Activated charcoal and graphite for the micropropagation of Cattleya bicolor Lindl. and a orchid double-hybrid ‘BLC Pastoral Innocence’ - doi: 10.4025/actasciagron.v34i2.12257

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Prizão, Eliane Cristina
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Gonçalves, Letícia de Menezes, Gutierre, Maria Auxiliadora, Mangolin, Claudete Aparecida, Machado, Maria de Fátima Pires da Silva
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)
Texto Completo: http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/12257
Resumo: No previous studies have investigated the use of graphite instead of activated charcoal in orchids. In this work, different concentrations of activated charcoal or graphite were added to KC medium to darken the culture medium and stimulate the in vitro propagation of Cattleya bicolor and of a double hybrid orchid (‘BLC Pastoral Innocence’). The seedlings were inoculated on growth regulator-free KC medium; the effects of activated charcoal (0.0, 1.5, 3.0, 4.5, 6.0, and 7.5 g L-1) and graphite (0.0, 1.5, 3.0, 4.5, 6.0, and 7.5 g L-1) concentrations were tested separately. Each flask contained fifteen seedlings, and the experiments had a randomised, two-way factorial design. The two tested variables were culture medium and illumination levels; eleven culture levels (different concentrations of graphite or activate charcoal) and two illumination levels (14-hr photoperiod or continuous illumination) were evaluated. Three replicates of each combination were utilised. After six months of culture, the average numbers of induced buds and roots per seedling were recorded for each concentration of activated charcoal or graphite. Whereas the largest number of buds in C. bicolor seedlings occurred on media containing 6.0 or 7.5 g L-1 graphite, the largest number of roots occurred on media containing 6.0 g L-1 activated charcoal. In the hybrid ‘BLC Pastoral Innocence’, the largest number of buds and roots was reported in medium with 4.5 g L-1 activated charcoal. When using graphite in place of activated charcoal, we obtained disparate the results in root formation that suggest that graphite is not a recommended substitute for activated charcoal. 
id UEM-5_8fae05d0b15e2623e2f555aba61fcac6
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/12257
network_acronym_str UEM-5
network_name_str Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Activated charcoal and graphite for the micropropagation of Cattleya bicolor Lindl. and a orchid double-hybrid ‘BLC Pastoral Innocence’ - doi: 10.4025/actasciagron.v34i2.12257activated charcoalgraphiteorchidsmicropropagationNo previous studies have investigated the use of graphite instead of activated charcoal in orchids. In this work, different concentrations of activated charcoal or graphite were added to KC medium to darken the culture medium and stimulate the in vitro propagation of Cattleya bicolor and of a double hybrid orchid (‘BLC Pastoral Innocence’). The seedlings were inoculated on growth regulator-free KC medium; the effects of activated charcoal (0.0, 1.5, 3.0, 4.5, 6.0, and 7.5 g L-1) and graphite (0.0, 1.5, 3.0, 4.5, 6.0, and 7.5 g L-1) concentrations were tested separately. Each flask contained fifteen seedlings, and the experiments had a randomised, two-way factorial design. The two tested variables were culture medium and illumination levels; eleven culture levels (different concentrations of graphite or activate charcoal) and two illumination levels (14-hr photoperiod or continuous illumination) were evaluated. Three replicates of each combination were utilised. After six months of culture, the average numbers of induced buds and roots per seedling were recorded for each concentration of activated charcoal or graphite. Whereas the largest number of buds in C. bicolor seedlings occurred on media containing 6.0 or 7.5 g L-1 graphite, the largest number of roots occurred on media containing 6.0 g L-1 activated charcoal. In the hybrid ‘BLC Pastoral Innocence’, the largest number of buds and roots was reported in medium with 4.5 g L-1 activated charcoal. When using graphite in place of activated charcoal, we obtained disparate the results in root formation that suggest that graphite is not a recommended substitute for activated charcoal. Universidade Estadual de Maringá2011-10-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionlaboratory analysislaboratory analysisapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/1225710.4025/actasciagron.v34i2.12257Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; Vol 34 No 2 (2012); 157-161Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; v. 34 n. 2 (2012); 157-1611807-86211679-9275reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMporenghttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/12257/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/12257/pdf_1Prizão, Eliane CristinaGonçalves, Letícia de MenezesGutierre, Maria AuxiliadoraMangolin, Claudete AparecidaMachado, Maria de Fátima Pires da Silvainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-11-23T18:38:27Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/12257Revistahttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgronPUBhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/oaiactaagron@uem.br||actaagron@uem.br|| edamasio@uem.br1807-86211679-9275opendoar:2022-11-23T18:38:27Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Activated charcoal and graphite for the micropropagation of Cattleya bicolor Lindl. and a orchid double-hybrid ‘BLC Pastoral Innocence’ - doi: 10.4025/actasciagron.v34i2.12257
title Activated charcoal and graphite for the micropropagation of Cattleya bicolor Lindl. and a orchid double-hybrid ‘BLC Pastoral Innocence’ - doi: 10.4025/actasciagron.v34i2.12257
spellingShingle Activated charcoal and graphite for the micropropagation of Cattleya bicolor Lindl. and a orchid double-hybrid ‘BLC Pastoral Innocence’ - doi: 10.4025/actasciagron.v34i2.12257
Prizão, Eliane Cristina
activated charcoal
graphite
orchids
micropropagation
title_short Activated charcoal and graphite for the micropropagation of Cattleya bicolor Lindl. and a orchid double-hybrid ‘BLC Pastoral Innocence’ - doi: 10.4025/actasciagron.v34i2.12257
title_full Activated charcoal and graphite for the micropropagation of Cattleya bicolor Lindl. and a orchid double-hybrid ‘BLC Pastoral Innocence’ - doi: 10.4025/actasciagron.v34i2.12257
title_fullStr Activated charcoal and graphite for the micropropagation of Cattleya bicolor Lindl. and a orchid double-hybrid ‘BLC Pastoral Innocence’ - doi: 10.4025/actasciagron.v34i2.12257
title_full_unstemmed Activated charcoal and graphite for the micropropagation of Cattleya bicolor Lindl. and a orchid double-hybrid ‘BLC Pastoral Innocence’ - doi: 10.4025/actasciagron.v34i2.12257
title_sort Activated charcoal and graphite for the micropropagation of Cattleya bicolor Lindl. and a orchid double-hybrid ‘BLC Pastoral Innocence’ - doi: 10.4025/actasciagron.v34i2.12257
author Prizão, Eliane Cristina
author_facet Prizão, Eliane Cristina
Gonçalves, Letícia de Menezes
Gutierre, Maria Auxiliadora
Mangolin, Claudete Aparecida
Machado, Maria de Fátima Pires da Silva
author_role author
author2 Gonçalves, Letícia de Menezes
Gutierre, Maria Auxiliadora
Mangolin, Claudete Aparecida
Machado, Maria de Fátima Pires da Silva
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Prizão, Eliane Cristina
Gonçalves, Letícia de Menezes
Gutierre, Maria Auxiliadora
Mangolin, Claudete Aparecida
Machado, Maria de Fátima Pires da Silva
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv activated charcoal
graphite
orchids
micropropagation
topic activated charcoal
graphite
orchids
micropropagation
description No previous studies have investigated the use of graphite instead of activated charcoal in orchids. In this work, different concentrations of activated charcoal or graphite were added to KC medium to darken the culture medium and stimulate the in vitro propagation of Cattleya bicolor and of a double hybrid orchid (‘BLC Pastoral Innocence’). The seedlings were inoculated on growth regulator-free KC medium; the effects of activated charcoal (0.0, 1.5, 3.0, 4.5, 6.0, and 7.5 g L-1) and graphite (0.0, 1.5, 3.0, 4.5, 6.0, and 7.5 g L-1) concentrations were tested separately. Each flask contained fifteen seedlings, and the experiments had a randomised, two-way factorial design. The two tested variables were culture medium and illumination levels; eleven culture levels (different concentrations of graphite or activate charcoal) and two illumination levels (14-hr photoperiod or continuous illumination) were evaluated. Three replicates of each combination were utilised. After six months of culture, the average numbers of induced buds and roots per seedling were recorded for each concentration of activated charcoal or graphite. Whereas the largest number of buds in C. bicolor seedlings occurred on media containing 6.0 or 7.5 g L-1 graphite, the largest number of roots occurred on media containing 6.0 g L-1 activated charcoal. In the hybrid ‘BLC Pastoral Innocence’, the largest number of buds and roots was reported in medium with 4.5 g L-1 activated charcoal. When using graphite in place of activated charcoal, we obtained disparate the results in root formation that suggest that graphite is not a recommended substitute for activated charcoal. 
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-10-21
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
laboratory analysis
laboratory analysis
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/12257
10.4025/actasciagron.v34i2.12257
url http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/12257
identifier_str_mv 10.4025/actasciagron.v34i2.12257
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/12257/pdf
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/12257/pdf_1
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Maringá
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Maringá
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; Vol 34 No 2 (2012); 157-161
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; v. 34 n. 2 (2012); 157-161
1807-8621
1679-9275
reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron:UEM
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron_str UEM
institution UEM
reponame_str Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)
collection Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv actaagron@uem.br||actaagron@uem.br|| edamasio@uem.br
_version_ 1750315305840672768