Systemic interactions between law, economics and organizations: considerations about the rupture with the cartesianism and the law as cost to the Business activity

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ferreira, Luciano Vaz
Data de Publicação: 2008
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Scientia Iuris (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/4066
Resumo: In the study of epistemology, two opposite theories can be found in an endless combat. On the one hand, the Cartesian proposal, which sees the world as a precise and predictable object, capable of being dissected into totally independent pieces without any communication among them, to make comprehension easier. On the other hand, there is the systemic approach, which states the contrary: the interaction between the parts is important for the functioning of the whole object. Thus, it is possible to conclude that, while the basis of the first theory is the separation of different disciplines, the second defends interdisciplinarity. Reality is rich to show numerous examples of mutual influence among Law, Economics and Administration. In this scenario, the Law, Economics and Organizations approach appears as an interesting mechanism for the solution of law controversies by the overcoming of the Cartesian paradigm.
id UEL-6_91a9eeaaa6fbe3fae8d888decaedb2f0
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/4066
network_acronym_str UEL-6
network_name_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Systemic interactions between law, economics and organizations: considerations about the rupture with the cartesianism and the law as cost to the Business activityAs interações sistêmicas entre direito, economia e organizações: considerações sobre o rompimento com o cartesianismo e o direito como custo para Atividade empresarialCartesianismsystems theorylaweconomicsadministrationCartesianismoteoria dos sistemasdiretoeconomiaadministraçãoIn the study of epistemology, two opposite theories can be found in an endless combat. On the one hand, the Cartesian proposal, which sees the world as a precise and predictable object, capable of being dissected into totally independent pieces without any communication among them, to make comprehension easier. On the other hand, there is the systemic approach, which states the contrary: the interaction between the parts is important for the functioning of the whole object. Thus, it is possible to conclude that, while the basis of the first theory is the separation of different disciplines, the second defends interdisciplinarity. Reality is rich to show numerous examples of mutual influence among Law, Economics and Administration. In this scenario, the Law, Economics and Organizations approach appears as an interesting mechanism for the solution of law controversies by the overcoming of the Cartesian paradigm.No estudo da epistemologia, duas vertentes opostas encontram-se em constante combate. De um lado, a proposta cartesiana, que vê o mundo como um objeto preciso e previsível, capaz de ser dissecado em partes totalmente independentes, sem comunicação entre elas, de modo a facilitar sua compreensão. Como contraponto, tem-se a abordagem sistêmica, a qual prega que a interação entre as diversas partes é fundamental para o funcionamento do objeto como um todo. Dessa maneira, pode-se concluir, que enquanto o fundamento para a primeira está na separação das diversas disciplinas, a segunda prima pela interdisciplinaridade. A realidade é rica em demonstrar variados exemplos de influências mútuas entre Direito, Economia e Administração. Nesse cenário, a abordagem da “Análise Econômica do Direito e das Organizações” (Law, Economics and Organizations) revela-se ser um interessante mecanismo para a solução das controvérsias jurídicas, por meio da superação do paradigma cartesiano.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2008-12-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/406610.5433/2178-8189.2008v12n0p43Scientia Iuris; v. 12 (2008); 43-532178-81891415-6490reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/4066/3605Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iurisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFerreira, Luciano Vaz2010-01-28T17:25:21Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/4066Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iurisPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/oairevistamdireito@uel.br2178-81891415-6490opendoar:2010-01-28T17:25:21Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Systemic interactions between law, economics and organizations: considerations about the rupture with the cartesianism and the law as cost to the Business activity
As interações sistêmicas entre direito, economia e organizações: considerações sobre o rompimento com o cartesianismo e o direito como custo para Atividade empresarial
title Systemic interactions between law, economics and organizations: considerations about the rupture with the cartesianism and the law as cost to the Business activity
spellingShingle Systemic interactions between law, economics and organizations: considerations about the rupture with the cartesianism and the law as cost to the Business activity
Ferreira, Luciano Vaz
Cartesianism
systems theory
law
economics
administration
Cartesianismo
teoria dos sistemas
direto
economia
administração
title_short Systemic interactions between law, economics and organizations: considerations about the rupture with the cartesianism and the law as cost to the Business activity
title_full Systemic interactions between law, economics and organizations: considerations about the rupture with the cartesianism and the law as cost to the Business activity
title_fullStr Systemic interactions between law, economics and organizations: considerations about the rupture with the cartesianism and the law as cost to the Business activity
title_full_unstemmed Systemic interactions between law, economics and organizations: considerations about the rupture with the cartesianism and the law as cost to the Business activity
title_sort Systemic interactions between law, economics and organizations: considerations about the rupture with the cartesianism and the law as cost to the Business activity
author Ferreira, Luciano Vaz
author_facet Ferreira, Luciano Vaz
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ferreira, Luciano Vaz
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cartesianism
systems theory
law
economics
administration
Cartesianismo
teoria dos sistemas
direto
economia
administração
topic Cartesianism
systems theory
law
economics
administration
Cartesianismo
teoria dos sistemas
direto
economia
administração
description In the study of epistemology, two opposite theories can be found in an endless combat. On the one hand, the Cartesian proposal, which sees the world as a precise and predictable object, capable of being dissected into totally independent pieces without any communication among them, to make comprehension easier. On the other hand, there is the systemic approach, which states the contrary: the interaction between the parts is important for the functioning of the whole object. Thus, it is possible to conclude that, while the basis of the first theory is the separation of different disciplines, the second defends interdisciplinarity. Reality is rich to show numerous examples of mutual influence among Law, Economics and Administration. In this scenario, the Law, Economics and Organizations approach appears as an interesting mechanism for the solution of law controversies by the overcoming of the Cartesian paradigm.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008-12-15
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/4066
10.5433/2178-8189.2008v12n0p43
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/4066
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/2178-8189.2008v12n0p43
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/4066/3605
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris; v. 12 (2008); 43-53
2178-8189
1415-6490
reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
collection Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistamdireito@uel.br
_version_ 1799306013278470144

Registros relacionados