ARBITRATION IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rodrigues dos Santos, Luciano Alves
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Cachapuz, Rozane da Rosa
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Scientia Iuris (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/11900
Resumo: Demonstrates the evolution of Administrative Law,for the three reforms of the Brazilian State, from the 30s. Firstthe bureaucratic model, followed by the developmentalistmodel, until you get to management reform, which enabled theinclusion of non-judicial mechanisms to resolve conflicts.Arbitration is a private mechanism for the trial of disputesinvolving avaliable property rights. When contractually agreedbetween Public Administration and private sphere and formedarbitration agreement, does not lend itself to judge unavailablerights matters; rests solely to support available ones.Noteworthy is the administrative control, the control of theCourt of Auditors;’s Judiciary and Public Prosecution;parliamentarian, and social control or popular.
id UEL-6_ae6b524ec022f96f890a8ab4cc588bb9
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11900
network_acronym_str UEL-6
network_name_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling ARBITRATION IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIONArbitragem na administração públicaState reformsProblems under non-disposable rightsObjective arbitrationSubjective arbitrationForms of control.Reformas de EstadoConvenção arbitralArbitragem objetivaArbitragem subjetivaFormas de controle.Demonstrates the evolution of Administrative Law,for the three reforms of the Brazilian State, from the 30s. Firstthe bureaucratic model, followed by the developmentalistmodel, until you get to management reform, which enabled theinclusion of non-judicial mechanisms to resolve conflicts.Arbitration is a private mechanism for the trial of disputesinvolving avaliable property rights. When contractually agreedbetween Public Administration and private sphere and formedarbitration agreement, does not lend itself to judge unavailablerights matters; rests solely to support available ones.Noteworthy is the administrative control, the control of theCourt of Auditors;’s Judiciary and Public Prosecution;parliamentarian, and social control or popular.Demonstra-se a evolução do Direito Administrativo,quanto às três reformas do Estado Brasileiro, a partir dos anos30. Parte-se do modelo burocrático,seguido pelo modelodesenvolvimentalista, até chegar à reforma gerencial, quepossibilitou a inclusão de mecanismos resolutivos extrajudiciaisde conflitos. A arbitragem é um mecanismo privado destinadoao julgamento de conflitos que envolvam direitos patrimoniaisdisponíveis. Quando pactuada contratualmente entreAdministração Pública e esfera privada e formada a convençãoarbitral, não se presta a julgar matérias indisponíveis; cabe,unicamente, às atividades-meio. Destaca-se o controleadministrativo; o controle do Tribunal de Contas; do PoderJudiciário e Ministério Público; o parlamentar; e o controlesocial ou popular.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2012-10-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/1190010.5433/2178-8189.2012v16n1p137Scientia Iuris; v. 16 n. 1 (2012); 137-1602178-81891415-6490reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/11900/11529Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iurisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRodrigues dos Santos, Luciano AlvesCachapuz, Rozane da Rosa2014-04-22T17:50:54Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11900Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iurisPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/oairevistamdireito@uel.br2178-81891415-6490opendoar:2014-04-22T17:50:54Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv ARBITRATION IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Arbitragem na administração pública
title ARBITRATION IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
spellingShingle ARBITRATION IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Rodrigues dos Santos, Luciano Alves
State reforms
Problems under non-disposable rights
Objective arbitration
Subjective arbitration
Forms of control.
Reformas de Estado
Convenção arbitral
Arbitragem objetiva
Arbitragem subjetiva
Formas de controle.
title_short ARBITRATION IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
title_full ARBITRATION IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
title_fullStr ARBITRATION IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
title_full_unstemmed ARBITRATION IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
title_sort ARBITRATION IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
author Rodrigues dos Santos, Luciano Alves
author_facet Rodrigues dos Santos, Luciano Alves
Cachapuz, Rozane da Rosa
author_role author
author2 Cachapuz, Rozane da Rosa
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rodrigues dos Santos, Luciano Alves
Cachapuz, Rozane da Rosa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv State reforms
Problems under non-disposable rights
Objective arbitration
Subjective arbitration
Forms of control.
Reformas de Estado
Convenção arbitral
Arbitragem objetiva
Arbitragem subjetiva
Formas de controle.
topic State reforms
Problems under non-disposable rights
Objective arbitration
Subjective arbitration
Forms of control.
Reformas de Estado
Convenção arbitral
Arbitragem objetiva
Arbitragem subjetiva
Formas de controle.
description Demonstrates the evolution of Administrative Law,for the three reforms of the Brazilian State, from the 30s. Firstthe bureaucratic model, followed by the developmentalistmodel, until you get to management reform, which enabled theinclusion of non-judicial mechanisms to resolve conflicts.Arbitration is a private mechanism for the trial of disputesinvolving avaliable property rights. When contractually agreedbetween Public Administration and private sphere and formedarbitration agreement, does not lend itself to judge unavailablerights matters; rests solely to support available ones.Noteworthy is the administrative control, the control of theCourt of Auditors;’s Judiciary and Public Prosecution;parliamentarian, and social control or popular.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-10-25
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/11900
10.5433/2178-8189.2012v16n1p137
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/11900
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/2178-8189.2012v16n1p137
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/11900/11529
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris; v. 16 n. 1 (2012); 137-160
2178-8189
1415-6490
reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
collection Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistamdireito@uel.br
_version_ 1799306014310268928