Destruição das soqueiras de algodão : métodos de manejo mecânico associados ao controle químico e "carryover" nas culturas subsequentes

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Francischini, Alessandra Constantin
Data de Publicação: 2016
Tipo de documento: Tese
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de Maringá (RI-UEM)
Texto Completo: http://repositorio.uem.br:8080/jspui/handle/1/1170
Resumo: This study aimed to investigate the most efficient mechanical handling method to promote the control of cotton stalks and identify among 28 herbicide treatments tested, the one that can promote percentages of control satisfactory on cotton stalks destruction, as well as determines the empty Sanitary stipulated by the Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture (MAPA), beyond of that, identify the carryover effect of these products in crop secession as soybean, corn and cotton. Thus, the tests performed in the field, aimed at identifying the best mechanical handling associated to an herbicide treatment, it was observed that the methods Management F and G were the ones with highest number of herbicide treatments that promoted control levels close to 100%. However, the method of management F was successful showing 100,00% control of cotton stalks since the 53 DAM when combined with treatment 2,4-D + glyphosate + saflufenacil, being the fastest and most efficient in the control of cotton stalk. When evaluated the control of cotton stalks with 28 different herbicides in the field, it stands out as the best herbicide treatments: glyphosate + saflufenacil + fluroxypyr, glyphosate + fluroxypyr + [imazapic + imazapyr], glyphosate + dicamba + saflufenacil and 2,4-D + glyphosate + saflufenacil+ [imazapic + imazapyr], which showed percentages of 100.00% control of cotton stalks in equal periods and less than 68 days after the management. However, in the evaluation of residual effects (carryover) to subsequent crops (cotton, soybean and corn) provided by herbicide treatments that obtained visual percentages of control equal and greater than 99.00%, was possible to identify the least harmful herbicide treatments and the products able to promote a satisfactory reduction of cotton stalks were: 2,4-D, 2,4-D + glyphosate, 2,4-D + glyphosate + saflufenacil e glyphosate + saflufenacil + fluroxypyr. Thus it can be concluded that the herbicides: 2,4-D, 2,4-D + glyphosate, 2,4-D + glyphosate + saflufenacil e glyphosate + saflufenacil + fluroxypyr when combined will a mechanical handling method to use in cotton stalk destruction can be a great ally in the destruction of the rest of the crops that can remains in the field, thus avoiding the proliferation of potentially destructive insects, pests and fungi for cotton crop in Brazil.
id UEM-10_ef1ca14833c34bd0f616030dbf0aae89
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:1/1170
network_acronym_str UEM-10
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de Maringá (RI-UEM)
repository_id_str
spelling Destruição das soqueiras de algodão : métodos de manejo mecânico associados ao controle químico e "carryover" nas culturas subsequentesCotton stalk destruction: management methods, chemical control and carryover effect in subsequent culturesControle mecânico, 2,4-DHerbicidasVazio sanitárioBrasil.Mechanical management, 2,4-DHerbicidesSanitary empty seasonBrazil.Ciências AgráriasAgronomiaThis study aimed to investigate the most efficient mechanical handling method to promote the control of cotton stalks and identify among 28 herbicide treatments tested, the one that can promote percentages of control satisfactory on cotton stalks destruction, as well as determines the empty Sanitary stipulated by the Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture (MAPA), beyond of that, identify the carryover effect of these products in crop secession as soybean, corn and cotton. Thus, the tests performed in the field, aimed at identifying the best mechanical handling associated to an herbicide treatment, it was observed that the methods Management F and G were the ones with highest number of herbicide treatments that promoted control levels close to 100%. However, the method of management F was successful showing 100,00% control of cotton stalks since the 53 DAM when combined with treatment 2,4-D + glyphosate + saflufenacil, being the fastest and most efficient in the control of cotton stalk. When evaluated the control of cotton stalks with 28 different herbicides in the field, it stands out as the best herbicide treatments: glyphosate + saflufenacil + fluroxypyr, glyphosate + fluroxypyr + [imazapic + imazapyr], glyphosate + dicamba + saflufenacil and 2,4-D + glyphosate + saflufenacil+ [imazapic + imazapyr], which showed percentages of 100.00% control of cotton stalks in equal periods and less than 68 days after the management. However, in the evaluation of residual effects (carryover) to subsequent crops (cotton, soybean and corn) provided by herbicide treatments that obtained visual percentages of control equal and greater than 99.00%, was possible to identify the least harmful herbicide treatments and the products able to promote a satisfactory reduction of cotton stalks were: 2,4-D, 2,4-D + glyphosate, 2,4-D + glyphosate + saflufenacil e glyphosate + saflufenacil + fluroxypyr. Thus it can be concluded that the herbicides: 2,4-D, 2,4-D + glyphosate, 2,4-D + glyphosate + saflufenacil e glyphosate + saflufenacil + fluroxypyr when combined will a mechanical handling method to use in cotton stalk destruction can be a great ally in the destruction of the rest of the crops that can remains in the field, thus avoiding the proliferation of potentially destructive insects, pests and fungi for cotton crop in Brazil.A destruição das soqueiras de algodão é um problema comum entre os produtores de algodão do Brasil, devido a grande dificuldade de um método eficaz e rápido para promover a destruição das sobras das plantas desta cultura após sua colheita. Desta maneira, este trabalho teve como objetivo investigar o método de controle mecânico mais efetivo para promover o controle das soqueiras de algodão e identificar tratamentos herbicidas que promovam porcentagens satisfatórias de controle das soqueiras, tendo em vista o período de Vazio Sanitário estipulado pelo Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento (MAPA), sem que haja "carryover" nas culturas subsequentes à cultura do algodão. Nos ensaios realizados no campo, visando à identificação do melhor método de controle mecânico associado a um tratamento herbicida, observou-se que os métodos de controle F (Após a colheita, roçar as plantas de algodão a uma altura de 29-32 cm e aplicar o tratamento herbicida imediatamente após a roçada das plantas. Esperar 45 dias até a planta apresentar rebrotes de no mínimo 12 folhas com 4 cm2 cada, e aplicar o tratamento herbicida novamente) e G (Após a colheita, roçar as plantas de algodão a uma altura de 29-32 cm, esperar 45 dias até a planta apresentar rebrotes de no mínimo 12 folhas com 4 cm2 cada, aplicar o tratamento herbicida, esperar mais 45 dias até a planta apresentar rebrotes de no mínimo 12 folhas com 4 cm2 cada, aplicar o tratamento herbicida novamente) foram os que obtiveram maior número de tratamentos herbicidas com porcentagens de controle próximo a 100%. O método de controle F promoveu, já aos 53 dias após o manejo (DAM), 100% de controle quando em associação com o tratamento herbicida 2,4-D + glyphosate + saflufenacil, sendo o mais rápido e eficiente no controle das soqueiras de algodão. Quando avaliados os 28 diferentes tratamentos herbicidas no controle das soqueiras de algodão no campo, destacam-se como melhores tratamentos aqueles compostos pelos herbicidas: glyphosate + saflufenacil + fluroxypyr, glyphosate + fluroxypyr + [imazapic + imazapyr], glyphosate + dicamba + saflufenacil e 2,4-D + glyphosate + saflufenacil + [imazapic + imazapyr], que proporcionaram 100% de controle das soqueiras de algodão em períodos iguais ou inferiores a 68 DAM. Na avaliação do efeito residual ("carryover") às culturas subsequentes (algodão, soja e milho) proporcionado pelos tratamentos herbicidas que se destacaram em relação ao controle das soqueiras (controle ≥99%), os tratamentos herbicidas menos prejudiciais às culturas subsequentes com menor período residual no solo foram: 2,4-D, 2,4-D + glyphosate, 2,4-D + glyphosate + saflufenacil e glyphosate + saflufenacil + fluroxypyr. Conclui-se que tratamentos herbicidas com 2,4-D, 2,4-D + glyphosate, 2,4-D + glyphosate + saflufenacil e glyphosate + saflufenacil + fluroxypyr quando associados a um método de manejo mecânico das soqueiras de algodão podem ser uma ferramenta eficiente na destruição dos restos culturais do algodão.vii, 134 fUniversidade Estadual de MaringáBrasilDepartamento de AgronomiaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em AgronomiaUEMMaringá, PRCentro de Ciências AgráriasJamil ConstantinCleber Daniel de Goes Maciel - UNIOESTEFelipe Haenel Gomes - UEMReni Saath - UEMRubem Silvério de Oliveira Júnior - UEMFrancischini, Alessandra Constantin2018-04-04T17:26:24Z2018-04-04T17:26:24Z2016info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesishttp://repositorio.uem.br:8080/jspui/handle/1/1170porinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de Maringá (RI-UEM)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEM2018-10-11T19:16:38Zoai:localhost:1/1170Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.uem.br:8080/oai/requestopendoar:2024-04-23T14:54:04.541781Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de Maringá (RI-UEM) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Destruição das soqueiras de algodão : métodos de manejo mecânico associados ao controle químico e "carryover" nas culturas subsequentes
Cotton stalk destruction: management methods, chemical control and carryover effect in subsequent cultures
title Destruição das soqueiras de algodão : métodos de manejo mecânico associados ao controle químico e "carryover" nas culturas subsequentes
spellingShingle Destruição das soqueiras de algodão : métodos de manejo mecânico associados ao controle químico e "carryover" nas culturas subsequentes
Francischini, Alessandra Constantin
Controle mecânico, 2,4-D
Herbicidas
Vazio sanitário
Brasil.
Mechanical management, 2,4-D
Herbicides
Sanitary empty season
Brazil.
Ciências Agrárias
Agronomia
title_short Destruição das soqueiras de algodão : métodos de manejo mecânico associados ao controle químico e "carryover" nas culturas subsequentes
title_full Destruição das soqueiras de algodão : métodos de manejo mecânico associados ao controle químico e "carryover" nas culturas subsequentes
title_fullStr Destruição das soqueiras de algodão : métodos de manejo mecânico associados ao controle químico e "carryover" nas culturas subsequentes
title_full_unstemmed Destruição das soqueiras de algodão : métodos de manejo mecânico associados ao controle químico e "carryover" nas culturas subsequentes
title_sort Destruição das soqueiras de algodão : métodos de manejo mecânico associados ao controle químico e "carryover" nas culturas subsequentes
author Francischini, Alessandra Constantin
author_facet Francischini, Alessandra Constantin
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Jamil Constantin
Cleber Daniel de Goes Maciel - UNIOESTE
Felipe Haenel Gomes - UEM
Reni Saath - UEM
Rubem Silvério de Oliveira Júnior - UEM
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Francischini, Alessandra Constantin
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Controle mecânico, 2,4-D
Herbicidas
Vazio sanitário
Brasil.
Mechanical management, 2,4-D
Herbicides
Sanitary empty season
Brazil.
Ciências Agrárias
Agronomia
topic Controle mecânico, 2,4-D
Herbicidas
Vazio sanitário
Brasil.
Mechanical management, 2,4-D
Herbicides
Sanitary empty season
Brazil.
Ciências Agrárias
Agronomia
description This study aimed to investigate the most efficient mechanical handling method to promote the control of cotton stalks and identify among 28 herbicide treatments tested, the one that can promote percentages of control satisfactory on cotton stalks destruction, as well as determines the empty Sanitary stipulated by the Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture (MAPA), beyond of that, identify the carryover effect of these products in crop secession as soybean, corn and cotton. Thus, the tests performed in the field, aimed at identifying the best mechanical handling associated to an herbicide treatment, it was observed that the methods Management F and G were the ones with highest number of herbicide treatments that promoted control levels close to 100%. However, the method of management F was successful showing 100,00% control of cotton stalks since the 53 DAM when combined with treatment 2,4-D + glyphosate + saflufenacil, being the fastest and most efficient in the control of cotton stalk. When evaluated the control of cotton stalks with 28 different herbicides in the field, it stands out as the best herbicide treatments: glyphosate + saflufenacil + fluroxypyr, glyphosate + fluroxypyr + [imazapic + imazapyr], glyphosate + dicamba + saflufenacil and 2,4-D + glyphosate + saflufenacil+ [imazapic + imazapyr], which showed percentages of 100.00% control of cotton stalks in equal periods and less than 68 days after the management. However, in the evaluation of residual effects (carryover) to subsequent crops (cotton, soybean and corn) provided by herbicide treatments that obtained visual percentages of control equal and greater than 99.00%, was possible to identify the least harmful herbicide treatments and the products able to promote a satisfactory reduction of cotton stalks were: 2,4-D, 2,4-D + glyphosate, 2,4-D + glyphosate + saflufenacil e glyphosate + saflufenacil + fluroxypyr. Thus it can be concluded that the herbicides: 2,4-D, 2,4-D + glyphosate, 2,4-D + glyphosate + saflufenacil e glyphosate + saflufenacil + fluroxypyr when combined will a mechanical handling method to use in cotton stalk destruction can be a great ally in the destruction of the rest of the crops that can remains in the field, thus avoiding the proliferation of potentially destructive insects, pests and fungi for cotton crop in Brazil.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016
2018-04-04T17:26:24Z
2018-04-04T17:26:24Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.uem.br:8080/jspui/handle/1/1170
url http://repositorio.uem.br:8080/jspui/handle/1/1170
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Maringá
Brasil
Departamento de Agronomia
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Agronomia
UEM
Maringá, PR
Centro de Ciências Agrárias
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Maringá
Brasil
Departamento de Agronomia
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Agronomia
UEM
Maringá, PR
Centro de Ciências Agrárias
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de Maringá (RI-UEM)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron:UEM
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron_str UEM
institution UEM
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de Maringá (RI-UEM)
collection Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de Maringá (RI-UEM)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de Maringá (RI-UEM) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1801841383723499520