The Resizing Of The Concept Of Access To Justice In The Constitutional Democratic Paradigm: The Influx Of The Third Renovatory Wave

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: da Silveira Fernandes, Geovana Faza
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: de Almeida, Marcelo Pereira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Scientia Iuris (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/33825
Resumo: In this work, we propose a critical analysis of thecontents of the guarantee of access to justice in the paradigms:liberal, social and democratic constitutional and how the changesof perspectives impact the conception of the role of the processin the scenario of dispute resolution. We willalso reflect on someobstacles to the substantial access, in the contemporary paradigm,and on the alternative sought by the Florence Project in its thirdrenewal wave, and by the Pound Conference of 1976, to betterenable fair access by proposing a multiport model of justice, thatis a forum to provide jurisdictions with alternative methods ofdispute resolution besides the traditional process, which may be more appropriate to the case in point.
id UEL-6_11763bc66f6f38584365ff7f8a9c7616
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/33825
network_acronym_str UEL-6
network_name_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The Resizing Of The Concept Of Access To Justice In The Constitutional Democratic Paradigm: The Influx Of The Third Renovatory WaveO redimensionamento do conceito de acesso à justiça no paradigma democrático constitucional: influxos da terceira onda renovatóriaAccess to justice. Process. Florence Project. Obstacles. Multidoor Courthouse.Acesso à justiçaprocessoProjeto Florençaobstáculosjustiça multiportasIn this work, we propose a critical analysis of thecontents of the guarantee of access to justice in the paradigms:liberal, social and democratic constitutional and how the changesof perspectives impact the conception of the role of the processin the scenario of dispute resolution. We willalso reflect on someobstacles to the substantial access, in the contemporary paradigm,and on the alternative sought by the Florence Project in its thirdrenewal wave, and by the Pound Conference of 1976, to betterenable fair access by proposing a multiport model of justice, thatis a forum to provide jurisdictions with alternative methods ofdispute resolution besides the traditional process, which may be more appropriate to the case in point.Neste trabalho, propomos uma análise crítica a respeito dos conteúdos da garantia do acesso à justiça nos diversos paradigmas: liberal, social e democrático constitucional e do modo como as mudanças de perspectivas impactam na concepção do papel do processo no cenário de resolução de disputas. Como consectário dessa abordagem, refletiremos sobre alguns obstáculos ao acesso substancial, no paradigma contemporâneo, e sobre a alternativa buscada pelo Projeto Florença, em sua terceira onda renovatória, e pela conferência norte-americana, conhecida como Pound Conference, de 1976, para melhor viabilizar o acesso justo, propondo um modelo de justiça multiportas, ou seja, um fórum que disponibiliza aos jurisdicionados outros meios de resolução que não o processo tradicional, e que podem ser mais adequados ao caso concreto. Universidade Estadual de Londrina2019-03-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/3382510.5433/2178-8189.2019v23n1p41Scientia Iuris; v. 23 n. 1 (2019); 41-622178-81891415-6490reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/33825/25172Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iurishttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BRinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessda Silveira Fernandes, Geovana Fazade Almeida, Marcelo Pereira2023-01-17T19:06:56Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/33825Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iurisPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/oairevistamdireito@uel.br2178-81891415-6490opendoar:2023-01-17T19:06:56Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Resizing Of The Concept Of Access To Justice In The Constitutional Democratic Paradigm: The Influx Of The Third Renovatory Wave
O redimensionamento do conceito de acesso à justiça no paradigma democrático constitucional: influxos da terceira onda renovatória
title The Resizing Of The Concept Of Access To Justice In The Constitutional Democratic Paradigm: The Influx Of The Third Renovatory Wave
spellingShingle The Resizing Of The Concept Of Access To Justice In The Constitutional Democratic Paradigm: The Influx Of The Third Renovatory Wave
da Silveira Fernandes, Geovana Faza
Access to justice. Process. Florence Project. Obstacles. Multidoor Courthouse.
Acesso à justiça
processo
Projeto Florença
obstáculos
justiça multiportas
title_short The Resizing Of The Concept Of Access To Justice In The Constitutional Democratic Paradigm: The Influx Of The Third Renovatory Wave
title_full The Resizing Of The Concept Of Access To Justice In The Constitutional Democratic Paradigm: The Influx Of The Third Renovatory Wave
title_fullStr The Resizing Of The Concept Of Access To Justice In The Constitutional Democratic Paradigm: The Influx Of The Third Renovatory Wave
title_full_unstemmed The Resizing Of The Concept Of Access To Justice In The Constitutional Democratic Paradigm: The Influx Of The Third Renovatory Wave
title_sort The Resizing Of The Concept Of Access To Justice In The Constitutional Democratic Paradigm: The Influx Of The Third Renovatory Wave
author da Silveira Fernandes, Geovana Faza
author_facet da Silveira Fernandes, Geovana Faza
de Almeida, Marcelo Pereira
author_role author
author2 de Almeida, Marcelo Pereira
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv da Silveira Fernandes, Geovana Faza
de Almeida, Marcelo Pereira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Access to justice. Process. Florence Project. Obstacles. Multidoor Courthouse.
Acesso à justiça
processo
Projeto Florença
obstáculos
justiça multiportas
topic Access to justice. Process. Florence Project. Obstacles. Multidoor Courthouse.
Acesso à justiça
processo
Projeto Florença
obstáculos
justiça multiportas
description In this work, we propose a critical analysis of thecontents of the guarantee of access to justice in the paradigms:liberal, social and democratic constitutional and how the changesof perspectives impact the conception of the role of the processin the scenario of dispute resolution. We willalso reflect on someobstacles to the substantial access, in the contemporary paradigm,and on the alternative sought by the Florence Project in its thirdrenewal wave, and by the Pound Conference of 1976, to betterenable fair access by proposing a multiport model of justice, thatis a forum to provide jurisdictions with alternative methods ofdispute resolution besides the traditional process, which may be more appropriate to the case in point.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-03-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/33825
10.5433/2178-8189.2019v23n1p41
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/33825
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/2178-8189.2019v23n1p41
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/33825/25172
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris; v. 23 n. 1 (2019); 41-62
2178-8189
1415-6490
reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
collection Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistamdireito@uel.br
_version_ 1799306015525568512

Registros relacionados