Critical analysis of complementary law nº. 24/75 through the prism of the fundamental precept of democracy
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2009 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista do Direito Público |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/10870 |
Resumo: | This paper aims to do a critical analysis of complementary law nº. 24/75 through the prism of the brazilian democratic state, which recognized ostensibly the democracy as a cornerstone of the Federative Republic of Brazil. It starts bringing preliminary notes about the national legal and tax system addresing and definig the legal norm and the hierarchy that exists between them. In this line, the paper shows the role played by the constitution as a fundamental law, notably on tax matter, clarifying also the function that the complementary law has in this context.It is noted the influence of the democratic principle in the structuring of the brazilian state showing after considerations summarized about the tax on transactions related to the movement of goods. The work analyzes the general rules that regulates the tax treated with an emphasys on complementary law nº. 24/75, which provides for the signing of agreements granting exemptions and tax benefits. Finally, we analyze the contrast between the requirements contained in the latter and the fundamental precept of democracy adopted in brazilian state. |
id |
UEL-2_bca20992ed97fc5a835235a9465af72e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/10870 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista do Direito Público |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Critical analysis of complementary law nº. 24/75 through the prism of the fundamental precept of democracyAnálise crítica à lei complementar nº. 24/75 sob o prisma do preceito fundamental da democraciaComplementary law nº.24/75ICMSAgreementsDemocracy.Lei complementar nº 24/75ICMSConvêniosDemocracia.This paper aims to do a critical analysis of complementary law nº. 24/75 through the prism of the brazilian democratic state, which recognized ostensibly the democracy as a cornerstone of the Federative Republic of Brazil. It starts bringing preliminary notes about the national legal and tax system addresing and definig the legal norm and the hierarchy that exists between them. In this line, the paper shows the role played by the constitution as a fundamental law, notably on tax matter, clarifying also the function that the complementary law has in this context.It is noted the influence of the democratic principle in the structuring of the brazilian state showing after considerations summarized about the tax on transactions related to the movement of goods. The work analyzes the general rules that regulates the tax treated with an emphasys on complementary law nº. 24/75, which provides for the signing of agreements granting exemptions and tax benefits. Finally, we analyze the contrast between the requirements contained in the latter and the fundamental precept of democracy adopted in brazilian state.Objetiva tecer análise crítica à Lei Complementar nº. 24/75 sob a luz do Estado Democrático brasileiro, que reconheceu de forma ostensiva a democracia como pedra angular da República Federativa do Brasil. Inicia-se trazendo apontamentos preliminares acerca do sistema jurídico-tributário nacional, abordando e delimitando as normas jurídicas e a hierarquia que existe entre elas. Nesta linha, aduz sobre o papel desempenhado pela Constituição como diploma fundamental, notadamente em matéria tributária, esclarecendo, ainda, a função que tem a lei complementar neste contexto. Observa a influência do princípio democrático na estruturação do Estado brasileiro, traçando, após, considerações resumidas acerca do imposto sobre operações relativas à circulação de mercadorias. Examina as normas gerais disciplinadoras do tributo em apreço, com especial ênfase à Lei Complementar nº 24/75, que dispõe sobre a celebração de convênios para concessão de isenções e benefícios fiscais. Finalmente, analisa o contraste existente entre as exigências contidas na última e o preceito fundamental da democracia, adotado no Estado brasileiro.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2009-12-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/1087010.5433/1980-511X.2009v4n3p50Revista do Direito Público; v. 4 n. 3 (2009); 50 - 701980-511Xreponame:Revista do Direito Públicoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/10870/9495Leal Júnior, João CarlosFreitas Filho, Julio Cesar deinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2017-03-16T16:44:26Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/10870Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopubPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/oai||rdpubuel@uel.br1980-511X1980-511Xopendoar:2017-03-16T16:44:26Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Critical analysis of complementary law nº. 24/75 through the prism of the fundamental precept of democracy Análise crítica à lei complementar nº. 24/75 sob o prisma do preceito fundamental da democracia |
title |
Critical analysis of complementary law nº. 24/75 through the prism of the fundamental precept of democracy |
spellingShingle |
Critical analysis of complementary law nº. 24/75 through the prism of the fundamental precept of democracy Leal Júnior, João Carlos Complementary law nº.24/75 ICMS Agreements Democracy. Lei complementar nº 24/75 ICMS Convênios Democracia. |
title_short |
Critical analysis of complementary law nº. 24/75 through the prism of the fundamental precept of democracy |
title_full |
Critical analysis of complementary law nº. 24/75 through the prism of the fundamental precept of democracy |
title_fullStr |
Critical analysis of complementary law nº. 24/75 through the prism of the fundamental precept of democracy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Critical analysis of complementary law nº. 24/75 through the prism of the fundamental precept of democracy |
title_sort |
Critical analysis of complementary law nº. 24/75 through the prism of the fundamental precept of democracy |
author |
Leal Júnior, João Carlos |
author_facet |
Leal Júnior, João Carlos Freitas Filho, Julio Cesar de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Freitas Filho, Julio Cesar de |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Leal Júnior, João Carlos Freitas Filho, Julio Cesar de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Complementary law nº.24/75 ICMS Agreements Democracy. Lei complementar nº 24/75 ICMS Convênios Democracia. |
topic |
Complementary law nº.24/75 ICMS Agreements Democracy. Lei complementar nº 24/75 ICMS Convênios Democracia. |
description |
This paper aims to do a critical analysis of complementary law nº. 24/75 through the prism of the brazilian democratic state, which recognized ostensibly the democracy as a cornerstone of the Federative Republic of Brazil. It starts bringing preliminary notes about the national legal and tax system addresing and definig the legal norm and the hierarchy that exists between them. In this line, the paper shows the role played by the constitution as a fundamental law, notably on tax matter, clarifying also the function that the complementary law has in this context.It is noted the influence of the democratic principle in the structuring of the brazilian state showing after considerations summarized about the tax on transactions related to the movement of goods. The work analyzes the general rules that regulates the tax treated with an emphasys on complementary law nº. 24/75, which provides for the signing of agreements granting exemptions and tax benefits. Finally, we analyze the contrast between the requirements contained in the latter and the fundamental precept of democracy adopted in brazilian state. |
publishDate |
2009 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2009-12-15 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/10870 10.5433/1980-511X.2009v4n3p50 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/10870 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1980-511X.2009v4n3p50 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/10870/9495 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Direito Público; v. 4 n. 3 (2009); 50 - 70 1980-511X reponame:Revista do Direito Público instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Revista do Direito Público |
collection |
Revista do Direito Público |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rdpubuel@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799305930036215808 |