Quantile regression for genomic selection of growth curves

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Nascimento, Ana Carolina Campana
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Azevedo, Camila Ferreira, Barreto, Cynthia Aparecida Valiati, Oliveira, Gabriela França, Nascimento, Moysés
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)
Texto Completo: http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/65081
Resumo: This study evaluated the efficiency of genome-wide selection (GWS) based on regularized quantile regression (RQR) to obtain genomic growth curves based on genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) of individuals with different probability distributions. The data were simulated and composed of 2,025 individuals from two generations and 435 markers randomly distributed across five chromosomes. The simulated phenotypes presented symmetrical, skewed, positive, and negative distributions. Data were analyzed using RQR considering nine quantiles (0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, and 0.9) and traditional methods of genomic selection (specifically, RR-BLUP, BLASSO, BayesA, and BayesB). In general, RQR-based estimation of the GEBV was efficient—at least for a quantile model, the results obtained were more accurate than those obtained by the other evaluated methodologies. Specifically, in the symmetrical-distribution scenario, the highest accuracy values were obtained for the parameters with the models RQR0.4, RQR0.3, and RQR0.4. For positive skewness, the models RQR0.2, RQR0.3, and RQR0.1 presented higher accuracy values, whereas for negative skewness, the best model was RQR0.9. Finally, the GEBV vectors obtained by RQR facilitated the construction of genomic growth curves at different levels of interest (quantiles), illustrating the weight–age relationship.
id UEM-5_786187479d85c1efc31be8821ab70ccf
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/65081
network_acronym_str UEM-5
network_name_str Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Quantile regression for genomic selection of growth curvesQuantile regression for genomic selection of growth curvesconditional quantiles; genomic prediction; GWS; genetic breeding.conditional quantiles; genomic prediction; GWS; genetic breeding.This study evaluated the efficiency of genome-wide selection (GWS) based on regularized quantile regression (RQR) to obtain genomic growth curves based on genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) of individuals with different probability distributions. The data were simulated and composed of 2,025 individuals from two generations and 435 markers randomly distributed across five chromosomes. The simulated phenotypes presented symmetrical, skewed, positive, and negative distributions. Data were analyzed using RQR considering nine quantiles (0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, and 0.9) and traditional methods of genomic selection (specifically, RR-BLUP, BLASSO, BayesA, and BayesB). In general, RQR-based estimation of the GEBV was efficient—at least for a quantile model, the results obtained were more accurate than those obtained by the other evaluated methodologies. Specifically, in the symmetrical-distribution scenario, the highest accuracy values were obtained for the parameters with the models RQR0.4, RQR0.3, and RQR0.4. For positive skewness, the models RQR0.2, RQR0.3, and RQR0.1 presented higher accuracy values, whereas for negative skewness, the best model was RQR0.9. Finally, the GEBV vectors obtained by RQR facilitated the construction of genomic growth curves at different levels of interest (quantiles), illustrating the weight–age relationship.This study evaluated the efficiency of genome-wide selection (GWS) based on regularized quantile regression (RQR) to obtain genomic growth curves based on genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) of individuals with different probability distributions. The data were simulated and composed of 2,025 individuals from two generations and 435 markers randomly distributed across five chromosomes. The simulated phenotypes presented symmetrical, skewed, positive, and negative distributions. Data were analyzed using RQR considering nine quantiles (0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, and 0.9) and traditional methods of genomic selection (specifically, RR-BLUP, BLASSO, BayesA, and BayesB). In general, RQR-based estimation of the GEBV was efficient—at least for a quantile model, the results obtained were more accurate than those obtained by the other evaluated methodologies. Specifically, in the symmetrical-distribution scenario, the highest accuracy values were obtained for the parameters with the models RQR0.4, RQR0.3, and RQR0.4. For positive skewness, the models RQR0.2, RQR0.3, and RQR0.1 presented higher accuracy values, whereas for negative skewness, the best model was RQR0.9. Finally, the GEBV vectors obtained by RQR facilitated the construction of genomic growth curves at different levels of interest (quantiles), illustrating the weight–age relationship.Universidade Estadual de Maringá2023-12-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/6508110.4025/actasciagron.v46i1.65081Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; Vol 46 No 1 (2024): Publicação contínua; e65081Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; v. 46 n. 1 (2024): Publicação contínua; e650811807-86211679-9275reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMenghttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/65081/751375156925Copyright (c) 2024 Acta Scientiarum. Agronomyhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNascimento, Ana Carolina Campana Azevedo, Camila Ferreira Barreto, Cynthia Aparecida Valiati Oliveira, Gabriela França Nascimento, Moysés2024-02-08T19:38:27Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/65081Revistahttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgronPUBhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/oaiactaagron@uem.br||actaagron@uem.br|| edamasio@uem.br1807-86211679-9275opendoar:2024-02-08T19:38:27Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Quantile regression for genomic selection of growth curves
Quantile regression for genomic selection of growth curves
title Quantile regression for genomic selection of growth curves
spellingShingle Quantile regression for genomic selection of growth curves
Nascimento, Ana Carolina Campana
conditional quantiles; genomic prediction; GWS; genetic breeding.
conditional quantiles; genomic prediction; GWS; genetic breeding.
title_short Quantile regression for genomic selection of growth curves
title_full Quantile regression for genomic selection of growth curves
title_fullStr Quantile regression for genomic selection of growth curves
title_full_unstemmed Quantile regression for genomic selection of growth curves
title_sort Quantile regression for genomic selection of growth curves
author Nascimento, Ana Carolina Campana
author_facet Nascimento, Ana Carolina Campana
Azevedo, Camila Ferreira
Barreto, Cynthia Aparecida Valiati
Oliveira, Gabriela França
Nascimento, Moysés
author_role author
author2 Azevedo, Camila Ferreira
Barreto, Cynthia Aparecida Valiati
Oliveira, Gabriela França
Nascimento, Moysés
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Nascimento, Ana Carolina Campana
Azevedo, Camila Ferreira
Barreto, Cynthia Aparecida Valiati
Oliveira, Gabriela França
Nascimento, Moysés
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv conditional quantiles; genomic prediction; GWS; genetic breeding.
conditional quantiles; genomic prediction; GWS; genetic breeding.
topic conditional quantiles; genomic prediction; GWS; genetic breeding.
conditional quantiles; genomic prediction; GWS; genetic breeding.
description This study evaluated the efficiency of genome-wide selection (GWS) based on regularized quantile regression (RQR) to obtain genomic growth curves based on genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) of individuals with different probability distributions. The data were simulated and composed of 2,025 individuals from two generations and 435 markers randomly distributed across five chromosomes. The simulated phenotypes presented symmetrical, skewed, positive, and negative distributions. Data were analyzed using RQR considering nine quantiles (0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, and 0.9) and traditional methods of genomic selection (specifically, RR-BLUP, BLASSO, BayesA, and BayesB). In general, RQR-based estimation of the GEBV was efficient—at least for a quantile model, the results obtained were more accurate than those obtained by the other evaluated methodologies. Specifically, in the symmetrical-distribution scenario, the highest accuracy values were obtained for the parameters with the models RQR0.4, RQR0.3, and RQR0.4. For positive skewness, the models RQR0.2, RQR0.3, and RQR0.1 presented higher accuracy values, whereas for negative skewness, the best model was RQR0.9. Finally, the GEBV vectors obtained by RQR facilitated the construction of genomic growth curves at different levels of interest (quantiles), illustrating the weight–age relationship.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-12-12
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/65081
10.4025/actasciagron.v46i1.65081
url http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/65081
identifier_str_mv 10.4025/actasciagron.v46i1.65081
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/65081/751375156925
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Maringá
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Maringá
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; Vol 46 No 1 (2024): Publicação contínua; e65081
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; v. 46 n. 1 (2024): Publicação contínua; e65081
1807-8621
1679-9275
reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron:UEM
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron_str UEM
institution UEM
reponame_str Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)
collection Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv actaagron@uem.br||actaagron@uem.br|| edamasio@uem.br
_version_ 1799305901394362368