Molecular markers in studies on fish parasites (Platyhelminthes): Review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Acta Scientiarum Biological Sciences |
Texto Completo: | http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciBiolSci/article/view/29499 |
Resumo: | Studies with molecular markers are currently more common for all groups of living organisms. Molecular techniques used in Platyhelminthes parasites of fishes do not merely reveal complex life cycles, but are important for species distinction and the elucidation of the phylogenetic hypothesis. Current research verified which molecular markers were mainly used phylogenetic studies on Platyhelminthes parasites of fish so that subsidies for further phylogenetic studies in Icthyoparasitology could be provided. Data base of CAPES Journals platform was employed for bibliometric analysis comprising the keywords “fish” and “phylogeny” associated with “Cestoda”, “Digenea” or “Monogenea”. Information retrieved was quantified and tabulated. Most studies were on Monogenea (43%), followed by Digenea (37%) and Cestoda (18%). Ribosomal molecular markers were the most used in the phylogenetic studies for fish parasites. Due to the advance of molecular biology techniques and of bioinformatics, with more robust phylogenetic analysis, the use of these techniques in other areas such as Ichytioparasitology is on the increase. In fact, molecular phylogenetics and morphological structures analysis have efficiently contributed towards the understanding of phylogenetic relationships among the groups. |
id |
UEM-1_3871a8fcd5afdfa2fb1ddc7d4244ff43 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/29499 |
network_acronym_str |
UEM-1 |
network_name_str |
Acta Scientiarum Biological Sciences |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Molecular markers in studies on fish parasites (Platyhelminthes): ReviewDigeneaCestodaMonogenearibosomal DNACOIBiologia MolecularStudies with molecular markers are currently more common for all groups of living organisms. Molecular techniques used in Platyhelminthes parasites of fishes do not merely reveal complex life cycles, but are important for species distinction and the elucidation of the phylogenetic hypothesis. Current research verified which molecular markers were mainly used phylogenetic studies on Platyhelminthes parasites of fish so that subsidies for further phylogenetic studies in Icthyoparasitology could be provided. Data base of CAPES Journals platform was employed for bibliometric analysis comprising the keywords “fish” and “phylogeny” associated with “Cestoda”, “Digenea” or “Monogenea”. Information retrieved was quantified and tabulated. Most studies were on Monogenea (43%), followed by Digenea (37%) and Cestoda (18%). Ribosomal molecular markers were the most used in the phylogenetic studies for fish parasites. Due to the advance of molecular biology techniques and of bioinformatics, with more robust phylogenetic analysis, the use of these techniques in other areas such as Ichytioparasitology is on the increase. In fact, molecular phylogenetics and morphological structures analysis have efficiently contributed towards the understanding of phylogenetic relationships among the groups. Universidade Estadual De Maringá2016-12-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/vnd.ms-excelhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciBiolSci/article/view/2949910.4025/actascibiolsci.v38i4.29499Acta Scientiarum. Biological Sciences; Vol 38 No 4 (2016); 495-500Acta Scientiarum. Biological Sciences; v. 38 n. 4 (2016); 495-5001807-863X1679-9283reponame:Acta Scientiarum Biological Sciencesinstname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMenghttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciBiolSci/article/view/29499/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciBiolSci/article/view/29499/18186Copyright (c) 2016 Acta Scientiarum. Biological Sciencesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGraça, Rodrigo Junio daFabrin, Thomaz Mansini CarrenhoGasques, Luciano SeraphimPrioli, Sônia Maria Alves PintoPrioli, Alberto JoséTakemoto, Ricardo Massato2022-02-20T22:00:16Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/29499Revistahttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciBiolSciPUBhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciBiolSci/oai||actabiol@uem.br1807-863X1679-9283opendoar:2022-02-20T22:00:16Acta Scientiarum Biological Sciences - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Molecular markers in studies on fish parasites (Platyhelminthes): Review |
title |
Molecular markers in studies on fish parasites (Platyhelminthes): Review |
spellingShingle |
Molecular markers in studies on fish parasites (Platyhelminthes): Review Graça, Rodrigo Junio da Digenea Cestoda Monogenea ribosomal DNA COI Biologia Molecular |
title_short |
Molecular markers in studies on fish parasites (Platyhelminthes): Review |
title_full |
Molecular markers in studies on fish parasites (Platyhelminthes): Review |
title_fullStr |
Molecular markers in studies on fish parasites (Platyhelminthes): Review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Molecular markers in studies on fish parasites (Platyhelminthes): Review |
title_sort |
Molecular markers in studies on fish parasites (Platyhelminthes): Review |
author |
Graça, Rodrigo Junio da |
author_facet |
Graça, Rodrigo Junio da Fabrin, Thomaz Mansini Carrenho Gasques, Luciano Seraphim Prioli, Sônia Maria Alves Pinto Prioli, Alberto José Takemoto, Ricardo Massato |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Fabrin, Thomaz Mansini Carrenho Gasques, Luciano Seraphim Prioli, Sônia Maria Alves Pinto Prioli, Alberto José Takemoto, Ricardo Massato |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Graça, Rodrigo Junio da Fabrin, Thomaz Mansini Carrenho Gasques, Luciano Seraphim Prioli, Sônia Maria Alves Pinto Prioli, Alberto José Takemoto, Ricardo Massato |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Digenea Cestoda Monogenea ribosomal DNA COI Biologia Molecular |
topic |
Digenea Cestoda Monogenea ribosomal DNA COI Biologia Molecular |
description |
Studies with molecular markers are currently more common for all groups of living organisms. Molecular techniques used in Platyhelminthes parasites of fishes do not merely reveal complex life cycles, but are important for species distinction and the elucidation of the phylogenetic hypothesis. Current research verified which molecular markers were mainly used phylogenetic studies on Platyhelminthes parasites of fish so that subsidies for further phylogenetic studies in Icthyoparasitology could be provided. Data base of CAPES Journals platform was employed for bibliometric analysis comprising the keywords “fish” and “phylogeny” associated with “Cestoda”, “Digenea” or “Monogenea”. Information retrieved was quantified and tabulated. Most studies were on Monogenea (43%), followed by Digenea (37%) and Cestoda (18%). Ribosomal molecular markers were the most used in the phylogenetic studies for fish parasites. Due to the advance of molecular biology techniques and of bioinformatics, with more robust phylogenetic analysis, the use of these techniques in other areas such as Ichytioparasitology is on the increase. In fact, molecular phylogenetics and morphological structures analysis have efficiently contributed towards the understanding of phylogenetic relationships among the groups. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-12-20 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciBiolSci/article/view/29499 10.4025/actascibiolsci.v38i4.29499 |
url |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciBiolSci/article/view/29499 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.4025/actascibiolsci.v38i4.29499 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciBiolSci/article/view/29499/pdf http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciBiolSci/article/view/29499/18186 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Acta Scientiarum. Biological Sciences info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Acta Scientiarum. Biological Sciences |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/vnd.ms-excel |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual De Maringá |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual De Maringá |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum. Biological Sciences; Vol 38 No 4 (2016); 495-500 Acta Scientiarum. Biological Sciences; v. 38 n. 4 (2016); 495-500 1807-863X 1679-9283 reponame:Acta Scientiarum Biological Sciences instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) instacron:UEM |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
instacron_str |
UEM |
institution |
UEM |
reponame_str |
Acta Scientiarum Biological Sciences |
collection |
Acta Scientiarum Biological Sciences |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum Biological Sciences - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||actabiol@uem.br |
_version_ |
1799317396414005248 |