Agreement and validity between body fat estimated by skinfold measurement and air displacement plethysmography in adolescents
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista da Educação física/UEM (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevEducFis/article/view/63112 |
Resumo: | Objective: Assess the agreement and validity between relative body fat percentages estimated using anthropometric measurements and air displacement plethysmography (ADP). Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 118 adolescents (60 females) aged 10 to 14 years (x̄=12.19, sd=1.18). Adolescents were classified as eutrophic or with overweight according to body mass index (body weight/height2) (x̄=20,12, sd=3,56). Measurements of skinfold thickness (triceps and medial calf) were collected and used to estimate relative body fat by the Slaughter equation. ADP was used as a reference method for the estimation of relative body fat. Agreement between body fat measurement methods (anthropometry × ADP) was analyzed by the Bland–Altman method. The mean error (ME) was calculated by subtracting the body fat percentage estimated by the Slaughter equation from the body fat percentage estimated by ADP. Validity was tested with the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). Results: There was no agreement between the methods, regardless of sex and weight status. For boys with overweight (ME = 4.52; p = 0.007), eutrophic girls (ME = 6.37; p < 0.001), and girls with overweight (ME = 5.55; p < 0.001), the Slaughter equation resulted in overestimation of body fat compared with ADP. Skinfold equations did not demonstrate validity when compared with ADP. Conclusion: Slaughter's skinfold equations did not demonstrate agreement and validity compared with ADP in either sex or weight status. Skinfold equations should be used with caution and, whenever possible, in combination with other body composition indicators. |
id |
UEM-4_31b6dd3c49c9af48ae6c8ad4af55ce9c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/63112 |
network_acronym_str |
UEM-4 |
network_name_str |
Revista da Educação física/UEM (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Agreement and validity between body fat estimated by skinfold measurement and air displacement plethysmography in adolescentsConcordância e validade entre a gordura corporal estimada por medidas de dobras cutâneas e pletismografia por deslocamento de ar em adolescentesadolescentsbody compositionbody fatindirect methodsdoubly indirect methodsadolescentescomposição corporalgordura corporalmétodos indiretosmétodos duplamente indiretosObjective: Assess the agreement and validity between relative body fat percentages estimated using anthropometric measurements and air displacement plethysmography (ADP). Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 118 adolescents (60 females) aged 10 to 14 years (x̄=12.19, sd=1.18). Adolescents were classified as eutrophic or with overweight according to body mass index (body weight/height2) (x̄=20,12, sd=3,56). Measurements of skinfold thickness (triceps and medial calf) were collected and used to estimate relative body fat by the Slaughter equation. ADP was used as a reference method for the estimation of relative body fat. Agreement between body fat measurement methods (anthropometry × ADP) was analyzed by the Bland–Altman method. The mean error (ME) was calculated by subtracting the body fat percentage estimated by the Slaughter equation from the body fat percentage estimated by ADP. Validity was tested with the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). Results: There was no agreement between the methods, regardless of sex and weight status. For boys with overweight (ME = 4.52; p = 0.007), eutrophic girls (ME = 6.37; p < 0.001), and girls with overweight (ME = 5.55; p < 0.001), the Slaughter equation resulted in overestimation of body fat compared with ADP. Skinfold equations did not demonstrate validity when compared with ADP. Conclusion: Slaughter's skinfold equations did not demonstrate agreement and validity compared with ADP in either sex or weight status. Skinfold equations should be used with caution and, whenever possible, in combination with other body composition indicators.Objetivo: Avaliar a concordância e validade entre os percentuais de gordura corporal estimados usando medidas antropométricas e pletismografia por deslocamento de ar (PDA). Métodos: Um estudo transversal foi conduzido em 118 adolescentes (60 meninas) com idade entre 10 e 14 anos (x̄=12,19, dp=1,18). Os adolescentes foram classificados como eutróficos ou com sobrepeso de acordo com o índice de massa corporal (peso/altura2) (x̄=20,12, dp=3,56). Medidas de dobras cutâneas (tríceps e panturrilha medial) foram coletadas e utilizadas para estimar a gordura corporal relativa pela equação de Slaughter. A PDA foi utilizada como método de referência para a estimativa da gordura corporal relativa. A concordância entre os métodos de medida de gordura corporal (antropometria × PDA) foi analisada pelo método de Bland–Altman. O erro médio (EM) foi calculado subtraindo o percentual de gordura corporal estimado pela equação de Slaughter do percentual de gordura corporal estimado pela PDA. A validade foi testada com o coeficiente de correlação de concordância (CCC). Resultados: Não houve concordância entre os métodos, independente do sexo e status de peso. Para meninos com excesso de peso (EM = 4,52; p = 0,007), meninas eutróficas (EM = 6,37; p < 0,001) e meninas com excesso de peso (EM = 5,55; p < 0,001), a equação de Slaughter resultou em superestimação da gordura corporal comparada com PDA. As equações de dobras cutâneas não demonstraram validade quando comparadas ao PDA. Conclusão: As equações de dobras cutâneas de Slaughter não demonstraram concordância e validade em comparação com PDA em ambos os sexos ou status de peso. As equações de dobras cutâneas devem ser utilizadas com cautela e, sempre que possível, acompanhada de outros indicadores de composição corporal.Department of Physical Education - State University of Maringá (UEM), Maringá-PR, Brazil2022-12-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevEducFis/article/view/6311210.4025/jphyseduc.v34i1.3403Journal of Physical Education; Vol 34 No 1 (2023): Journal of Physical Education; e-3403Journal of Physical Education; Vol. 34 Núm. 1 (2023): Journal of Physical Education; e-3403Journal of Physical Education; v. 34 n. 1 (2023): Journal of Physical Education; e-34032448-2455reponame:Revista da Educação física/UEM (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMenghttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevEducFis/article/view/63112/751375155168Copyright (c) 2022 Bim et al.https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBim, Mateus AugustoPinto, André de AraújoGonzaga, IsadoraDe Marco, Jean Carlos Parmigiani De Angelo, Hector Cris Colares Claumann, Gaia Salvador Pelegrini, Andreia2023-03-28T20:40:45Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/63112Revistahttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevEducFis/PUBhttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevEducFis/oai||revdef@uem.br1983-30830103-3948opendoar:2023-03-28T20:40:45Revista da Educação física/UEM (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Agreement and validity between body fat estimated by skinfold measurement and air displacement plethysmography in adolescents Concordância e validade entre a gordura corporal estimada por medidas de dobras cutâneas e pletismografia por deslocamento de ar em adolescentes |
title |
Agreement and validity between body fat estimated by skinfold measurement and air displacement plethysmography in adolescents |
spellingShingle |
Agreement and validity between body fat estimated by skinfold measurement and air displacement plethysmography in adolescents Bim, Mateus Augusto adolescents body composition body fat indirect methods doubly indirect methods adolescentes composição corporal gordura corporal métodos indiretos métodos duplamente indiretos |
title_short |
Agreement and validity between body fat estimated by skinfold measurement and air displacement plethysmography in adolescents |
title_full |
Agreement and validity between body fat estimated by skinfold measurement and air displacement plethysmography in adolescents |
title_fullStr |
Agreement and validity between body fat estimated by skinfold measurement and air displacement plethysmography in adolescents |
title_full_unstemmed |
Agreement and validity between body fat estimated by skinfold measurement and air displacement plethysmography in adolescents |
title_sort |
Agreement and validity between body fat estimated by skinfold measurement and air displacement plethysmography in adolescents |
author |
Bim, Mateus Augusto |
author_facet |
Bim, Mateus Augusto Pinto, André de Araújo Gonzaga, Isadora De Marco, Jean Carlos Parmigiani De Angelo, Hector Cris Colares Claumann, Gaia Salvador Pelegrini, Andreia |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pinto, André de Araújo Gonzaga, Isadora De Marco, Jean Carlos Parmigiani De Angelo, Hector Cris Colares Claumann, Gaia Salvador Pelegrini, Andreia |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bim, Mateus Augusto Pinto, André de Araújo Gonzaga, Isadora De Marco, Jean Carlos Parmigiani De Angelo, Hector Cris Colares Claumann, Gaia Salvador Pelegrini, Andreia |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
adolescents body composition body fat indirect methods doubly indirect methods adolescentes composição corporal gordura corporal métodos indiretos métodos duplamente indiretos |
topic |
adolescents body composition body fat indirect methods doubly indirect methods adolescentes composição corporal gordura corporal métodos indiretos métodos duplamente indiretos |
description |
Objective: Assess the agreement and validity between relative body fat percentages estimated using anthropometric measurements and air displacement plethysmography (ADP). Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 118 adolescents (60 females) aged 10 to 14 years (x̄=12.19, sd=1.18). Adolescents were classified as eutrophic or with overweight according to body mass index (body weight/height2) (x̄=20,12, sd=3,56). Measurements of skinfold thickness (triceps and medial calf) were collected and used to estimate relative body fat by the Slaughter equation. ADP was used as a reference method for the estimation of relative body fat. Agreement between body fat measurement methods (anthropometry × ADP) was analyzed by the Bland–Altman method. The mean error (ME) was calculated by subtracting the body fat percentage estimated by the Slaughter equation from the body fat percentage estimated by ADP. Validity was tested with the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). Results: There was no agreement between the methods, regardless of sex and weight status. For boys with overweight (ME = 4.52; p = 0.007), eutrophic girls (ME = 6.37; p < 0.001), and girls with overweight (ME = 5.55; p < 0.001), the Slaughter equation resulted in overestimation of body fat compared with ADP. Skinfold equations did not demonstrate validity when compared with ADP. Conclusion: Slaughter's skinfold equations did not demonstrate agreement and validity compared with ADP in either sex or weight status. Skinfold equations should be used with caution and, whenever possible, in combination with other body composition indicators. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-12-16 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevEducFis/article/view/63112 10.4025/jphyseduc.v34i1.3403 |
url |
https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevEducFis/article/view/63112 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.4025/jphyseduc.v34i1.3403 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevEducFis/article/view/63112/751375155168 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Bim et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Bim et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Department of Physical Education - State University of Maringá (UEM), Maringá-PR, Brazil |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Department of Physical Education - State University of Maringá (UEM), Maringá-PR, Brazil |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Physical Education; Vol 34 No 1 (2023): Journal of Physical Education; e-3403 Journal of Physical Education; Vol. 34 Núm. 1 (2023): Journal of Physical Education; e-3403 Journal of Physical Education; v. 34 n. 1 (2023): Journal of Physical Education; e-3403 2448-2455 reponame:Revista da Educação física/UEM (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) instacron:UEM |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
instacron_str |
UEM |
institution |
UEM |
reponame_str |
Revista da Educação física/UEM (Online) |
collection |
Revista da Educação física/UEM (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista da Educação física/UEM (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revdef@uem.br |
_version_ |
1799317484912771072 |