Introduction to the debate about official policies on the criminal field
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2003 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Mediações - Revista de Ciências Sociais |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/mediacoes/article/view/9082 |
Resumo: | The current process of economic and financial globalization has elicited contradictory answers in the formulation of criminal policies by State bureaucracy. On the one hand, under strong influence of neoclassical economic thought, there appears in the United Kingdom the theory of crime normalization, qualifying the criminal act as a rational choice option, a matter of opportunity, according to which delinquents rationally calculate their actions. Such theory proposes to replace the classical model of criminal policy, which relates the penal practice to the figure of the "other", the "abnormal", by a new model of 'risk society' , which sees a professional career in criminal acts. On the other hand, there appears in the United States the movement in defense of law and order, which proposes no tolerance to crime by the amplification of penal right and the recrudescence of the State criminal answer. For the defenders of decriminalization and penal abolitionism the utopia of control society which favors the increase of punishment and target changes to administer crime ignores the existence of a society with no penalties which is manifested through the dark cipher, the difference between reported infractions to the police and those really judged. |
id |
UEL-16_75768135592a2bb70e5005e4a33f38f2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/9082 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-16 |
network_name_str |
Mediações - Revista de Ciências Sociais |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Introduction to the debate about official policies on the criminal fieldIntrodução ao debate sobre as políticas oficiais no campo criminalGlobalizationStateCrimePunishmentDecriminalizationPenalty abolishmentGlobalizaçãoEstadoCrimePuniçãoDescriminalizaçãoAbolição da penaThe current process of economic and financial globalization has elicited contradictory answers in the formulation of criminal policies by State bureaucracy. On the one hand, under strong influence of neoclassical economic thought, there appears in the United Kingdom the theory of crime normalization, qualifying the criminal act as a rational choice option, a matter of opportunity, according to which delinquents rationally calculate their actions. Such theory proposes to replace the classical model of criminal policy, which relates the penal practice to the figure of the "other", the "abnormal", by a new model of 'risk society' , which sees a professional career in criminal acts. On the other hand, there appears in the United States the movement in defense of law and order, which proposes no tolerance to crime by the amplification of penal right and the recrudescence of the State criminal answer. For the defenders of decriminalization and penal abolitionism the utopia of control society which favors the increase of punishment and target changes to administer crime ignores the existence of a society with no penalties which is manifested through the dark cipher, the difference between reported infractions to the police and those really judged.O processo de globalização econômica e financeira atual tem provocado respostas contraditórias na formulação de políticas criminais por parte da burocracia estatal. De um lado, sob forte influência do pensamento econômico neo clássico, surge, no reino unido, a teoria da normalização do crime qualificando o ato criminal como uma opção racional de escolha, uma questão de oportunidade mediante a qual os delinqüentes calculam racionalmente suas ações. De outro lado, surge, nos EUA, o movimento de defesa da lei e da ordem, que propõe tolerância zero ao crime mediante a ampliação do direito penal e o recrudescimento da resposta criminal estatal. Para os defensores da descriminalização e do abolicionismo a utopia da sociedade de controle favorável ao aumento da punição e mudanças de alvo para administrar o crime ignora o fato da existência de uma sociedade sem penas a qual se manifesta através da cifra negra, diferença entre infrações denunciadas na polícia e aquelas efetivamente julgadas.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2003-03-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/mediacoes/article/view/908210.5433/2176-6665.2003v8n1p47Mediações - Revista de Ciências Sociais; Vol. 8 No. 1 (2003); 47-69Mediações - Revista de Ciências Sociais; Vol. 8 Núm. 1 (2003); 47-69Mediações - Revista de Ciências Sociais; v. 8 n. 1 (2003); 47-692176-66651414-0543reponame:Mediações - Revista de Ciências Sociaisinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/mediacoes/article/view/9082/7633Copyright (c) 2003 Cezar Bueno de Limainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLima, Cezar Bueno de2022-06-08T11:03:45Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/9082Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/mediacoes/indexPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/mediacoes/oaimediacoes@uel.br2176-66652176-6665opendoar:2023-01-13T10:37:42.540894Mediações - Revista de Ciências Sociais - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Introduction to the debate about official policies on the criminal field Introdução ao debate sobre as políticas oficiais no campo criminal |
title |
Introduction to the debate about official policies on the criminal field |
spellingShingle |
Introduction to the debate about official policies on the criminal field Lima, Cezar Bueno de Globalization State Crime Punishment Decriminalization Penalty abolishment Globalização Estado Crime Punição Descriminalização Abolição da pena |
title_short |
Introduction to the debate about official policies on the criminal field |
title_full |
Introduction to the debate about official policies on the criminal field |
title_fullStr |
Introduction to the debate about official policies on the criminal field |
title_full_unstemmed |
Introduction to the debate about official policies on the criminal field |
title_sort |
Introduction to the debate about official policies on the criminal field |
author |
Lima, Cezar Bueno de |
author_facet |
Lima, Cezar Bueno de |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lima, Cezar Bueno de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Globalization State Crime Punishment Decriminalization Penalty abolishment Globalização Estado Crime Punição Descriminalização Abolição da pena |
topic |
Globalization State Crime Punishment Decriminalization Penalty abolishment Globalização Estado Crime Punição Descriminalização Abolição da pena |
description |
The current process of economic and financial globalization has elicited contradictory answers in the formulation of criminal policies by State bureaucracy. On the one hand, under strong influence of neoclassical economic thought, there appears in the United Kingdom the theory of crime normalization, qualifying the criminal act as a rational choice option, a matter of opportunity, according to which delinquents rationally calculate their actions. Such theory proposes to replace the classical model of criminal policy, which relates the penal practice to the figure of the "other", the "abnormal", by a new model of 'risk society' , which sees a professional career in criminal acts. On the other hand, there appears in the United States the movement in defense of law and order, which proposes no tolerance to crime by the amplification of penal right and the recrudescence of the State criminal answer. For the defenders of decriminalization and penal abolitionism the utopia of control society which favors the increase of punishment and target changes to administer crime ignores the existence of a society with no penalties which is manifested through the dark cipher, the difference between reported infractions to the police and those really judged. |
publishDate |
2003 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2003-03-04 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/mediacoes/article/view/9082 10.5433/2176-6665.2003v8n1p47 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/mediacoes/article/view/9082 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/2176-6665.2003v8n1p47 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/mediacoes/article/view/9082/7633 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2003 Cezar Bueno de Lima info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2003 Cezar Bueno de Lima |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Mediações - Revista de Ciências Sociais; Vol. 8 No. 1 (2003); 47-69 Mediações - Revista de Ciências Sociais; Vol. 8 Núm. 1 (2003); 47-69 Mediações - Revista de Ciências Sociais; v. 8 n. 1 (2003); 47-69 2176-6665 1414-0543 reponame:Mediações - Revista de Ciências Sociais instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Mediações - Revista de Ciências Sociais |
collection |
Mediações - Revista de Ciências Sociais |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Mediações - Revista de Ciências Sociais - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mediacoes@uel.br |
_version_ |
1797047382127411200 |