Revisiting the history of immigration and colonization in provincial Paraná
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Antíteses |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/article/view/20729 |
Resumo: | This article revisits two established themes in the historiography of Paraná: immigration and colonization. Studies dedicated to these themes had a general tendency to focus on the narrow relationship between these two historical experiences, appointing that, in Paraná, colonization was made effective by means of small land owners of foreign origin (the colonials) who farmed their land for general supply agriculture. Using sources that have also been largely explored by researchers of regional history – reports from province presidents and legislation – but prioritizing a less-studied period – the years 1850 and 1860 – and presenting questions related to the definition of public politics for the recently-constituted province, the research made evident that the proletarianization was a common experience for the immigrants in that period and that the so-called “nationals” were fundamental agents in the colonization projects then being implemented. The article, therefore, shows the problems of the synonymy constituted by the historiography between the words immigration and colonization, giving evidence to a context of ruptures, indeterminations and multiple expectations. |
id |
UEL-13_d0a3ad6928f188257765707b97697945 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/20729 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-13 |
network_name_str |
Antíteses |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Revisiting the history of immigration and colonization in provincial ParanáRevisitando a história da imigração e da colonização no Paraná provincialHistoryParanáImmigrationColonization nationalHistóriaParanáImigraçãoColonizaçãoNacionalThis article revisits two established themes in the historiography of Paraná: immigration and colonization. Studies dedicated to these themes had a general tendency to focus on the narrow relationship between these two historical experiences, appointing that, in Paraná, colonization was made effective by means of small land owners of foreign origin (the colonials) who farmed their land for general supply agriculture. Using sources that have also been largely explored by researchers of regional history – reports from province presidents and legislation – but prioritizing a less-studied period – the years 1850 and 1860 – and presenting questions related to the definition of public politics for the recently-constituted province, the research made evident that the proletarianization was a common experience for the immigrants in that period and that the so-called “nationals” were fundamental agents in the colonization projects then being implemented. The article, therefore, shows the problems of the synonymy constituted by the historiography between the words immigration and colonization, giving evidence to a context of ruptures, indeterminations and multiple expectations.Este artigo objetiva revisitar dois temas consagrados na historiografia sobre o Paraná - a colonização e a imigração. Os estudos que se dedicaram a tais temáticas tenderam, no geral, a enfatizar a estreita relação entre estas duas experiências históricas, registrando que, no Paraná, a colonização se efetivou por meio da imigração e esta foi implementada no sentido de colonizar a região, o que se fez por meio de pequenos proprietários de origem estrangeira (os colonos) que se dedicavam à agricultura de abastecimento. Utilizando fontes também já bastante exploradas por pesquisadores da história regional – relatórios de presidentes de província e legislação – mas priorizando um período pouco estudado – os anos 1850 e 1860 – e elencando questões relacionadas à definição de políticas públicas para a província recém-constituída, a pesquisa evidenciou que a proletarização foi uma experiência comum para os imigrantes naquele período e que os chamados “nacionais” foram agentes fundamentais nos projetos de colonização então implementados. O artigo, portanto, problematiza a sinonímia constituída pela historiografia entre os termos imigração e colonização, evidenciando um contexto de rupturas, indeterminações e expectativas múltiplas.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2016-01-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionHistorical research; Empirical researchPesquisa histórica; Pesquisa empíricaapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/article/view/2072910.5433/1984-3356.2015v8n16p204Antíteses; Vol. 8 No. 16 (2015): Dossiê: Identidades cristãs no mundo romano; 204-226Antíteses; v. 8 n. 16 (2015): Dossiê: Identidades cristãs no mundo romano; 204-2261984-3356reponame:Antítesesinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/article/view/20729/17810Copyright (c) 2015 Antítesesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMendonça, Joseli Maria Nunes2021-10-27T17:33:08Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/20729Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antitesesPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/oaiantiteses@uel.br||1984-33561984-3356opendoar:2021-10-27T17:33:08Antíteses - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Revisiting the history of immigration and colonization in provincial Paraná Revisitando a história da imigração e da colonização no Paraná provincial |
title |
Revisiting the history of immigration and colonization in provincial Paraná |
spellingShingle |
Revisiting the history of immigration and colonization in provincial Paraná Mendonça, Joseli Maria Nunes History Paraná Immigration Colonization national História Paraná Imigração Colonização Nacional |
title_short |
Revisiting the history of immigration and colonization in provincial Paraná |
title_full |
Revisiting the history of immigration and colonization in provincial Paraná |
title_fullStr |
Revisiting the history of immigration and colonization in provincial Paraná |
title_full_unstemmed |
Revisiting the history of immigration and colonization in provincial Paraná |
title_sort |
Revisiting the history of immigration and colonization in provincial Paraná |
author |
Mendonça, Joseli Maria Nunes |
author_facet |
Mendonça, Joseli Maria Nunes |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Mendonça, Joseli Maria Nunes |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
History Paraná Immigration Colonization national História Paraná Imigração Colonização Nacional |
topic |
History Paraná Immigration Colonization national História Paraná Imigração Colonização Nacional |
description |
This article revisits two established themes in the historiography of Paraná: immigration and colonization. Studies dedicated to these themes had a general tendency to focus on the narrow relationship between these two historical experiences, appointing that, in Paraná, colonization was made effective by means of small land owners of foreign origin (the colonials) who farmed their land for general supply agriculture. Using sources that have also been largely explored by researchers of regional history – reports from province presidents and legislation – but prioritizing a less-studied period – the years 1850 and 1860 – and presenting questions related to the definition of public politics for the recently-constituted province, the research made evident that the proletarianization was a common experience for the immigrants in that period and that the so-called “nationals” were fundamental agents in the colonization projects then being implemented. The article, therefore, shows the problems of the synonymy constituted by the historiography between the words immigration and colonization, giving evidence to a context of ruptures, indeterminations and multiple expectations. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-01-18 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Historical research; Empirical research Pesquisa histórica; Pesquisa empírica |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/article/view/20729 10.5433/1984-3356.2015v8n16p204 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/article/view/20729 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1984-3356.2015v8n16p204 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/article/view/20729/17810 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Antíteses info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Antíteses |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Antíteses; Vol. 8 No. 16 (2015): Dossiê: Identidades cristãs no mundo romano; 204-226 Antíteses; v. 8 n. 16 (2015): Dossiê: Identidades cristãs no mundo romano; 204-226 1984-3356 reponame:Antíteses instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Antíteses |
collection |
Antíteses |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Antíteses - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
antiteses@uel.br|| |
_version_ |
1797069047121051648 |