Dialogue between cuts: complementarity of the ISHR in the institutional protection of LGBTI+ people

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Amaro de Sousa, João Matheus
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Melo Franco de Moraes Bahia, Alexandre Gustavo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista do Direito Público
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/43467
Resumo: The combination of the legislative omission to imple-ment the constitutional and conventional command to criminalize homotransphobia with the conjuncture of violence against LGBTI+ people or those identified as such gave rise to the filing of the Direct Action of Unconstitutionality for Omission n. 26 / DF and Injunction Order no. 4733. The Supreme Federal Court, when considering the case, decided to recognize the unconstitutional omission and determined the application of Law no. 7.716 / 89, as well as art. 121, §2o, I, of the Penal Code. Thus, the research has the general objective of analyzing the essentiality of the interaction between the various organs of the inter-American system for the effective institutional protection of minorities or groups in situations of sexual vulnerability. To test the hypothesis, bibliographical and documentary research and the hypothetical-deductive method are developed. It is concluded that the construction of the concept of racism was the dialogical and interpretative way to “criminalize” the homotransphobic discriminatory practice.
id UEL-2_adb2ba9df6b7e48c29458f0d28847fcf
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/43467
network_acronym_str UEL-2
network_name_str Revista do Direito Público
repository_id_str
spelling Dialogue between cuts: complementarity of the ISHR in the institutional protection of LGBTI+ people Diálogo entre cortes: complementaridade do SIDH na proteção institucional das pessoas LGBTI+Criminalização da homotransfobiaOmissão inconstitucionalFunção contramajoritáriaDiálogo interjurisdicionalSistema Interamericano.criminalization of homotransphobia; unconstitutional omission; countermajoritarian function; inter-jurisdictional dia- logue; inter-american system.The combination of the legislative omission to imple-ment the constitutional and conventional command to criminalize homotransphobia with the conjuncture of violence against LGBTI+ people or those identified as such gave rise to the filing of the Direct Action of Unconstitutionality for Omission n. 26 / DF and Injunction Order no. 4733. The Supreme Federal Court, when considering the case, decided to recognize the unconstitutional omission and determined the application of Law no. 7.716 / 89, as well as art. 121, §2o, I, of the Penal Code. Thus, the research has the general objective of analyzing the essentiality of the interaction between the various organs of the inter-American system for the effective institutional protection of minorities or groups in situations of sexual vulnerability. To test the hypothesis, bibliographical and documentary research and the hypothetical-deductive method are developed. It is concluded that the construction of the concept of racism was the dialogical and interpretative way to “criminalize” the homotransphobic discriminatory practice.A combinação da omissão legislativa em implementar o mandamento constitucional e convencional de criminalização da homotransfobia com a conjuntura de violência às pessoas LGBTI+ ou identificadas como tal ensejaram o ajuizamento da Ação Direta de Inconstitucionalidade por Omissão n. 26/DF e do Mandado de Injunção n. 4733. O Supremo Tribunal Federal, ao apreciar a causa, decidiu por reconhecer a omissão inconstitucional e determinou a aplicação da Lei n. 7.716/89, assim como do art. 121, §2º, I, do Código Penal. Assim, a pesquisa tem como objetivo geral analisar a essencialidade da interação entre os diversos órgãos do sistema interamericano para a efetiva proteção institucional das minorias ou dos grupos em situação de vulnerabilidade sexual. Para testar a hipótese, desenvolve-se pesquisa bibliográfica e documental e do método hipotético-dedutivo. Chega-se à conclusão de que a construção do conceito de racismo foi o caminho dialógico e interpretativo para “criminalizar” a prática discriminatória homotransfóbica.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2023-09-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/4346710.5433/1980-511X.2023v18n2p119Revista do Direito Público; v. 18 n. 2 (2023); 119-1391980-511Xreponame:Revista do Direito Públicoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/43467/49339Copyright (c) 2023 Revista do Direito Públicohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAmaro de Sousa, João MatheusMelo Franco de Moraes Bahia, Alexandre Gustavo2023-09-12T17:29:00Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/43467Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopubPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/oai||rdpubuel@uel.br1980-511X1980-511Xopendoar:2023-09-12T17:29Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Dialogue between cuts: complementarity of the ISHR in the institutional protection of LGBTI+ people
Diálogo entre cortes: complementaridade do SIDH na proteção institucional das pessoas LGBTI+
title Dialogue between cuts: complementarity of the ISHR in the institutional protection of LGBTI+ people
spellingShingle Dialogue between cuts: complementarity of the ISHR in the institutional protection of LGBTI+ people
Amaro de Sousa, João Matheus
Criminalização da homotransfobia
Omissão inconstitucional
Função contramajoritária
Diálogo interjurisdicional
Sistema Interamericano.
criminalization of homotransphobia; unconstitutional omission; countermajoritarian function; inter-jurisdictional dia- logue; inter-american system.
title_short Dialogue between cuts: complementarity of the ISHR in the institutional protection of LGBTI+ people
title_full Dialogue between cuts: complementarity of the ISHR in the institutional protection of LGBTI+ people
title_fullStr Dialogue between cuts: complementarity of the ISHR in the institutional protection of LGBTI+ people
title_full_unstemmed Dialogue between cuts: complementarity of the ISHR in the institutional protection of LGBTI+ people
title_sort Dialogue between cuts: complementarity of the ISHR in the institutional protection of LGBTI+ people
author Amaro de Sousa, João Matheus
author_facet Amaro de Sousa, João Matheus
Melo Franco de Moraes Bahia, Alexandre Gustavo
author_role author
author2 Melo Franco de Moraes Bahia, Alexandre Gustavo
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Amaro de Sousa, João Matheus
Melo Franco de Moraes Bahia, Alexandre Gustavo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Criminalização da homotransfobia
Omissão inconstitucional
Função contramajoritária
Diálogo interjurisdicional
Sistema Interamericano.
criminalization of homotransphobia; unconstitutional omission; countermajoritarian function; inter-jurisdictional dia- logue; inter-american system.
topic Criminalização da homotransfobia
Omissão inconstitucional
Função contramajoritária
Diálogo interjurisdicional
Sistema Interamericano.
criminalization of homotransphobia; unconstitutional omission; countermajoritarian function; inter-jurisdictional dia- logue; inter-american system.
description The combination of the legislative omission to imple-ment the constitutional and conventional command to criminalize homotransphobia with the conjuncture of violence against LGBTI+ people or those identified as such gave rise to the filing of the Direct Action of Unconstitutionality for Omission n. 26 / DF and Injunction Order no. 4733. The Supreme Federal Court, when considering the case, decided to recognize the unconstitutional omission and determined the application of Law no. 7.716 / 89, as well as art. 121, §2o, I, of the Penal Code. Thus, the research has the general objective of analyzing the essentiality of the interaction between the various organs of the inter-American system for the effective institutional protection of minorities or groups in situations of sexual vulnerability. To test the hypothesis, bibliographical and documentary research and the hypothetical-deductive method are developed. It is concluded that the construction of the concept of racism was the dialogical and interpretative way to “criminalize” the homotransphobic discriminatory practice.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-09-03
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/43467
10.5433/1980-511X.2023v18n2p119
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/43467
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1980-511X.2023v18n2p119
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/43467/49339
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Revista do Direito Público
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Revista do Direito Público
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista do Direito Público; v. 18 n. 2 (2023); 119-139
1980-511X
reponame:Revista do Direito Público
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Revista do Direito Público
collection Revista do Direito Público
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rdpubuel@uel.br
_version_ 1799305933536362496

Registros relacionados