A challenge for contemporary civil law:the general clauses malleability
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Scientia Iuris (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/19917 |
Resumo: | The work aims to draw a contemporary profile of the general clauses, portraying its functional and promotion role that expresses the constitutional principles. The study of the subject will seek to demonstrate that the methodological approach adopted by the Civil Code, providing them with indeterminate legal concepts and general clauses, reflects the opening of the legal system. Based on the studies of the Italian doctrine, particularly in the works of Velluzi and Libertini, the article will try to confront the different meanings that the general clauses may take, seeking to conform a meaning that is more consistent with the Brazilian law. The paper examines the role of the judiciary, focusing the importance of the judge for the content densification of the general clauses, allowing the construction of a solution for the case that absorb all this content based on principles. The study also discusses the theory of autopoietic systems in the conception of Luhmann and Teuber, seeking to demonstrate the complexity and constant mutual intersection of the elements of the system of contemporary law. |
id |
UEL-6_9ec9a61c328300ea3ac028ec45f7d90f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/19917 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-6 |
network_name_str |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
A challenge for contemporary civil law:the general clauses malleabilityUm desafio para o Direito Civil: a maleabildade das cláusulasGeneral clause. Judiciary. Theory of autopoietic systemCláusula geralPoder judiciárioTeoria do sistema autopoiético.The work aims to draw a contemporary profile of the general clauses, portraying its functional and promotion role that expresses the constitutional principles. The study of the subject will seek to demonstrate that the methodological approach adopted by the Civil Code, providing them with indeterminate legal concepts and general clauses, reflects the opening of the legal system. Based on the studies of the Italian doctrine, particularly in the works of Velluzi and Libertini, the article will try to confront the different meanings that the general clauses may take, seeking to conform a meaning that is more consistent with the Brazilian law. The paper examines the role of the judiciary, focusing the importance of the judge for the content densification of the general clauses, allowing the construction of a solution for the case that absorb all this content based on principles. The study also discusses the theory of autopoietic systems in the conception of Luhmann and Teuber, seeking to demonstrate the complexity and constant mutual intersection of the elements of the system of contemporary law.O trabalho pretende traçar um perfil contemporâneo das cláusulas gerais, retratando o papel funcional e promocional que desempenham ao exprimir a principiologia constitucional. O estudo do tema procurará demonstrar que a opção metodológica adotada pelo Código Civil, dotando-o de conceitos legais indeterminados e cláusulas gerais, reflete a abertura do sistema. Com fundamento nos estudos da doutrina italiana, sobretudo na obra de Velluzi e Libertini, o artigo procurará confrontar as diversas acepções que as cláusulas gerais podem tomar, buscando conformar um significado que mais se coadune com o Direito brasileiro. O trabalho examina a atuação do Poder Judiciário, abordando a importância da atuação do juiz para a densificação do conteúdo das cláusulas gerais, permitindo a construção de uma solução para o caso concreto que absorva todo esse conteúdo principiológico. O estudo aborda ainda a teoria do sistema autopoiético na concepção de Luhmann e Teuber, buscando demonstrar a complexidade e a interseção constante e recíproca dos elementos que compõem o sistema do direito contemporâneo.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2014-11-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/1991710.5433/2178-8189.2014v18n2p73Scientia Iuris; v. 18 n. 2 (2014); 73-922178-81891415-6490reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/19917/15394Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iurisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPoli, Luciana2015-03-02T11:59:53Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/19917Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iurisPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/oairevistamdireito@uel.br2178-81891415-6490opendoar:2015-03-02T11:59:53Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A challenge for contemporary civil law:the general clauses malleability Um desafio para o Direito Civil: a maleabildade das cláusulas |
title |
A challenge for contemporary civil law:the general clauses malleability |
spellingShingle |
A challenge for contemporary civil law:the general clauses malleability Poli, Luciana General clause. Judiciary. Theory of autopoietic system Cláusula geral Poder judiciário Teoria do sistema autopoiético. |
title_short |
A challenge for contemporary civil law:the general clauses malleability |
title_full |
A challenge for contemporary civil law:the general clauses malleability |
title_fullStr |
A challenge for contemporary civil law:the general clauses malleability |
title_full_unstemmed |
A challenge for contemporary civil law:the general clauses malleability |
title_sort |
A challenge for contemporary civil law:the general clauses malleability |
author |
Poli, Luciana |
author_facet |
Poli, Luciana |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Poli, Luciana |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
General clause. Judiciary. Theory of autopoietic system Cláusula geral Poder judiciário Teoria do sistema autopoiético. |
topic |
General clause. Judiciary. Theory of autopoietic system Cláusula geral Poder judiciário Teoria do sistema autopoiético. |
description |
The work aims to draw a contemporary profile of the general clauses, portraying its functional and promotion role that expresses the constitutional principles. The study of the subject will seek to demonstrate that the methodological approach adopted by the Civil Code, providing them with indeterminate legal concepts and general clauses, reflects the opening of the legal system. Based on the studies of the Italian doctrine, particularly in the works of Velluzi and Libertini, the article will try to confront the different meanings that the general clauses may take, seeking to conform a meaning that is more consistent with the Brazilian law. The paper examines the role of the judiciary, focusing the importance of the judge for the content densification of the general clauses, allowing the construction of a solution for the case that absorb all this content based on principles. The study also discusses the theory of autopoietic systems in the conception of Luhmann and Teuber, seeking to demonstrate the complexity and constant mutual intersection of the elements of the system of contemporary law. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-11-23 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/19917 10.5433/2178-8189.2014v18n2p73 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/19917 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/2178-8189.2014v18n2p73 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/19917/15394 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Iuris; v. 18 n. 2 (2014); 73-92 2178-8189 1415-6490 reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
collection |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistamdireito@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306014730747904 |