Documentary language and the sign: an analysis on term and concept

• Autor(a) principal: Martines, Alexandre Robson
• Data de Publicação: 2021
• Outros Autores: Almeida, Carlos Cândido
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Informação & Informação
• Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/informacao/article/view/43409
• topic: Linguistics; Semiotics; Knowledge organization; Concept theory; Domain analysis; Lingüística; Semiótica; Organización del conocimiento; Teoría de conceptos; Análisis de domínio; Linguística; Semiótica; Organização do conhecimento; Teoria do conceito; Análise de domínio

Objective: to analyze the sign as the term-concept binomial and the technical relationship for the application of documentary language. In addition, it intend to carry out this analysis by exploring some theories of the sign, highlighting Semiology, defended by Saussure and Semiotics, presented by Peirce, thus reflecting on the concept in its role as a sign in order to verify how it acts in the discursive plane and how it lodges in the domain Methods: qualitative nature, exploratory type, in which theories from Linguistics are analyzed, and Peircean Semiotics, to understand the relationship between sign and object. In addition, works published in the Knowledge Organization area were recovered, establishing dialogues between the areas, providing cross-information based on interdisciplinarity, enabling the construction of inferences in search of reflections and innovations. Results: the procedures inherent to the documentary language can become more systemic and punctual with interdisciplinary action. In this perspective, the understanding of the nature of the term, its relationship with the lexicon, its potential to be a sign, its historicity and ideological marks in the face of conventionality under the linguistic bias, in addition to understanding it in its philosophical nature with the corroborating Peircean Semiotics the elaboration of the documentary language and its applicability to normalize meaning, respecting the needs of the domains, while paying attention to social practices. Conclusions: language theories have a lot to contribute on theoretical issues, with discussions about the representation of knowledge and its relationship with documentary language, thus directing the understanding of the systematization of linguistic phenomena in the elaboration of documentary language, thus collaborating for good practice knowledge organization systems.