Lia's role in minimizing inneficient beavior

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Seger de Camargo, Patrícia Maria
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Oliveira, Celmar Corrêa de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista do Direito Público
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/26636
Resumo: Public Administration needs ethical values and legal instruments to prevent or minimize inexcusable administrative errors. This research is based on the Brazilian Administrative Misconduct Act and aims at diagnosing public officials’ conduct liable for culpable administrative impropriety and also analyzing how the Brazilian Administrative Misconduct Act can help to minimize inefficient behavior. The paper presents a structural analysis of the Brazilian Administrative Misconduct Act and verifies which conducts in the statute allow culpable behavior. Next, it presents actions and behaviors collected in cases judged in the Court of Justice of Rio Grande do Sul state, in the period between 01/01/2010 and 12/19/2015, held accountable for culpable action or omission. The analysis identifies the causes of culpable actions. The research has a qualitative approach and the material used is from indirect sources. Finally, the research allowed the identification of a weak point affecting the operational efficiency and the presentation of how the 8.429/92 act clearly exhibits the preventive functionalities, undertaking the function of an educative law tool in the normative ethics field.
id UEL-2_c99edcd4520fed0b42885244b177419d
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/26636
network_acronym_str UEL-2
network_name_str Revista do Direito Público
repository_id_str
spelling Lia's role in minimizing inneficient beaviorO papel da lei de improbidade administrativa para a minimização de condutas ineficientesLaw. Malpractice. Guilt. Exchecker. Inneficiency.Direito. Improbidade. Culpa. Erário. Ineficiência.Public Administration needs ethical values and legal instruments to prevent or minimize inexcusable administrative errors. This research is based on the Brazilian Administrative Misconduct Act and aims at diagnosing public officials’ conduct liable for culpable administrative impropriety and also analyzing how the Brazilian Administrative Misconduct Act can help to minimize inefficient behavior. The paper presents a structural analysis of the Brazilian Administrative Misconduct Act and verifies which conducts in the statute allow culpable behavior. Next, it presents actions and behaviors collected in cases judged in the Court of Justice of Rio Grande do Sul state, in the period between 01/01/2010 and 12/19/2015, held accountable for culpable action or omission. The analysis identifies the causes of culpable actions. The research has a qualitative approach and the material used is from indirect sources. Finally, the research allowed the identification of a weak point affecting the operational efficiency and the presentation of how the 8.429/92 act clearly exhibits the preventive functionalities, undertaking the function of an educative law tool in the normative ethics field.A Administração Pública precisa de valores éticos e de instrumentos jurídicos que previnam ou minimizem erros administrativos inescusáveis. A presente pesquisa fundamenta-se na Lei de Improbidade Administrativa brasileira e visa diagnosticar condutas de agentes públicos responsabilizados por improbidade administrativa culposa, bem como analisar como a Lei de Improbidade Administrativa brasileira pode contribuir para minimizar condutas ineficientes. O trabalho apresenta uma análise estrutural da Lei de Improbidade Administrativa brasileira e verifica quais condutas previstas no diploma legal admitem forma culposa. Na sequência apresenta condutas coletadas em julgados do Tribunal de Justiça do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul, no período compreendido entre 01/01/2010 e 19/12/2015, responsabilizadas por ação ou omissão culposa. Na análise de resultados, identifica as causas dessas condutas culposas. A abordagem da pesquisa é qualitativa, e o material utilizado são fontes indiretas. Nas conclusões, a pesquisa permitiu identificar o ponto de fraqueza que atinge a eficiência funcional e apresenta de que modo a Lei 8.429/92 explicita funcionalidades preventivas, assumindo função de ferramenta jurídica educativa no campo ético normativoUniversidade Estadual de Londrina2018-04-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/2663610.5433/1980-511X.2018v13n1p42Revista do Direito Público; v. 13 n. 1 (2018); 42-691980-511Xreponame:Revista do Direito Públicoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/26636/23474Copyright (c) 2018 Revista do Direito Públicoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSeger de Camargo, Patrícia MariaOliveira, Celmar Corrêa de2018-04-27T16:19:03Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/26636Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopubPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/oai||rdpubuel@uel.br1980-511X1980-511Xopendoar:2018-04-27T16:19:03Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Lia's role in minimizing inneficient beavior
O papel da lei de improbidade administrativa para a minimização de condutas ineficientes
title Lia's role in minimizing inneficient beavior
spellingShingle Lia's role in minimizing inneficient beavior
Seger de Camargo, Patrícia Maria
Law. Malpractice. Guilt. Exchecker. Inneficiency.
Direito. Improbidade. Culpa. Erário. Ineficiência.
title_short Lia's role in minimizing inneficient beavior
title_full Lia's role in minimizing inneficient beavior
title_fullStr Lia's role in minimizing inneficient beavior
title_full_unstemmed Lia's role in minimizing inneficient beavior
title_sort Lia's role in minimizing inneficient beavior
author Seger de Camargo, Patrícia Maria
author_facet Seger de Camargo, Patrícia Maria
Oliveira, Celmar Corrêa de
author_role author
author2 Oliveira, Celmar Corrêa de
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Seger de Camargo, Patrícia Maria
Oliveira, Celmar Corrêa de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Law. Malpractice. Guilt. Exchecker. Inneficiency.
Direito. Improbidade. Culpa. Erário. Ineficiência.
topic Law. Malpractice. Guilt. Exchecker. Inneficiency.
Direito. Improbidade. Culpa. Erário. Ineficiência.
description Public Administration needs ethical values and legal instruments to prevent or minimize inexcusable administrative errors. This research is based on the Brazilian Administrative Misconduct Act and aims at diagnosing public officials’ conduct liable for culpable administrative impropriety and also analyzing how the Brazilian Administrative Misconduct Act can help to minimize inefficient behavior. The paper presents a structural analysis of the Brazilian Administrative Misconduct Act and verifies which conducts in the statute allow culpable behavior. Next, it presents actions and behaviors collected in cases judged in the Court of Justice of Rio Grande do Sul state, in the period between 01/01/2010 and 12/19/2015, held accountable for culpable action or omission. The analysis identifies the causes of culpable actions. The research has a qualitative approach and the material used is from indirect sources. Finally, the research allowed the identification of a weak point affecting the operational efficiency and the presentation of how the 8.429/92 act clearly exhibits the preventive functionalities, undertaking the function of an educative law tool in the normative ethics field.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-04-27
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/26636
10.5433/1980-511X.2018v13n1p42
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/26636
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1980-511X.2018v13n1p42
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/26636/23474
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista do Direito Público
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista do Direito Público
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista do Direito Público; v. 13 n. 1 (2018); 42-69
1980-511X
reponame:Revista do Direito Público
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Revista do Direito Público
collection Revista do Direito Público
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rdpubuel@uel.br
_version_ 1799305932005441536

Registros relacionados