BNDS from the liberalism and the neorroman republicanism of Philip Pettit perspective
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista do Direito Público |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/34455 |
Resumo: | This research analyzes the behavior of the National Bank for Economic and Social Development (BNDES), based on two doctrinal conceptions: liberalism and republicanism. These schools of thought represent different approaches of the concept of freedom. As a result, the understanding of this subject-matter can help in promoting new ideas in the realm of the BNDES. Furthermore, neo-Roman republicanism will also be analyzed, especially the works of Philip Pettit and his premises for the construction of a contested democracy. In order to analyze this subject, this paper used the deductive method, where, with use of general concepts, concrete explanations are made in regards to the behavior of BNDES. Some points were highlighted in the conclusion of this research: a) there was a lack of state planning aimed at national development, b) there was a lack of transparent actions and publicity for the reasons that led to the granting of investments and loans; c) some factors reveal the presence of arbitrariness and state domination towards the citizen, making it essential to change the direction of the Public Bank actions, so that the individual may choose to contest actions that diverge from the public interest. |
id |
UEL-2_e141b653e47bdbce8396def84b44cf41 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/34455 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista do Direito Público |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
BNDS from the liberalism and the neorroman republicanism of Philip Pettit perspectiveO BNDES nas visões de liberalismo e do republicanismo neorromano de Philip PettitBNDES. Liberalism. Republicanism. Philip Pettit. Public interest.BNDES. Liberalismo. Republicanismo. Philip Pettit. Interesse Público.This research analyzes the behavior of the National Bank for Economic and Social Development (BNDES), based on two doctrinal conceptions: liberalism and republicanism. These schools of thought represent different approaches of the concept of freedom. As a result, the understanding of this subject-matter can help in promoting new ideas in the realm of the BNDES. Furthermore, neo-Roman republicanism will also be analyzed, especially the works of Philip Pettit and his premises for the construction of a contested democracy. In order to analyze this subject, this paper used the deductive method, where, with use of general concepts, concrete explanations are made in regards to the behavior of BNDES. Some points were highlighted in the conclusion of this research: a) there was a lack of state planning aimed at national development, b) there was a lack of transparent actions and publicity for the reasons that led to the granting of investments and loans; c) some factors reveal the presence of arbitrariness and state domination towards the citizen, making it essential to change the direction of the Public Bank actions, so that the individual may choose to contest actions that diverge from the public interest.Esta pesquisa pretendeu analisar o comportamento do Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimento Econômico e Social, a partir de duas concepções doutrinárias que se destacam: o liberalismo e o republicanismo. Tais correntes de pensamento apresentam abordagens distintas no que tange ao conceito de liberdade, e suas apresentações trazem contribuições importantes para o estudo daquele Banco Público. Especialmente no que se refere ao republicanismo, o chamado republicanismo neorromano será objeto de maior estudo, especialmente o desenvolvimento doutrinário de Philip Pettit e suas premissas para a construção de uma democracia contestatória. Para tanto, optou-se pela utilização do método de abordagem dedutivo, onde por meio dos conceitos gerais, serão feitas aplicações concretas no comportamento do BNDES. Alguns pontos se destacaram na conclusão da pesquisa: a) verificou-se a ausência de um planejamento estatal voltado ao desenvolvimento nacional, b) carência de ações transparentes e de publicidade nos motivos que culminaram com a concessão de investimentos e empréstimos; c) estão presentes alguns fatores que revelam a presença de arbitrariedades e de dominação estatal para com o cidadão, tornando-se imprescindível a mudança no direcionamento da conduta do Banco Público para que o particular tenha condições de contestar as ações que divergem do interesse público.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2020-08-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/3445510.5433/1980-511X.2020v15n1p26Revista do Direito Público; v. 15 n. 1 (2020); 26-451980-511Xreponame:Revista do Direito Públicoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/34455/27268Copyright (c) 2020 Revista do Direito Públicoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMálaque, Déborah de MeiraStriquer Soares, Marcos Antonio2020-08-31T11:46:09Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/34455Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopubPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/oai||rdpubuel@uel.br1980-511X1980-511Xopendoar:2020-08-31T11:46:09Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
BNDS from the liberalism and the neorroman republicanism of Philip Pettit perspective O BNDES nas visões de liberalismo e do republicanismo neorromano de Philip Pettit |
title |
BNDS from the liberalism and the neorroman republicanism of Philip Pettit perspective |
spellingShingle |
BNDS from the liberalism and the neorroman republicanism of Philip Pettit perspective Málaque, Déborah de Meira BNDES. Liberalism. Republicanism. Philip Pettit. Public interest. BNDES. Liberalismo. Republicanismo. Philip Pettit. Interesse Público. |
title_short |
BNDS from the liberalism and the neorroman republicanism of Philip Pettit perspective |
title_full |
BNDS from the liberalism and the neorroman republicanism of Philip Pettit perspective |
title_fullStr |
BNDS from the liberalism and the neorroman republicanism of Philip Pettit perspective |
title_full_unstemmed |
BNDS from the liberalism and the neorroman republicanism of Philip Pettit perspective |
title_sort |
BNDS from the liberalism and the neorroman republicanism of Philip Pettit perspective |
author |
Málaque, Déborah de Meira |
author_facet |
Málaque, Déborah de Meira Striquer Soares, Marcos Antonio |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Striquer Soares, Marcos Antonio |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Málaque, Déborah de Meira Striquer Soares, Marcos Antonio |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
BNDES. Liberalism. Republicanism. Philip Pettit. Public interest. BNDES. Liberalismo. Republicanismo. Philip Pettit. Interesse Público. |
topic |
BNDES. Liberalism. Republicanism. Philip Pettit. Public interest. BNDES. Liberalismo. Republicanismo. Philip Pettit. Interesse Público. |
description |
This research analyzes the behavior of the National Bank for Economic and Social Development (BNDES), based on two doctrinal conceptions: liberalism and republicanism. These schools of thought represent different approaches of the concept of freedom. As a result, the understanding of this subject-matter can help in promoting new ideas in the realm of the BNDES. Furthermore, neo-Roman republicanism will also be analyzed, especially the works of Philip Pettit and his premises for the construction of a contested democracy. In order to analyze this subject, this paper used the deductive method, where, with use of general concepts, concrete explanations are made in regards to the behavior of BNDES. Some points were highlighted in the conclusion of this research: a) there was a lack of state planning aimed at national development, b) there was a lack of transparent actions and publicity for the reasons that led to the granting of investments and loans; c) some factors reveal the presence of arbitrariness and state domination towards the citizen, making it essential to change the direction of the Public Bank actions, so that the individual may choose to contest actions that diverge from the public interest. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-08-31 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/34455 10.5433/1980-511X.2020v15n1p26 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/34455 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1980-511X.2020v15n1p26 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/34455/27268 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista do Direito Público info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista do Direito Público |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Direito Público; v. 15 n. 1 (2020); 26-45 1980-511X reponame:Revista do Direito Público instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Revista do Direito Público |
collection |
Revista do Direito Público |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rdpubuel@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799305932930285568 |