Brazilian field of tourism (1990-2018): description and analysis of the research methodology of the journal articles with most impact (citations)
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2024 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Informação & Informação |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/informacao/article/view/45474 |
Resumo: | Objective: We describe and analyze the research methodology of the 70 articles most cited of the Brazilian field of tourism (1990-2018), regarding their nature, level of depth, design, method, and techniques, as well as to classify them as tourist business study or non-business tourist study. It is also evaluated what the aggregated results mean for the field. Methodology: To calculate the impact of journal articles, we made a bibliometric analysis. For the description and analysis of the research methodology of the 70 most cited articles, as well as the classification as tourist business study or non-business tourist study, we carried a systematic review. Results: There is a clear prevalence of qualitative research (94.29%), most of them of the exploratory deductive type, both those that start from a general theme, and try to apply a literature review to a specific situation, as well as those that are, in general, essays and opinionated and/or normative texts. Most of the 70 articles is composed by non-business tourist studies, especially the most recently published works. Conclusions: The growth in the number of journals and articles published has not yet been accompanied by the practice of taking previous works as seminal, citing them, and continuing their purpose for deepening the study. |
id |
UEL-8_7a658ff7a0896bdd589bd67c77a5ff15 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/45474 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-8 |
network_name_str |
Informação & Informação |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Brazilian field of tourism (1990-2018): description and analysis of the research methodology of the journal articles with most impact (citations)Campo turístico en brasil (1990-2018): descripción y análisis de la metodología de investigación de artículos de mayor impacto (citas)Campo de turismo no Brasil (1990-2018): descrição e análise da metodologia de pesquisa dos artigos de periódico com mais alto impacto (citações)TurismoImpactoMetodologia de pesquisaRevisão sistemáticaBibliometriaTourismImpactResearch methodologySystematic reviewBibliometricsTurismoImpactoMetodología de investigaciónRevisión sistemáticaBibliometríaObjective: We describe and analyze the research methodology of the 70 articles most cited of the Brazilian field of tourism (1990-2018), regarding their nature, level of depth, design, method, and techniques, as well as to classify them as tourist business study or non-business tourist study. It is also evaluated what the aggregated results mean for the field. Methodology: To calculate the impact of journal articles, we made a bibliometric analysis. For the description and analysis of the research methodology of the 70 most cited articles, as well as the classification as tourist business study or non-business tourist study, we carried a systematic review. Results: There is a clear prevalence of qualitative research (94.29%), most of them of the exploratory deductive type, both those that start from a general theme, and try to apply a literature review to a specific situation, as well as those that are, in general, essays and opinionated and/or normative texts. Most of the 70 articles is composed by non-business tourist studies, especially the most recently published works. Conclusions: The growth in the number of journals and articles published has not yet been accompanied by the practice of taking previous works as seminal, citing them, and continuing their purpose for deepening the study.Objetivo: El objetivo es describir y analizar la metodología de investigación de los 70 artículos más citados en el campo del turismo en Brasil (1990-2018), en cuanto a su naturaleza, nivel de profundidad, diseño, método y técnicas/instrumentos, así como clasificarlos como estudio de negocios turísticos o estudio turístico además de tus negocios. También se evalúa qué significan los resultados agregados para el campo mencionado. Metodología: Para calcular el impacto de los artículos de revistas se realizó un análisis bibliométrico. Para la descripción y análisis de la metodología de investigación y la clasificación en estudio de negocios turísticos o estudio turístico además de tus negocios, se realizó una revisión sistemática. Resultados: Hay un predominio de la investigación cualitativa (94,29%), la mayoría de las cuales son exploratorias-deductivas, tanto las que parten de un tema general, y tratan de aplicar una revisión bibliográfica a una situación específica, como las que son, en general, ensayos y textos opinativos y/o normativos. La mayoría de los 70 artículos están compuestos por estudios turísticos además de tus negocios, principalmente los más recientes. Conclusiones: El crecimiento en el número de revistas y artículos publicados aún no ha sido acompañado por la práctica de tomar trabajos anteriores como seminales, citarlos y continuar con su propósito de profundizar el estudio.Objetivo: Busca-se descrever e analisar a metodologia de pesquisa dos 70 artigos mais citados do campo de turismo no Brasil (1990-2018), no que concerne a sua natureza, nível de aprofundamento, delineamento, método e técnicas/instrumentos, assim como os classificar como estudo de negócios turísticos ou estudo turístico para além de seus negócios. Avalia-se, também, o que os resultados agregados significam para o supracitado campo. Metodologia: Para o cálculo do impacto dos artigos de periódico, foi feita uma análise bibliométrica. Para a descrição e análise da metodologia de pesquisa e da classificação em estudo de negócios turísticos ou estudo turístico para além de seus negócios, foi realizada uma revisão sistemática. Resultados: Há o predomínio de pesquisas qualitativas (94,29%), sendo a maioria do tipo exploratório-dedutivo, tanto as que partem de um tema geral, e tentam aplicar uma revisão de literatura a uma situação específica, quanto as que são, em geral, ensaios e textos opinativos e/ou normativos. A maioria dos 70 artigos é composta por estudos turísticos para além de seus negócios, principalmente os de publicação mais recente. Conclusões: O crescimento da quantidade de periódicos e artigos publicados não veio, ainda, acompanhado da prática de tomar trabalhos anteriores como seminais, citá-los e continuar seu propósito para aprofundamento do estudo.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2024-05-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/informacao/article/view/4547410.5433/1981-8920.2023v28n2p21Informação & Informação; v. 28 n. 2 (2023): Informação & Informação; 21-491981-8920reponame:Informação & Informaçãoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/informacao/article/view/45474/50359Copyright (c) 2024 Informação & Informaçãohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKöhler, André FontanCosta, Renato EliseuDigiampietri, Luciano AntonioRodrigues, Andrea Leite2024-05-04T01:40:42Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/45474Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/informacao/indexPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/informacao/oai||infoeinfo@uel.br10.5433/1981-89201981-89201414-2139opendoar:2024-05-04T01:40:42Informação & Informação - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian field of tourism (1990-2018): description and analysis of the research methodology of the journal articles with most impact (citations) Campo turístico en brasil (1990-2018): descripción y análisis de la metodología de investigación de artículos de mayor impacto (citas) Campo de turismo no Brasil (1990-2018): descrição e análise da metodologia de pesquisa dos artigos de periódico com mais alto impacto (citações) |
title |
Brazilian field of tourism (1990-2018): description and analysis of the research methodology of the journal articles with most impact (citations) |
spellingShingle |
Brazilian field of tourism (1990-2018): description and analysis of the research methodology of the journal articles with most impact (citations) Köhler, André Fontan Turismo Impacto Metodologia de pesquisa Revisão sistemática Bibliometria Tourism Impact Research methodology Systematic review Bibliometrics Turismo Impacto Metodología de investigación Revisión sistemática Bibliometría |
title_short |
Brazilian field of tourism (1990-2018): description and analysis of the research methodology of the journal articles with most impact (citations) |
title_full |
Brazilian field of tourism (1990-2018): description and analysis of the research methodology of the journal articles with most impact (citations) |
title_fullStr |
Brazilian field of tourism (1990-2018): description and analysis of the research methodology of the journal articles with most impact (citations) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Brazilian field of tourism (1990-2018): description and analysis of the research methodology of the journal articles with most impact (citations) |
title_sort |
Brazilian field of tourism (1990-2018): description and analysis of the research methodology of the journal articles with most impact (citations) |
author |
Köhler, André Fontan |
author_facet |
Köhler, André Fontan Costa, Renato Eliseu Digiampietri, Luciano Antonio Rodrigues, Andrea Leite |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Costa, Renato Eliseu Digiampietri, Luciano Antonio Rodrigues, Andrea Leite |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Köhler, André Fontan Costa, Renato Eliseu Digiampietri, Luciano Antonio Rodrigues, Andrea Leite |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Turismo Impacto Metodologia de pesquisa Revisão sistemática Bibliometria Tourism Impact Research methodology Systematic review Bibliometrics Turismo Impacto Metodología de investigación Revisión sistemática Bibliometría |
topic |
Turismo Impacto Metodologia de pesquisa Revisão sistemática Bibliometria Tourism Impact Research methodology Systematic review Bibliometrics Turismo Impacto Metodología de investigación Revisión sistemática Bibliometría |
description |
Objective: We describe and analyze the research methodology of the 70 articles most cited of the Brazilian field of tourism (1990-2018), regarding their nature, level of depth, design, method, and techniques, as well as to classify them as tourist business study or non-business tourist study. It is also evaluated what the aggregated results mean for the field. Methodology: To calculate the impact of journal articles, we made a bibliometric analysis. For the description and analysis of the research methodology of the 70 most cited articles, as well as the classification as tourist business study or non-business tourist study, we carried a systematic review. Results: There is a clear prevalence of qualitative research (94.29%), most of them of the exploratory deductive type, both those that start from a general theme, and try to apply a literature review to a specific situation, as well as those that are, in general, essays and opinionated and/or normative texts. Most of the 70 articles is composed by non-business tourist studies, especially the most recently published works. Conclusions: The growth in the number of journals and articles published has not yet been accompanied by the practice of taking previous works as seminal, citing them, and continuing their purpose for deepening the study. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-05-03 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/informacao/article/view/45474 10.5433/1981-8920.2023v28n2p21 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/informacao/article/view/45474 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1981-8920.2023v28n2p21 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/informacao/article/view/45474/50359 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 Informação & Informação http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 Informação & Informação http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Informação & Informação; v. 28 n. 2 (2023): Informação & Informação; 21-49 1981-8920 reponame:Informação & Informação instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Informação & Informação |
collection |
Informação & Informação |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Informação & Informação - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||infoeinfo@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799305981850550272 |