Formatting of specific protective measures and proportion of cognition scope
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2008 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Scientia Iuris (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/4166 |
Resumo: | This study starts from the premise that civil protective measures are the expression of the fundamental right to protection, and require the use of the best available technique in the current state of art. Its article will show that formatting techniques of specific protective measures, implemented by combining preventive measures and means for their effectiveness, adapted to the concrete needs of the right in need of protection, and added to the technique of correct proportion of legal cognition scope, contribute for the rationalization of the legal activity. Consequently, such techniques simplify and accelerate the procedure, causing gains in terms of effectiveness. |
id |
UEL-6_ffc25e7de8768da97c23fbe33c8a7d18 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/4166 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-6 |
network_name_str |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Formatting of specific protective measures and proportion of cognition scopeFormatação de tutelas específicas e dosagem da amplitude da cogniçãoCivil lawspecific protective measureslegal cognitionprocedural techniqueseffectivenessProcesso civiltutela específicacognição judicialtécnicas processuaisefetividadeThis study starts from the premise that civil protective measures are the expression of the fundamental right to protection, and require the use of the best available technique in the current state of art. Its article will show that formatting techniques of specific protective measures, implemented by combining preventive measures and means for their effectiveness, adapted to the concrete needs of the right in need of protection, and added to the technique of correct proportion of legal cognition scope, contribute for the rationalization of the legal activity. Consequently, such techniques simplify and accelerate the procedure, causing gains in terms of effectiveness.Partindo do pressuposto de que a tutela jurisdicional civil é expressão do direito fundamental de proteção, que exige o emprego da melhor técnica disponível no atual estado da arte, mostrar-se-á que as técnicas de formatação de tutelas específicas, implementadas a partir da possibilidade de combinação de provimentos e dos seus meios de efetivação, adequando-se às necessidades concretas do direito carente de tutela, somada à técnica da dosagem correta da amplitude da cognição judicial, contribuem sobremaneira para a racionalização da atividade jurisdicional, simplificando e acelerando o procedimento, importando, enfim, em ganhos em termos de efetividade.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2008-12-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/416610.5433/2178-8189.2008v12n0p275Scientia Iuris; v. 12 (2008); 275-2942178-81891415-6490reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/4166/3617Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iurisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessJúnior, Odoné Serrano2010-01-28T17:25:22Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/4166Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iurisPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/oairevistamdireito@uel.br2178-81891415-6490opendoar:2010-01-28T17:25:22Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Formatting of specific protective measures and proportion of cognition scope Formatação de tutelas específicas e dosagem da amplitude da cognição |
title |
Formatting of specific protective measures and proportion of cognition scope |
spellingShingle |
Formatting of specific protective measures and proportion of cognition scope Júnior, Odoné Serrano Civil law specific protective measures legal cognition procedural techniques effectiveness Processo civil tutela específica cognição judicial técnicas processuais efetividade |
title_short |
Formatting of specific protective measures and proportion of cognition scope |
title_full |
Formatting of specific protective measures and proportion of cognition scope |
title_fullStr |
Formatting of specific protective measures and proportion of cognition scope |
title_full_unstemmed |
Formatting of specific protective measures and proportion of cognition scope |
title_sort |
Formatting of specific protective measures and proportion of cognition scope |
author |
Júnior, Odoné Serrano |
author_facet |
Júnior, Odoné Serrano |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Júnior, Odoné Serrano |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Civil law specific protective measures legal cognition procedural techniques effectiveness Processo civil tutela específica cognição judicial técnicas processuais efetividade |
topic |
Civil law specific protective measures legal cognition procedural techniques effectiveness Processo civil tutela específica cognição judicial técnicas processuais efetividade |
description |
This study starts from the premise that civil protective measures are the expression of the fundamental right to protection, and require the use of the best available technique in the current state of art. Its article will show that formatting techniques of specific protective measures, implemented by combining preventive measures and means for their effectiveness, adapted to the concrete needs of the right in need of protection, and added to the technique of correct proportion of legal cognition scope, contribute for the rationalization of the legal activity. Consequently, such techniques simplify and accelerate the procedure, causing gains in terms of effectiveness. |
publishDate |
2008 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2008-12-15 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/4166 10.5433/2178-8189.2008v12n0p275 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/4166 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/2178-8189.2008v12n0p275 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/4166/3617 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Iuris; v. 12 (2008); 275-294 2178-8189 1415-6490 reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
collection |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistamdireito@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306013370744832 |