Resistance of chickpea cultivars to Chloridea virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Borella Júnior, Célio
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Correa, Fernanda, Silva, Anderson Rodrigo da, Siqueira, Ana Paula Silva, Nascimento, Warley Marcos, Almeida, André Cirilo de Sousa, Jesus, Flávio Gonçalves de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)
Texto Completo: http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/54619
Resumo: Chickpea is a legume with nutrient-rich grains important for human feeding. Tobacco budworm, Chloridea virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), is one of the most major pests of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) in Brazil. This pest damages leaves, flowers, pods, and grains. Plant resistance to insects is an important tactic of pest management, which usually facilitates and reduce costs of implementing an Integrated Pest Management for farmers. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the resistance in chickpea cultivars to C. virescens. Six chickpea cultivars were evaluated for antixenosis, initial antibiotic parameters, and behavior under field conditions. The cultivars BRS Kalifa and BRS Cícero were less attractive in a free-choice test, while Jamu 96 and BRS Kalifa were less attractive in a no-choice test. BRS Kalifa and BRS Toro leaves had a higher trichome density. Jamu 96 and BRS Toro had higher contents of oxalic and malic acids. C. virescens larvae in BRS Cícero, BRS Toro, and BRS Kalifa showed the lowest weights. Jamu 96 pods were the least damaged, and BRS Aleppo and Jamu 96 had the highest yields. The chickpea cultivars Jamu 96 and BRS Aleppo, which had resistance levels and mechanisms, can be used in integrated pest management programs to control C. virescens.
id UEM-5_bfdcb4ca2934cb8b7cf5514b105c3cc0
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/54619
network_acronym_str UEM-5
network_name_str Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Resistance of chickpea cultivars to Chloridea virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)Resistance of chickpea cultivars to Chloridea virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)Cicer aeritinum; plant resistance to insects; pulse crop; tobacco budworm.Cicer aeritinum; plant resistance to insects; pulse crop; tobacco budworm.Chickpea is a legume with nutrient-rich grains important for human feeding. Tobacco budworm, Chloridea virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), is one of the most major pests of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) in Brazil. This pest damages leaves, flowers, pods, and grains. Plant resistance to insects is an important tactic of pest management, which usually facilitates and reduce costs of implementing an Integrated Pest Management for farmers. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the resistance in chickpea cultivars to C. virescens. Six chickpea cultivars were evaluated for antixenosis, initial antibiotic parameters, and behavior under field conditions. The cultivars BRS Kalifa and BRS Cícero were less attractive in a free-choice test, while Jamu 96 and BRS Kalifa were less attractive in a no-choice test. BRS Kalifa and BRS Toro leaves had a higher trichome density. Jamu 96 and BRS Toro had higher contents of oxalic and malic acids. C. virescens larvae in BRS Cícero, BRS Toro, and BRS Kalifa showed the lowest weights. Jamu 96 pods were the least damaged, and BRS Aleppo and Jamu 96 had the highest yields. The chickpea cultivars Jamu 96 and BRS Aleppo, which had resistance levels and mechanisms, can be used in integrated pest management programs to control C. virescens.Chickpea is a legume with nutrient-rich grains important for human feeding. Tobacco budworm, Chloridea virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), is one of the most major pests of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) in Brazil. This pest damages leaves, flowers, pods, and grains. Plant resistance to insects is an important tactic of pest management, which usually facilitates and reduce costs of implementing an Integrated Pest Management for farmers. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the resistance in chickpea cultivars to C. virescens. Six chickpea cultivars were evaluated for antixenosis, initial antibiotic parameters, and behavior under field conditions. The cultivars BRS Kalifa and BRS Cícero were less attractive in a free-choice test, while Jamu 96 and BRS Kalifa were less attractive in a no-choice test. BRS Kalifa and BRS Toro leaves had a higher trichome density. Jamu 96 and BRS Toro had higher contents of oxalic and malic acids. C. virescens larvae in BRS Cícero, BRS Toro, and BRS Kalifa showed the lowest weights. Jamu 96 pods were the least damaged, and BRS Aleppo and Jamu 96 had the highest yields. The chickpea cultivars Jamu 96 and BRS Aleppo, which had resistance levels and mechanisms, can be used in integrated pest management programs to control C. virescens.Universidade Estadual de Maringá2022-05-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/5461910.4025/actasciagron.v44i1.54619Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; Vol 44 (2022): Publicação contínua; e54619Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; v. 44 (2022): Publicação contínua; e546191807-86211679-9275reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMenghttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/54619/751375154242Copyright (c) 2022 Acta Scientiarum. Agronomyhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBorella Júnior, Célio Correa, FernandaSilva, Anderson Rodrigo daSiqueira, Ana Paula Silva Nascimento, Warley Marcos Almeida, André Cirilo de Sousa Jesus, Flávio Gonçalves de2022-06-22T14:16:00Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/54619Revistahttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgronPUBhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/oaiactaagron@uem.br||actaagron@uem.br|| edamasio@uem.br1807-86211679-9275opendoar:2022-06-22T14:16Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Resistance of chickpea cultivars to Chloridea virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)
Resistance of chickpea cultivars to Chloridea virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)
title Resistance of chickpea cultivars to Chloridea virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)
spellingShingle Resistance of chickpea cultivars to Chloridea virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)
Borella Júnior, Célio
Cicer aeritinum; plant resistance to insects; pulse crop; tobacco budworm.
Cicer aeritinum; plant resistance to insects; pulse crop; tobacco budworm.
title_short Resistance of chickpea cultivars to Chloridea virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)
title_full Resistance of chickpea cultivars to Chloridea virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)
title_fullStr Resistance of chickpea cultivars to Chloridea virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)
title_full_unstemmed Resistance of chickpea cultivars to Chloridea virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)
title_sort Resistance of chickpea cultivars to Chloridea virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)
author Borella Júnior, Célio
author_facet Borella Júnior, Célio
Correa, Fernanda
Silva, Anderson Rodrigo da
Siqueira, Ana Paula Silva
Nascimento, Warley Marcos
Almeida, André Cirilo de Sousa
Jesus, Flávio Gonçalves de
author_role author
author2 Correa, Fernanda
Silva, Anderson Rodrigo da
Siqueira, Ana Paula Silva
Nascimento, Warley Marcos
Almeida, André Cirilo de Sousa
Jesus, Flávio Gonçalves de
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Borella Júnior, Célio
Correa, Fernanda
Silva, Anderson Rodrigo da
Siqueira, Ana Paula Silva
Nascimento, Warley Marcos
Almeida, André Cirilo de Sousa
Jesus, Flávio Gonçalves de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cicer aeritinum; plant resistance to insects; pulse crop; tobacco budworm.
Cicer aeritinum; plant resistance to insects; pulse crop; tobacco budworm.
topic Cicer aeritinum; plant resistance to insects; pulse crop; tobacco budworm.
Cicer aeritinum; plant resistance to insects; pulse crop; tobacco budworm.
description Chickpea is a legume with nutrient-rich grains important for human feeding. Tobacco budworm, Chloridea virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), is one of the most major pests of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) in Brazil. This pest damages leaves, flowers, pods, and grains. Plant resistance to insects is an important tactic of pest management, which usually facilitates and reduce costs of implementing an Integrated Pest Management for farmers. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the resistance in chickpea cultivars to C. virescens. Six chickpea cultivars were evaluated for antixenosis, initial antibiotic parameters, and behavior under field conditions. The cultivars BRS Kalifa and BRS Cícero were less attractive in a free-choice test, while Jamu 96 and BRS Kalifa were less attractive in a no-choice test. BRS Kalifa and BRS Toro leaves had a higher trichome density. Jamu 96 and BRS Toro had higher contents of oxalic and malic acids. C. virescens larvae in BRS Cícero, BRS Toro, and BRS Kalifa showed the lowest weights. Jamu 96 pods were the least damaged, and BRS Aleppo and Jamu 96 had the highest yields. The chickpea cultivars Jamu 96 and BRS Aleppo, which had resistance levels and mechanisms, can be used in integrated pest management programs to control C. virescens.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-05-24
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/54619
10.4025/actasciagron.v44i1.54619
url http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/54619
identifier_str_mv 10.4025/actasciagron.v44i1.54619
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/54619/751375154242
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Maringá
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Maringá
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; Vol 44 (2022): Publicação contínua; e54619
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; v. 44 (2022): Publicação contínua; e54619
1807-8621
1679-9275
reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron:UEM
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron_str UEM
institution UEM
reponame_str Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)
collection Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv actaagron@uem.br||actaagron@uem.br|| edamasio@uem.br
_version_ 1799305911860199424