Mexico and Brazil: two extremes of an idea
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2005 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Mediações - Revista de Ciências Sociais |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/mediacoes/article/view/2163 |
Resumo: | This article questions the real strength Latin America had and has had in the formation of its States and shows that the sense of unity is more a consequence of dependence than a project of its own. It analyzes the regional attempts of integration, the evolution of external politics in Mexico and Brazil and it attempts to identify likely trends (and difficulties) for the formulation of a joint project. The choice upon these two countries is due to the fact that they represent the extremes of this American continent. This study reveals that Latin America, as a political project, has always been more distant from reality than the discourses may show. Such account has become even more abstract and superficial from the decade of 1990 on. |
id |
UEL-16_66f0143bfc3a7299832ad2a29764ff28 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2163 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-16 |
network_name_str |
Mediações - Revista de Ciências Sociais |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Mexico and Brazil: two extremes of an ideaMéxico e Brasil: dois extremos de uma idéiaLatin AméricaForeign AffairsAmérica LatinaPolíticas externasThis article questions the real strength Latin America had and has had in the formation of its States and shows that the sense of unity is more a consequence of dependence than a project of its own. It analyzes the regional attempts of integration, the evolution of external politics in Mexico and Brazil and it attempts to identify likely trends (and difficulties) for the formulation of a joint project. The choice upon these two countries is due to the fact that they represent the extremes of this American continent. This study reveals that Latin America, as a political project, has always been more distant from reality than the discourses may show. Such account has become even more abstract and superficial from the decade of 1990 on.O artigo questiona o real peso que a idéia de América Latina teve e tem para os Estados que a compõe, mostrando que o sentido de unidade provém mais da relação de dependência do que de um projeto próprio. Para isso, escolheu-se analisar, além das tentativas regionais de integração, a evolução das políticas externas de México e Brasil, tentando identificar possíveis tendências (e dificuldades) de formulação de um projeto conjunto. A escolha desses países deve-se ao fato de representarem extremos dessa parte do continente americano. O estudo revela que a América Latina, como projeto político, sempre esteve mais distante da realidade do que os discursos possam aparentar. E a partir da década de 1990 a expressão ainda se tornou mais abstrata e fraca.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2005-12-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/mediacoes/article/view/216310.5433/2176-6665.2005v10n2p25Mediações - Revista de Ciências Sociais; Vol. 10 No. 2 (2005); 25-54Mediações - Revista de Ciências Sociais; Vol. 10 Núm. 2 (2005); 25-54Mediações - Revista de Ciências Sociais; v. 10 n. 2 (2005); 25-542176-66651414-0543reponame:Mediações - Revista de Ciências Sociaisinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/mediacoes/article/view/2163/1852Copyright (c) 2005 Daniel Antiquerainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAntiquera, Daniel2022-06-01T12:34:45Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2163Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/mediacoes/indexPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/mediacoes/oaimediacoes@uel.br2176-66652176-6665opendoar:2023-01-13T10:37:27.018104Mediações - Revista de Ciências Sociais - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Mexico and Brazil: two extremes of an idea México e Brasil: dois extremos de uma idéia |
title |
Mexico and Brazil: two extremes of an idea |
spellingShingle |
Mexico and Brazil: two extremes of an idea Antiquera, Daniel Latin América Foreign Affairs América Latina Políticas externas |
title_short |
Mexico and Brazil: two extremes of an idea |
title_full |
Mexico and Brazil: two extremes of an idea |
title_fullStr |
Mexico and Brazil: two extremes of an idea |
title_full_unstemmed |
Mexico and Brazil: two extremes of an idea |
title_sort |
Mexico and Brazil: two extremes of an idea |
author |
Antiquera, Daniel |
author_facet |
Antiquera, Daniel |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Antiquera, Daniel |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Latin América Foreign Affairs América Latina Políticas externas |
topic |
Latin América Foreign Affairs América Latina Políticas externas |
description |
This article questions the real strength Latin America had and has had in the formation of its States and shows that the sense of unity is more a consequence of dependence than a project of its own. It analyzes the regional attempts of integration, the evolution of external politics in Mexico and Brazil and it attempts to identify likely trends (and difficulties) for the formulation of a joint project. The choice upon these two countries is due to the fact that they represent the extremes of this American continent. This study reveals that Latin America, as a political project, has always been more distant from reality than the discourses may show. Such account has become even more abstract and superficial from the decade of 1990 on. |
publishDate |
2005 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2005-12-15 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/mediacoes/article/view/2163 10.5433/2176-6665.2005v10n2p25 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/mediacoes/article/view/2163 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/2176-6665.2005v10n2p25 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/mediacoes/article/view/2163/1852 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2005 Daniel Antiquera info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2005 Daniel Antiquera |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Mediações - Revista de Ciências Sociais; Vol. 10 No. 2 (2005); 25-54 Mediações - Revista de Ciências Sociais; Vol. 10 Núm. 2 (2005); 25-54 Mediações - Revista de Ciências Sociais; v. 10 n. 2 (2005); 25-54 2176-6665 1414-0543 reponame:Mediações - Revista de Ciências Sociais instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Mediações - Revista de Ciências Sociais |
collection |
Mediações - Revista de Ciências Sociais |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Mediações - Revista de Ciências Sociais - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mediacoes@uel.br |
_version_ |
1797047381160624128 |