Agreement and validity between body fat estimated by skinfold measurement and air displacement plethysmography in adolescents

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bim, Mateus Augusto
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Pinto, André de Araújo, Gonzaga, Isadora, De Marco, Jean Carlos Parmigiani, De Angelo, Hector Cris Colares, Claumann, Gaia Salvador, Pelegrini, Andreia
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista da Educação física/UEM (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevEducFis/article/view/63112
Resumo: Objective: Assess the agreement and validity between relative body fat percentages estimated using anthropometric measurements and air displacement plethysmography (ADP). Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 118 adolescents (60 females) aged 10 to 14 years (x̄=12.19, sd=1.18). Adolescents were classified as eutrophic or with overweight according to body mass index (body weight/height2) (x̄=20,12, sd=3,56). Measurements of skinfold thickness (triceps and medial calf) were collected and used to estimate relative body fat by the Slaughter equation. ADP was used as a reference method for the estimation of relative body fat. Agreement between body fat measurement methods (anthropometry × ADP) was analyzed by the Bland–Altman method. The mean error (ME) was calculated by subtracting the body fat percentage estimated by the Slaughter equation from the body fat percentage estimated by ADP. Validity was tested with the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). Results: There was no agreement between the methods, regardless of sex and weight status. For boys with overweight (ME = 4.52; p = 0.007), eutrophic girls (ME = 6.37; p < 0.001), and girls with overweight (ME = 5.55; p < 0.001), the Slaughter equation resulted in overestimation of body fat compared with ADP. Skinfold equations did not demonstrate validity when compared with ADP. Conclusion: Slaughter's skinfold equations did not demonstrate agreement and validity compared with ADP in either sex or weight status. Skinfold equations should be used with caution and, whenever possible, in combination with other body composition indicators.
id UEM-4_31b6dd3c49c9af48ae6c8ad4af55ce9c
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/63112
network_acronym_str UEM-4
network_name_str Revista da Educação física/UEM (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Agreement and validity between body fat estimated by skinfold measurement and air displacement plethysmography in adolescentsConcordância e validade entre a gordura corporal estimada por medidas de dobras cutâneas e pletismografia por deslocamento de ar em adolescentesadolescentsbody compositionbody fatindirect methodsdoubly indirect methodsadolescentescomposição corporalgordura corporalmétodos indiretosmétodos duplamente indiretosObjective: Assess the agreement and validity between relative body fat percentages estimated using anthropometric measurements and air displacement plethysmography (ADP). Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 118 adolescents (60 females) aged 10 to 14 years (x̄=12.19, sd=1.18). Adolescents were classified as eutrophic or with overweight according to body mass index (body weight/height2) (x̄=20,12, sd=3,56). Measurements of skinfold thickness (triceps and medial calf) were collected and used to estimate relative body fat by the Slaughter equation. ADP was used as a reference method for the estimation of relative body fat. Agreement between body fat measurement methods (anthropometry × ADP) was analyzed by the Bland–Altman method. The mean error (ME) was calculated by subtracting the body fat percentage estimated by the Slaughter equation from the body fat percentage estimated by ADP. Validity was tested with the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). Results: There was no agreement between the methods, regardless of sex and weight status. For boys with overweight (ME = 4.52; p = 0.007), eutrophic girls (ME = 6.37; p < 0.001), and girls with overweight (ME = 5.55; p < 0.001), the Slaughter equation resulted in overestimation of body fat compared with ADP. Skinfold equations did not demonstrate validity when compared with ADP. Conclusion: Slaughter's skinfold equations did not demonstrate agreement and validity compared with ADP in either sex or weight status. Skinfold equations should be used with caution and, whenever possible, in combination with other body composition indicators.Objetivo: Avaliar a concordância e validade entre os percentuais de gordura corporal estimados usando medidas antropométricas e pletismografia por deslocamento de ar (PDA). Métodos: Um estudo transversal foi conduzido em 118 adolescentes (60 meninas) com idade entre 10 e 14 anos (x̄=12,19, dp=1,18). Os adolescentes foram classificados como eutróficos ou com sobrepeso de acordo com o índice de massa corporal (peso/altura2) (x̄=20,12, dp=3,56). Medidas de dobras cutâneas (tríceps e panturrilha medial) foram coletadas e utilizadas para estimar a gordura corporal relativa pela equação de Slaughter. A PDA foi utilizada como método de referência para a estimativa da gordura corporal relativa. A concordância entre os métodos de medida de gordura corporal (antropometria × PDA) foi analisada pelo método de Bland–Altman. O erro médio (EM) foi calculado subtraindo o percentual de gordura corporal estimado pela equação de Slaughter do percentual de gordura corporal estimado pela PDA. A validade foi testada com o coeficiente de correlação de concordância (CCC). Resultados: Não houve concordância entre os métodos, independente do sexo e status de peso. Para meninos com excesso de peso (EM = 4,52; p = 0,007), meninas eutróficas (EM = 6,37; p < 0,001) e meninas com excesso de peso (EM = 5,55; p < 0,001), a equação de Slaughter resultou em superestimação da gordura corporal comparada com PDA. As equações de dobras cutâneas não demonstraram validade quando comparadas ao PDA. Conclusão: As equações de dobras cutâneas de Slaughter não demonstraram concordância e validade em comparação com PDA em ambos os sexos ou status de peso. As equações de dobras cutâneas devem ser utilizadas com cautela e, sempre que possível, acompanhada de outros indicadores de composição corporal.Department of Physical Education - State University of Maringá (UEM), Maringá-PR, Brazil2022-12-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevEducFis/article/view/6311210.4025/jphyseduc.v34i1.3403Journal of Physical Education; Vol 34 No 1 (2023): Journal of Physical Education; e-3403Journal of Physical Education; Vol. 34 Núm. 1 (2023): Journal of Physical Education; e-3403Journal of Physical Education; v. 34 n. 1 (2023): Journal of Physical Education; e-34032448-2455reponame:Revista da Educação física/UEM (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMenghttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevEducFis/article/view/63112/751375155168Copyright (c) 2022 Bim et al.https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBim, Mateus AugustoPinto, André de AraújoGonzaga, IsadoraDe Marco, Jean Carlos Parmigiani De Angelo, Hector Cris Colares Claumann, Gaia Salvador Pelegrini, Andreia2023-03-28T20:40:45Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/63112Revistahttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevEducFis/PUBhttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevEducFis/oai||revdef@uem.br1983-30830103-3948opendoar:2023-03-28T20:40:45Revista da Educação física/UEM (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Agreement and validity between body fat estimated by skinfold measurement and air displacement plethysmography in adolescents
Concordância e validade entre a gordura corporal estimada por medidas de dobras cutâneas e pletismografia por deslocamento de ar em adolescentes
title Agreement and validity between body fat estimated by skinfold measurement and air displacement plethysmography in adolescents
spellingShingle Agreement and validity between body fat estimated by skinfold measurement and air displacement plethysmography in adolescents
Bim, Mateus Augusto
adolescents
body composition
body fat
indirect methods
doubly indirect methods
adolescentes
composição corporal
gordura corporal
métodos indiretos
métodos duplamente indiretos
title_short Agreement and validity between body fat estimated by skinfold measurement and air displacement plethysmography in adolescents
title_full Agreement and validity between body fat estimated by skinfold measurement and air displacement plethysmography in adolescents
title_fullStr Agreement and validity between body fat estimated by skinfold measurement and air displacement plethysmography in adolescents
title_full_unstemmed Agreement and validity between body fat estimated by skinfold measurement and air displacement plethysmography in adolescents
title_sort Agreement and validity between body fat estimated by skinfold measurement and air displacement plethysmography in adolescents
author Bim, Mateus Augusto
author_facet Bim, Mateus Augusto
Pinto, André de Araújo
Gonzaga, Isadora
De Marco, Jean Carlos Parmigiani
De Angelo, Hector Cris Colares
Claumann, Gaia Salvador
Pelegrini, Andreia
author_role author
author2 Pinto, André de Araújo
Gonzaga, Isadora
De Marco, Jean Carlos Parmigiani
De Angelo, Hector Cris Colares
Claumann, Gaia Salvador
Pelegrini, Andreia
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bim, Mateus Augusto
Pinto, André de Araújo
Gonzaga, Isadora
De Marco, Jean Carlos Parmigiani
De Angelo, Hector Cris Colares
Claumann, Gaia Salvador
Pelegrini, Andreia
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv adolescents
body composition
body fat
indirect methods
doubly indirect methods
adolescentes
composição corporal
gordura corporal
métodos indiretos
métodos duplamente indiretos
topic adolescents
body composition
body fat
indirect methods
doubly indirect methods
adolescentes
composição corporal
gordura corporal
métodos indiretos
métodos duplamente indiretos
description Objective: Assess the agreement and validity between relative body fat percentages estimated using anthropometric measurements and air displacement plethysmography (ADP). Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 118 adolescents (60 females) aged 10 to 14 years (x̄=12.19, sd=1.18). Adolescents were classified as eutrophic or with overweight according to body mass index (body weight/height2) (x̄=20,12, sd=3,56). Measurements of skinfold thickness (triceps and medial calf) were collected and used to estimate relative body fat by the Slaughter equation. ADP was used as a reference method for the estimation of relative body fat. Agreement between body fat measurement methods (anthropometry × ADP) was analyzed by the Bland–Altman method. The mean error (ME) was calculated by subtracting the body fat percentage estimated by the Slaughter equation from the body fat percentage estimated by ADP. Validity was tested with the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). Results: There was no agreement between the methods, regardless of sex and weight status. For boys with overweight (ME = 4.52; p = 0.007), eutrophic girls (ME = 6.37; p < 0.001), and girls with overweight (ME = 5.55; p < 0.001), the Slaughter equation resulted in overestimation of body fat compared with ADP. Skinfold equations did not demonstrate validity when compared with ADP. Conclusion: Slaughter's skinfold equations did not demonstrate agreement and validity compared with ADP in either sex or weight status. Skinfold equations should be used with caution and, whenever possible, in combination with other body composition indicators.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-12-16
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevEducFis/article/view/63112
10.4025/jphyseduc.v34i1.3403
url https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevEducFis/article/view/63112
identifier_str_mv 10.4025/jphyseduc.v34i1.3403
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevEducFis/article/view/63112/751375155168
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Bim et al.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Bim et al.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Department of Physical Education - State University of Maringá (UEM), Maringá-PR, Brazil
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Department of Physical Education - State University of Maringá (UEM), Maringá-PR, Brazil
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Physical Education; Vol 34 No 1 (2023): Journal of Physical Education; e-3403
Journal of Physical Education; Vol. 34 Núm. 1 (2023): Journal of Physical Education; e-3403
Journal of Physical Education; v. 34 n. 1 (2023): Journal of Physical Education; e-3403
2448-2455
reponame:Revista da Educação física/UEM (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron:UEM
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron_str UEM
institution UEM
reponame_str Revista da Educação física/UEM (Online)
collection Revista da Educação física/UEM (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista da Educação física/UEM (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revdef@uem.br
_version_ 1799317484912771072