The law of biosecurity under the boarding of the discourse ethics

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ferraro, Valkíria Aparecida Lopes
Data de Publicação: 2007
Outros Autores: Oliveira, Simone Vinhas de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Scientia Iuris (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/4120
Resumo: The biotechnology activity indicates a perspective to social and ecosystems modifications with improvidence about the results of these alterations. This involves ethical-legal topics, therefore, denotes risks for the contemporary society. The creation of public spaces with popular participation means a procedural proposal of control the possible imposes of the biotechnological activity and intend suppress the temerity. In this way, the discoursive ethics represent a key part of a project of democratic radicalization for which they are valid and accepted norms as universal state, this will in the biotechnological development - Universal Principle. And this will, as a rational will defined by the intersubjectiv of the communicative rationality, will only follow a norm if it will be universal in the measure and all the sectors interested in the biotechnological development to participate of the speeches - Principle of the Speech. For Habermas, the grounded discoursive norms make to be valid for two topics: the knowledge of something that exist in each moment and the every one interest, and also the general will that learned, without pressure, the will of everyone. With all those fundaments, it is able to have thoughts about the effect of the Biosecurity Law - the creation of one discretionary power to regulate the biotechnology activities thought CTNBio and the absence of regulation of the CNBS. These facts are asymmetric for the actual democratic stander and make unable the process of democratic radicalization.
id UEL-6_0c928e828f3c89b6315c9664fccadbff
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/4120
network_acronym_str UEL-6
network_name_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The law of biosecurity under the boarding of the discourse ethicsA lei de biossegurança sob a abordagem da ética discursivaBiotechnologicaldemocracycommunicative actiondiscoursive ethicsbiosecurity.Biotecnológicademocraciaação comunicativaética discursivabiossegurança.The biotechnology activity indicates a perspective to social and ecosystems modifications with improvidence about the results of these alterations. This involves ethical-legal topics, therefore, denotes risks for the contemporary society. The creation of public spaces with popular participation means a procedural proposal of control the possible imposes of the biotechnological activity and intend suppress the temerity. In this way, the discoursive ethics represent a key part of a project of democratic radicalization for which they are valid and accepted norms as universal state, this will in the biotechnological development - Universal Principle. And this will, as a rational will defined by the intersubjectiv of the communicative rationality, will only follow a norm if it will be universal in the measure and all the sectors interested in the biotechnological development to participate of the speeches - Principle of the Speech. For Habermas, the grounded discoursive norms make to be valid for two topics: the knowledge of something that exist in each moment and the every one interest, and also the general will that learned, without pressure, the will of everyone. With all those fundaments, it is able to have thoughts about the effect of the Biosecurity Law - the creation of one discretionary power to regulate the biotechnology activities thought CTNBio and the absence of regulation of the CNBS. These facts are asymmetric for the actual democratic stander and make unable the process of democratic radicalization.A atividade biotecnologia indica uma perspectiva de modificação social e de ecossistemas com uma imprevisão sobre os resultados dessas alterações. Isso toca em questões ético-jurídicas, pois, denota riscos para as sociedades contemporâneas. A criação de espaços públicos de participação popular significa uma proposta procedimental de controle dos possíveis abusos da atividade biotecnológica e a pretensa coibição das temeridades. Nesse sentido, a ética discursiva representa uma peça chave de um projeto de radicalização democrática pelo qual são válidas e aceitas normas que exprimem uma vontade universal no desenvolvimento biotecnológico - Princípio Universal. E essa vontade, como uma vontade racional definida pela intersubjetividade da racionalidade comunicativa, só seguirá uma norma se ela for universal na medida em que todos os setores interessados no desenvolvimento biotecnológico participarem dos discursos – Princípio do Discurso. Para Habermas, as normas fundamentadas discursivamente fazem valer ao mesmo tempo duas coisas: o conhecimento daquilo que a cada momento reside no interesse de todos, bem como uma vontade geral que apreendeu em si mesma, sem repreensão, a vontade de todos. Diante desses fundamentos, tecem-se reflexões sobre um dos efeitos da Lei de Biossegurança - a criação de um poder discricionário da CTNBio e a ausência de regulamentação do CNBS. Tais fatos são assimétricos para o atual modelo democrático, bem como impossibilita um processo de radicalização democrática.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2007-12-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/412010.5433/2178-8189.2007v11n0p243Scientia Iuris; v. 11 (2007); 243-2572178-81891415-6490reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/4120/3524Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iurisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFerraro, Valkíria Aparecida LopesOliveira, Simone Vinhas de2018-07-03T19:10:28Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/4120Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iurisPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/oairevistamdireito@uel.br2178-81891415-6490opendoar:2018-07-03T19:10:28Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The law of biosecurity under the boarding of the discourse ethics
A lei de biossegurança sob a abordagem da ética discursiva
title The law of biosecurity under the boarding of the discourse ethics
spellingShingle The law of biosecurity under the boarding of the discourse ethics
Ferraro, Valkíria Aparecida Lopes
Biotechnological
democracy
communicative action
discoursive ethics
biosecurity.
Biotecnológica
democracia
ação comunicativa
ética discursiva
biossegurança.
title_short The law of biosecurity under the boarding of the discourse ethics
title_full The law of biosecurity under the boarding of the discourse ethics
title_fullStr The law of biosecurity under the boarding of the discourse ethics
title_full_unstemmed The law of biosecurity under the boarding of the discourse ethics
title_sort The law of biosecurity under the boarding of the discourse ethics
author Ferraro, Valkíria Aparecida Lopes
author_facet Ferraro, Valkíria Aparecida Lopes
Oliveira, Simone Vinhas de
author_role author
author2 Oliveira, Simone Vinhas de
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ferraro, Valkíria Aparecida Lopes
Oliveira, Simone Vinhas de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Biotechnological
democracy
communicative action
discoursive ethics
biosecurity.
Biotecnológica
democracia
ação comunicativa
ética discursiva
biossegurança.
topic Biotechnological
democracy
communicative action
discoursive ethics
biosecurity.
Biotecnológica
democracia
ação comunicativa
ética discursiva
biossegurança.
description The biotechnology activity indicates a perspective to social and ecosystems modifications with improvidence about the results of these alterations. This involves ethical-legal topics, therefore, denotes risks for the contemporary society. The creation of public spaces with popular participation means a procedural proposal of control the possible imposes of the biotechnological activity and intend suppress the temerity. In this way, the discoursive ethics represent a key part of a project of democratic radicalization for which they are valid and accepted norms as universal state, this will in the biotechnological development - Universal Principle. And this will, as a rational will defined by the intersubjectiv of the communicative rationality, will only follow a norm if it will be universal in the measure and all the sectors interested in the biotechnological development to participate of the speeches - Principle of the Speech. For Habermas, the grounded discoursive norms make to be valid for two topics: the knowledge of something that exist in each moment and the every one interest, and also the general will that learned, without pressure, the will of everyone. With all those fundaments, it is able to have thoughts about the effect of the Biosecurity Law - the creation of one discretionary power to regulate the biotechnology activities thought CTNBio and the absence of regulation of the CNBS. These facts are asymmetric for the actual democratic stander and make unable the process of democratic radicalization.
publishDate 2007
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2007-12-15
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/4120
10.5433/2178-8189.2007v11n0p243
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/4120
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/2178-8189.2007v11n0p243
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/4120/3524
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris; v. 11 (2007); 243-257
2178-8189
1415-6490
reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
collection Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistamdireito@uel.br
_version_ 1799306013322510336

Registros relacionados