Production of five yam clones as a function of their size - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v25i1.2649
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2008 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/2649 |
Resumo: | Five yam clones (Mimoso, Pezão, Caramujo, Roxo and Flórida) and four cuttings sizes (3 cm2 of peel x 3 cm3 of starchy part; 3 cm2 x 6 cm3; 6 cm2 x 6 cm3 and 6 cm2 x 12 cm3) were evaluated. They were arranged in a 5 x 4 factorial scheme, in a randomized block design, with four replications, for fresh mass plants productions. Harvest was done on 248th day after planting. Average productions of fresh masses of aerial parts and rhizomes were not influenced by interaction, but showed significant dependence on clones and cut sizes. Highest rates of aerial part and rhizome fresh masses belonged to ‘Caramujo’, with 17.20 t ha-1 and 51.40 t ha-1, respectively. ‘Mimoso’ 7.10 t ha-1 and ‘Pezão’ with 24.55 t ha-1 had lowest rates respectively in aerial parts and in rhizome production. When cutting size is taken into account, the highest productions of fresh masses of aerial parts (14.75 t ha-1) and of rhizomes (52.01 t ha-1) were those from plants with large cuttings. Planting of yam clones must use cuttings with minimum size 6 cm2 peel and 6 cm3 starchy part. |
id |
UEM-5_0dc6596c737453c8202eb510742e1c80 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/2649 |
network_acronym_str |
UEM-5 |
network_name_str |
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Production of five yam clones as a function of their size - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v25i1.2649Produção de clones de inhame em função do tamanho das mudas - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v25i1.2649Dioscorea spp.propagaçãoprodutividade5.00.00.00-4 Ciências AgráriasFive yam clones (Mimoso, Pezão, Caramujo, Roxo and Flórida) and four cuttings sizes (3 cm2 of peel x 3 cm3 of starchy part; 3 cm2 x 6 cm3; 6 cm2 x 6 cm3 and 6 cm2 x 12 cm3) were evaluated. They were arranged in a 5 x 4 factorial scheme, in a randomized block design, with four replications, for fresh mass plants productions. Harvest was done on 248th day after planting. Average productions of fresh masses of aerial parts and rhizomes were not influenced by interaction, but showed significant dependence on clones and cut sizes. Highest rates of aerial part and rhizome fresh masses belonged to ‘Caramujo’, with 17.20 t ha-1 and 51.40 t ha-1, respectively. ‘Mimoso’ 7.10 t ha-1 and ‘Pezão’ with 24.55 t ha-1 had lowest rates respectively in aerial parts and in rhizome production. When cutting size is taken into account, the highest productions of fresh masses of aerial parts (14.75 t ha-1) and of rhizomes (52.01 t ha-1) were those from plants with large cuttings. Planting of yam clones must use cuttings with minimum size 6 cm2 peel and 6 cm3 starchy part.Com o objetivo de verificar as produções de massa fresca das plantas, foram avaliados cinco clones de inhame (Mimoso, Pezão, Caramujo, Roxo e Flórida) e quatro tamanhos de mudas (3 cm2 de casca x 3 cm3 de parte amídica; 3 cm2 x 6 cm3; 6 cm2 x 6 cm3 e 6 cm2 x 12 cm3), arranjados como fatorial 5 x 4, no delineamento experimental de blocos casualizados, com quatro repetições. A colheita foi realizada aos 248 dias após o plantio. As produções médias de massa fresca de parte aérea e de rizomas não foram influenciadas pela interação, mas mostraram dependência significativa dos clones e do tamanho das mudas. As maiores produções de massa fresca, tanto na parte aérea como de rizomas, foram do ‘Caramujo’ com 17,20 t ha-1 e 51,40 t ha-1, respectivamente, e as menores (relacionado à parte aérea) foram do ‘Mimoso’, com 7,10 t ha-1, e (na produção de rizomas) do Pezão, com 24,55 t ha-1. Quanto ao tamanho de mudas, as maiores produções de massas frescas de partes aéreas (14,75 t ha-1) e de rizomas (52,01 t ha-1) foram das plantas provenientes de mudas maiores. Concluiu-se que, para o plantio desses clones de inhame deve-se utilizar mudas com o mínimo de 6 cm2 de casca e 6 cm3 de amido.Universidade Estadual de Maringá2008-04-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/264910.4025/actasciagron.v25i1.2649Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; Vol 25 No 1 (2003); 183-186Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; v. 25 n. 1 (2003); 183-1861807-86211679-9275reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMporhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/2649/1649Zárate, Néstor Antonio HerediaVieira, Maria do CarmoFacco, Renato Cerutiinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-11-23T18:37:52Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/2649Revistahttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgronPUBhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/oaiactaagron@uem.br||actaagron@uem.br|| edamasio@uem.br1807-86211679-9275opendoar:2022-11-23T18:37:52Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Production of five yam clones as a function of their size - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v25i1.2649 Produção de clones de inhame em função do tamanho das mudas - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v25i1.2649 |
title |
Production of five yam clones as a function of their size - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v25i1.2649 |
spellingShingle |
Production of five yam clones as a function of their size - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v25i1.2649 Zárate, Néstor Antonio Heredia Dioscorea spp. propagação produtividade 5.00.00.00-4 Ciências Agrárias |
title_short |
Production of five yam clones as a function of their size - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v25i1.2649 |
title_full |
Production of five yam clones as a function of their size - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v25i1.2649 |
title_fullStr |
Production of five yam clones as a function of their size - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v25i1.2649 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Production of five yam clones as a function of their size - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v25i1.2649 |
title_sort |
Production of five yam clones as a function of their size - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v25i1.2649 |
author |
Zárate, Néstor Antonio Heredia |
author_facet |
Zárate, Néstor Antonio Heredia Vieira, Maria do Carmo Facco, Renato Ceruti |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Vieira, Maria do Carmo Facco, Renato Ceruti |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Zárate, Néstor Antonio Heredia Vieira, Maria do Carmo Facco, Renato Ceruti |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Dioscorea spp. propagação produtividade 5.00.00.00-4 Ciências Agrárias |
topic |
Dioscorea spp. propagação produtividade 5.00.00.00-4 Ciências Agrárias |
description |
Five yam clones (Mimoso, Pezão, Caramujo, Roxo and Flórida) and four cuttings sizes (3 cm2 of peel x 3 cm3 of starchy part; 3 cm2 x 6 cm3; 6 cm2 x 6 cm3 and 6 cm2 x 12 cm3) were evaluated. They were arranged in a 5 x 4 factorial scheme, in a randomized block design, with four replications, for fresh mass plants productions. Harvest was done on 248th day after planting. Average productions of fresh masses of aerial parts and rhizomes were not influenced by interaction, but showed significant dependence on clones and cut sizes. Highest rates of aerial part and rhizome fresh masses belonged to ‘Caramujo’, with 17.20 t ha-1 and 51.40 t ha-1, respectively. ‘Mimoso’ 7.10 t ha-1 and ‘Pezão’ with 24.55 t ha-1 had lowest rates respectively in aerial parts and in rhizome production. When cutting size is taken into account, the highest productions of fresh masses of aerial parts (14.75 t ha-1) and of rhizomes (52.01 t ha-1) were those from plants with large cuttings. Planting of yam clones must use cuttings with minimum size 6 cm2 peel and 6 cm3 starchy part. |
publishDate |
2008 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2008-04-23 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/2649 10.4025/actasciagron.v25i1.2649 |
url |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/2649 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.4025/actasciagron.v25i1.2649 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/2649/1649 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; Vol 25 No 1 (2003); 183-186 Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; v. 25 n. 1 (2003); 183-186 1807-8621 1679-9275 reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) instacron:UEM |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
instacron_str |
UEM |
institution |
UEM |
reponame_str |
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) |
collection |
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
actaagron@uem.br||actaagron@uem.br|| edamasio@uem.br |
_version_ |
1799305905842421760 |