseur dosBarreto, Julio CesarTeixeira, SilvanaSerrano, Roman CastanedaBarbosa, Orlando RusMano, Daniel SuziganFerelli, FernandaConeglian, Sabrina Marcantonioinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2015-11-19T18:37:50Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/3346Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2015-11-19T18:37:50Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Proteic supplements with and without sulfur sources on intake behavior of steers fed with low quality hay Suplementos proteicos com e sem fontes de enxofre sobre o comportamento ingestivo de novilhos alimentados com feno de baixa qualidade |
title |
Proteic supplements with and without sulfur sources on intake behavior of steers fed with low quality hay |
spellingShingle |
Proteic supplements with and without sulfur sources on intake behavior of steers fed with low quality hay Granzotto, Fernanda Feeding Sulfur Rumination Sulfate. Alimentação Enxofre Ruminação Sulfato. |
title_short |
Proteic supplements with and without sulfur sources on intake behavior of steers fed with low quality hay |
title_full |
Proteic supplements with and without sulfur sources on intake behavior of steers fed with low quality hay |
title_fullStr |
Proteic supplements with and without sulfur sources on intake behavior of steers fed with low quality hay |
title_full_unstemmed |
Proteic supplements with and without sulfur sources on intake behavior of steers fed with low quality hay |
title_sort |
Proteic supplements with and without sulfur sources on intake behavior of steers fed with low quality hay |
author |
Granzotto, Fernanda |
author_facet |
Granzotto, Fernanda Branco, Antonio Ferriani Santos, Alexandre Leseur dos Barreto, Julio Cesar Teixeira, Silvana Serrano, Roman Castaneda Barbosa, Orlando Rus Mano, Daniel Suzigan Ferelli, Fernanda Coneglian, Sabrina Marcantonio |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Branco, Antonio Ferriani Santos, Alexandre Leseur dos Barreto, Julio Cesar Teixeira, Silvana Serrano, Roman Castaneda Barbosa, Orlando Rus Mano, Daniel Suzigan Ferelli, Fernanda Coneglian, Sabrina Marcantonio |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Granzotto, Fernanda Branco, Antonio Ferriani Santos, Alexandre Leseur dos Barreto, Julio Cesar Teixeira, Silvana Serrano, Roman Castaneda Barbosa, Orlando Rus Mano, Daniel Suzigan Ferelli, Fernanda Coneglian, Sabrina Marcantonio |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Feeding Sulfur Rumination Sulfate. Alimentação Enxofre Ruminação Sulfato. |
topic |
Feeding Sulfur Rumination Sulfate. Alimentação Enxofre Ruminação Sulfato. |
description |
This experiment was conduct to study the effects of proteic supplementation and different sulfur sources added to supplements on the intake behavior, for cattle. Seven Holstein steers, weighing 442 kg ± 59 kg of live weight. The statistical design was a Latin square 7 x 7, and treatments consisted of the supplements use or no with addition or no of different sulfur sources: hay + supplement without sulfur (SWS), hay + sulfur 70S (S70), hay + sulfur 98S (S98), hay + calcium sulfate hemi-hydrated (CSH), hay + calcium sulfate di-hydrated (CSD), hay + ammonium sulfate (SFA) and hay without supplement (FSS). The Supplements affected in a positive way the feeding, chewing and resting activities. Steers without supplement (HWS) showed shorter total time of feeding, lower total time of chewing, and resting than steers with supplements. They had shorter meals and spent more time for rumination chewing per ruminal bolus, had lower efficiency of feeding (g DM/hour) and lower rumination efficiency (g of DM/hour and g of NDF/hour) as well as of the lower intake. SWS showed higher total time of rumination then supplements with different sulfur sources. The animals that had consumed supplements with sulfur, had presented lower number of rumination chews per day and per bolus, but they had not different to feeding efficiency and rumination. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-08-25 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Experimento |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/1679-0359.2011v32n3p1151 10.5433/1679-0359.2011v32n3p1151 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/1679-0359.2011v32n3p1151 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1679-0359.2011v32n3p1151 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/1679-0359.2011v32n3p1151/8390 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 32 No. 3 (2011); 1151-1162 Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 32 n. 3 (2011); 1151-1162 1679-0359 1676-546X reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
collection |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
semina.agrarias@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306055772012544 |