Resistance of chickpea cultivars to Chloridea virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/54619 |
Resumo: | Chickpea is a legume with nutrient-rich grains important for human feeding. Tobacco budworm, Chloridea virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), is one of the most major pests of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) in Brazil. This pest damages leaves, flowers, pods, and grains. Plant resistance to insects is an important tactic of pest management, which usually facilitates and reduce costs of implementing an Integrated Pest Management for farmers. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the resistance in chickpea cultivars to C. virescens. Six chickpea cultivars were evaluated for antixenosis, initial antibiotic parameters, and behavior under field conditions. The cultivars BRS Kalifa and BRS Cícero were less attractive in a free-choice test, while Jamu 96 and BRS Kalifa were less attractive in a no-choice test. BRS Kalifa and BRS Toro leaves had a higher trichome density. Jamu 96 and BRS Toro had higher contents of oxalic and malic acids. C. virescens larvae in BRS Cícero, BRS Toro, and BRS Kalifa showed the lowest weights. Jamu 96 pods were the least damaged, and BRS Aleppo and Jamu 96 had the highest yields. The chickpea cultivars Jamu 96 and BRS Aleppo, which had resistance levels and mechanisms, can be used in integrated pest management programs to control C. virescens. |
id |
UEM-5_bfdcb4ca2934cb8b7cf5514b105c3cc0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/54619 |
network_acronym_str |
UEM-5 |
network_name_str |
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Resistance of chickpea cultivars to Chloridea virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)Resistance of chickpea cultivars to Chloridea virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)Cicer aeritinum; plant resistance to insects; pulse crop; tobacco budworm.Cicer aeritinum; plant resistance to insects; pulse crop; tobacco budworm.Chickpea is a legume with nutrient-rich grains important for human feeding. Tobacco budworm, Chloridea virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), is one of the most major pests of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) in Brazil. This pest damages leaves, flowers, pods, and grains. Plant resistance to insects is an important tactic of pest management, which usually facilitates and reduce costs of implementing an Integrated Pest Management for farmers. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the resistance in chickpea cultivars to C. virescens. Six chickpea cultivars were evaluated for antixenosis, initial antibiotic parameters, and behavior under field conditions. The cultivars BRS Kalifa and BRS Cícero were less attractive in a free-choice test, while Jamu 96 and BRS Kalifa were less attractive in a no-choice test. BRS Kalifa and BRS Toro leaves had a higher trichome density. Jamu 96 and BRS Toro had higher contents of oxalic and malic acids. C. virescens larvae in BRS Cícero, BRS Toro, and BRS Kalifa showed the lowest weights. Jamu 96 pods were the least damaged, and BRS Aleppo and Jamu 96 had the highest yields. The chickpea cultivars Jamu 96 and BRS Aleppo, which had resistance levels and mechanisms, can be used in integrated pest management programs to control C. virescens.Chickpea is a legume with nutrient-rich grains important for human feeding. Tobacco budworm, Chloridea virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), is one of the most major pests of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) in Brazil. This pest damages leaves, flowers, pods, and grains. Plant resistance to insects is an important tactic of pest management, which usually facilitates and reduce costs of implementing an Integrated Pest Management for farmers. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the resistance in chickpea cultivars to C. virescens. Six chickpea cultivars were evaluated for antixenosis, initial antibiotic parameters, and behavior under field conditions. The cultivars BRS Kalifa and BRS Cícero were less attractive in a free-choice test, while Jamu 96 and BRS Kalifa were less attractive in a no-choice test. BRS Kalifa and BRS Toro leaves had a higher trichome density. Jamu 96 and BRS Toro had higher contents of oxalic and malic acids. C. virescens larvae in BRS Cícero, BRS Toro, and BRS Kalifa showed the lowest weights. Jamu 96 pods were the least damaged, and BRS Aleppo and Jamu 96 had the highest yields. The chickpea cultivars Jamu 96 and BRS Aleppo, which had resistance levels and mechanisms, can be used in integrated pest management programs to control C. virescens.Universidade Estadual de Maringá2022-05-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/5461910.4025/actasciagron.v44i1.54619Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; Vol 44 (2022): Publicação contínua; e54619Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; v. 44 (2022): Publicação contínua; e546191807-86211679-9275reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMenghttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/54619/751375154242Copyright (c) 2022 Acta Scientiarum. Agronomyhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBorella Júnior, Célio Correa, FernandaSilva, Anderson Rodrigo daSiqueira, Ana Paula Silva Nascimento, Warley Marcos Almeida, André Cirilo de Sousa Jesus, Flávio Gonçalves de2022-06-22T14:16:00Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/54619Revistahttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgronPUBhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/oaiactaagron@uem.br||actaagron@uem.br|| edamasio@uem.br1807-86211679-9275opendoar:2022-06-22T14:16Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Resistance of chickpea cultivars to Chloridea virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Resistance of chickpea cultivars to Chloridea virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) |
title |
Resistance of chickpea cultivars to Chloridea virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) |
spellingShingle |
Resistance of chickpea cultivars to Chloridea virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Borella Júnior, Célio Cicer aeritinum; plant resistance to insects; pulse crop; tobacco budworm. Cicer aeritinum; plant resistance to insects; pulse crop; tobacco budworm. |
title_short |
Resistance of chickpea cultivars to Chloridea virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) |
title_full |
Resistance of chickpea cultivars to Chloridea virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) |
title_fullStr |
Resistance of chickpea cultivars to Chloridea virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Resistance of chickpea cultivars to Chloridea virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) |
title_sort |
Resistance of chickpea cultivars to Chloridea virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) |
author |
Borella Júnior, Célio |
author_facet |
Borella Júnior, Célio Correa, Fernanda Silva, Anderson Rodrigo da Siqueira, Ana Paula Silva Nascimento, Warley Marcos Almeida, André Cirilo de Sousa Jesus, Flávio Gonçalves de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Correa, Fernanda Silva, Anderson Rodrigo da Siqueira, Ana Paula Silva Nascimento, Warley Marcos Almeida, André Cirilo de Sousa Jesus, Flávio Gonçalves de |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Borella Júnior, Célio Correa, Fernanda Silva, Anderson Rodrigo da Siqueira, Ana Paula Silva Nascimento, Warley Marcos Almeida, André Cirilo de Sousa Jesus, Flávio Gonçalves de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Cicer aeritinum; plant resistance to insects; pulse crop; tobacco budworm. Cicer aeritinum; plant resistance to insects; pulse crop; tobacco budworm. |
topic |
Cicer aeritinum; plant resistance to insects; pulse crop; tobacco budworm. Cicer aeritinum; plant resistance to insects; pulse crop; tobacco budworm. |
description |
Chickpea is a legume with nutrient-rich grains important for human feeding. Tobacco budworm, Chloridea virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), is one of the most major pests of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) in Brazil. This pest damages leaves, flowers, pods, and grains. Plant resistance to insects is an important tactic of pest management, which usually facilitates and reduce costs of implementing an Integrated Pest Management for farmers. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the resistance in chickpea cultivars to C. virescens. Six chickpea cultivars were evaluated for antixenosis, initial antibiotic parameters, and behavior under field conditions. The cultivars BRS Kalifa and BRS Cícero were less attractive in a free-choice test, while Jamu 96 and BRS Kalifa were less attractive in a no-choice test. BRS Kalifa and BRS Toro leaves had a higher trichome density. Jamu 96 and BRS Toro had higher contents of oxalic and malic acids. C. virescens larvae in BRS Cícero, BRS Toro, and BRS Kalifa showed the lowest weights. Jamu 96 pods were the least damaged, and BRS Aleppo and Jamu 96 had the highest yields. The chickpea cultivars Jamu 96 and BRS Aleppo, which had resistance levels and mechanisms, can be used in integrated pest management programs to control C. virescens. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-05-24 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/54619 10.4025/actasciagron.v44i1.54619 |
url |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/54619 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.4025/actasciagron.v44i1.54619 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/54619/751375154242 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; Vol 44 (2022): Publicação contínua; e54619 Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; v. 44 (2022): Publicação contínua; e54619 1807-8621 1679-9275 reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) instacron:UEM |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
instacron_str |
UEM |
institution |
UEM |
reponame_str |
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) |
collection |
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
actaagron@uem.br||actaagron@uem.br|| edamasio@uem.br |
_version_ |
1799305911860199424 |