Sociometric analysis of Working Group 4 of ENANCIB – Information and Knowledge Management: a study of the relations between authors, co-authors and teaching institutions

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Elaine Drumond Pires e
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Ziviani, Fabricio, Maria, Thais Campos, Frogeri, Rodrigo Franklin, Ferreira, Daniela Assis Alves
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Informação & Informação
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/informacao/article/view/45264
Resumo: Objective: This work deals with a sociometric analysis of the working group 4 (GT4) of the National Meeting of Research in Information Science (ENANCIB). This approach is justified by the fact that ENANCIB is the main research and postgraduate event in the country that aims to discuss and reflect on scientific production in the area of ​​Information Science. As of 2007, the year of the VIII ENANCIB, WG4 has as its central theme “Information and Knowledge Management in Organizations”. The purpose of this article is to evaluate the scientific research from the ENANCIBs that took place between the years 2003 to 2018 on topics involving GT4. Methodology: For this purpose, a quantitative approach was chosen, based on a survey of 428 studies and 973 authors. For the analyses, the social network analysis method (ARS) and the UCINET software were used. Results: The results of the analyzes showed an increase in the number of publications between 2003 and 2018 on the topics of Information Management (GI) and Knowledge Management (GC) and there was also a congruence between the most productive universities and researchers in GT4. Conclusions: An increase in the number of publications between the years 2003 and 2018 on the topics of knowledge management and information management in ENANCIB can be seen. As a future study, we suggest the analysis of the other GTs under the methodological aspect of this research.
id UEL-8_2b40dcbe3a1e77c642b29a0098482d80
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/45264
network_acronym_str UEL-8
network_name_str Informação & Informação
repository_id_str
spelling Sociometric analysis of Working Group 4 of ENANCIB – Information and Knowledge Management: a study of the relations between authors, co-authors and teaching institutionsAnálisis sociométrico del Grupo de Trabajo 4 de ENANCIB – Gestión de la Información y del Conocimiento: un estudio de las relaciones entre autores, coautores e instituciones docentesAnálise sociométrica do Grupo de Trabalho 4 do ENANCIB – Gestão da Informação e do Conhecimento: um estudo das relações entre os autores, coautores e instituições de ensinoENANCIBGT4Gestão do ConhecimentoGestão da InformaçãoAnálise de Redes Sociais.ENANCIBGT4Knowledge managementInformation managementSocial Network AnalysisENANCIBGT4Conocimiento AdministrativoGestión de la InformaciónAnálisis de Redes SocialesObjective: This work deals with a sociometric analysis of the working group 4 (GT4) of the National Meeting of Research in Information Science (ENANCIB). This approach is justified by the fact that ENANCIB is the main research and postgraduate event in the country that aims to discuss and reflect on scientific production in the area of ​​Information Science. As of 2007, the year of the VIII ENANCIB, WG4 has as its central theme “Information and Knowledge Management in Organizations”. The purpose of this article is to evaluate the scientific research from the ENANCIBs that took place between the years 2003 to 2018 on topics involving GT4. Methodology: For this purpose, a quantitative approach was chosen, based on a survey of 428 studies and 973 authors. For the analyses, the social network analysis method (ARS) and the UCINET software were used. Results: The results of the analyzes showed an increase in the number of publications between 2003 and 2018 on the topics of Information Management (GI) and Knowledge Management (GC) and there was also a congruence between the most productive universities and researchers in GT4. Conclusions: An increase in the number of publications between the years 2003 and 2018 on the topics of knowledge management and information management in ENANCIB can be seen. As a future study, we suggest the analysis of the other GTs under the methodological aspect of this research.Objetivo: Este trabajo aborda un análisis sociométrico del grupo de trabajo 4 (GT4) del Encuentro Nacional de Investigación en Ciencias de la Información (ENANCIB). Este enfoque se justifica por el hecho de que la ENANCIB es el principal evento de investigación y posgrado del país que tiene como objetivo discutir y reflexionar sobre la producción científica en el área de las Ciencias de la Información. A partir de 2007, año de la VIII ENANCIB, el GT4 tiene como tema central “Gestión de la Información y el Conocimiento en las Organizaciones”. El propósito de este artículo es evaluar las investigaciones científicas de las ENANCIB que se realizaron entre los años 2003 al 2018 en temas relacionados con el GT4. Metodología: Para ello se optó por un enfoque cuantitativo, basado en una encuesta de 428 estudios y 973 autores. Para los análisis se utilizó el método de análisis de redes sociales (ARS) y el software UCINET. Resultados: Los resultados de los análisis mostraron un aumento en el número de publicaciones entre 2003 y 2018 sobre los temas de Gestión de la Información (GI) y Gestión del Conocimiento (GC) y también hubo una congruencia entre las universidades e investigadores más productivos en GT4. Conclusiones: Se puede observar un aumento en el número de publicaciones entre los años 2003 y 2018 sobre los temas de gestión del conocimiento y gestión de la información en la ENANCIB. Como estudio futuro, sugerimos el análisis de los demás GT bajo el aspecto metodológico de esta investigación.Objetivo: Este trabalho trata de uma análise sociométrica do grupo de trabalho 4 (GT4) do Encontro Nacional de Pesquisa em Ciência da Informação (ENANCIB). Tal abordagem justifica- se pelo ENANCIB constituir-se no principal evento de pesquisa e pós-graduação do país que visa à discussão e reflexão da produção científica na área de Ciência da Informação. A partir de 2007, ano do VIII ENANCIB, o GT4 tem como tema central a “Gestão da Informação e do Conhecimento nas Organizações”. O objetivo deste artigo é avaliar as pesquisas científicas provenientes dos ENANCIBs ocorridas entre os anos de 2003 a 2018 dos temas que envolvem o GT4. Metodologia: Para esse propósito optou-se por uma abordagem quantitativa, a partir do levantamento de 428 estudos e 973 autores. Para as análises utilizou-se o método de análise de redes sociais (ARS) e o auxílio do software UCINET. Resultados: Os resultados das análises demonstraram o aumento da quantidade de publicações entre 2003 e 2018 dos temas em Gestão da Informação (GI) e Gestão do Conhecimento (GC) e observou-se ainda, uma congruência entre as universidades e pesquisadores mais produtivos no GT4. Conclusões: Pode-se constatar o aumento da quantidade de publicações entre os anos 2003 e 2018 dos temas gestão do conhecimento e gestão da informação no ENANCIB. Como estudo futuro, sugere-se a análise dos outros GTs sob o aspecto metodológico desta pesquisa.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2023-09-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/informacao/article/view/4526410.5433/1981-8920.2022v27n4p135Informação & Informação; v. 27 n. 4 (2022): Informação & Informação; 135-1561981-8920reponame:Informação & Informaçãoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/informacao/article/view/45264/49411Copyright (c) 2023 Informação & Informaçãohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Elaine Drumond Pires eZiviani, FabricioMaria, Thais CamposFrogeri, Rodrigo FranklinFerreira, Daniela Assis Alves2023-10-20T14:40:37Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/45264Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/informacao/indexPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/informacao/oai||infoeinfo@uel.br10.5433/1981-89201981-89201414-2139opendoar:2023-10-20T14:40:37Informação & Informação - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Sociometric analysis of Working Group 4 of ENANCIB – Information and Knowledge Management: a study of the relations between authors, co-authors and teaching institutions
Análisis sociométrico del Grupo de Trabajo 4 de ENANCIB – Gestión de la Información y del Conocimiento: un estudio de las relaciones entre autores, coautores e instituciones docentes
Análise sociométrica do Grupo de Trabalho 4 do ENANCIB – Gestão da Informação e do Conhecimento: um estudo das relações entre os autores, coautores e instituições de ensino
title Sociometric analysis of Working Group 4 of ENANCIB – Information and Knowledge Management: a study of the relations between authors, co-authors and teaching institutions
spellingShingle Sociometric analysis of Working Group 4 of ENANCIB – Information and Knowledge Management: a study of the relations between authors, co-authors and teaching institutions
Silva, Elaine Drumond Pires e
ENANCIB
GT4
Gestão do Conhecimento
Gestão da Informação
Análise de Redes Sociais.
ENANCIB
GT4
Knowledge management
Information management
Social Network Analysis
ENANCIB
GT4
Conocimiento Administrativo
Gestión de la Información
Análisis de Redes Sociales
title_short Sociometric analysis of Working Group 4 of ENANCIB – Information and Knowledge Management: a study of the relations between authors, co-authors and teaching institutions
title_full Sociometric analysis of Working Group 4 of ENANCIB – Information and Knowledge Management: a study of the relations between authors, co-authors and teaching institutions
title_fullStr Sociometric analysis of Working Group 4 of ENANCIB – Information and Knowledge Management: a study of the relations between authors, co-authors and teaching institutions
title_full_unstemmed Sociometric analysis of Working Group 4 of ENANCIB – Information and Knowledge Management: a study of the relations between authors, co-authors and teaching institutions
title_sort Sociometric analysis of Working Group 4 of ENANCIB – Information and Knowledge Management: a study of the relations between authors, co-authors and teaching institutions
author Silva, Elaine Drumond Pires e
author_facet Silva, Elaine Drumond Pires e
Ziviani, Fabricio
Maria, Thais Campos
Frogeri, Rodrigo Franklin
Ferreira, Daniela Assis Alves
author_role author
author2 Ziviani, Fabricio
Maria, Thais Campos
Frogeri, Rodrigo Franklin
Ferreira, Daniela Assis Alves
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Elaine Drumond Pires e
Ziviani, Fabricio
Maria, Thais Campos
Frogeri, Rodrigo Franklin
Ferreira, Daniela Assis Alves
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv ENANCIB
GT4
Gestão do Conhecimento
Gestão da Informação
Análise de Redes Sociais.
ENANCIB
GT4
Knowledge management
Information management
Social Network Analysis
ENANCIB
GT4
Conocimiento Administrativo
Gestión de la Información
Análisis de Redes Sociales
topic ENANCIB
GT4
Gestão do Conhecimento
Gestão da Informação
Análise de Redes Sociais.
ENANCIB
GT4
Knowledge management
Information management
Social Network Analysis
ENANCIB
GT4
Conocimiento Administrativo
Gestión de la Información
Análisis de Redes Sociales
description Objective: This work deals with a sociometric analysis of the working group 4 (GT4) of the National Meeting of Research in Information Science (ENANCIB). This approach is justified by the fact that ENANCIB is the main research and postgraduate event in the country that aims to discuss and reflect on scientific production in the area of ​​Information Science. As of 2007, the year of the VIII ENANCIB, WG4 has as its central theme “Information and Knowledge Management in Organizations”. The purpose of this article is to evaluate the scientific research from the ENANCIBs that took place between the years 2003 to 2018 on topics involving GT4. Methodology: For this purpose, a quantitative approach was chosen, based on a survey of 428 studies and 973 authors. For the analyses, the social network analysis method (ARS) and the UCINET software were used. Results: The results of the analyzes showed an increase in the number of publications between 2003 and 2018 on the topics of Information Management (GI) and Knowledge Management (GC) and there was also a congruence between the most productive universities and researchers in GT4. Conclusions: An increase in the number of publications between the years 2003 and 2018 on the topics of knowledge management and information management in ENANCIB can be seen. As a future study, we suggest the analysis of the other GTs under the methodological aspect of this research.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-09-14
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/informacao/article/view/45264
10.5433/1981-8920.2022v27n4p135
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/informacao/article/view/45264
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1981-8920.2022v27n4p135
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/informacao/article/view/45264/49411
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Informação & Informação
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Informação & Informação
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Informação & Informação; v. 27 n. 4 (2022): Informação & Informação; 135-156
1981-8920
reponame:Informação & Informação
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Informação & Informação
collection Informação & Informação
repository.name.fl_str_mv Informação & Informação - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||infoeinfo@uel.br
_version_ 1799305987781296128