Descartes e Drummond – art of philosophy and philosophy of art - doi: 10.4025/actascilangcult.v35i1.7056
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciLangCult/article/view/7056 |
Resumo: | Descartes and Drummond, in their proposals of observations and elaboration of the world, are apparently so different and, at the same time, they can be approached by the aesthetic work, the images construction that vivifies concepts linked to the comprehension of reality. The use of reasoning and subjective search can be closer than it is supposed by the common sense. It was used a comparative approach between aesthetic work in cartesian book Meditations (2000) and drummondian poems selected from the convergence of figures and themes. It was done a route of literary criticism based on the four reasons presented by Descartes. It has been observed that the same instrument, the verbal language, doesn't guarantee similarities between the authors, but the images selection, the symbolic building and its developments. While Drummond verifies the grandiosity and disability of the poetic labor, Descartes uses, by aesthetic resources, the building of esthesis on the concept creation that he tries to deny by himself. While one author gives himself away to the language symbolical abyss, the other one tries to overcome it and, by this apparent opposition, these authors get together by the symbolical convergence. |
id |
UEM-2_57e079a09751e6697b072d66a2f7390b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/7056 |
network_acronym_str |
UEM-2 |
network_name_str |
Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Descartes e Drummond – art of philosophy and philosophy of art - doi: 10.4025/actascilangcult.v35i1.7056Descartes e Drummond – a arte da filosofia e a filosofia da arte - doi: 10.4025/actascilangcult.v35i1.7056poetrymethodaestheticssymbolpoesiamétodoestéticasímboloDescartes and Drummond, in their proposals of observations and elaboration of the world, are apparently so different and, at the same time, they can be approached by the aesthetic work, the images construction that vivifies concepts linked to the comprehension of reality. The use of reasoning and subjective search can be closer than it is supposed by the common sense. It was used a comparative approach between aesthetic work in cartesian book Meditations (2000) and drummondian poems selected from the convergence of figures and themes. It was done a route of literary criticism based on the four reasons presented by Descartes. It has been observed that the same instrument, the verbal language, doesn't guarantee similarities between the authors, but the images selection, the symbolic building and its developments. While Drummond verifies the grandiosity and disability of the poetic labor, Descartes uses, by aesthetic resources, the building of esthesis on the concept creation that he tries to deny by himself. While one author gives himself away to the language symbolical abyss, the other one tries to overcome it and, by this apparent opposition, these authors get together by the symbolical convergence. Descartes e Drummond, em suas propostas de observação e elaboração do mundo, aparentemente tão diferentes, aproximam-se no zelo estético, na construção de imagens que vivificam conceitos na compreensão da realidade. Uso da razão e busca subjetiva podem ser menos díspares do que o supõe o senso comum. Sendo assim, foi utilizada uma abordagem comparativa entre o trabalho estético presente na obra cartesiana Meditações Metafísicas (2000) e poemas drummondianos selecionados a partir da convergência de temas ou figuras com a referida obra. Realizou-se um percurso de crítica literária baseada nas quatro razões apresentadas por Descartes. Observou-se que a utilização do mesmo veículo, a linguagem verbal, não constitui, per si, fator de aproximação entre autores, mas a seleção de imagens, a construção dos símbolos e seus desdobramentos. Enquanto Drummond verifica a imponência e impotência do lavor poético, Descartes imprime, por meio de recursos estéticos, a construção da estesia na criação de conceitos que buscam negá-la. Enquanto um se entrega ao abismo simbólico da língua, o outro busca superá-lo e, nessa aparente oposição, unem-se pela convergência simbólica. Universidade Estadual De Maringá2012-09-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciLangCult/article/view/705610.4025/actascilangcult.v35i1.7056Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture; Vol 35 No 1 (2013); 39-48Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture; v. 35 n. 1 (2013); 39-481983-46831983-4675reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMporhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciLangCult/article/view/7056/pdfOliveira, Fernanda Ribeiro Queirozinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-11-23T17:35:00Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/7056Revistahttp://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciLangCultPUBhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciLangCult/oai||actalan@uem.br1983-46831983-4675opendoar:2022-11-23T17:35Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Descartes e Drummond – art of philosophy and philosophy of art - doi: 10.4025/actascilangcult.v35i1.7056 Descartes e Drummond – a arte da filosofia e a filosofia da arte - doi: 10.4025/actascilangcult.v35i1.7056 |
title |
Descartes e Drummond – art of philosophy and philosophy of art - doi: 10.4025/actascilangcult.v35i1.7056 |
spellingShingle |
Descartes e Drummond – art of philosophy and philosophy of art - doi: 10.4025/actascilangcult.v35i1.7056 Oliveira, Fernanda Ribeiro Queiroz poetry method aesthetics symbol poesia método estética símbolo |
title_short |
Descartes e Drummond – art of philosophy and philosophy of art - doi: 10.4025/actascilangcult.v35i1.7056 |
title_full |
Descartes e Drummond – art of philosophy and philosophy of art - doi: 10.4025/actascilangcult.v35i1.7056 |
title_fullStr |
Descartes e Drummond – art of philosophy and philosophy of art - doi: 10.4025/actascilangcult.v35i1.7056 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Descartes e Drummond – art of philosophy and philosophy of art - doi: 10.4025/actascilangcult.v35i1.7056 |
title_sort |
Descartes e Drummond – art of philosophy and philosophy of art - doi: 10.4025/actascilangcult.v35i1.7056 |
author |
Oliveira, Fernanda Ribeiro Queiroz |
author_facet |
Oliveira, Fernanda Ribeiro Queiroz |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira, Fernanda Ribeiro Queiroz |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
poetry method aesthetics symbol poesia método estética símbolo |
topic |
poetry method aesthetics symbol poesia método estética símbolo |
description |
Descartes and Drummond, in their proposals of observations and elaboration of the world, are apparently so different and, at the same time, they can be approached by the aesthetic work, the images construction that vivifies concepts linked to the comprehension of reality. The use of reasoning and subjective search can be closer than it is supposed by the common sense. It was used a comparative approach between aesthetic work in cartesian book Meditations (2000) and drummondian poems selected from the convergence of figures and themes. It was done a route of literary criticism based on the four reasons presented by Descartes. It has been observed that the same instrument, the verbal language, doesn't guarantee similarities between the authors, but the images selection, the symbolic building and its developments. While Drummond verifies the grandiosity and disability of the poetic labor, Descartes uses, by aesthetic resources, the building of esthesis on the concept creation that he tries to deny by himself. While one author gives himself away to the language symbolical abyss, the other one tries to overcome it and, by this apparent opposition, these authors get together by the symbolical convergence. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-09-04 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciLangCult/article/view/7056 10.4025/actascilangcult.v35i1.7056 |
url |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciLangCult/article/view/7056 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.4025/actascilangcult.v35i1.7056 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciLangCult/article/view/7056/pdf |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual De Maringá |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual De Maringá |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture; Vol 35 No 1 (2013); 39-48 Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture; v. 35 n. 1 (2013); 39-48 1983-4683 1983-4675 reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) instacron:UEM |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
instacron_str |
UEM |
institution |
UEM |
reponame_str |
Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture (Online) |
collection |
Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||actalan@uem.br |
_version_ |
1799317464750751744 |