Philosophy of history, utopia and crisis: similarities and differences between Reinhart Koselleck and Jörn Rüsen

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Gustavo Castanheira Borges de
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Antíteses
DOI: 10.5433/1984-3356.2020v13n25p801
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/article/view/36705
Resumo: The aim of this article is to analyze and compare the works of Reinhart Koselleck and Jörn Rüsen, probably the two German historians most widely disseminated in Brazil today, but who lack comparative studies. The approach between the authors will be made through the topics of the philosophy of history, utopia and crisis. The objective is to understand how each author works on these themes, and what are the possible similarities and differences between the two approaches. Our thesis is that both authors start from the same problem: how to understand and assimilate the catastrophe of World War II and National Socialism; however, they postulate different answers: Rüsen is directly linked to a certain Illuminist tradition (Kant), and elaborates a more optimistic theory about the future and about humanity; already Koselleck presents a more incisive critical position against the rehabilitation of Illuminist traditions and the XIX century Philosophy of History.
id UEL-13_0667ddbc7e753de20ba201bcbca0e431
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/36705
network_acronym_str UEL-13
network_name_str Antíteses
spelling Philosophy of history, utopia and crisis: similarities and differences between Reinhart Koselleck and Jörn RüsenFilosofia da história, utopia e crise: semelhanças e diferenças entre Reinhart Koselleck e Jörn RüsenKoselleckRüsenPhilosophy of history.UtopiaCrisisHistoriografia alemãKoselleckRüsenFilosofia da históriaUtopiaCriseHistoriografia alemãThe aim of this article is to analyze and compare the works of Reinhart Koselleck and Jörn Rüsen, probably the two German historians most widely disseminated in Brazil today, but who lack comparative studies. The approach between the authors will be made through the topics of the philosophy of history, utopia and crisis. The objective is to understand how each author works on these themes, and what are the possible similarities and differences between the two approaches. Our thesis is that both authors start from the same problem: how to understand and assimilate the catastrophe of World War II and National Socialism; however, they postulate different answers: Rüsen is directly linked to a certain Illuminist tradition (Kant), and elaborates a more optimistic theory about the future and about humanity; already Koselleck presents a more incisive critical position against the rehabilitation of Illuminist traditions and the XIX century Philosophy of History.O foco deste artigo é analisar e comparar as obras de Reinhart Koselleck e Jörn Rüsen, provavelmente os dois historiadores alemães mais disseminados no Brasil atualmente, mas que carecem de estudos comparativos. A aproximação entre os autores será feita a partir dos tópicos da filosofia da história, da utopia e da crise. O objetivo é perceber como cada autor trabalha estes temas, e quais as possíveis semelhanças e diferenças entre as duas abordagens. A nossa tese é a de que os dois autores partem de um mesmo problema: como entender e assimilar a catástrofe da Segunda Guerra Mundial e do Nacional-socialismo; etretanto, chegam a resultados diferentes: Rüsen se liga diretamente a uma certa tradição Iluminista (Kant), e elabora uma teoria mais otimista sobre o futuro e sobre a humanidade; já Koselleck apresenta uma posição crítica mais incisiva contra à reabilitação de tradições Iluministas e da Filosofia da História do século XIX, contrapondo um ceticismo ao otimismo de Rüsen.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2020-08-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/article/view/3670510.5433/1984-3356.2020v13n25p801Antíteses; Vol. 13 No. 25 (2020): v13-n25; 801-832Antíteses; v. 13 n. 25 (2020): v13-n25; 801-8321984-3356reponame:Antítesesinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/article/view/36705/27865Copyright (c) 2020 Antítesesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, Gustavo Castanheira Borges de2020-10-26T12:34:16Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/36705Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antitesesPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/oaiantiteses@uel.br||1984-33561984-3356opendoar:2020-10-26T12:34:16Antíteses - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Philosophy of history, utopia and crisis: similarities and differences between Reinhart Koselleck and Jörn Rüsen
Filosofia da história, utopia e crise: semelhanças e diferenças entre Reinhart Koselleck e Jörn Rüsen
title Philosophy of history, utopia and crisis: similarities and differences between Reinhart Koselleck and Jörn Rüsen
spellingShingle Philosophy of history, utopia and crisis: similarities and differences between Reinhart Koselleck and Jörn Rüsen
Philosophy of history, utopia and crisis: similarities and differences between Reinhart Koselleck and Jörn Rüsen
Oliveira, Gustavo Castanheira Borges de
Koselleck
Rüsen
Philosophy of history.
Utopia
Crisis
Historiografia alemã
Koselleck
Rüsen
Filosofia da história
Utopia
Crise
Historiografia alemã
Oliveira, Gustavo Castanheira Borges de
Koselleck
Rüsen
Philosophy of history.
Utopia
Crisis
Historiografia alemã
Koselleck
Rüsen
Filosofia da história
Utopia
Crise
Historiografia alemã
title_short Philosophy of history, utopia and crisis: similarities and differences between Reinhart Koselleck and Jörn Rüsen
title_full Philosophy of history, utopia and crisis: similarities and differences between Reinhart Koselleck and Jörn Rüsen
title_fullStr Philosophy of history, utopia and crisis: similarities and differences between Reinhart Koselleck and Jörn Rüsen
Philosophy of history, utopia and crisis: similarities and differences between Reinhart Koselleck and Jörn Rüsen
title_full_unstemmed Philosophy of history, utopia and crisis: similarities and differences between Reinhart Koselleck and Jörn Rüsen
Philosophy of history, utopia and crisis: similarities and differences between Reinhart Koselleck and Jörn Rüsen
title_sort Philosophy of history, utopia and crisis: similarities and differences between Reinhart Koselleck and Jörn Rüsen
author Oliveira, Gustavo Castanheira Borges de
author_facet Oliveira, Gustavo Castanheira Borges de
Oliveira, Gustavo Castanheira Borges de
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Gustavo Castanheira Borges de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Koselleck
Rüsen
Philosophy of history.
Utopia
Crisis
Historiografia alemã
Koselleck
Rüsen
Filosofia da história
Utopia
Crise
Historiografia alemã
topic Koselleck
Rüsen
Philosophy of history.
Utopia
Crisis
Historiografia alemã
Koselleck
Rüsen
Filosofia da história
Utopia
Crise
Historiografia alemã
description The aim of this article is to analyze and compare the works of Reinhart Koselleck and Jörn Rüsen, probably the two German historians most widely disseminated in Brazil today, but who lack comparative studies. The approach between the authors will be made through the topics of the philosophy of history, utopia and crisis. The objective is to understand how each author works on these themes, and what are the possible similarities and differences between the two approaches. Our thesis is that both authors start from the same problem: how to understand and assimilate the catastrophe of World War II and National Socialism; however, they postulate different answers: Rüsen is directly linked to a certain Illuminist tradition (Kant), and elaborates a more optimistic theory about the future and about humanity; already Koselleck presents a more incisive critical position against the rehabilitation of Illuminist traditions and the XIX century Philosophy of History.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-08-21
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/article/view/36705
10.5433/1984-3356.2020v13n25p801
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/article/view/36705
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1984-3356.2020v13n25p801
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/article/view/36705/27865
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Antíteses
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Antíteses
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Antíteses; Vol. 13 No. 25 (2020): v13-n25; 801-832
Antíteses; v. 13 n. 25 (2020): v13-n25; 801-832
1984-3356
reponame:Antíteses
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Antíteses
collection Antíteses
repository.name.fl_str_mv Antíteses - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv antiteses@uel.br||
_version_ 1822180397404913664
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.5433/1984-3356.2020v13n25p801

Registros relacionados