Robert Merton and Thomas Kuhn’s contribution to self-organized view about the scientific collaboration: a metatheoretical study
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Informação & Informação |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/informacao/article/view/26314 |
Resumo: | Introduction: Scientific collaboration is a social interaction activity among researchers who work in groups or doubles to elaborate a more complete and precise research. Objective: It aims to analyze the scientific collaboration in Merton and Kuhn's studies view, in order to propose a new conceptual-theoretical and methodological approach to collaboration, which we analyse in this study as a spontaneous and self-organized activity. Methodology: It presents the Ritzer's meta-theoretical analysis and describes the collaborative scientific behavior from the theory of Merton and Kuhn. Results: The behavior of researchers can be determined from social rules and from the scientific community standards, and also conected to cognitive and individual rules. Conclusions: It consider that the Merton and Kuhn's proposal could be complementary, and when we combine it they tend to endorse the autonomous and autorregente perspective of scientific collaboration process because the knowledge construction process could also be considered a social interactions result. However, the knowledge construction process depends on the structural characteristics of each sector as proposed by Merton, in addition to individual preferences and cognitive rules of researchers who participated in the knowledge construction process, and it shows the existence of cognitive rules in the scientific work, highlighted by Kuhn. |
id |
UEL-8_853116b50e6e1cd267420aae851791e2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/26314 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-8 |
network_name_str |
Informação & Informação |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Robert Merton and Thomas Kuhn’s contribution to self-organized view about the scientific collaboration: a metatheoretical studyLa contribución de Robert Merton y Thomas Kuhn para la visión auto-organizada de la colaboración científica: un estudio metateóricoA contribuição de Robert Merton e Thomas Kuhn para a visão auto-organizada da colaboração científica: um estudo metateóricoScientific CollaborationParadigmBibliometricSocial NetworkColaboración científicaParadigmaBibliometríaRedes socialesColaboração CientíficaParadigmasBibliometriaRedes SociaisIntroduction: Scientific collaboration is a social interaction activity among researchers who work in groups or doubles to elaborate a more complete and precise research. Objective: It aims to analyze the scientific collaboration in Merton and Kuhn's studies view, in order to propose a new conceptual-theoretical and methodological approach to collaboration, which we analyse in this study as a spontaneous and self-organized activity. Methodology: It presents the Ritzer's meta-theoretical analysis and describes the collaborative scientific behavior from the theory of Merton and Kuhn. Results: The behavior of researchers can be determined from social rules and from the scientific community standards, and also conected to cognitive and individual rules. Conclusions: It consider that the Merton and Kuhn's proposal could be complementary, and when we combine it they tend to endorse the autonomous and autorregente perspective of scientific collaboration process because the knowledge construction process could also be considered a social interactions result. However, the knowledge construction process depends on the structural characteristics of each sector as proposed by Merton, in addition to individual preferences and cognitive rules of researchers who participated in the knowledge construction process, and it shows the existence of cognitive rules in the scientific work, highlighted by Kuhn.Introducción: La colaboración científica es una actividad social de interacción entre investigadores que actúan en grupos o dobles para la elaboración de investigaciones más completas y precisas. Objetivo: reflejar la colaboración científica a la luz de los estudios de Merton y Kuhn, con el fin de proponer un enfoque conceptual-teórico y metodológico a la colaboración, tratada aquí como una actividad espontánea y auto-organizada. Metodología: Se presenta el análisis metateóricas Ritzer y describe el comportamiento de colaboración científica de la teoría de los autores Merton y Kuhn. Resultados: Identificar el comportamiento de los investigadores puede determinarse a partir de los estándares y normas de la comunidad científica asociada con las normas sociales cognitivas individuales. Conclusiones: Considera que las propuestas de Merton y Kuhn se completarán, y cuando se combina tienden a respaldar la perspectiva autónoma y autorregente del proceso de colaboración científica como el proceso de construcción del conocimiento puede ser considerado como un resultado de las interacciones sociales, sin embargo, este último sujeto a las características estructurales de cada dominio, como se propone por Merton, además de las preferencias individuales y las normas cognitivas de los investigadores que participan en el proceso de construcción de conocimiento, que muestra la existencia de normas cognitivas en el trabajo científico, resaltados por Thomas Kuhn.Introdução: A colaboração científica é uma atividade social de interação entre pesquisadores que atuam em grupos ou duplas para a elaboração de pesquisas mais completas e precisas. Objetivo: refletir a colaboração científica à luz dos estudos de Merton e Kuhn, a fim de propor uma abordagem conceitual-teórico-metodológico para a colaboração, tratada neste trabalho como uma atividade espontânea e auto-organizada. Metodologia: apresenta as análises metateóricas de Ritzer e descreve o comportamento científico colaborativo a partir da teoria dos autores de Merton e Kuhn. Resultados: Identifica que o comportamento dos pesquisadores pode ser determinado a partir de padrões e normas sociais da comunidade científica, associados às normas cognitivas individuais. Conclusões: As propostas de Merton e Kuhn podem ser completares, e quando associadas tendem a endossar a perspectiva autônoma e autorregente do processo de colaboração científica uma vez que o processo de construção do conhecimento pode ser considerado resultado de interações sociais, todavia, esta última condicionada às características estruturais de cada domínio conforme a proposta de Merton, somada as preferências e normas cognitivas individuais dos pesquisadores que participam do processo de construção do conhecimento, evidenciando a existência de normas cognitivas no fazer científico, destacada por Thomas Kuhn.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2018-12-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/informacao/article/view/2631410.5433/1981-8920.2018v23n3p17Informação & Informação; v. 23 n. 3 (2018); 17-371981-8920reponame:Informação & Informaçãoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/informacao/article/view/26314/pdfCopyright (c) 2018 Informação & Informaçãoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHilário, Carla MaraGrácio, Maria Cláudia Cabrini2022-07-05T10:47:50Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/26314Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/informacao/indexPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/informacao/oai||infoeinfo@uel.br10.5433/1981-89201981-89201414-2139opendoar:2022-07-05T10:47:50Informação & Informação - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Robert Merton and Thomas Kuhn’s contribution to self-organized view about the scientific collaboration: a metatheoretical study La contribución de Robert Merton y Thomas Kuhn para la visión auto-organizada de la colaboración científica: un estudio metateórico A contribuição de Robert Merton e Thomas Kuhn para a visão auto-organizada da colaboração científica: um estudo metateórico |
title |
Robert Merton and Thomas Kuhn’s contribution to self-organized view about the scientific collaboration: a metatheoretical study |
spellingShingle |
Robert Merton and Thomas Kuhn’s contribution to self-organized view about the scientific collaboration: a metatheoretical study Hilário, Carla Mara Scientific Collaboration Paradigm Bibliometric Social Network Colaboración científica Paradigma Bibliometría Redes sociales Colaboração Científica Paradigmas Bibliometria Redes Sociais |
title_short |
Robert Merton and Thomas Kuhn’s contribution to self-organized view about the scientific collaboration: a metatheoretical study |
title_full |
Robert Merton and Thomas Kuhn’s contribution to self-organized view about the scientific collaboration: a metatheoretical study |
title_fullStr |
Robert Merton and Thomas Kuhn’s contribution to self-organized view about the scientific collaboration: a metatheoretical study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Robert Merton and Thomas Kuhn’s contribution to self-organized view about the scientific collaboration: a metatheoretical study |
title_sort |
Robert Merton and Thomas Kuhn’s contribution to self-organized view about the scientific collaboration: a metatheoretical study |
author |
Hilário, Carla Mara |
author_facet |
Hilário, Carla Mara Grácio, Maria Cláudia Cabrini |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Grácio, Maria Cláudia Cabrini |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Hilário, Carla Mara Grácio, Maria Cláudia Cabrini |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Scientific Collaboration Paradigm Bibliometric Social Network Colaboración científica Paradigma Bibliometría Redes sociales Colaboração Científica Paradigmas Bibliometria Redes Sociais |
topic |
Scientific Collaboration Paradigm Bibliometric Social Network Colaboración científica Paradigma Bibliometría Redes sociales Colaboração Científica Paradigmas Bibliometria Redes Sociais |
description |
Introduction: Scientific collaboration is a social interaction activity among researchers who work in groups or doubles to elaborate a more complete and precise research. Objective: It aims to analyze the scientific collaboration in Merton and Kuhn's studies view, in order to propose a new conceptual-theoretical and methodological approach to collaboration, which we analyse in this study as a spontaneous and self-organized activity. Methodology: It presents the Ritzer's meta-theoretical analysis and describes the collaborative scientific behavior from the theory of Merton and Kuhn. Results: The behavior of researchers can be determined from social rules and from the scientific community standards, and also conected to cognitive and individual rules. Conclusions: It consider that the Merton and Kuhn's proposal could be complementary, and when we combine it they tend to endorse the autonomous and autorregente perspective of scientific collaboration process because the knowledge construction process could also be considered a social interactions result. However, the knowledge construction process depends on the structural characteristics of each sector as proposed by Merton, in addition to individual preferences and cognitive rules of researchers who participated in the knowledge construction process, and it shows the existence of cognitive rules in the scientific work, highlighted by Kuhn. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-12-27 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/informacao/article/view/26314 10.5433/1981-8920.2018v23n3p17 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/informacao/article/view/26314 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1981-8920.2018v23n3p17 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/informacao/article/view/26314/pdf |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Informação & Informação info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Informação & Informação |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Informação & Informação; v. 23 n. 3 (2018); 17-37 1981-8920 reponame:Informação & Informação instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Informação & Informação |
collection |
Informação & Informação |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Informação & Informação - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||infoeinfo@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799305984405929984 |