Timing of fungicide sprays for the control of late season diseases of soybean Glycine max (L.) Merrill

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Klingelfuss, Luiza Helena
Data de Publicação: 2008
Outros Autores: Yorinori, José Tadashi, Ferreira, Léo Pires, Pereira, José Erivaldo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)
Texto Completo: http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/2597
Resumo: More than 40 diseases have been identified in soybeans in Brazil and annual yield losses are estimated at 15-20% amounting to US$1.3 billion. Late season diseases (LSD) alone, caused by brown spot and Cercospora leaf blight may be responsible for over 20% losses on individual farms. Genetic resistance is the most economical and easiest way to control many diseases. In the case of LSD no reliable source of resistance is available and chemical control is the only cure. Little is known about the best time of fungicide sprays for LSD control. Research determined the best time for fungicide application based on pod-filling stages and for the control of diseases and its impact on yield. Field experiments were carried out under three tillage practices: non-tillage, minimum tillage (subsoiler) and conventional tillage. Experimental design was randomized complete block, with ten treatments (nine times of spraying and check) and five replicates each. Fungicide used was difenoconazole at 75 g active ingredient per hectare. Fungicide was applied at growth stages R5.1, R5.2, R5.3, R5.4, R5.5, R6, R5.1 + R5.4, R5.2 + R5.5 and R5.3 + R6. Parameters were: a. severity of LSD, b. percent defoliation compared to check; c. yield (kg/ha), and d. 1.000 seed weight (tsw). Due to prevailing water deficit and high temperature during the reproductive stage of soybeans, disease severity was low and no yield differences were detected among the treatments. For other parameters, significant differences were observed when difenoconazole was applied at growth stages R5.1 + R5.4, in all three soil management. Conventional tillage had greater values in all parameters when compared to no-tillage
id UEM-5_ccd9cdd2bc62c438e20eb4d782b359fa
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/2597
network_acronym_str UEM-5
network_name_str Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Timing of fungicide sprays for the control of late season diseases of soybean Glycine max (L.) MerrillÉpoca de aplicação de fungicidas para controle de doenças de final de ciclo em soja, Glycine max (L.) MerrillGlycine maxColletotrichum truncatumCercospora kikuchiisojadoenças de final de ciclocontrole químico5.00.00.00-4 Ciências AgráriasMore than 40 diseases have been identified in soybeans in Brazil and annual yield losses are estimated at 15-20% amounting to US$1.3 billion. Late season diseases (LSD) alone, caused by brown spot and Cercospora leaf blight may be responsible for over 20% losses on individual farms. Genetic resistance is the most economical and easiest way to control many diseases. In the case of LSD no reliable source of resistance is available and chemical control is the only cure. Little is known about the best time of fungicide sprays for LSD control. Research determined the best time for fungicide application based on pod-filling stages and for the control of diseases and its impact on yield. Field experiments were carried out under three tillage practices: non-tillage, minimum tillage (subsoiler) and conventional tillage. Experimental design was randomized complete block, with ten treatments (nine times of spraying and check) and five replicates each. Fungicide used was difenoconazole at 75 g active ingredient per hectare. Fungicide was applied at growth stages R5.1, R5.2, R5.3, R5.4, R5.5, R6, R5.1 + R5.4, R5.2 + R5.5 and R5.3 + R6. Parameters were: a. severity of LSD, b. percent defoliation compared to check; c. yield (kg/ha), and d. 1.000 seed weight (tsw). Due to prevailing water deficit and high temperature during the reproductive stage of soybeans, disease severity was low and no yield differences were detected among the treatments. For other parameters, significant differences were observed when difenoconazole was applied at growth stages R5.1 + R5.4, in all three soil management. Conventional tillage had greater values in all parameters when compared to no-tillageNo Brasil, há cerca de 40 doenças identificadas em soja que são responsáveis por prejuízos anuais de 15% a 20% da produção, e as doenças de final de ciclo (DFC) podem causar perdas superiores a 20%. Apenas na safra 1997/98, essas perdas foram estimadas em 1,3 bilhões de dólares. A resistência genética é o método mais econômico e eficaz no controle dessas doenças, mas, devido à inexistência de cultivares resistentes para a maioria delas, o controle químico pode ser uma alternativa. Há pouca informação disponível, no Brasil, sobre a eficiência ou a época de aplicação de fungicidas na parte aérea da soja. Este trabalho teve por objetivo avaliar qual a melhor época de aplicação de fungicidas na soja para controle de patógenos causadores de DFC e seu efeito na produtividade de grãos. Foram instalados experimentos em três sistemas de manejo do solo: semeadura direta, cultivo mínimo e preparo convencional. O delineamento experimental foi o de blocos ao acaso, com cinco repetições e dez tratamentos, sendo uma testemunha e nove diferentes épocas de aplicação do fungicida difenoconazole (75 g i.a./ha). As pulverizações foram nos estádios de R5.1, R5.2, R5.3, R5.4, R5.5, R5.6, R5.1, com reaplicação em R5.4, R5.2, com reaplicação em R5.5 e R5.3, com reaplicação em R6. Foram avaliados: a severidade de DFC, a porcentagem de desfolha, a produtividade de grãos e o peso de 1.000 sementes. Não foi possível verificar diferenças significativas quanto à produtividade, devido ao baixo nível de DFC ocorrido durante a safra. Quanto aos demais parâmetros avaliados, os resultados mostraram maior eficiência de duas pulverizações com difenoconazole (75 g i.a./ha) em R5.1 e R5.4, nos três experimentos. Foi possível observar que os resultados em sistema de cultivo convencional foram superiores aos em semeadura diretaUniversidade Estadual de Maringá2008-05-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/259710.4025/actasciagron.v23i0.2597Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; Vol 23 (2001); 1287-1292Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; v. 23 (2001); 1287-12921807-86211679-9275reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMporhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/2597/2073Klingelfuss, Luiza HelenaYorinori, José TadashiFerreira, Léo PiresPereira, José Erivaldoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-11-23T18:37:52Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/2597Revistahttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgronPUBhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/oaiactaagron@uem.br||actaagron@uem.br|| edamasio@uem.br1807-86211679-9275opendoar:2022-11-23T18:37:52Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Timing of fungicide sprays for the control of late season diseases of soybean Glycine max (L.) Merrill
Época de aplicação de fungicidas para controle de doenças de final de ciclo em soja, Glycine max (L.) Merrill
title Timing of fungicide sprays for the control of late season diseases of soybean Glycine max (L.) Merrill
spellingShingle Timing of fungicide sprays for the control of late season diseases of soybean Glycine max (L.) Merrill
Klingelfuss, Luiza Helena
Glycine max
Colletotrichum truncatum
Cercospora kikuchii
soja
doenças de final de ciclo
controle químico
5.00.00.00-4 Ciências Agrárias
title_short Timing of fungicide sprays for the control of late season diseases of soybean Glycine max (L.) Merrill
title_full Timing of fungicide sprays for the control of late season diseases of soybean Glycine max (L.) Merrill
title_fullStr Timing of fungicide sprays for the control of late season diseases of soybean Glycine max (L.) Merrill
title_full_unstemmed Timing of fungicide sprays for the control of late season diseases of soybean Glycine max (L.) Merrill
title_sort Timing of fungicide sprays for the control of late season diseases of soybean Glycine max (L.) Merrill
author Klingelfuss, Luiza Helena
author_facet Klingelfuss, Luiza Helena
Yorinori, José Tadashi
Ferreira, Léo Pires
Pereira, José Erivaldo
author_role author
author2 Yorinori, José Tadashi
Ferreira, Léo Pires
Pereira, José Erivaldo
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Klingelfuss, Luiza Helena
Yorinori, José Tadashi
Ferreira, Léo Pires
Pereira, José Erivaldo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Glycine max
Colletotrichum truncatum
Cercospora kikuchii
soja
doenças de final de ciclo
controle químico
5.00.00.00-4 Ciências Agrárias
topic Glycine max
Colletotrichum truncatum
Cercospora kikuchii
soja
doenças de final de ciclo
controle químico
5.00.00.00-4 Ciências Agrárias
description More than 40 diseases have been identified in soybeans in Brazil and annual yield losses are estimated at 15-20% amounting to US$1.3 billion. Late season diseases (LSD) alone, caused by brown spot and Cercospora leaf blight may be responsible for over 20% losses on individual farms. Genetic resistance is the most economical and easiest way to control many diseases. In the case of LSD no reliable source of resistance is available and chemical control is the only cure. Little is known about the best time of fungicide sprays for LSD control. Research determined the best time for fungicide application based on pod-filling stages and for the control of diseases and its impact on yield. Field experiments were carried out under three tillage practices: non-tillage, minimum tillage (subsoiler) and conventional tillage. Experimental design was randomized complete block, with ten treatments (nine times of spraying and check) and five replicates each. Fungicide used was difenoconazole at 75 g active ingredient per hectare. Fungicide was applied at growth stages R5.1, R5.2, R5.3, R5.4, R5.5, R6, R5.1 + R5.4, R5.2 + R5.5 and R5.3 + R6. Parameters were: a. severity of LSD, b. percent defoliation compared to check; c. yield (kg/ha), and d. 1.000 seed weight (tsw). Due to prevailing water deficit and high temperature during the reproductive stage of soybeans, disease severity was low and no yield differences were detected among the treatments. For other parameters, significant differences were observed when difenoconazole was applied at growth stages R5.1 + R5.4, in all three soil management. Conventional tillage had greater values in all parameters when compared to no-tillage
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008-05-09
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/2597
10.4025/actasciagron.v23i0.2597
url http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/2597
identifier_str_mv 10.4025/actasciagron.v23i0.2597
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/2597/2073
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Maringá
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Maringá
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; Vol 23 (2001); 1287-1292
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; v. 23 (2001); 1287-1292
1807-8621
1679-9275
reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron:UEM
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron_str UEM
institution UEM
reponame_str Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)
collection Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv actaagron@uem.br||actaagron@uem.br|| edamasio@uem.br
_version_ 1799305905804673024