The Perpetrator’s Confessions and the Problem of Truth in Argentina; around the Statements of Eduardo “Tucu” Costanzo

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Salvi, Valentina Isolda
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: spa
Título da fonte: Antíteses
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/article/view/30468
Resumo: This article is focused on the declarations made by Eduardo "Tucu" Costanzo, a defendant in the Guerrieri I Case, the first trial for crimes against humanity held in the city of Rosario, which took place between 2009 and 2010. With the aim of contributing to the debate about the social, political and moral weight of the "first person" testimony of the perpetrators and the different senses of truth that this words produce, in this article I also analyze the repercussions and controversies these declarations aroused among the social actors that were personally and politically involved in the judicial process in Rosario. For this purpose, I will provide a similarly brief description of the social conditions whereby these declarations were able to be made and heard, in order to examine the meanings and representations of the violence of the past that are brought into play once unknown (and horrific) aspects of the illegal repression are made public in the voice of one of its perpetrators.
id UEL-13_f57a05c6ea540e39d32dacd1de1d2550
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/30468
network_acronym_str UEL-13
network_name_str Antíteses
repository_id_str
spelling The Perpetrator’s Confessions and the Problem of Truth in Argentina; around the Statements of Eduardo “Tucu” CostanzoLa palabra de los represores y el problema de la verdad en Argentina: reflexiones a partir de los dichos de Eduardo “Tucu” CostanzoA palavra dos repressores e o problema da verdade na Argentina: reflexões a partir das falas de Eduardo “Tucu” CostanzoMemoryDictatorshipArgentinaPerpetratorsPublic statementsEstudios de memoriaMemoriaDictaduras militaresArgentinaRepresoresDeclaraciones públicasEstudios de memoriaMemoriaDitaduras militaresArgentinaRepressoresDeclarações públicasEstudios de memoriaThis article is focused on the declarations made by Eduardo "Tucu" Costanzo, a defendant in the Guerrieri I Case, the first trial for crimes against humanity held in the city of Rosario, which took place between 2009 and 2010. With the aim of contributing to the debate about the social, political and moral weight of the "first person" testimony of the perpetrators and the different senses of truth that this words produce, in this article I also analyze the repercussions and controversies these declarations aroused among the social actors that were personally and politically involved in the judicial process in Rosario. For this purpose, I will provide a similarly brief description of the social conditions whereby these declarations were able to be made and heard, in order to examine the meanings and representations of the violence of the past that are brought into play once unknown (and horrific) aspects of the illegal repression are made public in the voice of one of its perpetrators.A partir de las declaraciones realizadas por el imputado, Eduardo Tucu Costanzo, en el marco de la causa Guerrieri I, primer juicio por crímenes de lesa humanidad en la cuidad de Rosario, Provincia de Santa Fé (2009-2010), este artículo se propone, por un lado, analizar lo efectivamente dicho por un represor que rompió el “pacto de silencio” y sus condiciones de posibilidad; y por otro lado, dar cuenta de los efectos que esa palabra provocó una vez que fue puesta en circulación, el modo en que fue tratada, el carácter que se le otorgó, los debate suscitados y los respuestas y reacciones generadas entre los actores sociales involucrados personal y políticamente en el proceso judicial en Rosario. El contenido de las declaraciones de Costanzo como los efectos y reacciones que provocó permiten plantear una serie de cuestiones más generales respecto del lugar que ocupan los represores y su palabra en los procesos memoriales así como sobre los sentidos sobre la concepción de verdad que la circulación pública de esta palabra condensa.Com base nas declarações do arguido Eduardo Tucu Costanzo, no âmbito do caso Guerrieri I, primeiro julgamento por crimes contra a humanidade na cidade de Rosário, Província de Santa Fé (2009-2010), este artigo propõe, sobre de um lado, para analisar o que realmente foi dito por um repressor que rompeu o "pacto do silêncio" e suas condições de possibilidade; e, por outro lado, dar conta dos efeitos que aquela palavra causou ao ser colocada em circulação, a forma como foi tratada, o caráter que lhe foi atribuído, os debates suscitados e as respostas e reações geradas entre os atores sociais envolvidos. pessoal e politicamente no processo judicial em Rosário. O conteúdo das falas de Costanzo, bem como os efeitos e reações por elas provocadas, permitem levantar uma série de questões mais gerais sobre o lugar que os repressores ocupam e sua palavra nos processos memoriais, bem como os sentidos da concepção de verdade que a circulação pública desta palavra condensaUniversidade Estadual de Londrina2019-01-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisa empírica de campoPesquisa empírica de campoPesquisa empírica de campoapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/article/view/3046810.5433/1984-3356.2018v11n22p773Antíteses; Vol. 11 No. 22 (2018): v.11, n.22, jul/dez 2018; 773-794Antíteses; v. 11 n. 22 (2018): v.11, n.22, jul/dez 2018; 773-7941984-3356reponame:Antítesesinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELspahttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/article/view/30468/25516Copyright (c) 2018 Antítesesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSalvi, Valentina Isolda2021-07-07T17:41:02Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/30468Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antitesesPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/oaiantiteses@uel.br||1984-33561984-3356opendoar:2021-07-07T17:41:02Antíteses - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Perpetrator’s Confessions and the Problem of Truth in Argentina; around the Statements of Eduardo “Tucu” Costanzo
La palabra de los represores y el problema de la verdad en Argentina: reflexiones a partir de los dichos de Eduardo “Tucu” Costanzo
A palavra dos repressores e o problema da verdade na Argentina: reflexões a partir das falas de Eduardo “Tucu” Costanzo
title The Perpetrator’s Confessions and the Problem of Truth in Argentina; around the Statements of Eduardo “Tucu” Costanzo
spellingShingle The Perpetrator’s Confessions and the Problem of Truth in Argentina; around the Statements of Eduardo “Tucu” Costanzo
Salvi, Valentina Isolda
Memory
Dictatorship
Argentina
Perpetrators
Public statements
Estudios de memoria
Memoria
Dictaduras militares
Argentina
Represores
Declaraciones públicas
Estudios de memoria
Memoria
Ditaduras militares
Argentina
Repressores
Declarações públicas
Estudios de memoria
title_short The Perpetrator’s Confessions and the Problem of Truth in Argentina; around the Statements of Eduardo “Tucu” Costanzo
title_full The Perpetrator’s Confessions and the Problem of Truth in Argentina; around the Statements of Eduardo “Tucu” Costanzo
title_fullStr The Perpetrator’s Confessions and the Problem of Truth in Argentina; around the Statements of Eduardo “Tucu” Costanzo
title_full_unstemmed The Perpetrator’s Confessions and the Problem of Truth in Argentina; around the Statements of Eduardo “Tucu” Costanzo
title_sort The Perpetrator’s Confessions and the Problem of Truth in Argentina; around the Statements of Eduardo “Tucu” Costanzo
author Salvi, Valentina Isolda
author_facet Salvi, Valentina Isolda
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Salvi, Valentina Isolda
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Memory
Dictatorship
Argentina
Perpetrators
Public statements
Estudios de memoria
Memoria
Dictaduras militares
Argentina
Represores
Declaraciones públicas
Estudios de memoria
Memoria
Ditaduras militares
Argentina
Repressores
Declarações públicas
Estudios de memoria
topic Memory
Dictatorship
Argentina
Perpetrators
Public statements
Estudios de memoria
Memoria
Dictaduras militares
Argentina
Represores
Declaraciones públicas
Estudios de memoria
Memoria
Ditaduras militares
Argentina
Repressores
Declarações públicas
Estudios de memoria
description This article is focused on the declarations made by Eduardo "Tucu" Costanzo, a defendant in the Guerrieri I Case, the first trial for crimes against humanity held in the city of Rosario, which took place between 2009 and 2010. With the aim of contributing to the debate about the social, political and moral weight of the "first person" testimony of the perpetrators and the different senses of truth that this words produce, in this article I also analyze the repercussions and controversies these declarations aroused among the social actors that were personally and politically involved in the judicial process in Rosario. For this purpose, I will provide a similarly brief description of the social conditions whereby these declarations were able to be made and heard, in order to examine the meanings and representations of the violence of the past that are brought into play once unknown (and horrific) aspects of the illegal repression are made public in the voice of one of its perpetrators.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-01-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Pesquisa empírica de campo
Pesquisa empírica de campo
Pesquisa empírica de campo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/article/view/30468
10.5433/1984-3356.2018v11n22p773
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/article/view/30468
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1984-3356.2018v11n22p773
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/article/view/30468/25516
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Antíteses
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Antíteses
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Antíteses; Vol. 11 No. 22 (2018): v.11, n.22, jul/dez 2018; 773-794
Antíteses; v. 11 n. 22 (2018): v.11, n.22, jul/dez 2018; 773-794
1984-3356
reponame:Antíteses
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Antíteses
collection Antíteses
repository.name.fl_str_mv Antíteses - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv antiteses@uel.br||
_version_ 1797069047876026368

Registros relacionados