Control of a bilateral and atypical procedural agreement: the need for a Dworkinian Hercules judge posture

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ferrer, Alexandre De Moura Bonini
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Rodrigues, Nina Trícia Disconzi, Maicá, Richard da Silveira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Scientia Iuris (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/27476
Resumo: This study aims to understand new bilateral and atypical procedural agreements, examining a magistrate’s use of the dworkinian hercules stance in order to control legal transactions. Moreover, article 190 of the new Brazilian Civil Procedure Code (CPC) breaks the traditional rationalist paradigm of the previous CPC. In addition, this research uses the philosophical hermeneutic approach. In the end, this paper concludes that article 190 of the CPC is an indication of the paradigmatic break of the rationalist understanding, specifically with the creation of private autonomy sustained on the principle of self-rule. This study also notes that the magistrate responsible for the control of a bilateral and atypical procedural agreement has to be in the position of “being in the procedure” as it prevents the law from being inefficacious. 
id UEL-6_4769a986bdf467e3e58bf077d015203f
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/27476
network_acronym_str UEL-6
network_name_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Control of a bilateral and atypical procedural agreement: the need for a Dworkinian Hercules judge postureControle de negócio jurídico pré-processual bilateral atípico: necessidade de uma postura de juiz Hércules DworkinianoRacionalismoJuiz HérculesDworkinNegócio Jurídico Pré-Processual Bilateral AtípicoNovo Código de Processo Civil BrasileiroThis study aims to understand new bilateral and atypical procedural agreements, examining a magistrate’s use of the dworkinian hercules stance in order to control legal transactions. Moreover, article 190 of the new Brazilian Civil Procedure Code (CPC) breaks the traditional rationalist paradigm of the previous CPC. In addition, this research uses the philosophical hermeneutic approach. In the end, this paper concludes that article 190 of the CPC is an indication of the paradigmatic break of the rationalist understanding, specifically with the creation of private autonomy sustained on the principle of self-rule. This study also notes that the magistrate responsible for the control of a bilateral and atypical procedural agreement has to be in the position of “being in the procedure” as it prevents the law from being inefficacious. O estudo objetivou entender os novos negócios jurídicos pré-processuais bilaterais atípicos, apontando a necessidade de o juiz adotar como postura o modelo de Juiz Hércules dworkiniano para controle desses negócios jurídicos. O problema trata-se de verificar se há quebra paradigmática racionalista no Art. 190 no novo Código de Processo Civil Brasileiro. O estudo se deu partir de um “método” de abordagem hermenêutico-filosófico. Conclui-se que o artigo 190 do NCPC pode ser um grande indício da quebra paradigmática quanto ao seu caráter racionalista, a partir da criação da autonomia privada sustentado em um princípio de autorregramento. Verifica-se também que o juiz, responsável pelo controle dos negócios jurídicos pré-processuais bilaterais atípicos, deve entender-se como um juiz ser-no-processo, de forma a evitar que o dispositivo vire letra morta.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2018-03-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/2747610.5433/2178-8189.2018v22n1p74Scientia Iuris; v. 22 n. 1 (2018); 74-1002178-81891415-6490reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/27476/23351Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iurisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFerrer, Alexandre De Moura BoniniRodrigues, Nina Trícia DisconziMaicá, Richard da Silveira2018-04-04T18:29:49Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/27476Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iurisPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/oairevistamdireito@uel.br2178-81891415-6490opendoar:2018-04-04T18:29:49Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Control of a bilateral and atypical procedural agreement: the need for a Dworkinian Hercules judge posture
Controle de negócio jurídico pré-processual bilateral atípico: necessidade de uma postura de juiz Hércules Dworkiniano
title Control of a bilateral and atypical procedural agreement: the need for a Dworkinian Hercules judge posture
spellingShingle Control of a bilateral and atypical procedural agreement: the need for a Dworkinian Hercules judge posture
Ferrer, Alexandre De Moura Bonini
Racionalismo
Juiz Hércules
Dworkin
Negócio Jurídico Pré-Processual Bilateral Atípico
Novo Código de Processo Civil Brasileiro
title_short Control of a bilateral and atypical procedural agreement: the need for a Dworkinian Hercules judge posture
title_full Control of a bilateral and atypical procedural agreement: the need for a Dworkinian Hercules judge posture
title_fullStr Control of a bilateral and atypical procedural agreement: the need for a Dworkinian Hercules judge posture
title_full_unstemmed Control of a bilateral and atypical procedural agreement: the need for a Dworkinian Hercules judge posture
title_sort Control of a bilateral and atypical procedural agreement: the need for a Dworkinian Hercules judge posture
author Ferrer, Alexandre De Moura Bonini
author_facet Ferrer, Alexandre De Moura Bonini
Rodrigues, Nina Trícia Disconzi
Maicá, Richard da Silveira
author_role author
author2 Rodrigues, Nina Trícia Disconzi
Maicá, Richard da Silveira
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ferrer, Alexandre De Moura Bonini
Rodrigues, Nina Trícia Disconzi
Maicá, Richard da Silveira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Racionalismo
Juiz Hércules
Dworkin
Negócio Jurídico Pré-Processual Bilateral Atípico
Novo Código de Processo Civil Brasileiro
topic Racionalismo
Juiz Hércules
Dworkin
Negócio Jurídico Pré-Processual Bilateral Atípico
Novo Código de Processo Civil Brasileiro
description This study aims to understand new bilateral and atypical procedural agreements, examining a magistrate’s use of the dworkinian hercules stance in order to control legal transactions. Moreover, article 190 of the new Brazilian Civil Procedure Code (CPC) breaks the traditional rationalist paradigm of the previous CPC. In addition, this research uses the philosophical hermeneutic approach. In the end, this paper concludes that article 190 of the CPC is an indication of the paradigmatic break of the rationalist understanding, specifically with the creation of private autonomy sustained on the principle of self-rule. This study also notes that the magistrate responsible for the control of a bilateral and atypical procedural agreement has to be in the position of “being in the procedure” as it prevents the law from being inefficacious. 
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-03-28
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/27476
10.5433/2178-8189.2018v22n1p74
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/27476
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/2178-8189.2018v22n1p74
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/27476/23351
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris; v. 22 n. 1 (2018); 74-100
2178-8189
1415-6490
reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
collection Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistamdireito@uel.br
_version_ 1799306015142838272

Registros relacionados