Forest Stewardship Council’s contributions to sustainable development: conjugation of interests by governance mechanisms
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Scientia Iuris (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/41828 |
Resumo: | In the context marked by transnationality, new modes of environmental standardization appear, not marked by state power with its traditional legal instruments of command and control. Private instruments stand out, such as the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC), which aim to tackle complex issues, such as the environmental ones, for which conventional instruments alone have not been effective in many cases. The purpose of this article is to demonstrate that the way the FSC is structured has positive impacts for sustainable development. Based on broad governance, with equal participation of representatives from the three pillars: social, environmental and economic, it manages to combine the interests of several stakeholders, contributing to global environmental governance, as a soft law instrument. In addition, its actions are guided by ten broad principles and standards that also align with the Agenda 2030 SDGs. The research was exploratory, bibliographic and documentary, so that the data collected were analyzed using the dialectic and deductive method. It is concluded that, in the search for sustainable development, as one of the first collective emergencies, the FSC has played an important role in inducing changes in the environmental paradigm of forest management and the chain of custody of wood. Lessons learned at the FSC case study can be taken as inspiration to other initiatives on complex sustainability issues. |
id |
UEL-6_274893d6016b1c3c5485b728c0806020 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/41828 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-6 |
network_name_str |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Forest Stewardship Council’s contributions to sustainable development: conjugation of interests by governance mechanismsContribuições do Forest Stewardship Council ao desenvolvimento sustentável: conjugação de interesses por mecanismos de governançaCertificação Ambiental PrivadaFSCGovernançaODSSoft Law.Private Environmental Certification; FSC; ODS; Governance; Soft law.In the context marked by transnationality, new modes of environmental standardization appear, not marked by state power with its traditional legal instruments of command and control. Private instruments stand out, such as the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC), which aim to tackle complex issues, such as the environmental ones, for which conventional instruments alone have not been effective in many cases. The purpose of this article is to demonstrate that the way the FSC is structured has positive impacts for sustainable development. Based on broad governance, with equal participation of representatives from the three pillars: social, environmental and economic, it manages to combine the interests of several stakeholders, contributing to global environmental governance, as a soft law instrument. In addition, its actions are guided by ten broad principles and standards that also align with the Agenda 2030 SDGs. The research was exploratory, bibliographic and documentary, so that the data collected were analyzed using the dialectic and deductive method. It is concluded that, in the search for sustainable development, as one of the first collective emergencies, the FSC has played an important role in inducing changes in the environmental paradigm of forest management and the chain of custody of wood. Lessons learned at the FSC case study can be taken as inspiration to other initiatives on complex sustainability issues.No contexto marcado pela transnacionalidade, surgem novos modos de normatização ambiental não mais marcados pelo poder estatal com seus instrumentos jurídicos tradicionais de comando e controle. Destacam-se os instrumentos privados, como o Forest Stewardship Council (FSC), que se propõem a enfrentar questões complexas, como as ambientais, para as quais os instrumentos convencionais sozinhos não têm se mostrado eficientes em muitos casos. O objetivo deste artigo é demonstrar que a forma como o FSC se estrutura e traz impactos positivos para o desenvolvimento sustentável. Baseado em ampla governança, com participação igualitária de representantes dos três pilares: social, ambiental e econômico-, consegue conjugar interesses de diversos stakeholders, contribuindo para a governança ambiental global, como instrumento soft law. Ademais, suas ações são pautadas em dez princípios amplos e normas que também se alinham aos Objetivos de Desenvolvimento Sustentável (ODS) da Agenda 2030. A pesquisa foi exploratória, bibliográfica e documental, de modo que os dados coletados foram analisados pelo método dialético e dedutivo. Conclui-se que, na busca pelo desenvolvimento sustentável, como uma das primeiras urgências coletivas, o FSC tem desempenhado papel relevante como indutor de mudanças no paradigma ambiental do manejo florestal e da cadeia de custódia da madeira. Acredita-se que as lições aprendidas na experiência do FSC possam inspirar iniciativas semelhantes em outros temas complexos da sustentabilidade.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2023-11-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/4182810.5433/2178-8189.2023v27n3p75-93Scientia Iuris; v. 27 n. 3 (2023): Scientia Iuris; 75-932178-81891415-6490reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/41828/49700Copyright (c) 2023 Scientia Iurishttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BRinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHonain, Celi Aparecida ConsolinRibeiro, Flávio de Miranda2023-11-28T14:52:42Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/41828Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iurisPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/oairevistamdireito@uel.br2178-81891415-6490opendoar:2023-11-28T14:52:42Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Forest Stewardship Council’s contributions to sustainable development: conjugation of interests by governance mechanisms Contribuições do Forest Stewardship Council ao desenvolvimento sustentável: conjugação de interesses por mecanismos de governança |
title |
Forest Stewardship Council’s contributions to sustainable development: conjugation of interests by governance mechanisms |
spellingShingle |
Forest Stewardship Council’s contributions to sustainable development: conjugation of interests by governance mechanisms Honain, Celi Aparecida Consolin Certificação Ambiental Privada FSC Governança ODS Soft Law. Private Environmental Certification; FSC; ODS; Governance; Soft law. |
title_short |
Forest Stewardship Council’s contributions to sustainable development: conjugation of interests by governance mechanisms |
title_full |
Forest Stewardship Council’s contributions to sustainable development: conjugation of interests by governance mechanisms |
title_fullStr |
Forest Stewardship Council’s contributions to sustainable development: conjugation of interests by governance mechanisms |
title_full_unstemmed |
Forest Stewardship Council’s contributions to sustainable development: conjugation of interests by governance mechanisms |
title_sort |
Forest Stewardship Council’s contributions to sustainable development: conjugation of interests by governance mechanisms |
author |
Honain, Celi Aparecida Consolin |
author_facet |
Honain, Celi Aparecida Consolin Ribeiro, Flávio de Miranda |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ribeiro, Flávio de Miranda |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Honain, Celi Aparecida Consolin Ribeiro, Flávio de Miranda |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Certificação Ambiental Privada FSC Governança ODS Soft Law. Private Environmental Certification; FSC; ODS; Governance; Soft law. |
topic |
Certificação Ambiental Privada FSC Governança ODS Soft Law. Private Environmental Certification; FSC; ODS; Governance; Soft law. |
description |
In the context marked by transnationality, new modes of environmental standardization appear, not marked by state power with its traditional legal instruments of command and control. Private instruments stand out, such as the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC), which aim to tackle complex issues, such as the environmental ones, for which conventional instruments alone have not been effective in many cases. The purpose of this article is to demonstrate that the way the FSC is structured has positive impacts for sustainable development. Based on broad governance, with equal participation of representatives from the three pillars: social, environmental and economic, it manages to combine the interests of several stakeholders, contributing to global environmental governance, as a soft law instrument. In addition, its actions are guided by ten broad principles and standards that also align with the Agenda 2030 SDGs. The research was exploratory, bibliographic and documentary, so that the data collected were analyzed using the dialectic and deductive method. It is concluded that, in the search for sustainable development, as one of the first collective emergencies, the FSC has played an important role in inducing changes in the environmental paradigm of forest management and the chain of custody of wood. Lessons learned at the FSC case study can be taken as inspiration to other initiatives on complex sustainability issues. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-11-28 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/41828 10.5433/2178-8189.2023v27n3p75-93 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/41828 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/2178-8189.2023v27n3p75-93 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/41828/49700 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Scientia Iuris https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Scientia Iuris https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Iuris; v. 27 n. 3 (2023): Scientia Iuris; 75-93 2178-8189 1415-6490 reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
collection |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistamdireito@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306016141082624 |