Adhesion to the myths of conjugality by men and women: associations with marital quality and conflict

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Neumann, Angélica Paula
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Falcke, Denise, Mosmann, Clarisse Pereira, Wagner, Adriana
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologia
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/eip/article/view/36864
Resumo: The purpose of this study was to identify the adhesion of men and women to conjugal myths, comparing the sexes and checking associations with sociodemographic variables, marital quality and style of conflict resolution strategies. Participated 65 heterosexual couples, officially married (45.3%), in a stable union (35.9%) or dating (18.5%). The instruments used were: sociodemographic questionnaire, questionnaire of conjugal myths, Golombok and Rust Inventory of Martital State e Conflict Resolution Style Inventory. The results revealed that there was high or moderate adhesion to the conjugal myths. For men, greater adherence was associated with perceived higher marital quality, greater use of submission strategy and less involvement in conflict. For women, adherence to myths was positively correlated with the strategies of positive resolution of conflicts and submission and negatively with involvement in the conflict. It is discussed the need to consider adherence to the myths of conjugality in interventions with couples.
id UEL-9_bab662e18b3e292c680c44ee034dddeb
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/36864
network_acronym_str UEL-9
network_name_str Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologia
repository_id_str
spelling Adhesion to the myths of conjugality by men and women: associations with marital quality and conflictAdhesión a los mitos de la conjugalidad por hombres y mujeres: asociaciones con calidad y conflicto conjugalAdesão aos mitos da conjugalidade por homens e mulheres: associações com qualidade e conflito conjugalConjugal mythsGenderConjugal qualityConjugal conflictmitos conyugalesgénerocalidad conyugalconflicto conyugalmitos conjugaissexoqualidade conjugalconflito conjugalThe purpose of this study was to identify the adhesion of men and women to conjugal myths, comparing the sexes and checking associations with sociodemographic variables, marital quality and style of conflict resolution strategies. Participated 65 heterosexual couples, officially married (45.3%), in a stable union (35.9%) or dating (18.5%). The instruments used were: sociodemographic questionnaire, questionnaire of conjugal myths, Golombok and Rust Inventory of Martital State e Conflict Resolution Style Inventory. The results revealed that there was high or moderate adhesion to the conjugal myths. For men, greater adherence was associated with perceived higher marital quality, greater use of submission strategy and less involvement in conflict. For women, adherence to myths was positively correlated with the strategies of positive resolution of conflicts and submission and negatively with involvement in the conflict. It is discussed the need to consider adherence to the myths of conjugality in interventions with couples.Este estudio analizó la adhesión de hombres y mujeres a los mitos conyugales, haciendo comparaciones entre los sexos y verificando las asociaciones con las variables sociodemográficas, la calidad conyugal y el estilo de resolución de conflictos. Participaron 65 parejas heterosexuales, en matrimonios oficiales (45,3%), unión de hecho (35,9%) y novios (18,5%). Los instrumentos utilizados fueron: cuestionario sociodemográfico y de mitos conyugales, Golombok and Rust Inventory of Martital State e Conflict Resolution Style Inventory. Hubo adhesión alta o moderada a los mitos conyugales. Para los hombres, la mayor adhesión se presentó asociada a la percepción de más calidad conyugal y uso de estrategia de sumisión y menos implicación en el conflicto. Para las mujeres, la adhesión a los mitos se correlacionó positivamente con las estrategias de resolución positiva de los conflictos y la sumisión; y negativamente con la participación en el conflicto. Se discute la necesidad de considerar la adhesión a los mitos conyugales en las intervenciones con parejas.O objetivo deste estudo foi identificar a adesão de homens e mulheres a mitos conjugais, comparando os sexos e verificando associações com variáveis sociodemográficas, qualidade conjugal e estilos de resolução de conflitos. Participaram 65 casais heterossexuais, casados oficialmente (45,3%), em união estável (35,9%) ou namorando (18,5%). Os instrumentos utilizados foram: questionário sociodemográfico, questionário de mitos conjugais, Inventário de Estado Conjugal de Golombok e Rust e Inventário de Estilos de Resolução de Conflitos. Os resultados revelaram que houve adesão alta ou moderada aos mitos conjugais. Na amostra masculina, maior adesão foi associada à percepção de maior qualidade conjugal, maior uso de estratégia de submissão e menor envolvimento no conflito. Na amostra feminina, a adesão aos mitos correlacionou-se positivamente com as estratégias de resolução positiva dos conflitos e submissão e negativamente com o envolvimento no conflito. Discute-se a necessidade de considerar a adesão aos mitos da conjugalidade nas intervenções com casais.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2020-01-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/eip/article/view/3686410.5433/2236-6407.2019v10n3suplp66Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologia; v. 10 n. 3supl (2019); 66-842236-6407reponame:Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologiainstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/eip/article/view/36864/26679Copyright (c) 2020 Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologiahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNeumann, Angélica PaulaFalcke, DeniseMosmann, Clarisse PereiraWagner, Adriana2022-11-23T17:47:32Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/36864Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/eipPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/eip/oai||revistaeip@uel.br2236-64072236-6407opendoar:2022-11-23T17:47:32Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologia - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Adhesion to the myths of conjugality by men and women: associations with marital quality and conflict
Adhesión a los mitos de la conjugalidad por hombres y mujeres: asociaciones con calidad y conflicto conjugal
Adesão aos mitos da conjugalidade por homens e mulheres: associações com qualidade e conflito conjugal
title Adhesion to the myths of conjugality by men and women: associations with marital quality and conflict
spellingShingle Adhesion to the myths of conjugality by men and women: associations with marital quality and conflict
Neumann, Angélica Paula
Conjugal myths
Gender
Conjugal quality
Conjugal conflict
mitos conyugales
género
calidad conyugal
conflicto conyugal
mitos conjugais
sexo
qualidade conjugal
conflito conjugal
title_short Adhesion to the myths of conjugality by men and women: associations with marital quality and conflict
title_full Adhesion to the myths of conjugality by men and women: associations with marital quality and conflict
title_fullStr Adhesion to the myths of conjugality by men and women: associations with marital quality and conflict
title_full_unstemmed Adhesion to the myths of conjugality by men and women: associations with marital quality and conflict
title_sort Adhesion to the myths of conjugality by men and women: associations with marital quality and conflict
author Neumann, Angélica Paula
author_facet Neumann, Angélica Paula
Falcke, Denise
Mosmann, Clarisse Pereira
Wagner, Adriana
author_role author
author2 Falcke, Denise
Mosmann, Clarisse Pereira
Wagner, Adriana
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Neumann, Angélica Paula
Falcke, Denise
Mosmann, Clarisse Pereira
Wagner, Adriana
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Conjugal myths
Gender
Conjugal quality
Conjugal conflict
mitos conyugales
género
calidad conyugal
conflicto conyugal
mitos conjugais
sexo
qualidade conjugal
conflito conjugal
topic Conjugal myths
Gender
Conjugal quality
Conjugal conflict
mitos conyugales
género
calidad conyugal
conflicto conyugal
mitos conjugais
sexo
qualidade conjugal
conflito conjugal
description The purpose of this study was to identify the adhesion of men and women to conjugal myths, comparing the sexes and checking associations with sociodemographic variables, marital quality and style of conflict resolution strategies. Participated 65 heterosexual couples, officially married (45.3%), in a stable union (35.9%) or dating (18.5%). The instruments used were: sociodemographic questionnaire, questionnaire of conjugal myths, Golombok and Rust Inventory of Martital State e Conflict Resolution Style Inventory. The results revealed that there was high or moderate adhesion to the conjugal myths. For men, greater adherence was associated with perceived higher marital quality, greater use of submission strategy and less involvement in conflict. For women, adherence to myths was positively correlated with the strategies of positive resolution of conflicts and submission and negatively with involvement in the conflict. It is discussed the need to consider adherence to the myths of conjugality in interventions with couples.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01-11
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/eip/article/view/36864
10.5433/2236-6407.2019v10n3suplp66
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/eip/article/view/36864
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/2236-6407.2019v10n3suplp66
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/eip/article/view/36864/26679
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologia
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologia
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologia; v. 10 n. 3supl (2019); 66-84
2236-6407
reponame:Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologia
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologia
collection Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologia - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistaeip@uel.br
_version_ 1799306108834152448

Registros relacionados