Social technologies and public administration tupiniquim: an articulation from the theory of the possibility of Guerreiro Ramos

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Duque, Thais Oliveira
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Valadão, José de Arimatéia Dias, Souza, Gustavo Costa de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online)
Texto Completo: http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/36767
Resumo: This is a theoretical essay that discusses social technologies in the brazilian context, with the Theory of Possibility of Guerreiro Ramos as the basis. From the perspective of Guerreiro Ramos on the need to establish a substantive rationality for society, this paper highlights how strategic it is to consider social technologies as objective possibilities in the construction of public policies in Brazil. For that, the Theory P and Theory N, used by Zwick, Teixeira, Pereira and Vilas Boas (2012), were used to contextualize the brazilian public administration, its relations with TS, and Guerreiro Ramos's arguments about the various rationalities employed in public management, which the authors call the Tupiniquim Public Administration. Therefore, the work emphasizes that the Tupiniquim Public Administration brought in its conception of emergence, ascent and consolidation, TS as an instrumental basis for its realization, loaded at the same time with subjective values and inherent in brazilian culture. In addition, it concludes that the specificity of brazilian management demanded specific forms also of technological development, where the new technologies have the same character of management hybridity, in an interface between the instrumental and substantive rationalities of the Tupiniquim administration.
id UEM-3_7ae100579bbe00b2391505fd0f2e13af
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/36767
network_acronym_str UEM-3
network_name_str Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Social technologies and public administration tupiniquim: an articulation from the theory of the possibility of Guerreiro RamosTecnologias sociais e administração pública tupiniquim: uma articulação a partir da teoria da possibilidade de Guerreiro Ramostupiniquimdevelopmentparticipationrationalitymanagementtupiniquimdesenvolvimentoparticipaçãoracionalidadegestãoadministração.This is a theoretical essay that discusses social technologies in the brazilian context, with the Theory of Possibility of Guerreiro Ramos as the basis. From the perspective of Guerreiro Ramos on the need to establish a substantive rationality for society, this paper highlights how strategic it is to consider social technologies as objective possibilities in the construction of public policies in Brazil. For that, the Theory P and Theory N, used by Zwick, Teixeira, Pereira and Vilas Boas (2012), were used to contextualize the brazilian public administration, its relations with TS, and Guerreiro Ramos's arguments about the various rationalities employed in public management, which the authors call the Tupiniquim Public Administration. Therefore, the work emphasizes that the Tupiniquim Public Administration brought in its conception of emergence, ascent and consolidation, TS as an instrumental basis for its realization, loaded at the same time with subjective values and inherent in brazilian culture. In addition, it concludes that the specificity of brazilian management demanded specific forms also of technological development, where the new technologies have the same character of management hybridity, in an interface between the instrumental and substantive rationalities of the Tupiniquim administration.Este é um ensaio teórico que discute tecnologias sociais no contexto brasileiro, tendo como base a Teoria da Possibilidade de Guerreiro Ramos. A partir da visão deste autor sobre a necessidade de se estabelecer uma racionalidade substantiva para a sociedade, este trabalho ressalta o quanto estratégico é considerar as tecnologias sociais como possibilidades objetivas na construção de políticas públicas no Brasil. Para isso, utilizam-se a Teoria P e a Teoria N, empregadas por Zwick, Teixeira, Pereira e Vilas Boas (2012), para contextualizar a administração pública brasileira, suas relações com as TS e os argumentos de Guerreiro Ramos sobre as diversas racionalidades empregadas na gestão pública, principalmente a que os autores chamam de administração pública tupiniquim. Desse modo, o trabalho destaca que este tipo de administração trouxe, em sua concepção de surgimento, ascensão e consolidação, as TS como base instrumental para sua realização, carregada, ao mesmo tempo, de valores subjetivos e inerentes à cultura brasileira. Além disso, conclui que a especificidade da gestão brasileira demandou formas específicas também de desenvolvimento tecnológico, o que explica por que as novas tecnologias têm o mesmo caráter de hibridez de gestão, numa interface entre as racionalidades instrumentais e substantivas da administração tupiniquim. Universidade Estadual De Maringá2017-12-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/3676710.4025/actascihumansoc.v39i3.36767Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences; Vol 39 No 3 (2017); 259-269Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences; v. 39 n. 3 (2017); 259-2691807-86561679-7361reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMporhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/36767/pdfCopyright (c) 2017 Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciencesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDuque, Thais OliveiraValadão, José de Arimatéia DiasSouza, Gustavo Costa de2018-03-06T09:10:10Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/36767Revistahttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/indexPUBhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/oai||actahuman@uem.br1807-86561679-7361opendoar:2018-03-06T09:10:10Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Social technologies and public administration tupiniquim: an articulation from the theory of the possibility of Guerreiro Ramos
Tecnologias sociais e administração pública tupiniquim: uma articulação a partir da teoria da possibilidade de Guerreiro Ramos
title Social technologies and public administration tupiniquim: an articulation from the theory of the possibility of Guerreiro Ramos
spellingShingle Social technologies and public administration tupiniquim: an articulation from the theory of the possibility of Guerreiro Ramos
Duque, Thais Oliveira
tupiniquim
development
participation
rationality
management
tupiniquim
desenvolvimento
participação
racionalidade
gestão
administração.
title_short Social technologies and public administration tupiniquim: an articulation from the theory of the possibility of Guerreiro Ramos
title_full Social technologies and public administration tupiniquim: an articulation from the theory of the possibility of Guerreiro Ramos
title_fullStr Social technologies and public administration tupiniquim: an articulation from the theory of the possibility of Guerreiro Ramos
title_full_unstemmed Social technologies and public administration tupiniquim: an articulation from the theory of the possibility of Guerreiro Ramos
title_sort Social technologies and public administration tupiniquim: an articulation from the theory of the possibility of Guerreiro Ramos
author Duque, Thais Oliveira
author_facet Duque, Thais Oliveira
Valadão, José de Arimatéia Dias
Souza, Gustavo Costa de
author_role author
author2 Valadão, José de Arimatéia Dias
Souza, Gustavo Costa de
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Duque, Thais Oliveira
Valadão, José de Arimatéia Dias
Souza, Gustavo Costa de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv tupiniquim
development
participation
rationality
management
tupiniquim
desenvolvimento
participação
racionalidade
gestão
administração.
topic tupiniquim
development
participation
rationality
management
tupiniquim
desenvolvimento
participação
racionalidade
gestão
administração.
description This is a theoretical essay that discusses social technologies in the brazilian context, with the Theory of Possibility of Guerreiro Ramos as the basis. From the perspective of Guerreiro Ramos on the need to establish a substantive rationality for society, this paper highlights how strategic it is to consider social technologies as objective possibilities in the construction of public policies in Brazil. For that, the Theory P and Theory N, used by Zwick, Teixeira, Pereira and Vilas Boas (2012), were used to contextualize the brazilian public administration, its relations with TS, and Guerreiro Ramos's arguments about the various rationalities employed in public management, which the authors call the Tupiniquim Public Administration. Therefore, the work emphasizes that the Tupiniquim Public Administration brought in its conception of emergence, ascent and consolidation, TS as an instrumental basis for its realization, loaded at the same time with subjective values and inherent in brazilian culture. In addition, it concludes that the specificity of brazilian management demanded specific forms also of technological development, where the new technologies have the same character of management hybridity, in an interface between the instrumental and substantive rationalities of the Tupiniquim administration.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-12-27
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/36767
10.4025/actascihumansoc.v39i3.36767
url http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/36767
identifier_str_mv 10.4025/actascihumansoc.v39i3.36767
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/36767/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual De Maringá
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual De Maringá
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences; Vol 39 No 3 (2017); 259-269
Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences; v. 39 n. 3 (2017); 259-269
1807-8656
1679-7361
reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron:UEM
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron_str UEM
institution UEM
reponame_str Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online)
collection Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||actahuman@uem.br
_version_ 1799317509415895040