Selectivity and efficacy of PROTOX inhibitors in cassava varieties cultivated in clayey and sandy soils
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/57135 |
Resumo: | The selectivity and efficacy of protoporphyrinogen oxidase (PROTOX) inhibitor herbicides in cassava varieties depend on product formulation, dosage, and soil texture. The aim of this study was to assess the selectivity and efficacy of flumioxazin and sulfentrazone in the cassava variety ‘IPR B36’ and the clone ‘VN 117’. Two experiments were carried out: one in a clayey soil and one in a sandy soil. Both experiments were laid in a split-plot randomized block design with three replicates. The two cassava varieties were used as main plots, with subplots consisting in 10 treatments including, flumioxazin at 50, 75, 100, and 125 g ha-1; sulfentrazone at 250, 500, 750, and 1000 g ha-1; one weed-free control, and one unweeded control. Flumioxazin (≥75 g ha-1) and sulfentrazone (≥250 g ha-1) achieved mean weed control rates > 70 and 90% in both types of soil for up to 90 days after application. Flumioxazin exhibited fewer residual effects on the cassava varieties than sulfentrazone, particularly in clayey soil. Flumioxazin was selective to the different cassava varieties planted in both soil types, whereas sulfentrazone was more selective in clayey soil. PROTOX inhibitors were effective in controlling weed growth in cassava plots, and there were no varietal differences in herbicide selectivity; however, the use of sulfentrazone should be restricted to maximum spray rates of 250 g ha-1 in sandy soils. |
id |
UEM-5_3d7e15c255f9b9b3df540a5801833f8a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/57135 |
network_acronym_str |
UEM-5 |
network_name_str |
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Selectivity and efficacy of PROTOX inhibitors in cassava varieties cultivated in clayey and sandy soilsSelectivity and efficacy of PROTOX inhibitors in cassava varieties cultivated in clayey and sandy soilsManihot esculenta; weed control; soil texture; flumioxazin; sulfentrazone.Manihot esculenta; weed control; soil texture; flumioxazin; sulfentrazone.The selectivity and efficacy of protoporphyrinogen oxidase (PROTOX) inhibitor herbicides in cassava varieties depend on product formulation, dosage, and soil texture. The aim of this study was to assess the selectivity and efficacy of flumioxazin and sulfentrazone in the cassava variety ‘IPR B36’ and the clone ‘VN 117’. Two experiments were carried out: one in a clayey soil and one in a sandy soil. Both experiments were laid in a split-plot randomized block design with three replicates. The two cassava varieties were used as main plots, with subplots consisting in 10 treatments including, flumioxazin at 50, 75, 100, and 125 g ha-1; sulfentrazone at 250, 500, 750, and 1000 g ha-1; one weed-free control, and one unweeded control. Flumioxazin (≥75 g ha-1) and sulfentrazone (≥250 g ha-1) achieved mean weed control rates > 70 and 90% in both types of soil for up to 90 days after application. Flumioxazin exhibited fewer residual effects on the cassava varieties than sulfentrazone, particularly in clayey soil. Flumioxazin was selective to the different cassava varieties planted in both soil types, whereas sulfentrazone was more selective in clayey soil. PROTOX inhibitors were effective in controlling weed growth in cassava plots, and there were no varietal differences in herbicide selectivity; however, the use of sulfentrazone should be restricted to maximum spray rates of 250 g ha-1 in sandy soils.The selectivity and efficacy of protoporphyrinogen oxidase (PROTOX) inhibitor herbicides in cassava varieties depend on product formulation, dosage, and soil texture. The aim of this study was to assess the selectivity and efficacy of flumioxazin and sulfentrazone in the cassava variety ‘IPR B36’ and the clone ‘VN 117’. Two experiments were carried out: one in a clayey soil and one in a sandy soil. Both experiments were laid in a split-plot randomized block design with three replicates. The two cassava varieties were used as main plots, with subplots consisting in 10 treatments including, flumioxazin at 50, 75, 100, and 125 g ha-1; sulfentrazone at 250, 500, 750, and 1000 g ha-1; one weed-free control, and one unweeded control. Flumioxazin (≥75 g ha-1) and sulfentrazone (≥250 g ha-1) achieved mean weed control rates > 70 and 90% in both types of soil for up to 90 days after application. Flumioxazin exhibited fewer residual effects on the cassava varieties than sulfentrazone, particularly in clayey soil. Flumioxazin was selective to the different cassava varieties planted in both soil types, whereas sulfentrazone was more selective in clayey soil. PROTOX inhibitors were effective in controlling weed growth in cassava plots, and there were no varietal differences in herbicide selectivity; however, the use of sulfentrazone should be restricted to maximum spray rates of 250 g ha-1 in sandy soils.Universidade Estadual de Maringá2022-11-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/5713510.4025/actasciagron.v45i1.57135Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; Vol 45 (2023): Publicação contínua; e57135Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; v. 45 (2023): Publicação contínua; e571351807-86211679-9275reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMenghttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/57135/751375155039Copyright (c) 2023 Acta Scientiarum. Agronomyhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCosta , Neumárcio Vilanova da Takahashi, MárioCosta , Andreia Cristina Peres Rodrigues da Ferreira, Silvio Douglas Brustolin, Dyogo Bortot Vasconcelos, Edmar Soares de 2023-01-31T19:21:01Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/57135Revistahttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgronPUBhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/oaiactaagron@uem.br||actaagron@uem.br|| edamasio@uem.br1807-86211679-9275opendoar:2023-01-31T19:21:01Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Selectivity and efficacy of PROTOX inhibitors in cassava varieties cultivated in clayey and sandy soils Selectivity and efficacy of PROTOX inhibitors in cassava varieties cultivated in clayey and sandy soils |
title |
Selectivity and efficacy of PROTOX inhibitors in cassava varieties cultivated in clayey and sandy soils |
spellingShingle |
Selectivity and efficacy of PROTOX inhibitors in cassava varieties cultivated in clayey and sandy soils Costa , Neumárcio Vilanova da Manihot esculenta; weed control; soil texture; flumioxazin; sulfentrazone. Manihot esculenta; weed control; soil texture; flumioxazin; sulfentrazone. |
title_short |
Selectivity and efficacy of PROTOX inhibitors in cassava varieties cultivated in clayey and sandy soils |
title_full |
Selectivity and efficacy of PROTOX inhibitors in cassava varieties cultivated in clayey and sandy soils |
title_fullStr |
Selectivity and efficacy of PROTOX inhibitors in cassava varieties cultivated in clayey and sandy soils |
title_full_unstemmed |
Selectivity and efficacy of PROTOX inhibitors in cassava varieties cultivated in clayey and sandy soils |
title_sort |
Selectivity and efficacy of PROTOX inhibitors in cassava varieties cultivated in clayey and sandy soils |
author |
Costa , Neumárcio Vilanova da |
author_facet |
Costa , Neumárcio Vilanova da Takahashi, Mário Costa , Andreia Cristina Peres Rodrigues da Ferreira, Silvio Douglas Brustolin, Dyogo Bortot Vasconcelos, Edmar Soares de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Takahashi, Mário Costa , Andreia Cristina Peres Rodrigues da Ferreira, Silvio Douglas Brustolin, Dyogo Bortot Vasconcelos, Edmar Soares de |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Costa , Neumárcio Vilanova da Takahashi, Mário Costa , Andreia Cristina Peres Rodrigues da Ferreira, Silvio Douglas Brustolin, Dyogo Bortot Vasconcelos, Edmar Soares de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Manihot esculenta; weed control; soil texture; flumioxazin; sulfentrazone. Manihot esculenta; weed control; soil texture; flumioxazin; sulfentrazone. |
topic |
Manihot esculenta; weed control; soil texture; flumioxazin; sulfentrazone. Manihot esculenta; weed control; soil texture; flumioxazin; sulfentrazone. |
description |
The selectivity and efficacy of protoporphyrinogen oxidase (PROTOX) inhibitor herbicides in cassava varieties depend on product formulation, dosage, and soil texture. The aim of this study was to assess the selectivity and efficacy of flumioxazin and sulfentrazone in the cassava variety ‘IPR B36’ and the clone ‘VN 117’. Two experiments were carried out: one in a clayey soil and one in a sandy soil. Both experiments were laid in a split-plot randomized block design with three replicates. The two cassava varieties were used as main plots, with subplots consisting in 10 treatments including, flumioxazin at 50, 75, 100, and 125 g ha-1; sulfentrazone at 250, 500, 750, and 1000 g ha-1; one weed-free control, and one unweeded control. Flumioxazin (≥75 g ha-1) and sulfentrazone (≥250 g ha-1) achieved mean weed control rates > 70 and 90% in both types of soil for up to 90 days after application. Flumioxazin exhibited fewer residual effects on the cassava varieties than sulfentrazone, particularly in clayey soil. Flumioxazin was selective to the different cassava varieties planted in both soil types, whereas sulfentrazone was more selective in clayey soil. PROTOX inhibitors were effective in controlling weed growth in cassava plots, and there were no varietal differences in herbicide selectivity; however, the use of sulfentrazone should be restricted to maximum spray rates of 250 g ha-1 in sandy soils. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-11-22 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/57135 10.4025/actasciagron.v45i1.57135 |
url |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/57135 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.4025/actasciagron.v45i1.57135 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/57135/751375155039 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; Vol 45 (2023): Publicação contínua; e57135 Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; v. 45 (2023): Publicação contínua; e57135 1807-8621 1679-9275 reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) instacron:UEM |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
instacron_str |
UEM |
institution |
UEM |
reponame_str |
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) |
collection |
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
actaagron@uem.br||actaagron@uem.br|| edamasio@uem.br |
_version_ |
1799305901172064256 |