Anaerobic soil disinfestation with ethanol or sucrose reduces the viability of Meloidogyne javanica and Stromatinia cepivora
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Acta Scientiarum Biological Sciences |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciBiolSci/article/view/64832 |
Resumo: | Anaerobic soil disinfestation (ASD) is an ecological alternative to chemical soil fumigation. However, little is known about the potential of this technique for the management of Meloidogyne javanica and Stromatinia cepivora. To test the hypothesis that ASD reduces the viability of these two pathogens, we assessed ethanol (5%, v:v) and sucrose (5%, m:v) as carbon sources for ASD, for an incubation period of three weeks. Twenty kilograms of soil naturally infested with M. javanica (82 ± 43 J2 100 cm-3 soil) were placed into a plastic container. Polyester traps, each with 15 S. cepivora sclerotia, were buried at 10 and 20 cm depth per container. ASD with diluted ethanol or sucrose (5% v:v or m:v) was compared to the untreated control (UTC), chemical fumigant metam sodium (MS), and soil saturation with water. In comparison to the UTC, ASD using ethanol reduced the numbers of J2 in soil and the galls in tomato roots by more than 93%, a degree of suppression similar to that achieved when using MS. The viability of sclerotia of S. cepivora was reduced by ASD using ethanol or sucrose from 38.12 to 58.1% compared to the UTC. ASD for three weeks using ethanol or sucrose (5%) reduces the viability of M. javanica and S. cepivora in the microcosm. |
id |
UEM-1_34f014ae9b028217e53405df8769f000 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/64832 |
network_acronym_str |
UEM-1 |
network_name_str |
Acta Scientiarum Biological Sciences |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Anaerobic soil disinfestation with ethanol or sucrose reduces the viability of Meloidogyne javanica and Stromatinia cepivora Anaerobic soil disinfestation with ethanol or sucrose reduces the viability of Meloidogyne javanica and Stromatinia cepivora biological soil disinfestation; reductive soil disinfestation; root-knot nematode; Sclerotium cepivorum.biological soil disinfestation; reductive soil disinfestation; root-knot nematode; Sclerotium cepivorum.Anaerobic soil disinfestation (ASD) is an ecological alternative to chemical soil fumigation. However, little is known about the potential of this technique for the management of Meloidogyne javanica and Stromatinia cepivora. To test the hypothesis that ASD reduces the viability of these two pathogens, we assessed ethanol (5%, v:v) and sucrose (5%, m:v) as carbon sources for ASD, for an incubation period of three weeks. Twenty kilograms of soil naturally infested with M. javanica (82 ± 43 J2 100 cm-3 soil) were placed into a plastic container. Polyester traps, each with 15 S. cepivora sclerotia, were buried at 10 and 20 cm depth per container. ASD with diluted ethanol or sucrose (5% v:v or m:v) was compared to the untreated control (UTC), chemical fumigant metam sodium (MS), and soil saturation with water. In comparison to the UTC, ASD using ethanol reduced the numbers of J2 in soil and the galls in tomato roots by more than 93%, a degree of suppression similar to that achieved when using MS. The viability of sclerotia of S. cepivora was reduced by ASD using ethanol or sucrose from 38.12 to 58.1% compared to the UTC. ASD for three weeks using ethanol or sucrose (5%) reduces the viability of M. javanica and S. cepivora in the microcosm.Anaerobic soil disinfestation (ASD) is an ecological alternative to chemical soil fumigation. However, little is known about the potential of this technique for the management of Meloidogyne javanica and Stromatinia cepivora. To test the hypothesis that ASD reduces the viability of these two pathogens, we assessed ethanol (5%, v:v) and sucrose (5%, m:v) as carbon sources for ASD, for an incubation period of three weeks. Twenty kilograms of soil naturally infested with M. javanica (82 ± 43 J2 100 cm-3 soil) were placed into a plastic container. Polyester traps, each with 15 S. cepivora sclerotia, were buried at 10 and 20 cm depth per container. ASD with diluted ethanol or sucrose (5% v:v or m:v) was compared to the untreated control (UTC), chemical fumigant metam sodium (MS), and soil saturation with water. In comparison to the UTC, ASD using ethanol reduced the numbers of J2 in soil and the galls in tomato roots by more than 93%, a degree of suppression similar to that achieved when using MS. The viability of sclerotia of S. cepivora was reduced by ASD using ethanol or sucrose from 38.12 to 58.1% compared to the UTC. ASD for three weeks using ethanol or sucrose (5%) reduces the viability of M. javanica and S. cepivora in the microcosm.Universidade Estadual De Maringá2023-07-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciBiolSci/article/view/6483210.4025/actascibiolsci.v45i1.64832Acta Scientiarum. Biological Sciences; Vol 45 (2023): Publicação contínua; e64832Acta Scientiarum. Biological Sciences; v. 45 (2023): Publicação contínua; e648321807-863X1679-9283reponame:Acta Scientiarum Biological Sciencesinstname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMenghttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciBiolSci/article/view/64832/751375156234Copyright (c) 2023 Acta Scientiarum. Biological Scienceshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessQuintino, Augusto Nicomedes Andrade Canedo, Ellen Junia Lopes, Everaldo AntonioVieira, Bruno Sergio Lourenco Junior, ValdirParreira, Douglas Ferreira Neves, Wania Santos 2023-08-17T16:46:18Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/64832Revistahttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciBiolSci/PUBhttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciBiolSci/oai||actabiol@uem.br1807-863X1679-9283opendoar:2023-08-17T16:46:18Acta Scientiarum Biological Sciences - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Anaerobic soil disinfestation with ethanol or sucrose reduces the viability of Meloidogyne javanica and Stromatinia cepivora Anaerobic soil disinfestation with ethanol or sucrose reduces the viability of Meloidogyne javanica and Stromatinia cepivora |
title |
Anaerobic soil disinfestation with ethanol or sucrose reduces the viability of Meloidogyne javanica and Stromatinia cepivora |
spellingShingle |
Anaerobic soil disinfestation with ethanol or sucrose reduces the viability of Meloidogyne javanica and Stromatinia cepivora Quintino, Augusto Nicomedes Andrade biological soil disinfestation; reductive soil disinfestation; root-knot nematode; Sclerotium cepivorum. biological soil disinfestation; reductive soil disinfestation; root-knot nematode; Sclerotium cepivorum. |
title_short |
Anaerobic soil disinfestation with ethanol or sucrose reduces the viability of Meloidogyne javanica and Stromatinia cepivora |
title_full |
Anaerobic soil disinfestation with ethanol or sucrose reduces the viability of Meloidogyne javanica and Stromatinia cepivora |
title_fullStr |
Anaerobic soil disinfestation with ethanol or sucrose reduces the viability of Meloidogyne javanica and Stromatinia cepivora |
title_full_unstemmed |
Anaerobic soil disinfestation with ethanol or sucrose reduces the viability of Meloidogyne javanica and Stromatinia cepivora |
title_sort |
Anaerobic soil disinfestation with ethanol or sucrose reduces the viability of Meloidogyne javanica and Stromatinia cepivora |
author |
Quintino, Augusto Nicomedes Andrade |
author_facet |
Quintino, Augusto Nicomedes Andrade Canedo, Ellen Junia Lopes, Everaldo Antonio Vieira, Bruno Sergio Lourenco Junior, Valdir Parreira, Douglas Ferreira Neves, Wania Santos |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Canedo, Ellen Junia Lopes, Everaldo Antonio Vieira, Bruno Sergio Lourenco Junior, Valdir Parreira, Douglas Ferreira Neves, Wania Santos |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Quintino, Augusto Nicomedes Andrade Canedo, Ellen Junia Lopes, Everaldo Antonio Vieira, Bruno Sergio Lourenco Junior, Valdir Parreira, Douglas Ferreira Neves, Wania Santos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
biological soil disinfestation; reductive soil disinfestation; root-knot nematode; Sclerotium cepivorum. biological soil disinfestation; reductive soil disinfestation; root-knot nematode; Sclerotium cepivorum. |
topic |
biological soil disinfestation; reductive soil disinfestation; root-knot nematode; Sclerotium cepivorum. biological soil disinfestation; reductive soil disinfestation; root-knot nematode; Sclerotium cepivorum. |
description |
Anaerobic soil disinfestation (ASD) is an ecological alternative to chemical soil fumigation. However, little is known about the potential of this technique for the management of Meloidogyne javanica and Stromatinia cepivora. To test the hypothesis that ASD reduces the viability of these two pathogens, we assessed ethanol (5%, v:v) and sucrose (5%, m:v) as carbon sources for ASD, for an incubation period of three weeks. Twenty kilograms of soil naturally infested with M. javanica (82 ± 43 J2 100 cm-3 soil) were placed into a plastic container. Polyester traps, each with 15 S. cepivora sclerotia, were buried at 10 and 20 cm depth per container. ASD with diluted ethanol or sucrose (5% v:v or m:v) was compared to the untreated control (UTC), chemical fumigant metam sodium (MS), and soil saturation with water. In comparison to the UTC, ASD using ethanol reduced the numbers of J2 in soil and the galls in tomato roots by more than 93%, a degree of suppression similar to that achieved when using MS. The viability of sclerotia of S. cepivora was reduced by ASD using ethanol or sucrose from 38.12 to 58.1% compared to the UTC. ASD for three weeks using ethanol or sucrose (5%) reduces the viability of M. javanica and S. cepivora in the microcosm. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-07-26 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciBiolSci/article/view/64832 10.4025/actascibiolsci.v45i1.64832 |
url |
https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciBiolSci/article/view/64832 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.4025/actascibiolsci.v45i1.64832 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciBiolSci/article/view/64832/751375156234 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Acta Scientiarum. Biological Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Acta Scientiarum. Biological Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual De Maringá |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual De Maringá |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum. Biological Sciences; Vol 45 (2023): Publicação contínua; e64832 Acta Scientiarum. Biological Sciences; v. 45 (2023): Publicação contínua; e64832 1807-863X 1679-9283 reponame:Acta Scientiarum Biological Sciences instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) instacron:UEM |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
instacron_str |
UEM |
institution |
UEM |
reponame_str |
Acta Scientiarum Biological Sciences |
collection |
Acta Scientiarum Biological Sciences |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum Biological Sciences - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||actabiol@uem.br |
_version_ |
1799317390431879168 |