Proteic supplements with and without sulfur sources on intake behavior of steers fed with low quality hay

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Granzotto, Fernanda
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Branco, Antonio Ferriani, Santos, Alexandre Leseur dos, Barreto, Julio Cesar, Teixeira, Silvana, Serrano, Roman Castaneda, Barbosa, Orlando Rus, Mano, Daniel Suzigan, Ferelli, Fernanda, Coneglian, Sabrina Marcantonio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/1679-0359.2011v32n3p1151
Resumo: This experiment was conduct to study the effects of proteic supplementation and different sulfur sources added to supplements on the intake behavior, for cattle. Seven Holstein steers, weighing 442 kg ± 59 kg of live weight. The statistical design was a Latin square 7 x 7, and treatments consisted of the supplements use or no with addition or no of different sulfur sources: hay + supplement without sulfur (SWS), hay + sulfur 70S (S70), hay + sulfur 98S (S98), hay + calcium sulfate hemi-hydrated (CSH), hay + calcium sulfate di-hydrated (CSD), hay + ammonium sulfate (SFA) and hay without supplement (FSS). The Supplements affected in a positive way the feeding, chewing and resting activities. Steers without supplement (HWS) showed shorter total time of feeding, lower total time of chewing, and resting than steers with supplements. They had shorter meals and spent more time for rumination chewing per ruminal bolus, had lower efficiency of feeding (g DM/hour) and lower rumination efficiency (g of DM/hour and g of NDF/hour) as well as of the lower intake. SWS showed higher total time of rumination then supplements with different sulfur sources. The animals that had consumed supplements with sulfur, had presented lower number of rumination chews per day and per bolus, but they had not different to feeding efficiency and rumination.
id UEL-11_fce2b670e2797706b1762e26468f6a2e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/3346
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Proteic supplements with and without sulfur sources on intake behavior of steers fed with low quality haySuplementos proteicos com e sem fontes de enxofre sobre o comportamento ingestivo de novilhos alimentados com feno de baixa qualidadeFeedingSulfurRuminationSulfate.AlimentaçãoEnxofreRuminaçãoSulfato.This experiment was conduct to study the effects of proteic supplementation and different sulfur sources added to supplements on the intake behavior, for cattle. Seven Holstein steers, weighing 442 kg ± 59 kg of live weight. The statistical design was a Latin square 7 x 7, and treatments consisted of the supplements use or no with addition or no of different sulfur sources: hay + supplement without sulfur (SWS), hay + sulfur 70S (S70), hay + sulfur 98S (S98), hay + calcium sulfate hemi-hydrated (CSH), hay + calcium sulfate di-hydrated (CSD), hay + ammonium sulfate (SFA) and hay without supplement (FSS). The Supplements affected in a positive way the feeding, chewing and resting activities. Steers without supplement (HWS) showed shorter total time of feeding, lower total time of chewing, and resting than steers with supplements. They had shorter meals and spent more time for rumination chewing per ruminal bolus, had lower efficiency of feeding (g DM/hour) and lower rumination efficiency (g of DM/hour and g of NDF/hour) as well as of the lower intake. SWS showed higher total time of rumination then supplements with different sulfur sources. The animals that had consumed supplements with sulfur, had presented lower number of rumination chews per day and per bolus, but they had not different to feeding efficiency and rumination.O presente experimento foi realizado com o objetivo de estudar os efeitos da suplementação proteica e de diferentes fontes de enxofre adicionadas aos suplementos, sobre o comportamento ingestivo de bovinos consumindo feno de baixa qualidade. Foram utilizados sete bovinos, machos, castrados, da raça Holandesa Preto e Branco com 442 kg ± 59 kg de peso vivo. O delineamento experimental utilizado foi o quadrado latino 7 x 7, e os tratamentos consistiram na utilização ou não de suplementos com adição ou não de diferentes fontes de enxofre, conforme segue: feno + suplemento sem enxofre (SSE), feno + enxofre 70S (E70), feno + enxofre 98S (E98), feno + sulfato de cálcio hemi-hidratado (SCH), feno + sulfato de cálcio di-hidratado (E98), feno + sulfato de amônia (SFA) e feno sem suplemento (FSS). Os suplementos influenciaram de forma positiva as atividades de alimentação, mastigação e de ócio. Animais que não foram suplementados (FSS) apresentaram menor tempo total de alimentação, menor tempo total de mastigação e de ócio que animais que receberam suplemento. Fizeram refeições mais curtas e despenderam mais tempo para mastigações merícicas por bolo ruminal, apresentaram menor eficiência de alimentação (g MS/hora) e menor eficiência de ruminação (g de MS/hora e g de FDN/hora), e tiveram conseqüentemente menor consumo. SSE apresentou maior tempo total de ruminação que suplementos com diferentes fontes de enxofre. Os animais que consumiram suplementos contendo enxofre tiveram menor número de mastigações merícicas por dia e por bolo, no entanto não apresentaram diferenças nas taxas de eficiência de alimentação e ruminação.UEL2011-08-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionExperimentoapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/1679-0359.2011v32n3p115110.5433/1679-0359.2011v32n3p1151Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 32 No. 3 (2011); 1151-1162Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 32 n. 3 (2011); 1151-11621679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/1679-0359.2011v32n3p1151/8390Granzotto, FernandaBranco, Antonio FerrianiSantos, Alexandre Leseur dosBarreto, Julio CesarTeixeira, SilvanaSerrano, Roman CastanedaBarbosa, Orlando RusMano, Daniel SuziganFerelli, FernandaConeglian, Sabrina Marcantonioinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2015-11-19T18:37:50Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/3346Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2015-11-19T18:37:50Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Proteic supplements with and without sulfur sources on intake behavior of steers fed with low quality hay
Suplementos proteicos com e sem fontes de enxofre sobre o comportamento ingestivo de novilhos alimentados com feno de baixa qualidade
title Proteic supplements with and without sulfur sources on intake behavior of steers fed with low quality hay
spellingShingle Proteic supplements with and without sulfur sources on intake behavior of steers fed with low quality hay
Granzotto, Fernanda
Feeding
Sulfur
Rumination
Sulfate.
Alimentação
Enxofre
Ruminação
Sulfato.
title_short Proteic supplements with and without sulfur sources on intake behavior of steers fed with low quality hay
title_full Proteic supplements with and without sulfur sources on intake behavior of steers fed with low quality hay
title_fullStr Proteic supplements with and without sulfur sources on intake behavior of steers fed with low quality hay
title_full_unstemmed Proteic supplements with and without sulfur sources on intake behavior of steers fed with low quality hay
title_sort Proteic supplements with and without sulfur sources on intake behavior of steers fed with low quality hay
author Granzotto, Fernanda
author_facet Granzotto, Fernanda
Branco, Antonio Ferriani
Santos, Alexandre Leseur dos
Barreto, Julio Cesar
Teixeira, Silvana
Serrano, Roman Castaneda
Barbosa, Orlando Rus
Mano, Daniel Suzigan
Ferelli, Fernanda
Coneglian, Sabrina Marcantonio
author_role author
author2 Branco, Antonio Ferriani
Santos, Alexandre Leseur dos
Barreto, Julio Cesar
Teixeira, Silvana
Serrano, Roman Castaneda
Barbosa, Orlando Rus
Mano, Daniel Suzigan
Ferelli, Fernanda
Coneglian, Sabrina Marcantonio
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Granzotto, Fernanda
Branco, Antonio Ferriani
Santos, Alexandre Leseur dos
Barreto, Julio Cesar
Teixeira, Silvana
Serrano, Roman Castaneda
Barbosa, Orlando Rus
Mano, Daniel Suzigan
Ferelli, Fernanda
Coneglian, Sabrina Marcantonio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Feeding
Sulfur
Rumination
Sulfate.
Alimentação
Enxofre
Ruminação
Sulfato.
topic Feeding
Sulfur
Rumination
Sulfate.
Alimentação
Enxofre
Ruminação
Sulfato.
description This experiment was conduct to study the effects of proteic supplementation and different sulfur sources added to supplements on the intake behavior, for cattle. Seven Holstein steers, weighing 442 kg ± 59 kg of live weight. The statistical design was a Latin square 7 x 7, and treatments consisted of the supplements use or no with addition or no of different sulfur sources: hay + supplement without sulfur (SWS), hay + sulfur 70S (S70), hay + sulfur 98S (S98), hay + calcium sulfate hemi-hydrated (CSH), hay + calcium sulfate di-hydrated (CSD), hay + ammonium sulfate (SFA) and hay without supplement (FSS). The Supplements affected in a positive way the feeding, chewing and resting activities. Steers without supplement (HWS) showed shorter total time of feeding, lower total time of chewing, and resting than steers with supplements. They had shorter meals and spent more time for rumination chewing per ruminal bolus, had lower efficiency of feeding (g DM/hour) and lower rumination efficiency (g of DM/hour and g of NDF/hour) as well as of the lower intake. SWS showed higher total time of rumination then supplements with different sulfur sources. The animals that had consumed supplements with sulfur, had presented lower number of rumination chews per day and per bolus, but they had not different to feeding efficiency and rumination.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-08-25
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Experimento
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/1679-0359.2011v32n3p1151
10.5433/1679-0359.2011v32n3p1151
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/1679-0359.2011v32n3p1151
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2011v32n3p1151
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/1679-0359.2011v32n3p1151/8390
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 32 No. 3 (2011); 1151-1162
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 32 n. 3 (2011); 1151-1162
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1799306055772012544