Notarial Minutes, Evidence And The Brazilian Code Of Civil Procedure
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Scientia Iuris (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/29101 |
Resumo: | This paper first studies the current reality of Brazilian Judiciary’s, which lacks efficiency as it has an ever more progressive and worrisome number of cases. In this context, many seek alternative ways for conflict resolution which does not involve the Brazilian Judiciary. Therefore, this paper proposes a new alternative method: the use of notarial minutes as a skillful instrument that validates acts without confirmation of Brazil’s court system. In spite of being considered an atypical means of evidence when the Brazilian Code of Civil Procedure of 1973 was in use, notarial acts have gained prominence in our legal system, specifically with the promulgation of the Brazilian Code of Civil Procedure of 2015, which reclassified notarial minutes as a typical means for evidence. Furthermore, this study carries out a legal reflection of the legal-historical context that resulted in this legislative change, as well analyzes the benefits that can be achieved with the new clothing given to this important means of evidence, considering the relevant role of notaries and registered agents in the disjudicialization of Brazil’s legal system. This paper utilizes the hypothetical-deductive method with literature review of legal works and scientific articles. |
id |
UEL-6_5bbbce6a88f7f0ab0c7f797398874d69 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/29101 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-6 |
network_name_str |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Notarial Minutes, Evidence And The Brazilian Code Of Civil ProcedureA ata notarial, a prova e o novo código de processo civilNotarial MinutesMeans of evidenceDisjudicializationBrazilian Code of Civil Procedure.Ata NotarialProvasDesjudicializaçãoNovo CPC.This paper first studies the current reality of Brazilian Judiciary’s, which lacks efficiency as it has an ever more progressive and worrisome number of cases. In this context, many seek alternative ways for conflict resolution which does not involve the Brazilian Judiciary. Therefore, this paper proposes a new alternative method: the use of notarial minutes as a skillful instrument that validates acts without confirmation of Brazil’s court system. In spite of being considered an atypical means of evidence when the Brazilian Code of Civil Procedure of 1973 was in use, notarial acts have gained prominence in our legal system, specifically with the promulgation of the Brazilian Code of Civil Procedure of 2015, which reclassified notarial minutes as a typical means for evidence. Furthermore, this study carries out a legal reflection of the legal-historical context that resulted in this legislative change, as well analyzes the benefits that can be achieved with the new clothing given to this important means of evidence, considering the relevant role of notaries and registered agents in the disjudicialization of Brazil’s legal system. This paper utilizes the hypothetical-deductive method with literature review of legal works and scientific articles.Partindo da constatação de um progressivo e preocupante congestionamento do Poder Judiciário brasileiro, o qual culmina na necessidade de buscar caminhos alternativos para desafogar o sistema de justiça e aprimorar a prestação jurisdicional, o presente trabalho propõe-se a analisar o instituto jurídico da ata notarial, enquanto instrumento hábil a contribuir para o crescente movimento de desjudicialização. Considerado como meio atípico de prova na vigência do Código de Processo Civil de 1973, a ata notarial ganhou destaque no ordenamento jurídico com a promulgação do Código de Processo Civil de 2015, recebendo o atributo de meio típico de prova. Diante disso, este estudo pretende realizar uma reflexão jurídica a respeito do contexto jurídico-histórico inerente a essa relevante alteração legislativa, bem como analisar os benefícios que podem ser alcançados com a nova roupagem conferida a este importante meio de prova, considerando o relevante papel dos notários e registradores como agentes do processo de desjudicialização. O trabalho faz uso do método hipotético-dedutivo de abordagem, sendo o tipo de pesquisa a bibliográfica, a partir de livros e artigos científicos.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2018-11-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/2910110.5433/2178-8189.2018v22n3p27Scientia Iuris; v. 22 n. 3 (2018); 27-382178-81891415-6490reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/29101/24537Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iurisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCouto, Monica BonettiKashiwagi, Erika Kazumi2019-07-05T16:33:31Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/29101Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iurisPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/oairevistamdireito@uel.br2178-81891415-6490opendoar:2019-07-05T16:33:31Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Notarial Minutes, Evidence And The Brazilian Code Of Civil Procedure A ata notarial, a prova e o novo código de processo civil |
title |
Notarial Minutes, Evidence And The Brazilian Code Of Civil Procedure |
spellingShingle |
Notarial Minutes, Evidence And The Brazilian Code Of Civil Procedure Couto, Monica Bonetti Notarial Minutes Means of evidence Disjudicialization Brazilian Code of Civil Procedure. Ata Notarial Provas Desjudicialização Novo CPC. |
title_short |
Notarial Minutes, Evidence And The Brazilian Code Of Civil Procedure |
title_full |
Notarial Minutes, Evidence And The Brazilian Code Of Civil Procedure |
title_fullStr |
Notarial Minutes, Evidence And The Brazilian Code Of Civil Procedure |
title_full_unstemmed |
Notarial Minutes, Evidence And The Brazilian Code Of Civil Procedure |
title_sort |
Notarial Minutes, Evidence And The Brazilian Code Of Civil Procedure |
author |
Couto, Monica Bonetti |
author_facet |
Couto, Monica Bonetti Kashiwagi, Erika Kazumi |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Kashiwagi, Erika Kazumi |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Couto, Monica Bonetti Kashiwagi, Erika Kazumi |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Notarial Minutes Means of evidence Disjudicialization Brazilian Code of Civil Procedure. Ata Notarial Provas Desjudicialização Novo CPC. |
topic |
Notarial Minutes Means of evidence Disjudicialization Brazilian Code of Civil Procedure. Ata Notarial Provas Desjudicialização Novo CPC. |
description |
This paper first studies the current reality of Brazilian Judiciary’s, which lacks efficiency as it has an ever more progressive and worrisome number of cases. In this context, many seek alternative ways for conflict resolution which does not involve the Brazilian Judiciary. Therefore, this paper proposes a new alternative method: the use of notarial minutes as a skillful instrument that validates acts without confirmation of Brazil’s court system. In spite of being considered an atypical means of evidence when the Brazilian Code of Civil Procedure of 1973 was in use, notarial acts have gained prominence in our legal system, specifically with the promulgation of the Brazilian Code of Civil Procedure of 2015, which reclassified notarial minutes as a typical means for evidence. Furthermore, this study carries out a legal reflection of the legal-historical context that resulted in this legislative change, as well analyzes the benefits that can be achieved with the new clothing given to this important means of evidence, considering the relevant role of notaries and registered agents in the disjudicialization of Brazil’s legal system. This paper utilizes the hypothetical-deductive method with literature review of legal works and scientific articles. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-11-27 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/29101 10.5433/2178-8189.2018v22n3p27 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/29101 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/2178-8189.2018v22n3p27 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/29101/24537 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Iuris; v. 22 n. 3 (2018); 27-38 2178-8189 1415-6490 reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
collection |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistamdireito@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306015186878464 |