Philosophy's mirror: Hegel's presence in Harris and Dewey classifications

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ferreira, Veronica de Sá
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Sales, Rodrigo de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Informação & Informação
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/informacao/article/view/38727
Resumo: Introduction: Created in the nineteenth century, the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) carries in its unchanging hierarchical structure the thoughts of its time. Among the various sources that contributed to its conception, William Torrey Harris is recognized in the Knowledge Organization literature as Dewey's most immediate influence to create your system. The article published in 1959 by Graziano, points to hegelian’s thought as the true philosophical support of Harris’s scheme and, consequently, for Dewey Decimal Classification, questioning the place occupied for Bacon in this systems. Objectives: The purposes of this research were analyzes the philosophical influences that based the classification of Arts in Harris and Dewey schemes, remaking Graziano's steps, in order to check the plausibility of his statement and extend his discussion, making progress in the DDC theoretical studies. In this article, it is proposed to examine the understanding of Art that formed the classifications of Bacon, Hegel, Harris and Dewey. Methodology: The methodological approach adopted as background was the historical-structural dialectics, which was used in order to develop an explanatory and qualitative investigation, considering the analysis of four different classifications. Results: The results presented clearly indicate Hegel’s presence not explicitly assumed by Harris and Dewey in their systems and still little discussed in the representation information field in Brazil. Conclusions: It is concluded, unlike Graziano, that it is not possible to completely remove Baconian’s thought from the structure of Harris's bibliographic classification, however, the presence of Hegel really confirms itself as the feeder source of the Arts class content.
id UEL-8_781575b424811bab5e42777692900e2a
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/38727
network_acronym_str UEL-8
network_name_str Informação & Informação
repository_id_str
spelling Philosophy's mirror: Hegel's presence in Harris and Dewey classificationsEspejo de una filosofía: la presencia de Hegel en las clasificaciones de Harris y DeweyEspelho de uma filosofia: a presença de Hegel nas classificações de Harris e DeweyKnowledge OrganizationClassificationArtsOrganización del ConocimientoClasificaciónArtesOrganização do ConhecimentoClassificaçãoArtesIntroduction: Created in the nineteenth century, the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) carries in its unchanging hierarchical structure the thoughts of its time. Among the various sources that contributed to its conception, William Torrey Harris is recognized in the Knowledge Organization literature as Dewey's most immediate influence to create your system. The article published in 1959 by Graziano, points to hegelian’s thought as the true philosophical support of Harris’s scheme and, consequently, for Dewey Decimal Classification, questioning the place occupied for Bacon in this systems. Objectives: The purposes of this research were analyzes the philosophical influences that based the classification of Arts in Harris and Dewey schemes, remaking Graziano's steps, in order to check the plausibility of his statement and extend his discussion, making progress in the DDC theoretical studies. In this article, it is proposed to examine the understanding of Art that formed the classifications of Bacon, Hegel, Harris and Dewey. Methodology: The methodological approach adopted as background was the historical-structural dialectics, which was used in order to develop an explanatory and qualitative investigation, considering the analysis of four different classifications. Results: The results presented clearly indicate Hegel’s presence not explicitly assumed by Harris and Dewey in their systems and still little discussed in the representation information field in Brazil. Conclusions: It is concluded, unlike Graziano, that it is not possible to completely remove Baconian’s thought from the structure of Harris's bibliographic classification, however, the presence of Hegel really confirms itself as the feeder source of the Arts class content.Introducción: Creada en el siglo XIX, la Clasificación Decimal Dewey (CDD) lleva en su estructura jerárquica inmutable los pensamientos de su tiempo. Entre las diversas fuentes que contribuyeron a su concepción, William Torrey Harris es reconocido por la literatura de la Organización del Conocimiento como la influencia más inmediata de Dewey para crear su sistema. El artículo publicado en 1959 por Graziano, señala el pensamiento de Hegel como el verdadero soporte filosófico del esquema de Harris y, consecuentemente, de la Clasificación Decimal de Dewey, cuestionando el espacio de Bacon en estos sistemas. Objetivos: Los propósitos de esta investigación fueron analizar las influencias filosóficas que basaron la clasificación de las artes en los esquemas de Harris y Dewey, rehaciendo los pasos de Graziano, con el fin de comprobar la plausibilidad de su afirmación y extender su discusión, avanzando en los estudios teóricos de la CDD. En este artículo se propone examinar el pensamiento sobre las Artes que formaron las clasificaciones de Bacon, Hegel, Harris y Dewey. Metodología: El enfoque metodológico adoptado como trasfondo fue la dialéctica histórico-estructural, que se utilizó para desarrollar una investigación explicativa y cualitativa, considerando el análisis de cuatro clasificaciones distintas. Resultados: Los resultados presentados indican claramente la presencia de Hegel no asumida explícitamente por Harris y Dewey en sus sistemas y aún poco discutida en el campo de la representación de la información en Brasil. Conclusiones: Se concluye, en oposición a Graziano, que no es posible eliminar completamente el pensamiento de Bacon de la estructura de la clasificación bibliográfica de Harris, sin embargo, la presencia de Hegel se confirma como la fuente que alimenta el contenido de la clase Artes.Introdução: Criada no século XIX, a Classificação Decimal de Dewey (CDD) carrega em sua estrutura hierárquica imutável o pensamento de sua época. Dentre as diversas fontes que contribuíram para sua concepção, William Torrey Harris é reconhecido pela literatura da Organização do Conhecimento como a mais imediata influência utilizada por Dewey para a criação de seu sistema. Em artigo de 1959, Graziano indica o pensamento de Hegel como o verdadeiro suporte filosófico do esquema de Harris e, consequentemente, de Dewey, questionando o lugar ocupado por Bacon nestes sistemas. Objetivos: Os objetivos desta pesquisa são analisar as influências filosóficas que embasaram a classe Artes de Harris e Dewey, refazendo o percurso de Graziano, a fim de verificar a plausibilidade de sua afirmação e ampliar sua discussão, avançando no debate em prol dos aportes teóricos da CDD. Serão examinados assim, o pensamento sobre Artes que formou as classificações de Bacon, Hegel, Harris e Dewey. Metodologia: Como abordagem metodológica, adotou-se como plano de fundo a observação sob a ótica da dialética histórica-estrutural para dar corpo a uma investigação explicativa e qualitativa, tendo em vista interpretações extraídas de uma análise realizada em quatro classificações distintas. Resultados: Os resultados apontam a presença hegeliana não assumida explicitamente por Harris e Dewey em seus sistemas e ainda pouco estudada no campo da representação da informação no Brasil. Conclusões: Conclui-se, em oposição a Graziano, não ser possível afastar totalmente o pensamento baconiano da estrutura do sistema de Harris, todavia, a presença de Hegel se confirma como a fonte alimentadora do conteúdo da classe Artes.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2019-12-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/informacao/article/view/3872710.5433/1981-8920.2019v24n3p104Informação & Informação; v. 24 n. 3 (2019); 104-1281981-8920reponame:Informação & Informaçãoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/informacao/article/view/38727/pdfCopyright (c) 2021 Informação & Informaçãoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFerreira, Veronica de SáSales, Rodrigo de2021-04-19T20:57:07Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/38727Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/informacao/indexPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/informacao/oai||infoeinfo@uel.br10.5433/1981-89201981-89201414-2139opendoar:2021-04-19T20:57:07Informação & Informação - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Philosophy's mirror: Hegel's presence in Harris and Dewey classifications
Espejo de una filosofía: la presencia de Hegel en las clasificaciones de Harris y Dewey
Espelho de uma filosofia: a presença de Hegel nas classificações de Harris e Dewey
title Philosophy's mirror: Hegel's presence in Harris and Dewey classifications
spellingShingle Philosophy's mirror: Hegel's presence in Harris and Dewey classifications
Ferreira, Veronica de Sá
Knowledge Organization
Classification
Arts
Organización del Conocimiento
Clasificación
Artes
Organização do Conhecimento
Classificação
Artes
title_short Philosophy's mirror: Hegel's presence in Harris and Dewey classifications
title_full Philosophy's mirror: Hegel's presence in Harris and Dewey classifications
title_fullStr Philosophy's mirror: Hegel's presence in Harris and Dewey classifications
title_full_unstemmed Philosophy's mirror: Hegel's presence in Harris and Dewey classifications
title_sort Philosophy's mirror: Hegel's presence in Harris and Dewey classifications
author Ferreira, Veronica de Sá
author_facet Ferreira, Veronica de Sá
Sales, Rodrigo de
author_role author
author2 Sales, Rodrigo de
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ferreira, Veronica de Sá
Sales, Rodrigo de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Knowledge Organization
Classification
Arts
Organización del Conocimiento
Clasificación
Artes
Organização do Conhecimento
Classificação
Artes
topic Knowledge Organization
Classification
Arts
Organización del Conocimiento
Clasificación
Artes
Organização do Conhecimento
Classificação
Artes
description Introduction: Created in the nineteenth century, the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) carries in its unchanging hierarchical structure the thoughts of its time. Among the various sources that contributed to its conception, William Torrey Harris is recognized in the Knowledge Organization literature as Dewey's most immediate influence to create your system. The article published in 1959 by Graziano, points to hegelian’s thought as the true philosophical support of Harris’s scheme and, consequently, for Dewey Decimal Classification, questioning the place occupied for Bacon in this systems. Objectives: The purposes of this research were analyzes the philosophical influences that based the classification of Arts in Harris and Dewey schemes, remaking Graziano's steps, in order to check the plausibility of his statement and extend his discussion, making progress in the DDC theoretical studies. In this article, it is proposed to examine the understanding of Art that formed the classifications of Bacon, Hegel, Harris and Dewey. Methodology: The methodological approach adopted as background was the historical-structural dialectics, which was used in order to develop an explanatory and qualitative investigation, considering the analysis of four different classifications. Results: The results presented clearly indicate Hegel’s presence not explicitly assumed by Harris and Dewey in their systems and still little discussed in the representation information field in Brazil. Conclusions: It is concluded, unlike Graziano, that it is not possible to completely remove Baconian’s thought from the structure of Harris's bibliographic classification, however, the presence of Hegel really confirms itself as the feeder source of the Arts class content.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-12-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/informacao/article/view/38727
10.5433/1981-8920.2019v24n3p104
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/informacao/article/view/38727
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1981-8920.2019v24n3p104
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/informacao/article/view/38727/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Informação & Informação
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Informação & Informação
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Informação & Informação; v. 24 n. 3 (2019); 104-128
1981-8920
reponame:Informação & Informação
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Informação & Informação
collection Informação & Informação
repository.name.fl_str_mv Informação & Informação - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||infoeinfo@uel.br
_version_ 1799305986066874368