In search of the effectiveness of environmental constitutional law: new technologies and environmental risks
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista do Direito Público |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/26742 |
Resumo: | Human activity has severely impacted ecosystems and because of this, they currently require ownership of their consequences. In a context where science has no answers, society must decide which action it will take to preserve the environment. This paper examines environmental risks from the perspective of the principles of life, responsibility, prevention, and precaution. Sequentially, it relates them to the irresponsible evolution of new technologies and dangers to ecosystems, which makes them necessary for promoting important dialogue between science, law and technology, so that regulations accompany scientific discoveries, specifically when faced with decisions on environmental risk and damage. As a means for organizing topics of study, this paper uses the phenomenological hermeneutic approach because it helps find approaches that advocate for the constitution’s principles effectiveness; thusly, promoting societies rescue, where the practical way of being in the world defines understanding. |
id |
UEL-2_3b3ca0a93d48d66ad2a514cc5b6ee701 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/26742 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista do Direito Público |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
In search of the effectiveness of environmental constitutional law: new technologies and environmental risksEm busca da efetivação do direito constitucional ambiental: aportes da interdisciplinaridade e da hermenêutica filosóficaPrecautionary Principle. Prevention principle. Interdisciplinarity. Environmental Constitutional Law. Responsibility Principle.Princípio da Precaução. Princípio da Prevenção. Interdisciplinaridade. Constituição Socioambiental. Princípio da Responsabilidade.Human activity has severely impacted ecosystems and because of this, they currently require ownership of their consequences. In a context where science has no answers, society must decide which action it will take to preserve the environment. This paper examines environmental risks from the perspective of the principles of life, responsibility, prevention, and precaution. Sequentially, it relates them to the irresponsible evolution of new technologies and dangers to ecosystems, which makes them necessary for promoting important dialogue between science, law and technology, so that regulations accompany scientific discoveries, specifically when faced with decisions on environmental risk and damage. As a means for organizing topics of study, this paper uses the phenomenological hermeneutic approach because it helps find approaches that advocate for the constitution’s principles effectiveness; thusly, promoting societies rescue, where the practical way of being in the world defines understanding.Os riscos e perigos causados pela ação humana nos ecossistemas passam a exigir que o direito se aproprie das consequências da sociedade de risco e passe a decidir em cenários em que a ciência ainda não tem respostas. A partir desse cenário o artigo se propõe a olhar os riscos ambientais sob o viés dos princípios vida, responsabilidade, prevenção e precaução em relação ao avanço irresponsável das novas tecnologias e os riscos aos ecossistemas, o que torna indubitável promover o necessário diálogo entre ciência, direito e tecnologia, para que concretamente a regulação acompanhe as descobertas científicas, especificamente quando diante de decisões sobre dano e risco ambiental. Como lógica de organização do trabalho, adota-se o método de abordagem fenomenológico hermenêutico, visto que o mesmo possibilita o encontro de respostas que preconizam a efetividade do constitucionalmente previsto à medida que promove o resgate da realidade, onde o modo prático de ser no mundo define a compreensão.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2020-12-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/2674210.5433/1980-511X.2020v15n3p48Revista do Direito Público; v. 15 n. 3 (2020); 48-701980-511Xreponame:Revista do Direito Públicoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/26742/28738Copyright (c) 2020 Revista do Direito Públicohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessWartha, Patrícia MainoHupffer, Haide Maria2022-09-23T16:18:02Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/26742Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopubPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/oai||rdpubuel@uel.br1980-511X1980-511Xopendoar:2022-09-23T16:18:02Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
In search of the effectiveness of environmental constitutional law: new technologies and environmental risks Em busca da efetivação do direito constitucional ambiental: aportes da interdisciplinaridade e da hermenêutica filosófica |
title |
In search of the effectiveness of environmental constitutional law: new technologies and environmental risks |
spellingShingle |
In search of the effectiveness of environmental constitutional law: new technologies and environmental risks Wartha, Patrícia Maino Precautionary Principle. Prevention principle. Interdisciplinarity. Environmental Constitutional Law. Responsibility Principle. Princípio da Precaução. Princípio da Prevenção. Interdisciplinaridade. Constituição Socioambiental. Princípio da Responsabilidade. |
title_short |
In search of the effectiveness of environmental constitutional law: new technologies and environmental risks |
title_full |
In search of the effectiveness of environmental constitutional law: new technologies and environmental risks |
title_fullStr |
In search of the effectiveness of environmental constitutional law: new technologies and environmental risks |
title_full_unstemmed |
In search of the effectiveness of environmental constitutional law: new technologies and environmental risks |
title_sort |
In search of the effectiveness of environmental constitutional law: new technologies and environmental risks |
author |
Wartha, Patrícia Maino |
author_facet |
Wartha, Patrícia Maino Hupffer, Haide Maria |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Hupffer, Haide Maria |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Wartha, Patrícia Maino Hupffer, Haide Maria |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Precautionary Principle. Prevention principle. Interdisciplinarity. Environmental Constitutional Law. Responsibility Principle. Princípio da Precaução. Princípio da Prevenção. Interdisciplinaridade. Constituição Socioambiental. Princípio da Responsabilidade. |
topic |
Precautionary Principle. Prevention principle. Interdisciplinarity. Environmental Constitutional Law. Responsibility Principle. Princípio da Precaução. Princípio da Prevenção. Interdisciplinaridade. Constituição Socioambiental. Princípio da Responsabilidade. |
description |
Human activity has severely impacted ecosystems and because of this, they currently require ownership of their consequences. In a context where science has no answers, society must decide which action it will take to preserve the environment. This paper examines environmental risks from the perspective of the principles of life, responsibility, prevention, and precaution. Sequentially, it relates them to the irresponsible evolution of new technologies and dangers to ecosystems, which makes them necessary for promoting important dialogue between science, law and technology, so that regulations accompany scientific discoveries, specifically when faced with decisions on environmental risk and damage. As a means for organizing topics of study, this paper uses the phenomenological hermeneutic approach because it helps find approaches that advocate for the constitution’s principles effectiveness; thusly, promoting societies rescue, where the practical way of being in the world defines understanding. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-26 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/26742 10.5433/1980-511X.2020v15n3p48 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/26742 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1980-511X.2020v15n3p48 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/26742/28738 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista do Direito Público http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista do Direito Público http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Direito Público; v. 15 n. 3 (2020); 48-70 1980-511X reponame:Revista do Direito Público instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Revista do Direito Público |
collection |
Revista do Direito Público |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rdpubuel@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799305932007538688 |