Partnerships in public administration
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista do Direito Público |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/13932 |
Resumo: | The work is a substantial study of the institutes introduced the managerial reform of the state, covering initially a historical overview, for, as a result, to delve into each of the existing contractual arrangements. The author is optimistic regarding the management model, however, it is firm in emphasizing the need for caution in the use of instruments. At some points, however, the positioning of the author, going against some renowned patriotic lawyers, such as Celso Antonio Bandeira de Mello, which makes severe criticism of the management reform, therefore, understands that although the state is admittedly a bad service is even worse when acting as an oversight entity. The issue is controversial and very current, and, therefore, is treated with particular caution by the author, which holds its position without attacking those who come to reform as a kind of loss of government reins. |
id |
UEL-2_9e6f8354a838184537096b0612fc9122 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/13932 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista do Direito Público |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Partnerships in public administrationParcerias na administração públicaDireito públicoThe work is a substantial study of the institutes introduced the managerial reform of the state, covering initially a historical overview, for, as a result, to delve into each of the existing contractual arrangements. The author is optimistic regarding the management model, however, it is firm in emphasizing the need for caution in the use of instruments. At some points, however, the positioning of the author, going against some renowned patriotic lawyers, such as Celso Antonio Bandeira de Mello, which makes severe criticism of the management reform, therefore, understands that although the state is admittedly a bad service is even worse when acting as an oversight entity. The issue is controversial and very current, and, therefore, is treated with particular caution by the author, which holds its position without attacking those who come to reform as a kind of loss of government reins.A obra é um substancial estudo dos institutos introduzidos pela reforma gerencial do Estado, abordando inicialmente um panorama histórico, para, na sequência, se aprofundar em cada uma das formas contratuais existentes.A autora se mostra otimista em relação ao modelo gerencial, contudo, é firme em ressaltar a necessidade de cautela na utilização dos instrumentos.Em alguns pontos, entretanto, o posicionamento da autora, vai de encontro ao de alguns renomados juristas pátrios, tais como Celso Antônio Bandeira de Mello, que, faz severa crítica à reforma gerencial, pois, entende que, embora o Estado seja reconhecidamente um mau prestador de serviços, é pior ainda quando age na qualidade de ente fiscalizador.A temática é polêmica e bastante atual, e, por isso mesmo, é tratado com peculiar cautela pela autora, que sustenta seu posicionamento sem atacar aqueles que vêm a reforma como uma espécie de perda das rédeas de governo.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2013-12-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/1393210.5433/1980-511X.2013v8n3p253Revista do Direito Público; v. 8 n. 3 (2013); 253-2551980-511Xreponame:Revista do Direito Públicoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/13932/13754Monteiro, Philippe Antonio Azedoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2015-12-18T20:14:43Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/13932Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopubPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/oai||rdpubuel@uel.br1980-511X1980-511Xopendoar:2015-12-18T20:14:43Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Partnerships in public administration Parcerias na administração pública |
title |
Partnerships in public administration |
spellingShingle |
Partnerships in public administration Monteiro, Philippe Antonio Azedo Direito público |
title_short |
Partnerships in public administration |
title_full |
Partnerships in public administration |
title_fullStr |
Partnerships in public administration |
title_full_unstemmed |
Partnerships in public administration |
title_sort |
Partnerships in public administration |
author |
Monteiro, Philippe Antonio Azedo |
author_facet |
Monteiro, Philippe Antonio Azedo |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Monteiro, Philippe Antonio Azedo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Direito público |
topic |
Direito público |
description |
The work is a substantial study of the institutes introduced the managerial reform of the state, covering initially a historical overview, for, as a result, to delve into each of the existing contractual arrangements. The author is optimistic regarding the management model, however, it is firm in emphasizing the need for caution in the use of instruments. At some points, however, the positioning of the author, going against some renowned patriotic lawyers, such as Celso Antonio Bandeira de Mello, which makes severe criticism of the management reform, therefore, understands that although the state is admittedly a bad service is even worse when acting as an oversight entity. The issue is controversial and very current, and, therefore, is treated with particular caution by the author, which holds its position without attacking those who come to reform as a kind of loss of government reins. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-12-12 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado por Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/13932 10.5433/1980-511X.2013v8n3p253 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/13932 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1980-511X.2013v8n3p253 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/13932/13754 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Direito Público; v. 8 n. 3 (2013); 253-255 1980-511X reponame:Revista do Direito Público instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Revista do Direito Público |
collection |
Revista do Direito Público |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rdpubuel@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799305930913873920 |