The museums of the federal judicial power: management, infrastructure, accessibility, collection, conservation and communication

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gomes, Ana Lúcia de Abreu
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Magaldi, Monique Batista, Araújo, Julyelenn Almeida Bruno
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Informação & Informação
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/informacao/article/view/40273
Resumo: Objective: to identify and analyze to what extent the museums of the Federal Judiciary follow the norms established by Ibram and its particularities. Methodology: We conducted the research in the five museums of the Federal Judiciary, namely: Institutional Memory Management, Museum of the Superior Court of Justice, Museum of the Military Justice of the Union, Memorial Geraldo Montedônio Bezerra de Menezes and Museu do Voto. For that, we contextualize these museums and the institutions of which they are part; we analyze how these spaces are managed; and we discussed how these museums deal with institutional memory. Methodology consisted of a mixed approach and the data collection was carried out through a questionnaire applied in person, in addition to the observation in loco. Results: We observed that the museums studied are either in compliance with the legislation in force or are undergoing a process of adequacy. The most sensitive issues, however, concern the profession and communication with society: none of the museums has museologists on their staff. Likewise, the exhibitions do not include aspects of the institution's relationship with society. Conclusions: We observed that the fact that they are institutional museums is not a determining factor for their operationality in terms of the museum processes undertaken by the researched institutions.
id UEL-8_592c5bef1d501b9665b03b5cd4b0510f
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/40273
network_acronym_str UEL-8
network_name_str Informação & Informação
repository_id_str
spelling The museums of the federal judicial power: management, infrastructure, accessibility, collection, conservation and communicationLos museos del poder judicial federal: gestión, infraestructura, accesibilidad, recogida, conservación y comunicaciónOs museus do poder Judiciário Federal: gestão, infraestrutura, acessibilidade, acervo, conservação e comunicaçãoInstitutional memoryInstitutional museumMuseums of the Federal JudiciaryMuseum managementMemoria institucionalMuseo institucionalMuseos del Poder Judicial de la FederaciónGestión de museosMemória institucionalMuseu institucionalMuseus do poder Judiciário FederalGestão de museuObjective: to identify and analyze to what extent the museums of the Federal Judiciary follow the norms established by Ibram and its particularities. Methodology: We conducted the research in the five museums of the Federal Judiciary, namely: Institutional Memory Management, Museum of the Superior Court of Justice, Museum of the Military Justice of the Union, Memorial Geraldo Montedônio Bezerra de Menezes and Museu do Voto. For that, we contextualize these museums and the institutions of which they are part; we analyze how these spaces are managed; and we discussed how these museums deal with institutional memory. Methodology consisted of a mixed approach and the data collection was carried out through a questionnaire applied in person, in addition to the observation in loco. Results: We observed that the museums studied are either in compliance with the legislation in force or are undergoing a process of adequacy. The most sensitive issues, however, concern the profession and communication with society: none of the museums has museologists on their staff. Likewise, the exhibitions do not include aspects of the institution's relationship with society. Conclusions: We observed that the fact that they are institutional museums is not a determining factor for their operationality in terms of the museum processes undertaken by the researched institutions.Objetivo: identificar y analizar en qué medida los museos del Poder Judicial de la Federación siguen las normas establecidas por Ibram y sus particularidades. Metodología: Realizamos la investigación en los cinco museos del Poder Judicial Federal, a saber: Gestión de la Memoria Institucional, Museo de la Corte Superior de Justicia, Museo de la Justicia Militar de la Unión, Memorial Geraldo Montedônio Bezerra de Menezes y Museu do Voto. Para eso, contextualizamos estos museos y las instituciones de las que forman parte; analizamos cómo se gestionan estos espacios; y discutimos cómo estos museos tratan la memoria institucional. La metodología consistió en un enfoque mixto y la recolección de datos se realizó a través de un cuestionario aplicado en persona, además de la observación in loco. Resultados: Observamos que los museos estudiados cumplen con la legislación vigente o están en proceso de adecuación. Los temas más sensibles, sin embargo, se refieren a la profesión y la comunicación con la sociedad: ninguno de los museos cuenta con museólogos en su plantilla. Asimismo, las exposiciones no incluyen aspectos de la relación de la institución con la sociedad. Conclusiones: Observamos que el hecho de que sean museos institucionales no es un factor determinante para su operatividad en términos de los procesos museísticos que realizan las instituciones investigadas.Objetivo: identificar e analisar em que medida os museus do Judiciário Federal seguem as normativas estabelecidas pelo Ibram e suas particularidades. Metodologia: Realizamos a pesquisa nos cinco museus do Poder Judiciário Federal quais sejam: Gerência de Memória Institucional, Museu do Superior Tribunal de Justiça, Museu da Justiça Militar da União, Memorial Geraldo Montedônio Bezerra de Menezes e Museu do Voto. Para tanto, contextualizamos esses museus e as instituições de que fazem parte; analisamos como se dá a gestão desses espaços; e discutimos sobre a forma por meio da qual esses museus lidam com a memória institucional. A metodologia consistiu na abordagem mista e a coleta de dados foi realizada por meio questionário aplicado presencialmente, além da própria observação in loco. Resultados: Observamos que os museus estudados ou estão condizentes com a legislação em vigor ou estão em franco processo de adequação. As questões mais sensíveis, entretanto, dizem respeito à profissão e a comunicação com a sociedade: nenhum dos museus apresenta museólogos em seus quadros. Igualmente, as exposições não contemplam os aspectos da relação da instituição com a sociedade. Conclusões: Observamos que o fato de serem museus institucionais não é um fator determinante para a sua operacionalidade em termos dos processos museais empreendidos pelas instituições pesquisadas.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2021-07-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/informacao/article/view/4027310.5433/1981-8920.2021v26n2p354Informação & Informação; v. 26 n. 2 (2021); 354-3761981-8920reponame:Informação & Informaçãoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/informacao/article/view/40273/pdfCopyright (c) 2021 Informação & Informaçãohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGomes, Ana Lúcia de AbreuMagaldi, Monique BatistaAraújo, Julyelenn Almeida Bruno2022-12-02T13:56:24Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/40273Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/informacao/indexPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/informacao/oai||infoeinfo@uel.br10.5433/1981-89201981-89201414-2139opendoar:2022-12-02T13:56:24Informação & Informação - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The museums of the federal judicial power: management, infrastructure, accessibility, collection, conservation and communication
Los museos del poder judicial federal: gestión, infraestructura, accesibilidad, recogida, conservación y comunicación
Os museus do poder Judiciário Federal: gestão, infraestrutura, acessibilidade, acervo, conservação e comunicação
title The museums of the federal judicial power: management, infrastructure, accessibility, collection, conservation and communication
spellingShingle The museums of the federal judicial power: management, infrastructure, accessibility, collection, conservation and communication
Gomes, Ana Lúcia de Abreu
Institutional memory
Institutional museum
Museums of the Federal Judiciary
Museum management
Memoria institucional
Museo institucional
Museos del Poder Judicial de la Federación
Gestión de museos
Memória institucional
Museu institucional
Museus do poder Judiciário Federal
Gestão de museu
title_short The museums of the federal judicial power: management, infrastructure, accessibility, collection, conservation and communication
title_full The museums of the federal judicial power: management, infrastructure, accessibility, collection, conservation and communication
title_fullStr The museums of the federal judicial power: management, infrastructure, accessibility, collection, conservation and communication
title_full_unstemmed The museums of the federal judicial power: management, infrastructure, accessibility, collection, conservation and communication
title_sort The museums of the federal judicial power: management, infrastructure, accessibility, collection, conservation and communication
author Gomes, Ana Lúcia de Abreu
author_facet Gomes, Ana Lúcia de Abreu
Magaldi, Monique Batista
Araújo, Julyelenn Almeida Bruno
author_role author
author2 Magaldi, Monique Batista
Araújo, Julyelenn Almeida Bruno
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gomes, Ana Lúcia de Abreu
Magaldi, Monique Batista
Araújo, Julyelenn Almeida Bruno
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Institutional memory
Institutional museum
Museums of the Federal Judiciary
Museum management
Memoria institucional
Museo institucional
Museos del Poder Judicial de la Federación
Gestión de museos
Memória institucional
Museu institucional
Museus do poder Judiciário Federal
Gestão de museu
topic Institutional memory
Institutional museum
Museums of the Federal Judiciary
Museum management
Memoria institucional
Museo institucional
Museos del Poder Judicial de la Federación
Gestión de museos
Memória institucional
Museu institucional
Museus do poder Judiciário Federal
Gestão de museu
description Objective: to identify and analyze to what extent the museums of the Federal Judiciary follow the norms established by Ibram and its particularities. Methodology: We conducted the research in the five museums of the Federal Judiciary, namely: Institutional Memory Management, Museum of the Superior Court of Justice, Museum of the Military Justice of the Union, Memorial Geraldo Montedônio Bezerra de Menezes and Museu do Voto. For that, we contextualize these museums and the institutions of which they are part; we analyze how these spaces are managed; and we discussed how these museums deal with institutional memory. Methodology consisted of a mixed approach and the data collection was carried out through a questionnaire applied in person, in addition to the observation in loco. Results: We observed that the museums studied are either in compliance with the legislation in force or are undergoing a process of adequacy. The most sensitive issues, however, concern the profession and communication with society: none of the museums has museologists on their staff. Likewise, the exhibitions do not include aspects of the institution's relationship with society. Conclusions: We observed that the fact that they are institutional museums is not a determining factor for their operationality in terms of the museum processes undertaken by the researched institutions.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-07-08
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/informacao/article/view/40273
10.5433/1981-8920.2021v26n2p354
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/informacao/article/view/40273
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1981-8920.2021v26n2p354
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/informacao/article/view/40273/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Informação & Informação
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Informação & Informação
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Informação & Informação; v. 26 n. 2 (2021); 354-376
1981-8920
reponame:Informação & Informação
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Informação & Informação
collection Informação & Informação
repository.name.fl_str_mv Informação & Informação - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||infoeinfo@uel.br
_version_ 1799305986312241152