Controversial aspects in passenger and luggage air transportation contracts
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Scientia Iuris (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/39229 |
Resumo: | The purpose of this article is to analyze passenger and luggage air transportation contracts, which are legislated by different sources that have many contradictions and antinomies between them, especially when regarding compensations for material and moral damages. Identifying which legislation applies to what case demands a considerable amount of effort from law professionals. Thus, the objective of this paper is to examine divergent doctrinal interpretations and solutions adopted by Brazilian courts. Although the object of study may not be new, the growing use of air travel from the most varied social classes imposes constant pressure on Brazilian law to consolidate fair solutions for both consumers and service providers. This study provides a theoretical, exploratory, and critical analysis from the logical deductive scientific method, which includes several methodological procedures, such as data collection, with emphasis on literature review, and legislative and jurisprudential bibliography. Furthermore, it is important to note, in the investigation, the harmonizing influence of the Constitution and its binding principles, especially regarding the principle of objective good faith. |
id |
UEL-6_1dab1df30552ce2abc6972464afb7e22 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/39229 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-6 |
network_name_str |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Controversial aspects in passenger and luggage air transportation contractsAspectos polêmicos do contrato de transporte aéreo de passageiros e bagagensAir Transportation. Passenger. Contracts.Transporte aéreoPassageiroContratoThe purpose of this article is to analyze passenger and luggage air transportation contracts, which are legislated by different sources that have many contradictions and antinomies between them, especially when regarding compensations for material and moral damages. Identifying which legislation applies to what case demands a considerable amount of effort from law professionals. Thus, the objective of this paper is to examine divergent doctrinal interpretations and solutions adopted by Brazilian courts. Although the object of study may not be new, the growing use of air travel from the most varied social classes imposes constant pressure on Brazilian law to consolidate fair solutions for both consumers and service providers. This study provides a theoretical, exploratory, and critical analysis from the logical deductive scientific method, which includes several methodological procedures, such as data collection, with emphasis on literature review, and legislative and jurisprudential bibliography. Furthermore, it is important to note, in the investigation, the harmonizing influence of the Constitution and its binding principles, especially regarding the principle of objective good faith.O tema do presente artigo é o contrato de transporte de pessoas e bagagens, realizado por via aérea. Observa-se, sobre a modalidade, uma multiplicidade de fontes legislativas, com contradições e antinomias, particularmente, no tocante à indenização por danos materiais e morais. Identificar a legislação aplicada ao caso concreto exige esforço exegético do profissional do direito. Assim, o artigo objetiva um estudo, destacando os divergentes posicionamentos doutrinários e as principais soluções adotadas pelos tribunais pátrios. Apesar do tema não ser recente, a expansão do emprego de transporte aéreo por usuários das mais variadas classes sociais impõe a constante reflexão da regulamentação, de forma a consolidar soluções justas, tanto para os consumidores como para os prestadores dos serviços. Denota-se que a pesquisa realizada tem cunho teórico, exploratório e crítico, desenvolvida à luz do método científico lógico-dedutivo e que conta com diversos procedimentos metodológicos de coleta de informações, com ênfase à pesquisa bibliográfica, legislativa e jurisprudencial. É importante considerar, na investigação, a influência harmonizadora da Constituição e dos novos princípios contratuais, especialmente a incidência da cláusula geral de boa-fé objetiva.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2020-11-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/3922910.5433/2178-8189.2020v24n3p119Scientia Iuris; v. 24 n. 3 (2020); 119-1422178-81891415-6490reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/39229/28419Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iurishttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BRinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPaiano, Daniela BragaFurlan, Alessandra Cristina2023-01-26T22:26:47Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/39229Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iurisPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/oairevistamdireito@uel.br2178-81891415-6490opendoar:2023-01-26T22:26:47Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Controversial aspects in passenger and luggage air transportation contracts Aspectos polêmicos do contrato de transporte aéreo de passageiros e bagagens |
title |
Controversial aspects in passenger and luggage air transportation contracts |
spellingShingle |
Controversial aspects in passenger and luggage air transportation contracts Paiano, Daniela Braga Air Transportation. Passenger. Contracts. Transporte aéreo Passageiro Contrato |
title_short |
Controversial aspects in passenger and luggage air transportation contracts |
title_full |
Controversial aspects in passenger and luggage air transportation contracts |
title_fullStr |
Controversial aspects in passenger and luggage air transportation contracts |
title_full_unstemmed |
Controversial aspects in passenger and luggage air transportation contracts |
title_sort |
Controversial aspects in passenger and luggage air transportation contracts |
author |
Paiano, Daniela Braga |
author_facet |
Paiano, Daniela Braga Furlan, Alessandra Cristina |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Furlan, Alessandra Cristina |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Paiano, Daniela Braga Furlan, Alessandra Cristina |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Air Transportation. Passenger. Contracts. Transporte aéreo Passageiro Contrato |
topic |
Air Transportation. Passenger. Contracts. Transporte aéreo Passageiro Contrato |
description |
The purpose of this article is to analyze passenger and luggage air transportation contracts, which are legislated by different sources that have many contradictions and antinomies between them, especially when regarding compensations for material and moral damages. Identifying which legislation applies to what case demands a considerable amount of effort from law professionals. Thus, the objective of this paper is to examine divergent doctrinal interpretations and solutions adopted by Brazilian courts. Although the object of study may not be new, the growing use of air travel from the most varied social classes imposes constant pressure on Brazilian law to consolidate fair solutions for both consumers and service providers. This study provides a theoretical, exploratory, and critical analysis from the logical deductive scientific method, which includes several methodological procedures, such as data collection, with emphasis on literature review, and legislative and jurisprudential bibliography. Furthermore, it is important to note, in the investigation, the harmonizing influence of the Constitution and its binding principles, especially regarding the principle of objective good faith. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-11-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/39229 10.5433/2178-8189.2020v24n3p119 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/39229 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/2178-8189.2020v24n3p119 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/39229/28419 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Iuris; v. 24 n. 3 (2020); 119-142 2178-8189 1415-6490 reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
collection |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistamdireito@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306015634620416 |