Differences in ecomorphology and trophic niche segregation of two sympatric heptapterids (Teleostei: Siluriformes)
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Acta Scientiarum Biological Sciences |
Texto Completo: | http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciBiolSci/article/view/49835 |
Resumo: | Morphological similarity, resource sharing, and differences in habitat use by species are factors that favor their coexistence. The objective of this study was to test possible differences in ecomorphology and diet composition of two Heptapterids (Imparfinis mirini and Cetopsorhamdia iherengi) to identify patterns related to resource use. Samplings were carried out in ten streams in Southern Brazil and 123 individuals were caught. A total of 21 ecomorphological indices were calculated for each individual and the volumetric and occurrence methods were used to quantify stomach contents. Both species presented significant differences in some ecomorphological traits, mainly related to foraging behavior. Even though both species were considered insectivorous, the consumed feeding resources differed between them. Cetopsorhamdia iheringi diet was dominated by Simuliidae and terrestrial Coleoptera larvae, while Imparfinis mirini, presented a diet dominated mainly by Trichoptera larvae, Ephemeroptera nymph, and Annelida. Although ecomorphological patterns cannot be used as an absolute factor to explain diet variations, they provide relevant information about how species share resources. These mechanisms allow us to obtain important subsidies for the conservation and management of freshwater ecosystems since they provide an effective understanding on the interactions that occur between the species. |
id |
UEM-1_9b251c91f468e4590cbf18e6fa3fd335 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/49835 |
network_acronym_str |
UEM-1 |
network_name_str |
Acta Scientiarum Biological Sciences |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Differences in ecomorphology and trophic niche segregation of two sympatric heptapterids (Teleostei: Siluriformes)Differences in ecomorphology and trophic niche segregation of two sympatric heptapterids (Teleostei: Siluriformes)fish; coexistence; feeding specialization; morphological traits; resource partitioning.fish; coexistence; feeding specialization; morphological traits; resource partitioning.Morphological similarity, resource sharing, and differences in habitat use by species are factors that favor their coexistence. The objective of this study was to test possible differences in ecomorphology and diet composition of two Heptapterids (Imparfinis mirini and Cetopsorhamdia iherengi) to identify patterns related to resource use. Samplings were carried out in ten streams in Southern Brazil and 123 individuals were caught. A total of 21 ecomorphological indices were calculated for each individual and the volumetric and occurrence methods were used to quantify stomach contents. Both species presented significant differences in some ecomorphological traits, mainly related to foraging behavior. Even though both species were considered insectivorous, the consumed feeding resources differed between them. Cetopsorhamdia iheringi diet was dominated by Simuliidae and terrestrial Coleoptera larvae, while Imparfinis mirini, presented a diet dominated mainly by Trichoptera larvae, Ephemeroptera nymph, and Annelida. Although ecomorphological patterns cannot be used as an absolute factor to explain diet variations, they provide relevant information about how species share resources. These mechanisms allow us to obtain important subsidies for the conservation and management of freshwater ecosystems since they provide an effective understanding on the interactions that occur between the species.Morphological similarity, resource sharing, and differences in habitat use by species are factors that favor their coexistence. The objective of this study was to test possible differences in ecomorphology and diet composition of two Heptapterids (Imparfinis mirini and Cetopsorhamdia iherengi) to identify patterns related to resource use. Samplings were carried out in ten streams in Southern Brazil and 123 individuals were caught. A total of 21 ecomorphological indices were calculated for each individual and the volumetric and occurrence methods were used to quantify stomach contents. Both species presented significant differences in some ecomorphological traits, mainly related to foraging behavior. Even though both species were considered insectivorous, the consumed feeding resources differed between them. Cetopsorhamdia iheringi diet was dominated by Simuliidae and terrestrial Coleoptera larvae, while Imparfinis mirini, presented a diet dominated mainly by Trichoptera larvae, Ephemeroptera nymph, and Annelida. Although ecomorphological patterns cannot be used as an absolute factor to explain diet variations, they provide relevant information about how species share resources. These mechanisms allow us to obtain important subsidies for the conservation and management of freshwater ecosystems since they provide an effective understanding on the interactions that occur between the species.Universidade Estadual De Maringá2020-05-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciBiolSci/article/view/4983510.4025/actascibiolsci.v42i1.49835Acta Scientiarum. Biological Sciences; Vol 42 (2020): Publicação contínua; e49835Acta Scientiarum. Biological Sciences; v. 42 (2020): Publicação contínua; e498351807-863X1679-9283reponame:Acta Scientiarum Biological Sciencesinstname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMenghttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciBiolSci/article/view/49835/751375150060Copyright (c) 2020 Acta Scientiarum. Biological Scienceshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGarcia, Thiago Deruza Quirino, Bárbara Angélio Pessoa, Leonardo Antunes Cardozo, Ana Lúcia Paz Goulart, Erivelto 2020-11-16T16:25:44Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/49835Revistahttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciBiolSciPUBhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciBiolSci/oai||actabiol@uem.br1807-863X1679-9283opendoar:2020-11-16T16:25:44Acta Scientiarum Biological Sciences - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Differences in ecomorphology and trophic niche segregation of two sympatric heptapterids (Teleostei: Siluriformes) Differences in ecomorphology and trophic niche segregation of two sympatric heptapterids (Teleostei: Siluriformes) |
title |
Differences in ecomorphology and trophic niche segregation of two sympatric heptapterids (Teleostei: Siluriformes) |
spellingShingle |
Differences in ecomorphology and trophic niche segregation of two sympatric heptapterids (Teleostei: Siluriformes) Garcia, Thiago Deruza fish; coexistence; feeding specialization; morphological traits; resource partitioning. fish; coexistence; feeding specialization; morphological traits; resource partitioning. |
title_short |
Differences in ecomorphology and trophic niche segregation of two sympatric heptapterids (Teleostei: Siluriformes) |
title_full |
Differences in ecomorphology and trophic niche segregation of two sympatric heptapterids (Teleostei: Siluriformes) |
title_fullStr |
Differences in ecomorphology and trophic niche segregation of two sympatric heptapterids (Teleostei: Siluriformes) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Differences in ecomorphology and trophic niche segregation of two sympatric heptapterids (Teleostei: Siluriformes) |
title_sort |
Differences in ecomorphology and trophic niche segregation of two sympatric heptapterids (Teleostei: Siluriformes) |
author |
Garcia, Thiago Deruza |
author_facet |
Garcia, Thiago Deruza Quirino, Bárbara Angélio Pessoa, Leonardo Antunes Cardozo, Ana Lúcia Paz Goulart, Erivelto |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Quirino, Bárbara Angélio Pessoa, Leonardo Antunes Cardozo, Ana Lúcia Paz Goulart, Erivelto |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Garcia, Thiago Deruza Quirino, Bárbara Angélio Pessoa, Leonardo Antunes Cardozo, Ana Lúcia Paz Goulart, Erivelto |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
fish; coexistence; feeding specialization; morphological traits; resource partitioning. fish; coexistence; feeding specialization; morphological traits; resource partitioning. |
topic |
fish; coexistence; feeding specialization; morphological traits; resource partitioning. fish; coexistence; feeding specialization; morphological traits; resource partitioning. |
description |
Morphological similarity, resource sharing, and differences in habitat use by species are factors that favor their coexistence. The objective of this study was to test possible differences in ecomorphology and diet composition of two Heptapterids (Imparfinis mirini and Cetopsorhamdia iherengi) to identify patterns related to resource use. Samplings were carried out in ten streams in Southern Brazil and 123 individuals were caught. A total of 21 ecomorphological indices were calculated for each individual and the volumetric and occurrence methods were used to quantify stomach contents. Both species presented significant differences in some ecomorphological traits, mainly related to foraging behavior. Even though both species were considered insectivorous, the consumed feeding resources differed between them. Cetopsorhamdia iheringi diet was dominated by Simuliidae and terrestrial Coleoptera larvae, while Imparfinis mirini, presented a diet dominated mainly by Trichoptera larvae, Ephemeroptera nymph, and Annelida. Although ecomorphological patterns cannot be used as an absolute factor to explain diet variations, they provide relevant information about how species share resources. These mechanisms allow us to obtain important subsidies for the conservation and management of freshwater ecosystems since they provide an effective understanding on the interactions that occur between the species. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-19 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciBiolSci/article/view/49835 10.4025/actascibiolsci.v42i1.49835 |
url |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciBiolSci/article/view/49835 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.4025/actascibiolsci.v42i1.49835 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciBiolSci/article/view/49835/751375150060 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Acta Scientiarum. Biological Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Acta Scientiarum. Biological Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual De Maringá |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual De Maringá |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum. Biological Sciences; Vol 42 (2020): Publicação contínua; e49835 Acta Scientiarum. Biological Sciences; v. 42 (2020): Publicação contínua; e49835 1807-863X 1679-9283 reponame:Acta Scientiarum Biological Sciences instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) instacron:UEM |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
instacron_str |
UEM |
institution |
UEM |
reponame_str |
Acta Scientiarum Biological Sciences |
collection |
Acta Scientiarum Biological Sciences |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum Biological Sciences - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||actabiol@uem.br |
_version_ |
1799317397516058624 |