Notarial Minutes, Evidence And The Brazilian Code Of Civil Procedure

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Couto, Monica Bonetti
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Kashiwagi, Erika Kazumi
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Scientia Iuris (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/29101
Resumo: This paper first studies the current reality of Brazilian Judiciary’s, which lacks efficiency as it has an ever more progressive and worrisome number of cases. In this context, many seek alternative ways for conflict resolution which does not involve the Brazilian Judiciary. Therefore, this paper proposes a new alternative method: the use of notarial minutes as a skillful instrument that validates acts without confirmation of Brazil’s court system. In spite of being considered an atypical means of evidence when the Brazilian Code of Civil Procedure of 1973 was in use, notarial acts have gained prominence in our legal system, specifically with the promulgation of the Brazilian Code of Civil Procedure of 2015, which reclassified notarial minutes as a typical means for evidence. Furthermore, this study carries out a legal reflection of the legal-historical context that resulted in this legislative change, as well analyzes the benefits that can be achieved with the new clothing given to this important means of evidence, considering the relevant role of notaries and registered agents in the disjudicialization of Brazil’s legal system. This paper utilizes the hypothetical-deductive method with literature review of legal works and scientific articles.
id UEL-6_5bbbce6a88f7f0ab0c7f797398874d69
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/29101
network_acronym_str UEL-6
network_name_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Notarial Minutes, Evidence And The Brazilian Code Of Civil ProcedureA ata notarial, a prova e o novo código de processo civilNotarial MinutesMeans of evidenceDisjudicializationBrazilian Code of Civil Procedure.Ata NotarialProvasDesjudicializaçãoNovo CPC.This paper first studies the current reality of Brazilian Judiciary’s, which lacks efficiency as it has an ever more progressive and worrisome number of cases. In this context, many seek alternative ways for conflict resolution which does not involve the Brazilian Judiciary. Therefore, this paper proposes a new alternative method: the use of notarial minutes as a skillful instrument that validates acts without confirmation of Brazil’s court system. In spite of being considered an atypical means of evidence when the Brazilian Code of Civil Procedure of 1973 was in use, notarial acts have gained prominence in our legal system, specifically with the promulgation of the Brazilian Code of Civil Procedure of 2015, which reclassified notarial minutes as a typical means for evidence. Furthermore, this study carries out a legal reflection of the legal-historical context that resulted in this legislative change, as well analyzes the benefits that can be achieved with the new clothing given to this important means of evidence, considering the relevant role of notaries and registered agents in the disjudicialization of Brazil’s legal system. This paper utilizes the hypothetical-deductive method with literature review of legal works and scientific articles.Partindo da constatação de um progressivo e preocupante congestionamento do Poder Judiciário brasileiro, o qual culmina na necessidade de buscar caminhos alternativos para desafogar o sistema de justiça e aprimorar a prestação jurisdicional, o presente trabalho propõe-se a analisar o instituto jurídico da ata notarial, enquanto instrumento hábil a contribuir para o crescente movimento de desjudicialização. Considerado como meio atípico de prova na vigência do Código de Processo Civil de 1973, a ata notarial ganhou destaque no ordenamento jurídico com a promulgação do Código de Processo Civil de 2015, recebendo o atributo de meio típico de prova. Diante disso, este estudo pretende realizar uma reflexão jurídica a respeito do contexto jurídico-histórico inerente a essa relevante alteração legislativa, bem como analisar os benefícios que podem ser alcançados com a nova roupagem conferida a este importante meio de prova, considerando o relevante papel dos notários e registradores como agentes do processo de desjudicialização. O trabalho faz uso do método hipotético-dedutivo de abordagem, sendo o tipo de pesquisa a bibliográfica, a partir de livros e artigos científicos.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2018-11-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/2910110.5433/2178-8189.2018v22n3p27Scientia Iuris; v. 22 n. 3 (2018); 27-382178-81891415-6490reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/29101/24537Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iurisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCouto, Monica BonettiKashiwagi, Erika Kazumi2019-07-05T16:33:31Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/29101Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iurisPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/oairevistamdireito@uel.br2178-81891415-6490opendoar:2019-07-05T16:33:31Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Notarial Minutes, Evidence And The Brazilian Code Of Civil Procedure
A ata notarial, a prova e o novo código de processo civil
title Notarial Minutes, Evidence And The Brazilian Code Of Civil Procedure
spellingShingle Notarial Minutes, Evidence And The Brazilian Code Of Civil Procedure
Couto, Monica Bonetti
Notarial Minutes
Means of evidence
Disjudicialization
Brazilian Code of Civil Procedure.
Ata Notarial
Provas
Desjudicialização
Novo CPC.
title_short Notarial Minutes, Evidence And The Brazilian Code Of Civil Procedure
title_full Notarial Minutes, Evidence And The Brazilian Code Of Civil Procedure
title_fullStr Notarial Minutes, Evidence And The Brazilian Code Of Civil Procedure
title_full_unstemmed Notarial Minutes, Evidence And The Brazilian Code Of Civil Procedure
title_sort Notarial Minutes, Evidence And The Brazilian Code Of Civil Procedure
author Couto, Monica Bonetti
author_facet Couto, Monica Bonetti
Kashiwagi, Erika Kazumi
author_role author
author2 Kashiwagi, Erika Kazumi
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Couto, Monica Bonetti
Kashiwagi, Erika Kazumi
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Notarial Minutes
Means of evidence
Disjudicialization
Brazilian Code of Civil Procedure.
Ata Notarial
Provas
Desjudicialização
Novo CPC.
topic Notarial Minutes
Means of evidence
Disjudicialization
Brazilian Code of Civil Procedure.
Ata Notarial
Provas
Desjudicialização
Novo CPC.
description This paper first studies the current reality of Brazilian Judiciary’s, which lacks efficiency as it has an ever more progressive and worrisome number of cases. In this context, many seek alternative ways for conflict resolution which does not involve the Brazilian Judiciary. Therefore, this paper proposes a new alternative method: the use of notarial minutes as a skillful instrument that validates acts without confirmation of Brazil’s court system. In spite of being considered an atypical means of evidence when the Brazilian Code of Civil Procedure of 1973 was in use, notarial acts have gained prominence in our legal system, specifically with the promulgation of the Brazilian Code of Civil Procedure of 2015, which reclassified notarial minutes as a typical means for evidence. Furthermore, this study carries out a legal reflection of the legal-historical context that resulted in this legislative change, as well analyzes the benefits that can be achieved with the new clothing given to this important means of evidence, considering the relevant role of notaries and registered agents in the disjudicialization of Brazil’s legal system. This paper utilizes the hypothetical-deductive method with literature review of legal works and scientific articles.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-11-27
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/29101
10.5433/2178-8189.2018v22n3p27
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/29101
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/2178-8189.2018v22n3p27
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/29101/24537
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris; v. 22 n. 3 (2018); 27-38
2178-8189
1415-6490
reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
collection Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistamdireito@uel.br
_version_ 1799306015186878464