The mandatory vote in Brazil: : critical and comparative analysis
| Autor(a) principal: | |
|---|---|
| Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
| Outros Autores: | |
| Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
| Idioma: | por |
| Título da fonte: | Revista do Direito Público |
| Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/45297 |
Resumo: | This research analyzes mandatory voting in Brazil inlight of the transformations in contemporary society. Therefore, it discusses the evolution of the concept of freedom, from antiquity tomodernity. Next, the 22 countries that have the most consolidated democracies are analyzed – countries that have been continuously since the mid-20th century. XX to the present time. Finally, there is a critical analysis of mandatory voting in Brazil. The deductive method and bibliographical and documentary research are used. It is concluded that the need for Brazil to adopt the optional vote, via amendment to the Constitution, much more suited to the concept of freedom in current times, as well as to democracy in contemporaneity. |
| id |
UEL-2_77086452e44b8591b0656df82fe79b20 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/45297 |
| network_acronym_str |
UEL-2 |
| network_name_str |
Revista do Direito Público |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
The mandatory vote in Brazil: : critical and comparative analysisO voto obrigatório no Brasil:: análise crítica e comparadaDemocracialiberdadevoto obrigatório.democracy; freedom; mandatory vote.This research analyzes mandatory voting in Brazil inlight of the transformations in contemporary society. Therefore, it discusses the evolution of the concept of freedom, from antiquity tomodernity. Next, the 22 countries that have the most consolidated democracies are analyzed – countries that have been continuously since the mid-20th century. XX to the present time. Finally, there is a critical analysis of mandatory voting in Brazil. The deductive method and bibliographical and documentary research are used. It is concluded that the need for Brazil to adopt the optional vote, via amendment to the Constitution, much more suited to the concept of freedom in current times, as well as to democracy in contemporaneity.A presente pesquisa analisa o voto obrigatório no Brasil diante das transformações da sociedade contemporânea. Para tanto, discorre-se sobre a evolução do conceito de liberdade, da antiguidade à modernidade. Na sequência, analisam-se os 22 países que possuem as democracias mais consolidadas – países ininterruptamente desde a metade do séc. XX até os tempos atuais. Por fim, faz-se uma análise crítica do voto obrigatório no Brasil. Utiliza-se o método dedutivo e pesquisa bibliográfica e documental. Conclui-se pela necessidade de o Brasil adotar o voto facultativo, via alteração à Constituição, muito mais adequado ao conceito de liberdade nos tempos atuais, bem como à democracia na contemporaneidade.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2023-12-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/4529710.5433/1980-511X.2023v18n3p186Revista do Direito Público; v. 18 n. 3 (2023); 186-2021980-511Xreponame:Revista do Direito Públicoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/45297/49839Copyright (c) 2023 Revista do Direito Públicohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCorralo, Giovani SilvaCamargo, Liliane de Oliveira2023-12-30T20:59:48Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/45297Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopubPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/oai||rdpubuel@uel.br1980-511X1980-511Xopendoar:2023-12-30T20:59:48Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The mandatory vote in Brazil: : critical and comparative analysis O voto obrigatório no Brasil:: análise crítica e comparada |
| title |
The mandatory vote in Brazil: : critical and comparative analysis |
| spellingShingle |
The mandatory vote in Brazil: : critical and comparative analysis Corralo, Giovani Silva Democracia liberdade voto obrigatório. democracy; freedom; mandatory vote. |
| title_short |
The mandatory vote in Brazil: : critical and comparative analysis |
| title_full |
The mandatory vote in Brazil: : critical and comparative analysis |
| title_fullStr |
The mandatory vote in Brazil: : critical and comparative analysis |
| title_full_unstemmed |
The mandatory vote in Brazil: : critical and comparative analysis |
| title_sort |
The mandatory vote in Brazil: : critical and comparative analysis |
| author |
Corralo, Giovani Silva |
| author_facet |
Corralo, Giovani Silva Camargo, Liliane de Oliveira |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Camargo, Liliane de Oliveira |
| author2_role |
author |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Corralo, Giovani Silva Camargo, Liliane de Oliveira |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Democracia liberdade voto obrigatório. democracy; freedom; mandatory vote. |
| topic |
Democracia liberdade voto obrigatório. democracy; freedom; mandatory vote. |
| description |
This research analyzes mandatory voting in Brazil inlight of the transformations in contemporary society. Therefore, it discusses the evolution of the concept of freedom, from antiquity tomodernity. Next, the 22 countries that have the most consolidated democracies are analyzed – countries that have been continuously since the mid-20th century. XX to the present time. Finally, there is a critical analysis of mandatory voting in Brazil. The deductive method and bibliographical and documentary research are used. It is concluded that the need for Brazil to adopt the optional vote, via amendment to the Constitution, much more suited to the concept of freedom in current times, as well as to democracy in contemporaneity. |
| publishDate |
2023 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-12-30 |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/45297 10.5433/1980-511X.2023v18n3p186 |
| url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/45297 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1980-511X.2023v18n3p186 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
| language |
por |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/45297/49839 |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista do Direito Público http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista do Direito Público http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Direito Público; v. 18 n. 3 (2023); 186-202 1980-511X reponame:Revista do Direito Público instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
| instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
| instacron_str |
UEL |
| institution |
UEL |
| reponame_str |
Revista do Direito Público |
| collection |
Revista do Direito Público |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rdpubuel@uel.br |
| _version_ |
1799305933590888448 |