Contractual review in the context of the pandemic: analysis of the symbology of legislation in the light of the decisions of TJERJ

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Konder, Carlos Nelson
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Scientia Iuris (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/47700
Resumo: The paper investigates the effective role of Laws n. 13.874/2019 ("Law of Economic Freedom" – LLE) and n. 14.010/2020 ("Emergency and transitional legal regime of legal relations of private law" - RJET) regarding restrictive rules for judicial review of contracts applicable during the pandemic. Through deductive method, the content of these initiatives is compared with the legal experience consolidated in Brazil in this theme and with qualitative and quantitative evaluation of judicial decisions, in order to evaluate the pertinence of considering them "symbolic legislation", that is, aimed at producing effects more in the rhetorical-ideological field than legal-normative field.
id UEL-6_9da5ba4dc41ace9eb05f884a9fd5b140
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/47700
network_acronym_str UEL-6
network_name_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Contractual review in the context of the pandemic: analysis of the symbology of legislation in the light of the decisions of TJERJRevisão contratual no contexto da pandemia: análise da simbologia da legislação à luz da jurisprudência do TJERJContratoLiberdade econômicaSolidariedadePandemiaLegislação simbólicaContract. Economic freedom. Solidarity. Pandemic. Symbolic legislation.The paper investigates the effective role of Laws n. 13.874/2019 ("Law of Economic Freedom" – LLE) and n. 14.010/2020 ("Emergency and transitional legal regime of legal relations of private law" - RJET) regarding restrictive rules for judicial review of contracts applicable during the pandemic. Through deductive method, the content of these initiatives is compared with the legal experience consolidated in Brazil in this theme and with qualitative and quantitative evaluation of judicial decisions, in order to evaluate the pertinence of considering them "symbolic legislation", that is, aimed at producing effects more in the rhetorical-ideological field than legal-normative field.O trabalho investiga o papel efetivo das Leis n. 13.874/2019 (“Lei de liberdade econômica” – LLE) e n. 14.010/2020 (“Regime jurídico emergencial e transitório das relações jurídicas de Direito Privado” – RJET) no que tange às normas restritivas de revisão judicial de contratos aplicáveis no contexto da pandemia. Por meio de método dedutivo, coteja-se o teor dessas iniciativas com a experiência jurídica consolidada no Brasil nesse tema e com avaliação qualitativa e quantitativa de decisões judiciais, de modo a avaliar a pertinência de reconduzi-las à categoria da chamada “legislação simbólica”, isto é, voltada a produzir efeitos mais no plano retórico-ideológico do que jurídico-normativo.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2023-07-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/4770010.5433/2178-8189.2023v27n2p170-186Scientia Iuris; v. 27 n. 2 (2023): Scientia Iuris; 170-1862178-81891415-6490reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/47700/49511Copyright (c) 2023 Carlos Nelson Konderhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BRinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKonder, Carlos Nelson2023-10-10T18:26:36Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/47700Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iurisPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/oairevistamdireito@uel.br2178-81891415-6490opendoar:2023-10-10T18:26:36Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Contractual review in the context of the pandemic: analysis of the symbology of legislation in the light of the decisions of TJERJ
Revisão contratual no contexto da pandemia: análise da simbologia da legislação à luz da jurisprudência do TJERJ
title Contractual review in the context of the pandemic: analysis of the symbology of legislation in the light of the decisions of TJERJ
spellingShingle Contractual review in the context of the pandemic: analysis of the symbology of legislation in the light of the decisions of TJERJ
Konder, Carlos Nelson
Contrato
Liberdade econômica
Solidariedade
Pandemia
Legislação simbólica
Contract. Economic freedom. Solidarity. Pandemic. Symbolic legislation.
title_short Contractual review in the context of the pandemic: analysis of the symbology of legislation in the light of the decisions of TJERJ
title_full Contractual review in the context of the pandemic: analysis of the symbology of legislation in the light of the decisions of TJERJ
title_fullStr Contractual review in the context of the pandemic: analysis of the symbology of legislation in the light of the decisions of TJERJ
title_full_unstemmed Contractual review in the context of the pandemic: analysis of the symbology of legislation in the light of the decisions of TJERJ
title_sort Contractual review in the context of the pandemic: analysis of the symbology of legislation in the light of the decisions of TJERJ
author Konder, Carlos Nelson
author_facet Konder, Carlos Nelson
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Konder, Carlos Nelson
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Contrato
Liberdade econômica
Solidariedade
Pandemia
Legislação simbólica
Contract. Economic freedom. Solidarity. Pandemic. Symbolic legislation.
topic Contrato
Liberdade econômica
Solidariedade
Pandemia
Legislação simbólica
Contract. Economic freedom. Solidarity. Pandemic. Symbolic legislation.
description The paper investigates the effective role of Laws n. 13.874/2019 ("Law of Economic Freedom" – LLE) and n. 14.010/2020 ("Emergency and transitional legal regime of legal relations of private law" - RJET) regarding restrictive rules for judicial review of contracts applicable during the pandemic. Through deductive method, the content of these initiatives is compared with the legal experience consolidated in Brazil in this theme and with qualitative and quantitative evaluation of judicial decisions, in order to evaluate the pertinence of considering them "symbolic legislation", that is, aimed at producing effects more in the rhetorical-ideological field than legal-normative field.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-07-28
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/47700
10.5433/2178-8189.2023v27n2p170-186
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/47700
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/2178-8189.2023v27n2p170-186
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/47700/49511
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Carlos Nelson Konder
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Carlos Nelson Konder
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris; v. 27 n. 2 (2023): Scientia Iuris; 170-186
2178-8189
1415-6490
reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
collection Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistamdireito@uel.br
_version_ 1799306016424198145