Social technologies and public administration tupiniquim: an articulation from the theory of the possibility of Guerreiro Ramos
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/36767 |
Resumo: | This is a theoretical essay that discusses social technologies in the brazilian context, with the Theory of Possibility of Guerreiro Ramos as the basis. From the perspective of Guerreiro Ramos on the need to establish a substantive rationality for society, this paper highlights how strategic it is to consider social technologies as objective possibilities in the construction of public policies in Brazil. For that, the Theory P and Theory N, used by Zwick, Teixeira, Pereira and Vilas Boas (2012), were used to contextualize the brazilian public administration, its relations with TS, and Guerreiro Ramos's arguments about the various rationalities employed in public management, which the authors call the Tupiniquim Public Administration. Therefore, the work emphasizes that the Tupiniquim Public Administration brought in its conception of emergence, ascent and consolidation, TS as an instrumental basis for its realization, loaded at the same time with subjective values and inherent in brazilian culture. In addition, it concludes that the specificity of brazilian management demanded specific forms also of technological development, where the new technologies have the same character of management hybridity, in an interface between the instrumental and substantive rationalities of the Tupiniquim administration. |
id |
UEM-3_7ae100579bbe00b2391505fd0f2e13af |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/36767 |
network_acronym_str |
UEM-3 |
network_name_str |
Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Social technologies and public administration tupiniquim: an articulation from the theory of the possibility of Guerreiro RamosTecnologias sociais e administração pública tupiniquim: uma articulação a partir da teoria da possibilidade de Guerreiro Ramostupiniquimdevelopmentparticipationrationalitymanagementtupiniquimdesenvolvimentoparticipaçãoracionalidadegestãoadministração.This is a theoretical essay that discusses social technologies in the brazilian context, with the Theory of Possibility of Guerreiro Ramos as the basis. From the perspective of Guerreiro Ramos on the need to establish a substantive rationality for society, this paper highlights how strategic it is to consider social technologies as objective possibilities in the construction of public policies in Brazil. For that, the Theory P and Theory N, used by Zwick, Teixeira, Pereira and Vilas Boas (2012), were used to contextualize the brazilian public administration, its relations with TS, and Guerreiro Ramos's arguments about the various rationalities employed in public management, which the authors call the Tupiniquim Public Administration. Therefore, the work emphasizes that the Tupiniquim Public Administration brought in its conception of emergence, ascent and consolidation, TS as an instrumental basis for its realization, loaded at the same time with subjective values and inherent in brazilian culture. In addition, it concludes that the specificity of brazilian management demanded specific forms also of technological development, where the new technologies have the same character of management hybridity, in an interface between the instrumental and substantive rationalities of the Tupiniquim administration.Este é um ensaio teórico que discute tecnologias sociais no contexto brasileiro, tendo como base a Teoria da Possibilidade de Guerreiro Ramos. A partir da visão deste autor sobre a necessidade de se estabelecer uma racionalidade substantiva para a sociedade, este trabalho ressalta o quanto estratégico é considerar as tecnologias sociais como possibilidades objetivas na construção de políticas públicas no Brasil. Para isso, utilizam-se a Teoria P e a Teoria N, empregadas por Zwick, Teixeira, Pereira e Vilas Boas (2012), para contextualizar a administração pública brasileira, suas relações com as TS e os argumentos de Guerreiro Ramos sobre as diversas racionalidades empregadas na gestão pública, principalmente a que os autores chamam de administração pública tupiniquim. Desse modo, o trabalho destaca que este tipo de administração trouxe, em sua concepção de surgimento, ascensão e consolidação, as TS como base instrumental para sua realização, carregada, ao mesmo tempo, de valores subjetivos e inerentes à cultura brasileira. Além disso, conclui que a especificidade da gestão brasileira demandou formas específicas também de desenvolvimento tecnológico, o que explica por que as novas tecnologias têm o mesmo caráter de hibridez de gestão, numa interface entre as racionalidades instrumentais e substantivas da administração tupiniquim. Universidade Estadual De Maringá2017-12-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/3676710.4025/actascihumansoc.v39i3.36767Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences; Vol 39 No 3 (2017); 259-269Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences; v. 39 n. 3 (2017); 259-2691807-86561679-7361reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMporhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/36767/pdfCopyright (c) 2017 Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciencesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDuque, Thais OliveiraValadão, José de Arimatéia DiasSouza, Gustavo Costa de2018-03-06T09:10:10Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/36767Revistahttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/indexPUBhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/oai||actahuman@uem.br1807-86561679-7361opendoar:2018-03-06T09:10:10Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Social technologies and public administration tupiniquim: an articulation from the theory of the possibility of Guerreiro Ramos Tecnologias sociais e administração pública tupiniquim: uma articulação a partir da teoria da possibilidade de Guerreiro Ramos |
title |
Social technologies and public administration tupiniquim: an articulation from the theory of the possibility of Guerreiro Ramos |
spellingShingle |
Social technologies and public administration tupiniquim: an articulation from the theory of the possibility of Guerreiro Ramos Duque, Thais Oliveira tupiniquim development participation rationality management tupiniquim desenvolvimento participação racionalidade gestão administração. |
title_short |
Social technologies and public administration tupiniquim: an articulation from the theory of the possibility of Guerreiro Ramos |
title_full |
Social technologies and public administration tupiniquim: an articulation from the theory of the possibility of Guerreiro Ramos |
title_fullStr |
Social technologies and public administration tupiniquim: an articulation from the theory of the possibility of Guerreiro Ramos |
title_full_unstemmed |
Social technologies and public administration tupiniquim: an articulation from the theory of the possibility of Guerreiro Ramos |
title_sort |
Social technologies and public administration tupiniquim: an articulation from the theory of the possibility of Guerreiro Ramos |
author |
Duque, Thais Oliveira |
author_facet |
Duque, Thais Oliveira Valadão, José de Arimatéia Dias Souza, Gustavo Costa de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Valadão, José de Arimatéia Dias Souza, Gustavo Costa de |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Duque, Thais Oliveira Valadão, José de Arimatéia Dias Souza, Gustavo Costa de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
tupiniquim development participation rationality management tupiniquim desenvolvimento participação racionalidade gestão administração. |
topic |
tupiniquim development participation rationality management tupiniquim desenvolvimento participação racionalidade gestão administração. |
description |
This is a theoretical essay that discusses social technologies in the brazilian context, with the Theory of Possibility of Guerreiro Ramos as the basis. From the perspective of Guerreiro Ramos on the need to establish a substantive rationality for society, this paper highlights how strategic it is to consider social technologies as objective possibilities in the construction of public policies in Brazil. For that, the Theory P and Theory N, used by Zwick, Teixeira, Pereira and Vilas Boas (2012), were used to contextualize the brazilian public administration, its relations with TS, and Guerreiro Ramos's arguments about the various rationalities employed in public management, which the authors call the Tupiniquim Public Administration. Therefore, the work emphasizes that the Tupiniquim Public Administration brought in its conception of emergence, ascent and consolidation, TS as an instrumental basis for its realization, loaded at the same time with subjective values and inherent in brazilian culture. In addition, it concludes that the specificity of brazilian management demanded specific forms also of technological development, where the new technologies have the same character of management hybridity, in an interface between the instrumental and substantive rationalities of the Tupiniquim administration. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-12-27 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/36767 10.4025/actascihumansoc.v39i3.36767 |
url |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/36767 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.4025/actascihumansoc.v39i3.36767 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/36767/pdf |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual De Maringá |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual De Maringá |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences; Vol 39 No 3 (2017); 259-269 Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences; v. 39 n. 3 (2017); 259-269 1807-8656 1679-7361 reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) instacron:UEM |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
instacron_str |
UEM |
institution |
UEM |
reponame_str |
Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online) |
collection |
Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||actahuman@uem.br |
_version_ |
1799317509415895040 |