Constitutional jurisdiction and normative control in defense of the federative pact in Brazil’s Constitution of 1988

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bastos, Elísio Augusto Velloso
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Amador, Joseane do Socorro de Sousa
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista do Direito Público
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/37361
Resumo: This paper examines constitutionality control as an instrument for defending the federative pact established by the Brazilian Constitution of 1988. This paper examines constitutional jurisdiction because it is important in safeguarding Brazil’s state formation as agreed in the Constitution of 1988. Moreover, this study explores the limits of the Constitutional Court as a body responsible for providing the jurisdiction and the restricted possibilities of intervention by the Union in issues of State autonomy. Moreover, it investigates the limits of Legislative activity vis-à-vis the autonomy principle of the entities of the Federation. This research is qualitative in nature and utilizes literature review and documentary analysis. This paper concludes that the most effective form of constitutional control, as a tool for upholding the federative pact, is abstract control with the Supreme Court as the competent and legitimate body for resolving constitutional conflicts that may threaten the autonomy of the Federated States.
id UEL-2_e63fc22fed02b82c8483d35883d58baf
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/37361
network_acronym_str UEL-2
network_name_str Revista do Direito Público
repository_id_str
spelling Constitutional jurisdiction and normative control in defense of the federative pact in Brazil’s Constitution of 1988Jurisdição constitucional e controle normativo na defesa do pacto federativo na constituição brasileira de 1988Constitutional Jurisdiction. Federal Pact. Supreme Court.Jurisdição ConstitucionalPacto FederativoSuprema Corte.This paper examines constitutionality control as an instrument for defending the federative pact established by the Brazilian Constitution of 1988. This paper examines constitutional jurisdiction because it is important in safeguarding Brazil’s state formation as agreed in the Constitution of 1988. Moreover, this study explores the limits of the Constitutional Court as a body responsible for providing the jurisdiction and the restricted possibilities of intervention by the Union in issues of State autonomy. Moreover, it investigates the limits of Legislative activity vis-à-vis the autonomy principle of the entities of the Federation. This research is qualitative in nature and utilizes literature review and documentary analysis. This paper concludes that the most effective form of constitutional control, as a tool for upholding the federative pact, is abstract control with the Supreme Court as the competent and legitimate body for resolving constitutional conflicts that may threaten the autonomy of the Federated States.O presente artigo trabalha o controle de constitucionalidade como instrumento de defesa do pacto federativo firmado na Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil de 1988 (CRFB/1988). Justifica-se pela importância da existência de uma jurisdição constitucional competente para resguardar o funcionamento do Estado acordado na CRFB/1988, considerando os limites da Corte Constitucional como órgão responsável pela prestação da jurisdição, bem como as possibilidades restritas de intervenção da União na autonomia dos Estados e os limites da atividade Legislativa frente ao princípio da autonomia dos entes da Federação. A pesquisa é de abordagem qualitativa, tendo como procedimento o levantamento bibliográfico e documental. Conclui-se que, no Brasil, a forma mais eficaz de controle de constitucionalidade como instrumento de defesa do pacto federativo é o controle abstrato via Suprema Corte como o órgão competente e legítimo para dirimir conflitos constitucionais que possam ameaçar a autonomia dos Estados Federados.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2020-12-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/3736110.5433/1980-511X.2020v15n3p142Revista do Direito Público; v. 15 n. 3 (2020); 142-1611980-511Xreponame:Revista do Direito Públicoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/37361/28745Copyright (c) 2020 Revista do Direito Públicoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBastos, Elísio Augusto VellosoAmador, Joseane do Socorro de Sousa2020-12-26T14:49:01Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/37361Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopubPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/oai||rdpubuel@uel.br1980-511X1980-511Xopendoar:2020-12-26T14:49:01Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Constitutional jurisdiction and normative control in defense of the federative pact in Brazil’s Constitution of 1988
Jurisdição constitucional e controle normativo na defesa do pacto federativo na constituição brasileira de 1988
title Constitutional jurisdiction and normative control in defense of the federative pact in Brazil’s Constitution of 1988
spellingShingle Constitutional jurisdiction and normative control in defense of the federative pact in Brazil’s Constitution of 1988
Bastos, Elísio Augusto Velloso
Constitutional Jurisdiction. Federal Pact. Supreme Court.
Jurisdição Constitucional
Pacto Federativo
Suprema Corte.
title_short Constitutional jurisdiction and normative control in defense of the federative pact in Brazil’s Constitution of 1988
title_full Constitutional jurisdiction and normative control in defense of the federative pact in Brazil’s Constitution of 1988
title_fullStr Constitutional jurisdiction and normative control in defense of the federative pact in Brazil’s Constitution of 1988
title_full_unstemmed Constitutional jurisdiction and normative control in defense of the federative pact in Brazil’s Constitution of 1988
title_sort Constitutional jurisdiction and normative control in defense of the federative pact in Brazil’s Constitution of 1988
author Bastos, Elísio Augusto Velloso
author_facet Bastos, Elísio Augusto Velloso
Amador, Joseane do Socorro de Sousa
author_role author
author2 Amador, Joseane do Socorro de Sousa
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bastos, Elísio Augusto Velloso
Amador, Joseane do Socorro de Sousa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Constitutional Jurisdiction. Federal Pact. Supreme Court.
Jurisdição Constitucional
Pacto Federativo
Suprema Corte.
topic Constitutional Jurisdiction. Federal Pact. Supreme Court.
Jurisdição Constitucional
Pacto Federativo
Suprema Corte.
description This paper examines constitutionality control as an instrument for defending the federative pact established by the Brazilian Constitution of 1988. This paper examines constitutional jurisdiction because it is important in safeguarding Brazil’s state formation as agreed in the Constitution of 1988. Moreover, this study explores the limits of the Constitutional Court as a body responsible for providing the jurisdiction and the restricted possibilities of intervention by the Union in issues of State autonomy. Moreover, it investigates the limits of Legislative activity vis-à-vis the autonomy principle of the entities of the Federation. This research is qualitative in nature and utilizes literature review and documentary analysis. This paper concludes that the most effective form of constitutional control, as a tool for upholding the federative pact, is abstract control with the Supreme Court as the competent and legitimate body for resolving constitutional conflicts that may threaten the autonomy of the Federated States.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-26
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/37361
10.5433/1980-511X.2020v15n3p142
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/37361
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1980-511X.2020v15n3p142
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/37361/28745
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista do Direito Público
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista do Direito Público
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista do Direito Público; v. 15 n. 3 (2020); 142-161
1980-511X
reponame:Revista do Direito Público
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Revista do Direito Público
collection Revista do Direito Público
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rdpubuel@uel.br
_version_ 1799305933006831616

Registros relacionados