Selectivity and efficacy of PROTOX inhibitors in cassava varieties cultivated in clayey and sandy soils

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Costa , Neumárcio Vilanova da
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Takahashi, Mário, Costa , Andreia Cristina Peres Rodrigues da, Ferreira, Silvio Douglas, Brustolin, Dyogo Bortot, Vasconcelos, Edmar Soares de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)
Texto Completo: http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/57135
Resumo: The selectivity and efficacy of protoporphyrinogen oxidase (PROTOX) inhibitor herbicides in cassava varieties depend on product formulation, dosage, and soil texture. The aim of this study was to assess the selectivity and efficacy of flumioxazin and sulfentrazone in the cassava variety ‘IPR B36’ and the clone ‘VN 117’. Two experiments were carried out: one in a clayey soil and one in a sandy soil. Both experiments were laid in a split-plot randomized block design with three replicates. The two cassava varieties were used as main plots, with subplots consisting in 10 treatments including, flumioxazin at 50, 75, 100, and 125 g ha-1; sulfentrazone at 250, 500, 750, and 1000 g ha-1; one weed-free control, and one unweeded control. Flumioxazin (≥75 g ha-1) and sulfentrazone (≥250 g ha-1) achieved mean weed control rates > 70 and 90% in both types of soil for up to 90 days after application. Flumioxazin exhibited fewer residual effects on the cassava varieties than sulfentrazone, particularly in clayey soil. Flumioxazin was selective to the different cassava varieties planted in both soil types, whereas sulfentrazone was more selective in clayey soil. PROTOX inhibitors were effective in controlling weed growth in cassava plots, and there were no varietal differences in herbicide selectivity; however, the use of sulfentrazone should be restricted to maximum spray rates of 250 g ha-1 in sandy soils.
id UEM-5_3d7e15c255f9b9b3df540a5801833f8a
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/57135
network_acronym_str UEM-5
network_name_str Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Selectivity and efficacy of PROTOX inhibitors in cassava varieties cultivated in clayey and sandy soilsSelectivity and efficacy of PROTOX inhibitors in cassava varieties cultivated in clayey and sandy soilsManihot esculenta; weed control; soil texture; flumioxazin; sulfentrazone.Manihot esculenta; weed control; soil texture; flumioxazin; sulfentrazone.The selectivity and efficacy of protoporphyrinogen oxidase (PROTOX) inhibitor herbicides in cassava varieties depend on product formulation, dosage, and soil texture. The aim of this study was to assess the selectivity and efficacy of flumioxazin and sulfentrazone in the cassava variety ‘IPR B36’ and the clone ‘VN 117’. Two experiments were carried out: one in a clayey soil and one in a sandy soil. Both experiments were laid in a split-plot randomized block design with three replicates. The two cassava varieties were used as main plots, with subplots consisting in 10 treatments including, flumioxazin at 50, 75, 100, and 125 g ha-1; sulfentrazone at 250, 500, 750, and 1000 g ha-1; one weed-free control, and one unweeded control. Flumioxazin (≥75 g ha-1) and sulfentrazone (≥250 g ha-1) achieved mean weed control rates > 70 and 90% in both types of soil for up to 90 days after application. Flumioxazin exhibited fewer residual effects on the cassava varieties than sulfentrazone, particularly in clayey soil. Flumioxazin was selective to the different cassava varieties planted in both soil types, whereas sulfentrazone was more selective in clayey soil. PROTOX inhibitors were effective in controlling weed growth in cassava plots, and there were no varietal differences in herbicide selectivity; however, the use of sulfentrazone should be restricted to maximum spray rates of 250 g ha-1 in sandy soils.The selectivity and efficacy of protoporphyrinogen oxidase (PROTOX) inhibitor herbicides in cassava varieties depend on product formulation, dosage, and soil texture. The aim of this study was to assess the selectivity and efficacy of flumioxazin and sulfentrazone in the cassava variety ‘IPR B36’ and the clone ‘VN 117’. Two experiments were carried out: one in a clayey soil and one in a sandy soil. Both experiments were laid in a split-plot randomized block design with three replicates. The two cassava varieties were used as main plots, with subplots consisting in 10 treatments including, flumioxazin at 50, 75, 100, and 125 g ha-1; sulfentrazone at 250, 500, 750, and 1000 g ha-1; one weed-free control, and one unweeded control. Flumioxazin (≥75 g ha-1) and sulfentrazone (≥250 g ha-1) achieved mean weed control rates > 70 and 90% in both types of soil for up to 90 days after application. Flumioxazin exhibited fewer residual effects on the cassava varieties than sulfentrazone, particularly in clayey soil. Flumioxazin was selective to the different cassava varieties planted in both soil types, whereas sulfentrazone was more selective in clayey soil. PROTOX inhibitors were effective in controlling weed growth in cassava plots, and there were no varietal differences in herbicide selectivity; however, the use of sulfentrazone should be restricted to maximum spray rates of 250 g ha-1 in sandy soils.Universidade Estadual de Maringá2022-11-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/5713510.4025/actasciagron.v45i1.57135Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; Vol 45 (2023): Publicação contínua; e57135Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; v. 45 (2023): Publicação contínua; e571351807-86211679-9275reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMenghttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/57135/751375155039Copyright (c) 2023 Acta Scientiarum. Agronomyhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCosta , Neumárcio Vilanova da Takahashi, MárioCosta , Andreia Cristina Peres Rodrigues da Ferreira, Silvio Douglas Brustolin, Dyogo Bortot Vasconcelos, Edmar Soares de 2023-01-31T19:21:01Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/57135Revistahttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgronPUBhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/oaiactaagron@uem.br||actaagron@uem.br|| edamasio@uem.br1807-86211679-9275opendoar:2023-01-31T19:21:01Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Selectivity and efficacy of PROTOX inhibitors in cassava varieties cultivated in clayey and sandy soils
Selectivity and efficacy of PROTOX inhibitors in cassava varieties cultivated in clayey and sandy soils
title Selectivity and efficacy of PROTOX inhibitors in cassava varieties cultivated in clayey and sandy soils
spellingShingle Selectivity and efficacy of PROTOX inhibitors in cassava varieties cultivated in clayey and sandy soils
Costa , Neumárcio Vilanova da
Manihot esculenta; weed control; soil texture; flumioxazin; sulfentrazone.
Manihot esculenta; weed control; soil texture; flumioxazin; sulfentrazone.
title_short Selectivity and efficacy of PROTOX inhibitors in cassava varieties cultivated in clayey and sandy soils
title_full Selectivity and efficacy of PROTOX inhibitors in cassava varieties cultivated in clayey and sandy soils
title_fullStr Selectivity and efficacy of PROTOX inhibitors in cassava varieties cultivated in clayey and sandy soils
title_full_unstemmed Selectivity and efficacy of PROTOX inhibitors in cassava varieties cultivated in clayey and sandy soils
title_sort Selectivity and efficacy of PROTOX inhibitors in cassava varieties cultivated in clayey and sandy soils
author Costa , Neumárcio Vilanova da
author_facet Costa , Neumárcio Vilanova da
Takahashi, Mário
Costa , Andreia Cristina Peres Rodrigues da
Ferreira, Silvio Douglas
Brustolin, Dyogo Bortot
Vasconcelos, Edmar Soares de
author_role author
author2 Takahashi, Mário
Costa , Andreia Cristina Peres Rodrigues da
Ferreira, Silvio Douglas
Brustolin, Dyogo Bortot
Vasconcelos, Edmar Soares de
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Costa , Neumárcio Vilanova da
Takahashi, Mário
Costa , Andreia Cristina Peres Rodrigues da
Ferreira, Silvio Douglas
Brustolin, Dyogo Bortot
Vasconcelos, Edmar Soares de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Manihot esculenta; weed control; soil texture; flumioxazin; sulfentrazone.
Manihot esculenta; weed control; soil texture; flumioxazin; sulfentrazone.
topic Manihot esculenta; weed control; soil texture; flumioxazin; sulfentrazone.
Manihot esculenta; weed control; soil texture; flumioxazin; sulfentrazone.
description The selectivity and efficacy of protoporphyrinogen oxidase (PROTOX) inhibitor herbicides in cassava varieties depend on product formulation, dosage, and soil texture. The aim of this study was to assess the selectivity and efficacy of flumioxazin and sulfentrazone in the cassava variety ‘IPR B36’ and the clone ‘VN 117’. Two experiments were carried out: one in a clayey soil and one in a sandy soil. Both experiments were laid in a split-plot randomized block design with three replicates. The two cassava varieties were used as main plots, with subplots consisting in 10 treatments including, flumioxazin at 50, 75, 100, and 125 g ha-1; sulfentrazone at 250, 500, 750, and 1000 g ha-1; one weed-free control, and one unweeded control. Flumioxazin (≥75 g ha-1) and sulfentrazone (≥250 g ha-1) achieved mean weed control rates > 70 and 90% in both types of soil for up to 90 days after application. Flumioxazin exhibited fewer residual effects on the cassava varieties than sulfentrazone, particularly in clayey soil. Flumioxazin was selective to the different cassava varieties planted in both soil types, whereas sulfentrazone was more selective in clayey soil. PROTOX inhibitors were effective in controlling weed growth in cassava plots, and there were no varietal differences in herbicide selectivity; however, the use of sulfentrazone should be restricted to maximum spray rates of 250 g ha-1 in sandy soils.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-11-22
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/57135
10.4025/actasciagron.v45i1.57135
url http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/57135
identifier_str_mv 10.4025/actasciagron.v45i1.57135
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/57135/751375155039
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Maringá
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Maringá
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; Vol 45 (2023): Publicação contínua; e57135
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; v. 45 (2023): Publicação contínua; e57135
1807-8621
1679-9275
reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron:UEM
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron_str UEM
institution UEM
reponame_str Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)
collection Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv actaagron@uem.br||actaagron@uem.br|| edamasio@uem.br
_version_ 1799305901172064256