The benefits of alternative means of conflict resolutions for business disputes involving personality rights in the brazilian legal order

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Soares, Marcelo Negri
Data de Publicação: 2024
Outros Autores: Avila Prazak, Maurício, Comar Riva, Luisa
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Scientia Iuris (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/49055
Resumo: Alternative means of resolving conflicts have proven to be a solution to avoid the judicialization of disputes. Therefore, the present study aims to analyze the benefits of alternative means, especially in business conflicts. Through the hypothetical deductive method, through the analysis of doctrine on the subject, legislation and relevant scientific articles, it is possible to conclude that extrajudicial means of resolving disputes cannot be used in all cases, because each case will require an analysis of what will be the best proposed resolution. Furthermore, the best thing for the specific case cannot come from the idea of ​​just “relieving the judiciary”, but rather that it is up to the judiciary, now through its multi-door policy, to continue fulfilling its constitucional role.
id UEL-6_2f671111d5de858b34dc4e4e5fe694a0
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/49055
network_acronym_str UEL-6
network_name_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The benefits of alternative means of conflict resolutions for business disputes involving personality rights in the brazilian legal orderOs benefícios dos meios alternativos de soluções de conflitos para os conflitos empresariais envolvendo direitos da personalidade no ordenamento jurídico brasileiroAlternative meansConflict resolutionJudicialExtrajudicialMeios alternativosSolução de conflitosJudicialExtrajuducialAlternative means of resolving conflicts have proven to be a solution to avoid the judicialization of disputes. Therefore, the present study aims to analyze the benefits of alternative means, especially in business conflicts. Through the hypothetical deductive method, through the analysis of doctrine on the subject, legislation and relevant scientific articles, it is possible to conclude that extrajudicial means of resolving disputes cannot be used in all cases, because each case will require an analysis of what will be the best proposed resolution. Furthermore, the best thing for the specific case cannot come from the idea of ​​just “relieving the judiciary”, but rather that it is up to the judiciary, now through its multi-door policy, to continue fulfilling its constitucional role.Os meios alternativos de soluções de conflitos têm se mostrado uma solução para evitar a judicialização de lides. Assim, o presente estudo visa analisar os benefícios dos meios alternativos, especialmente nos conflitos empresariais. Por meio do método hipotético dedutivo, pela análise de doutrina sobre o tema, legislação e artigos científicos relevantes, é possível concluir que os meios extrajudiciais de solução de controvérsias não podem ser utilizados em todos os casos, porque cada caso exigirá uma análise sobre qual será a melhor proposta de resolução. Ademais, o melhor para o caso concreto não pode partir da ideia de apenas “desafogar o judiciário”, mas sim de que cabe ao judiciário, agora através da sua política de multiportas, seguir cumprindo seu papel constitucional.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2024-03-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/4905510.5433/2178-8189.2024v28n1p97-116Scientia Iuris; v. 28 n. 1 (2024): Scientia Iuris; 97-1162178-81891415-6490reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/49055/50198Copyright (c) 2024 Marcelo Negri Soares, Maurício Avila Prazak, Luisa Comar Rivahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BRinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSoares, Marcelo NegriAvila Prazak, MaurícioComar Riva, Luisa2024-04-30T12:48:09Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/49055Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iurisPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/oairevistamdireito@uel.br2178-81891415-6490opendoar:2024-04-30T12:48:09Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The benefits of alternative means of conflict resolutions for business disputes involving personality rights in the brazilian legal order
Os benefícios dos meios alternativos de soluções de conflitos para os conflitos empresariais envolvendo direitos da personalidade no ordenamento jurídico brasileiro
title The benefits of alternative means of conflict resolutions for business disputes involving personality rights in the brazilian legal order
spellingShingle The benefits of alternative means of conflict resolutions for business disputes involving personality rights in the brazilian legal order
Soares, Marcelo Negri
Alternative means
Conflict resolution
Judicial
Extrajudicial
Meios alternativos
Solução de conflitos
Judicial
Extrajuducial
title_short The benefits of alternative means of conflict resolutions for business disputes involving personality rights in the brazilian legal order
title_full The benefits of alternative means of conflict resolutions for business disputes involving personality rights in the brazilian legal order
title_fullStr The benefits of alternative means of conflict resolutions for business disputes involving personality rights in the brazilian legal order
title_full_unstemmed The benefits of alternative means of conflict resolutions for business disputes involving personality rights in the brazilian legal order
title_sort The benefits of alternative means of conflict resolutions for business disputes involving personality rights in the brazilian legal order
author Soares, Marcelo Negri
author_facet Soares, Marcelo Negri
Avila Prazak, Maurício
Comar Riva, Luisa
author_role author
author2 Avila Prazak, Maurício
Comar Riva, Luisa
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Soares, Marcelo Negri
Avila Prazak, Maurício
Comar Riva, Luisa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Alternative means
Conflict resolution
Judicial
Extrajudicial
Meios alternativos
Solução de conflitos
Judicial
Extrajuducial
topic Alternative means
Conflict resolution
Judicial
Extrajudicial
Meios alternativos
Solução de conflitos
Judicial
Extrajuducial
description Alternative means of resolving conflicts have proven to be a solution to avoid the judicialization of disputes. Therefore, the present study aims to analyze the benefits of alternative means, especially in business conflicts. Through the hypothetical deductive method, through the analysis of doctrine on the subject, legislation and relevant scientific articles, it is possible to conclude that extrajudicial means of resolving disputes cannot be used in all cases, because each case will require an analysis of what will be the best proposed resolution. Furthermore, the best thing for the specific case cannot come from the idea of ​​just “relieving the judiciary”, but rather that it is up to the judiciary, now through its multi-door policy, to continue fulfilling its constitucional role.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-03-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/49055
10.5433/2178-8189.2024v28n1p97-116
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/49055
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/2178-8189.2024v28n1p97-116
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/49055/50198
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Marcelo Negri Soares, Maurício Avila Prazak, Luisa Comar Riva
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Marcelo Negri Soares, Maurício Avila Prazak, Luisa Comar Riva
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris; v. 28 n. 1 (2024): Scientia Iuris; 97-116
2178-8189
1415-6490
reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
collection Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistamdireito@uel.br
_version_ 1799306013236527104

Registros relacionados