ARBITRATION IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Scientia Iuris (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/11900 |
Resumo: | Demonstrates the evolution of Administrative Law,for the three reforms of the Brazilian State, from the 30s. Firstthe bureaucratic model, followed by the developmentalistmodel, until you get to management reform, which enabled theinclusion of non-judicial mechanisms to resolve conflicts.Arbitration is a private mechanism for the trial of disputesinvolving avaliable property rights. When contractually agreedbetween Public Administration and private sphere and formedarbitration agreement, does not lend itself to judge unavailablerights matters; rests solely to support available ones.Noteworthy is the administrative control, the control of theCourt of Auditors;’s Judiciary and Public Prosecution;parliamentarian, and social control or popular. |
id |
UEL-6_ae6b524ec022f96f890a8ab4cc588bb9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11900 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-6 |
network_name_str |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
ARBITRATION IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIONArbitragem na administração públicaState reformsProblems under non-disposable rightsObjective arbitrationSubjective arbitrationForms of control.Reformas de EstadoConvenção arbitralArbitragem objetivaArbitragem subjetivaFormas de controle.Demonstrates the evolution of Administrative Law,for the three reforms of the Brazilian State, from the 30s. Firstthe bureaucratic model, followed by the developmentalistmodel, until you get to management reform, which enabled theinclusion of non-judicial mechanisms to resolve conflicts.Arbitration is a private mechanism for the trial of disputesinvolving avaliable property rights. When contractually agreedbetween Public Administration and private sphere and formedarbitration agreement, does not lend itself to judge unavailablerights matters; rests solely to support available ones.Noteworthy is the administrative control, the control of theCourt of Auditors;’s Judiciary and Public Prosecution;parliamentarian, and social control or popular.Demonstra-se a evolução do Direito Administrativo,quanto às três reformas do Estado Brasileiro, a partir dos anos30. Parte-se do modelo burocrático,seguido pelo modelodesenvolvimentalista, até chegar à reforma gerencial, quepossibilitou a inclusão de mecanismos resolutivos extrajudiciaisde conflitos. A arbitragem é um mecanismo privado destinadoao julgamento de conflitos que envolvam direitos patrimoniaisdisponíveis. Quando pactuada contratualmente entreAdministração Pública e esfera privada e formada a convençãoarbitral, não se presta a julgar matérias indisponíveis; cabe,unicamente, às atividades-meio. Destaca-se o controleadministrativo; o controle do Tribunal de Contas; do PoderJudiciário e Ministério Público; o parlamentar; e o controlesocial ou popular.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2012-10-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/1190010.5433/2178-8189.2012v16n1p137Scientia Iuris; v. 16 n. 1 (2012); 137-1602178-81891415-6490reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/11900/11529Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iurisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRodrigues dos Santos, Luciano AlvesCachapuz, Rozane da Rosa2014-04-22T17:50:54Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11900Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iurisPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/oairevistamdireito@uel.br2178-81891415-6490opendoar:2014-04-22T17:50:54Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
ARBITRATION IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Arbitragem na administração pública |
title |
ARBITRATION IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION |
spellingShingle |
ARBITRATION IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Rodrigues dos Santos, Luciano Alves State reforms Problems under non-disposable rights Objective arbitration Subjective arbitration Forms of control. Reformas de Estado Convenção arbitral Arbitragem objetiva Arbitragem subjetiva Formas de controle. |
title_short |
ARBITRATION IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION |
title_full |
ARBITRATION IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION |
title_fullStr |
ARBITRATION IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION |
title_full_unstemmed |
ARBITRATION IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION |
title_sort |
ARBITRATION IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION |
author |
Rodrigues dos Santos, Luciano Alves |
author_facet |
Rodrigues dos Santos, Luciano Alves Cachapuz, Rozane da Rosa |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Cachapuz, Rozane da Rosa |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rodrigues dos Santos, Luciano Alves Cachapuz, Rozane da Rosa |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
State reforms Problems under non-disposable rights Objective arbitration Subjective arbitration Forms of control. Reformas de Estado Convenção arbitral Arbitragem objetiva Arbitragem subjetiva Formas de controle. |
topic |
State reforms Problems under non-disposable rights Objective arbitration Subjective arbitration Forms of control. Reformas de Estado Convenção arbitral Arbitragem objetiva Arbitragem subjetiva Formas de controle. |
description |
Demonstrates the evolution of Administrative Law,for the three reforms of the Brazilian State, from the 30s. Firstthe bureaucratic model, followed by the developmentalistmodel, until you get to management reform, which enabled theinclusion of non-judicial mechanisms to resolve conflicts.Arbitration is a private mechanism for the trial of disputesinvolving avaliable property rights. When contractually agreedbetween Public Administration and private sphere and formedarbitration agreement, does not lend itself to judge unavailablerights matters; rests solely to support available ones.Noteworthy is the administrative control, the control of theCourt of Auditors;’s Judiciary and Public Prosecution;parliamentarian, and social control or popular. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-10-25 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/11900 10.5433/2178-8189.2012v16n1p137 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/11900 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/2178-8189.2012v16n1p137 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/11900/11529 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Iuris; v. 16 n. 1 (2012); 137-160 2178-8189 1415-6490 reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
collection |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistamdireito@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306014310268928 |